4:31 pm - 02/21/2013

A professional athlete; a home with an arsenal of firearms; a dead young woman involved a long-term relationship with her killer. In November, her name was Kasanda Perkins and the man who shot her was Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belcher. Now her name is Reeva Steenkamp, killed by Olympic sprinter and double amputee Oscar “the Blade Runner” Pistorius. We don’t know whether Pistorius is guilty of murdering a woman he claims to have deeply loved or is guilty merely of being an unbelievably irresponsible gun owner, firing four bullets into the door of his bathroom in an effort to hit an imagined burglar. We do know that this is either an all-too-familiar story of a man and the woman he dated and then killed, or it’s the story of a man who thought a burglar had penetrated the electrified fence that surrounded his gated community to break into his house and use his toilet.
Just as with Belcher and Perkins, we will learn more than we ever wanted or needed to know in the weeks to come about the nature of Pistorius and Steenkamp’s relationship. We will learn about the “allegations of a domestic nature” that had brought police to his home in the past. We will learn about Pistorius’s previous allegedly violent relationships with women. We will learn about the variety of guns he kept at close hand. We will surely discuss male athletes and violence against women: the sort of all-too-common story that can create commonality between a football player from Long Island and a sprinter from Johannesburg. We might even ponder the way these gated communities, one of which was also the site of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin’s murder two years ago, become throbbing pods of paranoia and parabellums. We will learn about everything except what actually matters: there is a global epidemic of violence against women, and South Africa is at its epicenter.
Two days before Steenkamp’s death, there were protests outside of the South African parliament about the failures of the state to adjudicate the unsolved rapes and murders of women across the country. As the executive director of the Rape Crisis Centre Kathleen Dey said on February 12, “There are no overnight cures to the scourge of rape that is affecting South Africa. We have the highest instance of rape in the world and we cannot continue in this way.” The official statistics are shocking. Every seventeen seconds a woman is raped in South Africa yet just one out of nine women report it and only 14 percent of perpetrators are convicted. The Rape Crisis Centre and other organizations are starved for funds, with the demand for social services, counseling and even HIV tests far outstripping their capacity.
There have also had to be demonstrations against what the Women’s League of the African National Congress has termed “femicide.” In this country of 50 million people, three women a day are killed by their partners. When news of Steenkamp’s death became front-page news across the country, it pushed out ongoing headlines of the February 2 Western Cape gang rape and mutilation of a 17-year-old girl named Anene Booysen. Before her death, Booysen identified one of her perpetrators: it was someone she both trusted and knew.
This is hardly a South African problem, of course. We are confronting nothing less than a global system of brutal misogyny. Too many men across the world see too many women as repositories of their rage, frustration, narcissism or simply their will to enact violence. The World Health Organization’s reports that depending on the country, anywhere from “15% (Japan) to 71% (Ethiopia) of women report physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner at some point in their lives.” Like in South Africa, every statistic on this issue must be viewed with skepticism because of the transnational stigmas and shame that silence women who have survived.
In the United States, rape culture and the rape it produces have been normalized to the point where Notre Dame athletes accused of rape can take the field for a national championship football game without a peep from the sports pages. It’s a country where Fox News host Bob Beckel can ask incredulously, “When’s the last time you heard about rape on a college campus?” It’s a country, and a world, where people are now saying enough is enough.
It’s a global problem that will get solved only with a global response if we want to even dream of a world where violence against women is a relic of history. That’s the sentiment behind initiatives like “One Billion Rising to End Violence Against Women and Girls,” and this kind of brave solidarity and support is extremely welcome. This very solidarity was displayed by Reeva Steenkamp herself just before her death. Distraught over the murder of Anene Booysen, Steenkamp sent out an instragam message. It read, “I woke up in a happy safe home this morning. Not everyone did. Speak out against the rape of individuals in SA. RIP Anene Booysen.” Short of a billion of us rising, happy and safe homes will not be a reality for the women of the world. It should be. We have to act now unless we want to keep telling the stories of Kasandra Perkins, Anene Booysen and Reeva Steenkamp over and over again, only with different names.
source
Oscar Pistorius and the Global System of Deadly Misogyny

A professional athlete; a home with an arsenal of firearms; a dead young woman involved a long-term relationship with her killer. In November, her name was Kasanda Perkins and the man who shot her was Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belcher. Now her name is Reeva Steenkamp, killed by Olympic sprinter and double amputee Oscar “the Blade Runner” Pistorius. We don’t know whether Pistorius is guilty of murdering a woman he claims to have deeply loved or is guilty merely of being an unbelievably irresponsible gun owner, firing four bullets into the door of his bathroom in an effort to hit an imagined burglar. We do know that this is either an all-too-familiar story of a man and the woman he dated and then killed, or it’s the story of a man who thought a burglar had penetrated the electrified fence that surrounded his gated community to break into his house and use his toilet.
