ONTD

1:23 am - 02/25/2013

Tom Shales drags Seth MacFarlane


Listen -- a billion people are throwing up. That's a rough estimate of course, but every year somebody at the Oscars says a billion people on the planet are watching the program; however many watched this year's Oscar show, they may well have felt sickened by it. It was a stomach-churning, jaw-dropping debacle, incompetently hosted and witlessly produced.

But even in Hollywood and even on television, nothing is 100 per cent bad, and at about 11 p.m. Eastern time, Barbra Streisand magically materialized onstage to sing "The Way We Were" as a tribute to the late Marvin Hamlisch, and there wasn't a dry eye in the world. At last, a true living legend -- a genuinely thrilling star.

Then the producers managed to pull off a big emotional climax by having First Lady Michele Obama read the name of the Best Picture Winner ("Argo") "live" from the White House, peering out from under her bangs and lending the festivities at least of hint of -- what else -- festivity. And some much-needed class, too.

Streisand was in great voice, commanding and brilliant, the best thing on the show by far. Singing performances by Adele (the theme from "Skyfall"), Shirley Bassey ("Goldfinger") and a few others also helped elevate the proceedings from depths plumbed from the very outset on.

Hollywood historians will debate whether the 1989 Oscar show, disastrously produced by Allan Carr (with Rob Lowe singing to Snow White), will remain the worst ever or if this year's, sadistically concocted by producers Neil Meron and Craig Zadan, will take the dishonor as all-time most horrible. Both, let's face it, will live in infamy, like Pearl Harbor.

Skeptics were wisely taken aback when Seth MacFarlane, a squirrelly little ham whose forte is producing dirty cartoons for television, was chosen to host this year's event, and there was more astonishment when it was later announced he would sing and dance as part of his performance. He turned out to be the proverbial triple threat; he not only couldn't sing or dance but he was no stand-up comedian, either.

MacFarlane's attempts at irreverent humor -- like saying "Lincoln" star Daniel Day Lewis had attempted to "free" African American actor Don Cheadle backstage -- was apparently supposed to give the aging Oscarcast some kind of "edge." But people don't want an Oscars with edge; they want entertainment and schmaltz. MacFarlane laid one egg after another, many of them in the first seventeen hideous minutes: an off-the-wall sketch in which MacFarlane chatted with William Shatner (in his old "Star Trek" outfit -- from the TV series, mind you) about how to do the show.

There were mock headlines from "the future" assailing MacFarlane as having turned out to be the worst Oscar host ever, and the farce became fact; he WAS the worst host ever. Maybe not just of the Oscars, either -- maybe the worst host of anything.

"The show's a disaster," Shatner said kiddingly to MacFarlane, but the words rang horribly true, and only a few minutes in. Everything seemed wrong, even the set (at times, MacFarlane seemed to have been installed against a backdrop from the old "Hollywood Palace"), and especially a stupid bit of retro sexism directed at actresses in the audience, "We Saw Your Boobs." MacFarlane sang that accompanied by, for some completely unfathomable reason, the Gay Men's Chorus of Los Angeles.

Then Channing Tatum and Charlize Theron were trotted out to sing and dance "The Way You Look Tonight" from the classic Astaire-Rogers film, "Swingtime" -- but Astaire and Rogers they screamingly were not. Why hire MacFarlane to lure a younger audience to the Oscars and then have today's stars clumsily stumble through old-timey material?

So many details were mystifying or infuriating, like having a pair of socks, a white pair and a brown pair, re-enact a scene from the movie "Flight" starring Denzel Washington, or putting MacFarlane in a nun's habit so he could torment Sally Field (long ago the "Flying Nun" on TV) in a lame sketch taped earlier in the green room backstage. The saddest thing was that jokes meant to be self-deprecating just seemed horribly accurate, as when MacFarlane promised viewers "a telecast designed to put your patience to a test" or called his own movie "Ted" his "mediocre effort."

With MacFarlane flailing so miserably, the usual bugaboos of Oscar shows seemed more irritating than ever -- as when one of four men who won an early Oscar hogged the spotlight and thanked his children while the other three winners had to stand by silently. When will Oscar winners ever learn to shut up about their damn kids and stop treating this supposedly global event like a small-town pancake supper?

