ONTD

[info]poison_ivy_1
2:40 pm - 12/18/2006

Janet covers Harper's Bazaar (Jan. '07); 2007 Calendar

 



source. Pre-Order calendar here
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
Leave a Comment
[info]pennymofcknlane 18th-Dec-2006 07:46 pm (UTC)
ohmygod get over yourself old woman! i miss old school j.j :(
[info]new_buddhist No, really! — 18th-Dec-2006 08:11 pm (UTC)
She's half naked again?
[info]ashamed Re: No, really! — 18th-Dec-2006 08:37 pm (UTC)
[info]marlondew 18th-Dec-2006 09:32 pm (UTC)
Weird. I know the girl in your icon.
[info]floetcist 20th-Jan-2007 03:34 am (UTC)
Old school JJ as opposed to...?
[info]beenawhoo 18th-Dec-2006 07:47 pm (UTC)
She's gorgeous. All ages, all styles, all the time.
[info]martybru01 18th-Dec-2006 07:47 pm (UTC)
Trannet
[info]rockthehotbox 18th-Dec-2006 07:47 pm (UTC)
She has that whole Star Jones big head thing going on in that first pic. Take me to your leader.
[info]lanrek 18th-Dec-2006 07:56 pm (UTC)
Bold print.
[info]rockthehotbox 21st-Dec-2006 02:46 am (UTC)
Word.
[info]watermeloncholy 18th-Dec-2006 10:03 pm (UTC)
LOL.



p.s. Who's that in your icon?
[info]_thisismyname 18th-Dec-2006 07:49 pm (UTC)
ugh im just so tired of looking at her...

something about her doesnt intrigue me AT ALL
[info]bandslut 18th-Dec-2006 08:52 pm (UTC)
I've never understood anyone's interest in this woman. I think she is possibly the least talented (not to mention least interesting) of the bunch. So much so that she needed that "wardrobe malfunction" publicity stunt. So transparent in my opinion.
[info]young_glass 18th-Dec-2006 09:07 pm (UTC)
I agree with you.
[info]floetcist umm — 20th-Jan-2007 03:33 am (UTC)
First of all, regarding "of the bunch" are you referring to the Jackson family? Because if so Janet is most definetely NOT the least talented. She's up there with Michael. Have you ever listened to her albums, watched her videos or read about her? If not, how can you say she is not interesting or whatever?

Your conclusion at the end about needing that "wardrove malfunction publciity stunt" makes no logic. That was in 2004. She has had a 25+ career before than, and her last album at that point was her most successful (All For You in 2001). So what exactly would she need to do that for?

You know what, nevermind. Its too late at night for me to be ranting and getting high blood pressure over this..lol
[info]gibblerfan83 18th-Dec-2006 07:49 pm (UTC)
I'd like to see the before and after photoshop.
[info]happykitty69 18th-Dec-2006 08:23 pm (UTC)
Oh dog! Me too.
[info]7950 18th-Dec-2006 07:50 pm (UTC)
she's not just ugly, she's the kind of ugly that is NSFW, the kind that just shocks you when you see it.
[info]pandaklr 18th-Dec-2006 07:51 pm (UTC)
she looks good ... for a trannie
[info]passant17 18th-Dec-2006 07:53 pm (UTC)
wow, looking good.
[info]sweetnitanitro 18th-Dec-2006 07:55 pm (UTC)
That's terrifying, srsly.
[info]lazy_daisy64 18th-Dec-2006 08:58 pm (UTC)
she just doesn't even look like janet anymore. I don't get it.
[info]soft_distortion 18th-Dec-2006 07:57 pm (UTC)
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
[info]hawaii_bombay 18th-Dec-2006 07:59 pm (UTC)
E.T looks more like Nicole Richie.
[info]dirrtymyke 18th-Dec-2006 08:22 pm (UTC)
naw. Mary-Kate. espeically with those dressup pics. soemone find it!
[info]vilain_garcon 18th-Dec-2006 09:00 pm (UTC)
Omigod that's totally who she looks like!
[info]quiet_fiasco 19th-Dec-2006 12:42 am (UTC)
LOL
[info]goosh_betheh 18th-Dec-2006 07:57 pm (UTC)
Ugh. Of course she's featured in a "Shape/Weight Loss" issue.

She shouldn't even be a role model for people wanting to modify their bodies. There is no way she did it naturally, and the bitch is fug.
[info]r_ebelrebel 18th-Dec-2006 08:08 pm (UTC)
Plus she keeps gaining it all back.... and then losing again when she has a new record. That is not healthy at all...
[info]amanda8501 19th-Dec-2006 01:31 am (UTC)
I agree! Most health risks associated with obesity are due to yo-yo dieting. All the drastic weight loss and gain is horrible for your heart.
[info]itone The cover isn't that bad... — 18th-Dec-2006 07:58 pm (UTC)
except there is that huge FACE there that makes it fucking scary. JOKER!
[info]haydsvirgo Re: The cover isn't that bad... — 18th-Dec-2006 08:15 pm (UTC)
Yeah, it's really gross.
[info]hawaii_bombay 18th-Dec-2006 07:59 pm (UTC)
Holy shit! The Harper's cover scared the crap out of me X__X
[info]haligh 18th-Dec-2006 07:59 pm (UTC)
God, I'm not looking forward to seeing that in my mailbox... damn you, Bazaar.
[info]paradise_alley 19th-Dec-2006 07:50 am (UTC)
good thing you could have a warning on here. otherwise you might have jumped back out of fright and fallen down your stairs. whew. close call.
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
Leave a comment
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 9:34 pm GMT.