ONTD

[info]venus_ice
12:46 pm - 11/29/2006

Another blind item.

Sorry if it has been posted before but there's a new "BLIND ITEM OF THE YEAR" from everyone's favourite new "legal" blog.


DEVELOPING -- BLIND ITEM OF THE YEAR -- I keep trying to type this and I just cannot believe what the caller said. They definitely would know, but it is still unbelievable.

When this female celebrity (#1) is arguing with another female celebrity or two it has always been assumed that the argument pertained to boyfriends or some trivial matter.

As one of the female celebrities (#2) continues to go through personal problems, she is reaching out to friends with the story that she is involved in an on again and off again relationship with the other female celebrity (#1).

And that what started out as a laugh became love for celeb #2 while celeb #1 preys on those emotions and treats #2 as a plaything when she needs someone which is causing #2 to spiral out of control. -- STAY TUNED --


WUT??? It's either just unbelievable or utterly false but I can't tell which.
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
Leave a Comment
[info]guitarstrings 29th-Nov-2006 05:50 pm (UTC)
Paris and any of her bimbettes.
[info]sweetnitanitro 29th-Nov-2006 05:53 pm (UTC)
iawtc
[info]runnerlevelred 29th-Nov-2006 06:15 pm (UTC)
I can see it. How about Paris and LiLo?
[info]catean 29th-Nov-2006 05:51 pm (UTC)
Gee, Brit, Lilo and Paris?
[info]thies 29th-Nov-2006 05:57 pm (UTC)
videotape or it didn't happen
[info]principino 29th-Nov-2006 06:50 pm (UTC)
Still in love with your icon :)
[info]catean 29th-Nov-2006 07:53 pm (UTC)
Ha, thanks. Hey, I think I defended you the other day on here. Did you get into it with someone on the pretty Indian girl post?
[info]becky3306 29th-Nov-2006 08:40 pm (UTC)
I like your icon. My Aunt and Grandma both breed Birmans. They're so cute.
[info]rosanjin 29th-Nov-2006 09:08 pm (UTC)
Don't forget Nicole, too.
[info]macslover 29th-Nov-2006 09:53 pm (UTC)
Icon love! ♥
[info]yummiest_nickel 29th-Nov-2006 05:51 pm (UTC)
I have no ideaaaa. I still want to know who the modern day Milli Vanilli is.
[info]summerofjoe 29th-Nov-2006 05:54 pm (UTC)
Thats an easy one, its almost all of the "singers" out right now. Computers do wonders !
[info]ranata 29th-Nov-2006 06:14 pm (UTC)
Cassie. LOL
[info]yesternight 29th-Nov-2006 06:27 pm (UTC)
Hell no.
[info]forgethissmile 29th-Nov-2006 08:17 pm (UTC)
would NOT be surprised if that's the case. Holy shit she's basically there to look pretty and that's about it.
[info]ranata 29th-Nov-2006 06:14 pm (UTC)
Ohhh Paris Hilton
[info]yesternight 29th-Nov-2006 06:27 pm (UTC)
A lot of people think it's Norah Jones.
[info]falseidoll 29th-Nov-2006 09:34 pm (UTC)
I hope it's Beyonce.
[info]_if_6_was_9 29th-Nov-2006 05:51 pm (UTC)
I'm thinking this lawyer person is completely full of shit.
[info]ladycake 29th-Nov-2006 05:53 pm (UTC)
roger that. this doesn't even deserve to be posted on ontd. i could have started that blog.
[info]bad_jew 29th-Nov-2006 06:01 pm (UTC)
Yep. I'd sincerely doubt he's even a lawyer.
[info]fauxpaix 29th-Nov-2006 06:15 pm (UTC)
yeah. there's no reason a lawyer would CONSISTENTLY have super juicy celebrity cases. there's a lot of boring bs that goes on in the courts with celebs, too.
[info]newreflections 29th-Nov-2006 06:16 pm (UTC)
iawtc 100%
[info]stabinfluence 29th-Nov-2006 07:32 pm (UTC)
And what older successful lawyer is obsessed solely w/ the mary-kates, lindsays and meadow sopranos of the showbiz world. i mean, not even an occasional nod to someone in their 30s when real names are mentioned? come on. plus the australian gossip links are suspicious for an la-based person who works all day, even if they were being sent in by readers...wouldn't this person be primarily aware of local news, especially about tv? not just aussie reality tv? too odd.