It seems a certainty that Zadan and Meron won't be invited back to ruin another Oscar show (the term "Academy Awards" was all but banished from the program; apparently it's considered too stuffy for today's hip audience) and, perhaps knowing that, they managed to infest this year's with tributes to their own work, mainly the Broadway musical "Chicago" which they turned into a film. You'd think "Chicago" had been the equivalent of "Oklahoma!" combined with "Guys and Dolls" for all the fuss made about it.

That the show was such a dreadful embarrassment seems especially unfortunate because the consensus has been that this year's list of nominated people and films is particularly auspicious, with many of the top winners remaining unpredictable until show time -- or some of them, anyway. Maybe there's an axiom lurking in the wings: the better the crop of films, the worse the Oscar show? It would take weeks of painful research to figure that out, and who would want the job of looking at all those old Oscar shows -- unless you went back to the Bob Hope or Johnny Carson days?

Then again, no matter how bad some of the old shows might be when revisited, this year's will remain the ultimate loser -- at least for the next twelve months, after which somebody else will take another whack at it. Here's one record that might have been set: It could have been the first year in which the ridiculous and insipid Red-Carpet Show which precedes the Oscars was actually less offensive than the Oscar show itself.

Source
Page 1 of 7
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>
agentnever 25th-Feb-2013 06:25 am (UTC)
AMY AND TINA FOR ALL THE AWARDS SHOWS PLEASE.
_pinkpornstar_ 25th-Feb-2013 06:29 am (UTC)
this
allons_y42 25th-Feb-2013 06:38 am (UTC)
they would kill it
rhapsodeeinblue 25th-Feb-2013 06:41 am (UTC)
yes to this
sherrilina 25th-Feb-2013 06:45 am (UTC)
This! They were so on point...
dirtyknife 25th-Feb-2013 07:04 am (UTC)
YES PLEASE.
blazinguns 25th-Feb-2013 07:53 am (UTC)
They really weren't very good.
yousaidlog 25th-Feb-2013 12:34 pm (UTC)
+100000000
ohbubbajoan 25th-Feb-2013 12:40 pm (UTC)
yep
loveumbrella 25th-Feb-2013 03:42 pm (UTC)
um no
hawaii_bombay 25th-Feb-2013 03:54 pm (UTC)
Amy yes; Tina, fuck no.
whiskybars 25th-Feb-2013 06:26 am (UTC)
all i could think about during that embarrassing musical tribute was rob lowe duet with snow white

and going by the looks on HBC & SBC's faces they were with me
moddchicc 25th-Feb-2013 06:31 am (UTC)
I was a little surprised SBC was there, lol. I remember him mentioning last year that he got banned from the show after his Seacrest stunt.
peddlestools 25th-Feb-2013 06:48 am (UTC)
ikr i wish he had sneaked up behind ryan seacrest and shouted boo and made him cry again this year
x_butterfly19_x 26th-Feb-2013 01:01 am (UTC)
he was part of the les mis cast, but I wonder otherwise
holyfrijoles_2 25th-Feb-2013 06:26 am (UTC)
How are people writing all these Oscar thought pieces so fast?
peddlestools 25th-Feb-2013 06:27 am (UTC)
write during the endless commercial breaks, duh
rhapsodeeinblue 25th-Feb-2013 06:41 am (UTC)
We could probably compile some interesting essays from all the pages of ONTD comments tbh
jess_sayin 25th-Feb-2013 12:43 pm (UTC)
lol
morgan90 25th-Feb-2013 06:27 am (UTC)
I feel like the Academy is in an endless loop for hosts

