ONTD

9:41 am - 02/25/2013

Kristen Stewart Explains Foot Injury to Anne Hathaway

Kristen Stewart Explains Crutches, Foot Injury to Anne Hathaway Backstage at Oscars





Kristen Stewart had good reason to be at least little Les Miserables at Sunday's Oscars at the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood. The Twilight actress, 22, attended the Academy Awards sans love Robert Pattinson (in Australia filming) but with one very noticeable accessory: Crutches. Stewart went without that aid when she presented an award with Daniel Radcliffe -- limping a bit painfully toward the podium.

According to the Associated Press, the blockbuster actress encountered another A-list actress backstage before that presentation-- Anne Hathaway, immediately after her Best Supporting Actress victory -- and finally dispelled the mystery behind her unexplained injury.


"Oh no!" the Prada-clad Les Miserables star, 31, exclaimed in sympathy, seeing Stewart's crutch.

"I know, I'm an idiot," Stewart (stunning in a Reem Acra gown, Jimmy Choo heels and Fred Leighton jewelry) replied. "But congratulations!" she said, eyeing Hathaway's hard-earned Oscar.

"Please tell me you're going on stage with those [crutches]," Hathaway said, the AP reports. "Nope," Stewart replied. "I'm gonna hobble."

Quipped the "I Dreamed a Dream" singer: "Well, break a leg . . . Oops!" Stewart then explained that she cut her foot recently after stepping on glass. "I just hope [the wound] doesn't open up right now."


Indeed, Stewart's glam squad told Us Weekly more about the young star's injury. "She had sliced her foot and everyone was worrying about would she wear heels or flats or one heel, crutches or no crutches," manicurist Ashlie Johnson told Us. "She tried so many options, she was really a trouper."

"Kristen was nervous about her crutches so having her friends around playing music was just what she needed," hairstylist Danilo said. "We all were trying to make her feel better and her friends were trying to tell her she'd be fine, she has insecurities about being in front of people so today was even tougher."

src
bossm 25th-Feb-2013 02:59 pm (UTC)
>everyone was worrying about would she wear heels or flats or one heel, crutches or no crutches<

I kind of get the feeling that they gave her the clutches because she wore two different shoes and they wanted to make a show. Oh poor girl being hurt.



anchors_oceans 25th-Feb-2013 03:03 pm (UTC)
are those the shoes she wore? i didn't even see. where they at least the same color?
bossm 25th-Feb-2013 03:04 pm (UTC)
The Fashion Court tweeted it.
mynamehere07 25th-Feb-2013 03:08 pm (UTC)
That doesn't make sense why she would wear such drastically different shoes.

If she wore a pair of nice flats to accommodate her hurt foot, it wouldn't be a big deal.
liliana_ 25th-Feb-2013 03:17 pm (UTC)
Not having it be a big deal would defeat the whole purpose though.
psubookworm27 25th-Feb-2013 04:38 pm (UTC)
nailed it.
lovepollution 25th-Feb-2013 05:34 pm (UTC)
A+
lovepollution 25th-Feb-2013 05:34 pm (UTC)
Especially since you can't even see the shoes under a long gown.
liddlebins 25th-Feb-2013 09:59 pm (UTC)
they wanted to show the shoe, though.

i know what you mean, though
_myaugust 25th-Feb-2013 03:15 pm (UTC)
They probably played it up. I mean what idiot puts someone in two shoes of drastically different heights then forces them to use crutches on the high heel? These people...
bossm 25th-Feb-2013 11:48 pm (UTC)
In this pic you even see her wearing two different pair of shoes.

http://imgbox.com/abmI9QG0
modernelegance 25th-Feb-2013 03:33 pm (UTC)
So that is why she was limping so much...she had on two different shoes!
kwikimart 25th-Feb-2013 04:36 pm (UTC)
Oh so she does know that other flat shoes besides Converses exist...
bossm 25th-Feb-2013 09:59 pm (UTC)
Oh but we still have to hear how hard it was to find flats because there are not enough to choose from.
This page was loaded May 22nd 2013, 11:04 am GMT.