ONTD

11:59 pm - 03/08/2013

A 'Sweet Valley High' Ghostwriter On Living A Double Life



In her 20s, Amy Boesky lived a double life.

By day, she was a Harvard graduate studying 17th century British literature at Oxford. By night and on weekends, she was a ghostwriter for the popular teen book series Sweet Valley High.


"It was ... a sort of [an] antidote, a kind of escape hatch from the more rigorous world of scholarship and academia in which I was living," she tells NPR's Lynn Neary.

Over the course of six years, Boesky wrote more than 50 books for the series under the pseudonym Kate William. Boesky, who is now a professor of English at Boston College, revealed her past in a piece for The Kenyon Review.

At the time, only the people closest to Boesky knew about her life as a ghostwriter. Her professors and advisers had no idea.

The blockbuster series centers around the 16-year-old blonde Wakefield twins — Elizabeth, the diligent one, and Jessica, the mischievous one. Each book takes readers on a rollercoaster of teen drama in suburban California, with sensational plot twists involving boyfriend seduction, plane crashes and vacation adventures.

Before she started writing for the series, Boesky had never actually heard of Sweet Valley High.

Boesky met Francine Pascal, the creator of the series, at a friend's dinner party about a year after the books launched. Since Boesky was interested in writing and was trying to get her own children's book published, someone suggested that she should try out to write for the series.

Boesky had to write one chapter and a chapter outline.

"I discovered that the voices of these girls, not only Jessica and Elizabeth, but their friends, resonated with my own," she says. "And I found that enormously fun to write."

Meanwhile, Boesky was writing her dissertation on the utopias of the 17th century. Oddly enough, she found some similarities.

"The world of Sweet Valley was this ... very 1980s, Reagan-era, suburban utopia," says Boesky. "I think maybe it did help, in some ways, for me to theorize what these idealized places are that we're so drawn to. "


Before starting each book, Boesky would receive a plot outline from Pascal that was about eight or nine pages long.

"I would be reading with bated breath to see what was happening with the characters, especially as I got more and more involved in it."

Then, she would devise a subplot.

"With my subplots, it would always involve Jessica, who I loved. Jessica was always trying to get ahead, get in the way of other people."


Her first book was the 16th in the series, Rags to Riches — where the poorest boy in town turns out to be filthy rich and Jessica tries to steal him away from his girlfriend.

Boesky says that fleshing out these plot outlines helped her to hone her writing skills and find her voice. The series that had 15 books when she began, had nearly 100 when she stopped writing.

She finally stopped ghostwriting after she finished her doctorate program and got her first job. When she started teaching at Georgetown University, she thought it would be too weird to continue her crafting the teenage tales.

"I think for me, it really had a lot to do with what I've talked about as moving into writing under my own name, which is such a funny concept."

Boesky, author of the memoir What We Have, teaches early modern literature and creative nonfiction at Boston College. Since writing about her ghostwriting days in The Kenyon Review, Boesky has received a lot of delayed fan mail from readers.

"I've been getting these wonderful letters from readers, who are women now — who are lawyers, who are doctors, who grew up reading these books, sort of, under the covers with their flashlights. And their parents wanted them to be reading Jane Eyre or something more serious.

"I think many of us have a kind of guilty pleasure about some of this lighter cultural material, and I think there's room for both."

Source
__papillon 9th-Mar-2013 06:03 am (UTC)
"I've been getting these wonderful letters from readers, who are women now — who are lawyers, who are doctors, who grew up reading these books, sort of, under the covers with their flashlights. And their parents wanted them to be reading Jane Eyre or something more serious.

tbh i'm glad my parents weren't like that. my mom encouraged me to read sweet valley, bought me the books that we could find in the philippines, and then some abroad, read them with me and she did the same with the baby sitter's club, nancy drew, little house, etc. it got me into reading, and she cried happy tears when i said i wanted to read little women next lol.

it's why i don't judge little girls for liking twilight, because hopefully they'll be encouraged to graduate from that. my little cousin was like that, she was into ya and now she's reading austen and jane eyre.
tiny_winey87 9th-Mar-2013 06:33 am (UTC)
I never thought of Twilight in that way. It's good that you were not limited and it made it easier for you to accept more mature reading. Now I can have hope for Twilight young readers!
__papillon 9th-Mar-2013 06:38 am (UTC)
i do hope after they start thinking "hey, reading is fun and cool!!!" that they start reading other things too. and not grow up into twimoms or something lol.
tiny_winey87 9th-Mar-2013 02:33 pm (UTC)
me too bb. twimoms, egads!!! -_- i know my kids need to be readers!!
redleigh86 9th-Mar-2013 07:22 am (UTC)
Yeah, same. My mom encouraged my sister and I to read and (aside from comics) she didn't care what it was. She would reward us with trips to the bookstore too when we'd get good grades or do something good, so it felt special. I always thought that was one of the things she did best with us, because she never made us feel shame for what we were reading and she made it fun and so we grew up to be voracious readers.

I plan to do the same when I eventually have kids.
pirate_toast 9th-Mar-2013 09:37 am (UTC)
aw that's sweet.
distant_lines 9th-Mar-2013 03:03 pm (UTC)
My mother was like that. She never cared what I was reading, just that I was reading. Because, just about any reading you do helps you with your grammar and speaking correctly, I think.
greatestheroine 9th-Mar-2013 03:19 pm (UTC)
Did your parents buy those in National Book Store? I would legit throw a tantrum if we didn't pass by NBS for each and every time we went out so I could check out if a new SV book is on the shelf -- kids, twins and high. My parents at least condoned my love for reading. And I am forever grateful.
invisible_cunt 9th-Mar-2013 03:34 pm (UTC)
my parents were just happy i loved to read as a kid
and we live down the street from the library

the issue i have with twilight, other than it being horribly written, is what it promotes in terms of relationships.
tackyblue 9th-Mar-2013 03:43 pm (UTC)
My mom was the same. She believed that any reading was good reading and used to buy SVH books for me all the time. I think that's why I became such a voracious reader.
stellar_ball 9th-Mar-2013 03:54 pm (UTC)
Good for your mom! Wish a teacher of mine was like that. She totally judged any student of hers who read Goosebumps, and even though yes, they were easy reads, they were probably the books that made my imagination go crazy the most.
krabbykabby 9th-Mar-2013 04:05 pm (UTC)
My husband has a much younger sister and he kept buying her like Dickens and whatnot and then getting mad when it was obvious she never read them. I finally had to be like, listen, I know you think the stuff she DOES read is crap...but she's 11 and is reading of her own free will. So, next time, take her to the bookstore and buy her whatever SHE wants.
beatlesluv 9th-Mar-2013 04:36 pm (UTC)
This is sweet. I preferred BSB but I also really liked Sweet Valley too. Anything that encourages reading is a good thing IMO.

:D
chiffanichan 9th-Mar-2013 09:49 pm (UTC)
That's how I feel.
Like books like that and Twilight are gateway books, to get kids and young girls in to loving reading.
This page was loaded May 26th 2013, 8:06 am GMT.