"We need someone new and young to bring attention to the awards!"
"That young person bombed. Let's bring in an established veteran!"
"That veteran was boring and past their prime. Let's bring in some new blood!"
etc. etc.
squirrelsarerad 25th-Feb-2013 06:28 am (UTC)
lol mte
raised_eyebrows 25th-Feb-2013 06:28 am (UTC)
Nailed it.
holyfrijoles_2 25th-Feb-2013 06:29 am (UTC)
I wonder what "classic" host they'll bring in for 2014?
morgan90 25th-Feb-2013 06:33 am (UTC)
Hologram of Bob Hope
maidenhell 25th-Feb-2013 06:33 am (UTC)
Jay Leno won't offend anyone.
whiskybars 25th-Feb-2013 06:36 am (UTC)
they're trying to reach whoopi at the moment
deja_vu822 25th-Feb-2013 06:37 am (UTC)
i legit was going to say Steve Martin, but I'm pretty sure he just hosted before the Anne Hathaway/Franco fail. Maybe Martin Short.
bluepassiflora 25th-Feb-2013 06:39 am (UTC)
And the "classic" (i.e. old) host will make multiple racist and sexist jokes that will be excused because "things were different back in his day."
whiskybars 25th-Feb-2013 06:29 am (UTC)
exactly
deja_vu822 25th-Feb-2013 06:35 am (UTC)
lol so true
backincharge 25th-Feb-2013 06:41 am (UTC)
accurate.
purpleplague 25th-Feb-2013 06:45 am (UTC)
they should have a new/young person & an established veteran host together!
BAM, SOLVED IT

Edited at 2013-02-25 06:46 am (UTC)
megalixer 25th-Feb-2013 06:50 am (UTC)
lmao, so true
chuk_is_dazzled 25th-Feb-2013 07:05 am (UTC)
lol exactly
kwikimart 25th-Feb-2013 07:07 am (UTC)
Accurate
stellawuzadiver 25th-Feb-2013 07:16 am (UTC)
Exactly
ill_bitch 25th-Feb-2013 07:50 am (UTC)
lol irl. it's funny cause it's true
marmar627 25th-Feb-2013 12:37 pm (UTC)
I hate Seth but you're right. I'd also add "They were too edgy!" to the critiques. We got Seth because everyone thought Billy Crystal was too boring/past his prime last year. And we got Billy because Anne and James tanked so bad two years ago. And lbr had Eddie Murphy hosted last year, said "edgy" complaint may have been ascribed to him just like it was to Chris Rock (hmm, see a pattern? :/), depending on if he played it more Raw than Norbit.
deltabean 25th-Feb-2013 02:39 pm (UTC)
Pretty much
rtms 25th-Feb-2013 04:26 pm (UTC)
The problem is that they want the young hip hosts to follow all the rules thus ruining their routine that they are known for. The old ones of course won't offend because it's not in them. Either way they hand cuff the host every year. Unless they get over their butt kissing, bj blowing of the celebs attitude, I just don't see them getting a good host again.
euhm 25th-Feb-2013 06:53 pm (UTC)
putting my money on Jimmy Kimmel to be host soon

I'm actually surprised they didn't have him as host already
noon 25th-Feb-2013 06:27 am (UTC)
lol i was confused too by chicago, of all things, getting a tribute
tsarinakate1 25th-Feb-2013 06:30 am (UTC)
Yeah, me too. But now it all makes sense.

I mean it still makes no sense, but at least there was a bad reason for it
squirrelsarerad 25th-Feb-2013 06:33 am (UTC)
yeah that was really bizarre and out of place
fauxkaren 25th-Feb-2013 06:34 am (UTC)
Same. But now that I know that the Oscers were run by the people who directed the Chicago movie, it makes total sense.
rhapsodeeinblue 25th-Feb-2013 06:42 am (UTC)
So shameless tbh
bananasnrum 25th-Feb-2013 06:43 am (UTC)
Bill Condon?
marmar627 25th-Feb-2013 12:37 pm (UTC)
ikr?
cookinguptales 25th-Feb-2013 06:56 am (UTC)
Yeah, me too. I guess I thought it was kind of fun? Like maybe they were doing it because of Les Mis. But now that I know they made it, the whole thing takes on a gross, self-congratulatory overtone. :(
pipsdixiechick 25th-Feb-2013 07:11 am (UTC)
Actually it dawned on me earlier (though possibly not the reason)-aside from that the people who were behind the Oscars this year were behind Chicago, it's the 10th anniversary of Chicago winning Best Movie. But also they were celebrating the music of the Oscars this time too, so maybe that's it. I tend to over think things, lol.
wonderwomanhero 25th-Feb-2013 06:28 am (UTC)
Makes me wonder what everyone genuinely agrees to be the worst Oscar show ever, this one, the rob lowe one, the anne/james one, etc.
ichthyosaur 25th-Feb-2013 06:28 am (UTC)
I missed the first hour but I was upset to hear there were anti-Semitic jokes, what was said?
sevenbeat 25th-Feb-2013 06:31 am (UTC)
basically playing off that "jews run hollywood so suck up to them" thing. I cant remember what entirely was said but far worse was said throughout the night

