ONTD

11:02 am - 09/18/2006

final moments of anna nicole and her son

omg.  so sad.  

00000000PS001_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

(sorry, they're small.)

 

00000000PS009_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

00000000PS002_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg
(with Howard K. Stern, Smith's loyal lawyer)

00000000PS003_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

00000000PS004_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

00000000PS006_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

00000000PS008_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

00000000PS007_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

00000000PS017_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

00000000PS019_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

00000000PS020_Anna_Nicole_S.jpg

source: gawker & getty images

Page 1 of 10
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] >>
[info]p2bab 18th-Sep-2006 03:10 pm (UTC)
:(
[info]isthisdesire 18th-Sep-2006 08:29 pm (UTC)
iawtc
[info]jamisoney I THOUGHT ONLY 3 PEOPLE WERE IN THE ROOM THE ENTIRE TIME?18th-Sep-2006 10:32 pm (UTC)
???

who the heck took these pics?
[info]pressitonyou Re: I THOUGHT ONLY 3 PEOPLE WERE IN THE ROOM THE ENTIRE TIME?18th-Sep-2006 11:34 pm (UTC)
Omg, you're not serious, are you?

Did you not notice that there are never more than two people in the picture?? Which means that the third was OMG TAKING THE PICTURES!!!!
[info]shaine Re: I THOUGHT ONLY 3 PEOPLE WERE IN THE ROOM THE ENTIRE TIME?19th-Sep-2006 03:43 am (UTC)
You can't be serious.

Like pressitonyou states, if you notice, there are only two in each picture for the most part.

[info]fullhearts 18th-Sep-2006 03:11 pm (UTC)
:'(
[info]bagelofdeath 18th-Sep-2006 03:12 pm (UTC)
I hate to mention this, but it amused me that you outdid the poster above you with a single apostrophe.
[info]fullhearts 18th-Sep-2006 03:17 pm (UTC)
Haha... when I read this, no one had commented yet so I didn't mean to copy [info]p2bab.
[info]dissention_1 18th-Sep-2006 03:11 pm (UTC)
Releasing these pictures smacks of poor taste to me. Sorry. It's too voyeuristic and creepy for me.
[info]redden6 18th-Sep-2006 03:14 pm (UTC)
I agree 100%.
[info]red_bullet 18th-Sep-2006 03:14 pm (UTC)
Agreed. There's something about them that makes me very uncomfortable.
[info]warmplay 18th-Sep-2006 03:17 pm (UTC)
so why did you click on the link to see? that's pretty creepy and voyeuristic.
[info]dissention_1 18th-Sep-2006 03:21 pm (UTC)
So you could ask why bb.
[info]red_bullet 18th-Sep-2006 03:28 pm (UTC)
I was hoping the link would have said how Getty attained the images, its a little weird.
[info]_anglophile 18th-Sep-2006 03:18 pm (UTC)
Yea, and now I feel really guilty for looking at them :/
[info]mercurywingspan 18th-Sep-2006 03:30 pm (UTC)
yes.
[info]curious_maya 18th-Sep-2006 03:41 pm (UTC)
Isn't this whole site voyeuristic? I mean it's not like were seeing him lying there dead or anything. That would be crossing the line IMO. But everyone has their line I suppose, you just have a shorter distance than mine.

OK, don't know if I just rambled or made any sense...
[info]pealingthunder 18th-Sep-2006 04:21 pm (UTC)
i agree. they shouldn't have been released.
[info]healthypanda 18th-Sep-2006 04:42 pm (UTC)
Definitely agree.
[info]bunnicula38 18th-Sep-2006 04:54 pm (UTC)
I have to agree even though I was eager to look. :-(
[info]flying_ignorami 18th-Sep-2006 05:19 pm (UTC)
Agreed. Yes, I clicked out of curiosity since they were there, but I definitely could have lived without ever seeing them, and feel sort of guilty for even looking.
[info]citypavement 18th-Sep-2006 06:01 pm (UTC)
well this is ontd.........
[info]anthony 18th-Sep-2006 03:11 pm (UTC)
Wait... so who sold these photos? If Anna did... WTF?
[info]luckystars000 18th-Sep-2006 03:13 pm (UTC)
I believe someone from the hospital sold them to Getty. I'm sure it didn't come from Anna's camp.
[info]flying_ignorami 18th-Sep-2006 05:29 pm (UTC)
I was thinking that, but would Getty really buy pictures from such a shady source? It's blatantly obvious that those are very personal pictures taken in a private setting. Wouldn't they have had to at least check in with Anna Nicole's people to make sure it was okay for them to be posted?

If Getty really did buy the pictures from some opportunistic jackhole, I hope they get sued just as much as the person who sold them.
[info]dizzygoo82 18th-Sep-2006 03:14 pm (UTC)
yea i know. they haven't even really figured out how he died yet but yet they're releasing pictures of right before he died..
thats a shame.
[info]mad_turtle 18th-Sep-2006 04:38 pm (UTC)
I doubt she did. It makes sense to me that during this whole thing, a camera "disappeared" and the images sold. I'm guessing on that.
[info]boneshelp 18th-Sep-2006 03:11 pm (UTC)
:(((((((((
[info]armyofshe 18th-Sep-2006 03:12 pm (UTC)
That is extremely sad :(
[info]poppyspiral 18th-Sep-2006 05:41 pm (UTC)
yup
[info]luckystars000 18th-Sep-2006 03:12 pm (UTC)
That fourth picture is really nice.
[info]saara687 18th-Sep-2006 05:14 pm (UTC)
ITA
[info]galaxykat 18th-Sep-2006 03:12 pm (UTC)
How awful...This makes me hope they don't release the tape of Steve Irwin's final moments. It's too morbid.
[info]aniiia 18th-Sep-2006 05:01 pm (UTC)
Didn't they already release his last picture on the boat before his death?
[info]externalmusic 18th-Sep-2006 09:12 pm (UTC)
are you serious?

that's terrible.
[info]_tasty 18th-Sep-2006 11:29 pm (UTC)
i heard his wife destroyed the footage so that it wouldn't be released. i might be wrong.
[info]l_o_v_e 18th-Sep-2006 03:12 pm (UTC)
:O(
[info]bagelofdeath 18th-Sep-2006 03:13 pm (UTC)
That's really, really sad.
[info]pumpkinpnts 18th-Sep-2006 03:13 pm (UTC)
:[

[info]xcanonx 18th-Sep-2006 06:08 pm (UTC)
:[
[info]ex_bemylast843 18th-Sep-2006 03:13 pm (UTC)
:/
[info]phigmentor 18th-Sep-2006 03:14 pm (UTC)
OK wow... Morbid.
[info]poison_ivy_1 18th-Sep-2006 03:14 pm (UTC)
i'm sure she'll cherish the one of daniel holding his sister.
[info]xliveandletdiex 18th-Sep-2006 03:31 pm (UTC)
I agree. Family portrait.
[info]emmaline3 provided she still owns the rights to it18th-Sep-2006 07:54 pm (UTC)
because it looks like she doesn't
[info]vienna_sausages 18th-Sep-2006 03:15 pm (UTC)
hmm shouldnt these be kept as anna's personal pics and not spread all over the internets..?
[info]jamisoney internets, lol18th-Sep-2006 10:27 pm (UTC)
sorry, it made me laugh.
Page 1 of 10
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] >>
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 9:26 pm GMT.