he makes ted casablanca look like walter cronkite.
[info]deerlike 29th-Nov-2006 08:06 pm (UTC)
Ditto.
[info]takenbutterfly 29th-Nov-2006 05:52 pm (UTC)
I think most blind items are fake.
[info]goinghollywood 29th-Nov-2006 05:52 pm (UTC)
i knew this was coming.
[info]fairydust8418 29th-Nov-2006 06:59 pm (UTC)
I LOVE your icon
[info]lovenoelg 29th-Nov-2006 05:53 pm (UTC)
Meh. The singer one was better. This is too obvious.
[info]chainblinger 29th-Nov-2006 05:53 pm (UTC)
#1 is so Lindsay Lohan. #2 is SO Paris Hilton. Who is now preying on the emotions of Britney Spears!

Okay, maybe not but, that's my best/most entertaining to think about guess.
[info]misspinkkate 29th-Nov-2006 05:54 pm (UTC)
No, it's the other way around- Paris uses people, LiLo spins out of control.
[info]chainblinger 29th-Nov-2006 05:55 pm (UTC)
Ahh! Yes! You are right! I got the numbers mixed up:)
[info]sisterhavana 30th-Nov-2006 01:26 am (UTC)
My thinking exactly.
[info]rockchic22 29th-Nov-2006 05:55 pm (UTC)
backwards.
1 is paris, 2 is lilo
[info]bethknit11 29th-Nov-2006 07:59 pm (UTC)
i would actually say it's the reverse.
[info]misspinkkate 29th-Nov-2006 05:53 pm (UTC)
#1 is Paris, #2 is LiLo. FER SURE!
[info]janey 29th-Nov-2006 05:56 pm (UTC)
IAWTC
[info]laurenjennifer 29th-Nov-2006 07:03 pm (UTC)
my thoughts exactly
[info]numb_crystal 29th-Nov-2006 05:53 pm (UTC)
this one is lame because it seems so obvious
[info]turnthecrank 29th-Nov-2006 05:53 pm (UTC)
Paris, Lindsay, Nicole, and/or anyone else in their circle of friends.
[info]blondie786 29th-Nov-2006 05:54 pm (UTC)
this would be cool except why would you call a lawyer about a love triangle mess?

FAKE
[info]rockchic22 29th-Nov-2006 05:55 pm (UTC)
word
[info]starsprinkles 29th-Nov-2006 05:56 pm (UTC)
The wording makes it sound to me like this one was called in to the lawyer not by one of the people involved, but someone associated with them, who knows the lawyer is posting gossip on the site now and told him (her?) for that reason, not for legal help.

Of course, that doesn't make it any more likely to be true.
[info]wingkeeea 29th-Nov-2006 05:54 pm (UTC)
huh?
[info]hellocruelwrld 29th-Nov-2006 05:54 pm (UTC)
i had to read that three times to understand what was being said only to realize that i don't give a sh*t
[info]stah_chica 29th-Nov-2006 06:23 pm (UTC)
IAWTC
[info]meeshmelle 29th-Nov-2006 06:47 pm (UTC)
lol me too, about half way through the second read i stopped and asked myself why the hell I was reading it again when I truly believe this "lawyer blog" is a load of BS.
[info]hellocruelwrld 29th-Nov-2006 11:22 pm (UTC)
i know, blind items are lame anyway...why bother posting them?
[info]its_only_timmme 29th-Nov-2006 05:54 pm (UTC)
i don't even understand why he'd/she'd (do we know the sex?) be given this information... where's the legal matter involved? i don't see it.
[info]yourfeelings 29th-Nov-2006 06:27 pm (UTC)
is your icon real?

if so, excuse me, i have to go cry. cause that's CREEPY. yet funny at the same time....
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
Leave a comment
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 9:33 pm GMT.