From Celebslam.com: There's been a few reports over the weekend that there's an alleged clause in Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries' prenup that she has to pay him $2 million if she wants to keep the 20.5 carat engagement ring he "bought" her. TMZ says:
Ironically, without a special clause in the prenup, Kim would have been the proud owner outright, because once they became man and wife, the ring would have been Kim's. Since the couple is now kaput -- the diamond is in Kim's court. We're told KK still LOVES the ring -- and will pay Kris so she can keep it.Kim's mom Kris even appeared on Fox & Friends last week and said Kim shouldn't have to give the ring back:
"This is the first time I'm hearing that. That's between them -- a gift is a gift. If you look at the etiquette books, it says keep a present. But I don't think Kim is as concerned about that as else. I don't think it's about the gifts or the money, it's about what she's feeling. It's about two people and how their lives are changing."Interesting that Kris said Kim shouldn't have to give the ring back. Why would she give it back? It's her ring. The picture on the left was taken of Kim in 2007 (another pic here); the one on the right is from the People story announcing her engagement earlier this year. In other words, she bought her own damn engagement ring, gave it to Kris to give to her, and now her mom is giving interviews about whether she should be allowed to keep the "gift." I like to steal Halloween candy from little kids and even I think this family is unconscionable. They should go into politics.
+10 pics at the source