Edited at 2013-02-25 06:32 am (UTC)
agentnever 25th-Feb-2013 06:31 am (UTC)
Typical "Everyone in Hollywood is Jewish/ Hollywood is run by Jewish people" jokes.
peddlestools 25th-Feb-2013 06:31 am (UTC)
jews are run by hollywood blah blah blah

seth said it in peter griffith's voice via a cgi teddy bear
mistyraven 25th-Feb-2013 06:55 am (UTC)
I don't know why but "jews are run by hollywood" is making me lol
beaddddddsss 25th-Feb-2013 06:37 am (UTC)
He made a joke about Mark Wahlberg being a Jew because he has "berg" in his name. Then proceeded to act Jewish so he can have longevity in the business, synagogue going and stereotypical name included.

/csb: I only remember it because my friends and I freaked out since we were JUST talking about how this obnoxious drunk guy at a party last week yelled "O R U A JEWESS" to me when he asked for my name. I'm Latina so my surname is super Spanish, but it starts with "berg" ... and I am a Jew, coincidence or not, but wtf at calling me a Jewess)
bienenkiste 25th-Feb-2013 06:48 am (UTC)
omg such a qt icon
moddchicc 25th-Feb-2013 06:30 am (UTC)
Chicago is my fave musical, so I loved the tribute. The cast's presentation was so awkward though. Renee and CZJ looked so wasted and rough, omg. And I guess Richard Gere is now unbanned from the Oscars?
longlonglong12 25th-Feb-2013 06:31 am (UTC)
oooh why was he banned?
moddchicc 25th-Feb-2013 06:33 am (UTC)
Gere was banned as an Academy Award presenter in 1993 after he denounced the Chinese government in his capacity as presenter.[20][21]

Though he's been nominated multiple times for a Golden Globe and once for a Screen Actors Guild Award (two common indicators for an Academy Award nomination), he has never been nominated for an Oscar.
severalstories 25th-Feb-2013 06:56 am (UTC)
I don't know who picked Renee's gown or let her on the red carpet looking like she hadn't washed her hair in a week, but why.
cukoo4cocopuffs 25th-Feb-2013 03:55 pm (UTC)
Renee's face was scarryyyy.
lockupmytears 25th-Feb-2013 06:30 am (UTC)
I usually can't stand Seth but he was funny and entertaining tonight.
whiskybars 25th-Feb-2013 06:31 am (UTC)
really? i didn't crack a smile at him once
thecanuckian 25th-Feb-2013 06:40 am (UTC)
that's b/c ur bias against him hon

^_^
ellenpage 25th-Feb-2013 06:32 am (UTC)
Ia in spite of myself. You know to expect him to be a total asshole and if you took him as that, it was funny. Although there was some serious secondhand embarrassment from pretty much everyone tonight.
screw_jack 25th-Feb-2013 06:35 am (UTC)
ia, even though it wasn't perfect, I feel like it could have been worse - but it wasn't! lol
saturdaysinbed 25th-Feb-2013 06:43 am (UTC)
ia
__papillon 25th-Feb-2013 06:47 am (UTC)
i found him funny because he was laughing at how terrible he was lol. it's a lot better than james franco being shitty and trying not curr and just being more annoying and affected and leaving poor anne to try and play off of it.
philcollen 25th-Feb-2013 07:07 am (UTC)
ia
the_pinkdress 25th-Feb-2013 07:16 am (UTC)
i'm surprised at these reactions tbh. i thought he did well, some good jokes, didn't act smug or 'above it'... acted like he was there to host and did the job fully. of course there was offensive stuff but that's the fucking world we live in, i mean billy crystal was in blackface last year ffs. not saying this to 'excuse' him but idk pretty much everything in mass media is offensive to me so i'd have to turn off my TV/Internet/everything if I wanted to avoid that.

EDIT: Again, just wanted to reiterate that I don't want to give him a 'pass' for anything, I've always hated Seth McFarlane and still do, but as an "Oscar host" I think he pulled the gig off.

