Isn't this whole site voyeuristic? I mean it's not like were seeing him lying there dead or anything. That would be crossing the line IMO. But everyone has their line I suppose, you just have a shorter distance than mine.
OK, don't know if I just rambled or made any sense...
Agreed. Yes, I clicked out of curiosity since they were there, but I definitely could have lived without ever seeing them, and feel sort of guilty for even looking.
I was thinking that, but would Getty really buy pictures from such a shady source? It's blatantly obvious that those are very personal pictures taken in a private setting. Wouldn't they have had to at least check in with Anna Nicole's people to make sure it was okay for them to be posted?
If Getty really did buy the pictures from some opportunistic jackhole, I hope they get sued just as much as the person who sold them.
who the heck took these pics?
Did you not notice that there are never more than two people in the picture?? Which means that the third was OMG TAKING THE PICTURES!!!!
Like pressitonyou states, if you notice, there are only two in each picture for the most part.
OK, don't know if I just rambled or made any sense...
If Getty really did buy the pictures from some opportunistic jackhole, I hope they get sued just as much as the person who sold them.
thats a shame.
that's terrible.