Edited at 2013-02-25 07:33 am (UTC)
vanilla_blue 25th-Feb-2013 01:43 pm (UTC)
we were roaring with laughter at the oscar party i was at. we all agreed it was the best show in years.

i'm a huge seth fan tho
miss_real 25th-Feb-2013 02:37 pm (UTC)
The sound of music skit was pretty funny, the rest, not so much.
deltabean 25th-Feb-2013 02:40 pm (UTC)
I love him, so of course I agree :)
longlonglong12 25th-Feb-2013 06:30 am (UTC)
I just skimmed through the first discussion post. Whether it was funny or not, unbelievable how many people didn't understand the bit with the boobs song.
thecanuckian 25th-Feb-2013 06:41 am (UTC)
ikr
saturdaysinbed 25th-Feb-2013 06:43 am (UTC)
i keep seeing so much offense over that but apparently everyone missed the part of the opening where it was pointed out that the song was tacky, tasteless, and offensive
faithgrowsold 25th-Feb-2013 06:53 am (UTC)
Just because someone acknowledges that something is tacky, tasteless and offensive doesn't actually make it any less tacky, tasteless and offensive...?
josh_the_k 25th-Feb-2013 06:47 am (UTC)
I got it. But I didn't like it.
devochkazhenya 25th-Feb-2013 06:56 am (UTC)
i got it i just thought it was stupid. i'm so done with this hipster sexism/racism/homophobia bs
lovekrista 25th-Feb-2013 07:00 am (UTC)
I got it, but it wasn't funny to me and apparently not to many people in the audience either. Take a look at Naomi's reaction or the people behind JLaw when it's on. No one was pleased.
actxappalledx 25th-Feb-2013 07:01 am (UTC)
I got it, I just think it was unnecessary when the show is so damn long as it is. His whole opening act was way too long
deltabean 25th-Feb-2013 02:42 pm (UTC)
ikr?
beatlesluv 25th-Feb-2013 06:31 am (UTC)
He was such an awful host. I really just wanted him off my T.V. every time I saw him. :/
ellenpage 25th-Feb-2013 06:31 am (UTC)
It was super awkward, yeah but calling it the worst? I haven't been watching closely enough in the past few years I guess.

I was SO disappointed with the Bond tribute though. I heard that they were going to have all the Bonds, but the actual tribute was too long and lackluster.
screw_jack 25th-Feb-2013 06:34 am (UTC)
I thought that was gonna happen, that would've been more interesting.
backincharge 25th-Feb-2013 06:44 am (UTC)
Yeah the Bond tribute was a total letdown. Should have had Adele perform after Bassey (and then have them duet on Diamonds Are Forever) and then have the Bond's come out.

Otherwise, it just came off as completely random as they've never recognized the Bond series at the Oscars before, until tonight.
ellenpage 25th-Feb-2013 06:46 am (UTC)
I agree... your version would have been awesome. I thought they'd at least have a medley or snippets of different Bond themes instead of just one full song. And having it connect to Skyfall would have been so obvious and cool. Missed opportunities.
ill_bitch 25th-Feb-2013 07:58 am (UTC)
I think they tried to get all of the Bonds, but most declined or something
miss_real 25th-Feb-2013 02:42 pm (UTC)
that would have been AMAZING!

Such a letdown though, even the montage was crappy and looked like it took someone ten minutes, loads of shots of Connery and i think about one with Roger Moore, even though Moore has done the most films. awful.
camillesaens 25th-Feb-2013 02:49 pm (UTC)
Adele was HORRIBLE.

thank god she only did skyfall or else it would've been a bigger disaster
kamikashi 25th-Feb-2013 06:51 am (UTC)
all the bonds was made up by the internet though, craig was confirmed not to be going a while ago. so if they didnt have the current bond i doubt they would have the older ones.
bardotlashes 25th-Feb-2013 07:00 am (UTC)
Here's what Nikki Finke said about the Bond reunion that wasn't:

OK, here’s what really happened with this tribute to 50 years of James Bond films. (Besides the fact it looks like it was edited with a blunt meat cleaver.) The Academy and the show’s producers hoped to gather together all the living 007 actors. But Sean Connery refused to come because he hates the Broccoli family. Something about how he thinks they cheated him out of money he was owed. Then Pierce Brosnan refused to come because he hates the Broccoli family as well. Something about how he thinks they pulled him from the role too early. Roger Moore was dying to come because, well, he’s a sweetheart. And Daniel Craig would have come because he does what he’s told by the Broccoli family’s Eon Productions whose Bond #23 Skyfall just went through the box office global roof. So there you have it.
the_pinkdress 25th-Feb-2013 07:18 am (UTC)
Bond tribute and the ~musical tribute~ were stupid. lol I felt so embarrassed for Catherine Zeta-Jones, like it was just so pointless. They could've used that time for more interesting, relevant shit.
chantalzola 25th-Feb-2013 03:03 pm (UTC)
They didn't have all of the Bonds? Super fail on the Academy's part =/ or I guess the producers.
cukoo4cocopuffs 25th-Feb-2013 04:00 pm (UTC)
So disappointing. The film sequence lasted far too long. I thought they'd get Adele to sing and then bring Bassey in with some awesome seque but no. Nopeeee. Lame.
genbu_no_miko24 25th-Feb-2013 06:31 am (UTC)
Seth was just t e r r i b l e.
beaddddddsss 25th-Feb-2013 06:32 am (UTC)
The last time I really loved the Oscars was when Hugh Jackman hosted. He really is a fantastic host.
peddlestools 25th-Feb-2013 06:33 am (UTC)
omg and i actually loved his song and the interpretive dance and the part where he said he didn't see that one movie lol
war_machine_rox 25th-Feb-2013 06:34 am (UTC)
Reader.

I haven't seen the reader!

Lol that was funny with his little danxe
whiskybars iconic imo25th-Feb-2013 06:35 am (UTC)
THE READER

i haven't seen the reader

i went down to the theater but there was a line

all these people watching iron man for a second time
beaddddddsss 25th-Feb-2013 06:39 am (UTC)
omg yissss THAT KILLED ME!

the fact that he couldn't keep it together during that part made it all the more hilarious
bluepassiflora 25th-Feb-2013 06:41 am (UTC)
Dan Harmon got an Emmy for that song, IIRC.
dbil 25th-Feb-2013 06:33 am (UTC)
His opening was the best.
socorporatesuit 25th-Feb-2013 06:34 am (UTC)
ia. he was really enthusiastic, i loved it tbh. same with ellen degeneres
whiskybars 25th-Feb-2013 06:34 am (UTC)
mte
maidenhell 25th-Feb-2013 06:35 am (UTC)
I liked him too.
spufs 25th-Feb-2013 06:38 am (UTC)
Me too. He revamped the Oscars for me when he hosted.

Edited at 2013-02-25 06:38 am (UTC)
stellar_ball 25th-Feb-2013 06:47 am (UTC)
His opening was amazing.
bienenkiste 25th-Feb-2013 06:50 am (UTC)
omg IA
hrhobo 25th-Feb-2013 06:58 am (UTC)
ia. that was the last good oscar show.
chuk_is_dazzled 25th-Feb-2013 07:09 am (UTC)
he was great ilh
freeze_i_say 25th-Feb-2013 09:31 am (UTC)
YESSSSSSS - he was free of flaws and his enthusiasm was so infectious :''')
door 25th-Feb-2013 01:58 pm (UTC)
I wonder if there is anything he isn't good at. He has to be a terrible cook or hopeless at spelling or something. SOMETHING.
tebtosca 25th-Feb-2013 06:06 pm (UTC)
Hugh is the kind of classic but modern host that they need for shit like this
joaniemaloney 25th-Feb-2013 11:40 pm (UTC)
I feel so spoiled now bc that was the first year I really watched the oscars so I expected all of the monologues to be that great. :/
holyfrijoles_2 25th-Feb-2013 06:32 am (UTC)
Every Oscars is the worst lbr. I can't remember enjoying a ceremony all the way through in a while.
callme_morbid 25th-Feb-2013 06:40 am (UTC)
mte, i can't even rank them anymore.
icangoforthat 25th-Feb-2013 06:47 am (UTC)
mte.
bienenkiste 25th-Feb-2013 06:50 am (UTC)
IFKR.
velvetunicorn 25th-Feb-2013 03:47 pm (UTC)
ikr? i think they're all trying to recapture a moment that never really happened. there have been great bits and great openings but I've never sat through the whole thing and was surprised when it was over.
Page 1 of 7
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 12:07 pm GMT.