Just as with Belcher and Perkins, we will learn more than we ever wanted or needed to know in the weeks to come about the nature of Pistorius and Steenkamp’s relationship. We will learn about the “allegations of a domestic nature” that had brought police to his home in the past. We will learn about Pistorius’s previous allegedly violent relationships with women. We will learn about the variety of guns he kept at close hand. We will surely discuss male athletes and violence against women: the sort of all-too-common story that can create commonality between a football player from Long Island and a sprinter from Johannesburg. We might even ponder the way these gated communities, one of which was also the site of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin’s murder two years ago, become throbbing pods of paranoia and parabellums. We will learn about everything except what actually matters: there is a global epidemic of violence against women, and South Africa is at its epicenter.
Two days before Steenkamp’s death, there were protests outside of the South African parliament about the failures of the state to adjudicate the unsolved rapes and murders of women across the country. As the executive director of the Rape Crisis Centre Kathleen Dey said on February 12, “There are no overnight cures to the scourge of rape that is affecting South Africa. We have the highest instance of rape in the world and we cannot continue in this way.” The official statistics are shocking. Every seventeen seconds a woman is raped in South Africa yet just one out of nine women report it and only 14 percent of perpetrators are convicted. The Rape Crisis Centre and other organizations are starved for funds, with the demand for social services, counseling and even HIV tests far outstripping their capacity.
There have also had to be demonstrations against what the Women’s League of the African National Congress has termed “femicide.” In this country of 50 million people, three women a day are killed by their partners. When news of Steenkamp’s death became front-page news across the country, it pushed out ongoing headlines of the February 2 Western Cape gang rape and mutilation of a 17-year-old girl named Anene Booysen. Before her death, Booysen identified one of her perpetrators: it was someone she both trusted and knew.
This is hardly a South African problem, of course. We are confronting nothing less than a global system of brutal misogyny. Too many men across the world see too many women as repositories of their rage, frustration, narcissism or simply their will to enact violence. The World Health Organization’s reports that depending on the country, anywhere from “15% (Japan) to 71% (Ethiopia) of women report physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner at some point in their lives.” Like in South Africa, every statistic on this issue must be viewed with skepticism because of the transnational stigmas and shame that silence women who have survived.
In the United States, rape culture and the rape it produces have been normalized to the point where Notre Dame athletes accused of rape can take the field for a national championship football game without a peep from the sports pages. It’s a country where Fox News host Bob Beckel can ask incredulously, “When’s the last time you heard about rape on a college campus?” It’s a country, and a world, where people are now saying enough is enough.
It’s a global problem that will get solved only with a global response if we want to even dream of a world where violence against women is a relic of history. That’s the sentiment behind initiatives like “One Billion Rising to End Violence Against Women and Girls,” and this kind of brave solidarity and support is extremely welcome. This very solidarity was displayed by Reeva Steenkamp herself just before her death. Distraught over the murder of Anene Booysen, Steenkamp sent out an instragam message. It read, “I woke up in a happy safe home this morning. Not everyone did. Speak out against the rape of individuals in SA. RIP Anene Booysen.” Short of a billion of us rising, happy and safe homes will not be a reality for the women of the world. It should be. We have to act now unless we want to keep telling the stories of Kasandra Perkins, Anene Booysen and Reeva Steenkamp over and over again, only with different names.
source
lol nope.
Come back when women make up the majority of global victims of violence
Edited at 2013-02-21 10:30 pm (UTC)
b: fix your fucking icon it looks almost as stupid as you are.
this is quickly seeping into porn. while there obviously has always been violence against women without mainstream internet porn, I still get freaked out by the sheer amount of violence that is directly, visually associated with sex that is SO easily accessible to men--and boys--all over the world (and women, for that matter, internalizing and normalizing it.) In my women's studies class today we were discussing how our generation has been bombarded with the most violent porn ever. Even "normal" porn almost always involves some sort of hitting or choking of a woman, and very rarely is it without degrading language. And while some women do enjoy roughness or violence during intercourse (with a consenting, trustworthy partner obvs), it's reached a point where it's presented as though that's just default sex, not an option to explore.
idk not totally related but I've been thinking about this a lot, so.
In my textbook it said that some radical-libertarian feminists encouraged women to experiment with rape fantasies, and I was appalled. 1) How can you claim that patriarchy is the root of female oppression and then claim that it is sexually liberating to experiment with pretend rape? 2) What about the women for who rape isn't just a pretend thing? What about their real, horrible experiences with actual rape? Gonna tell them to explore possible sexual pleasure from that?
Jesus fucking christ I was floored.
Guys figure the right way to have sex apparently is slapping asses, squeezing tits and choking. All while asking the SLUT if she likes it.
There's not much female friendly porn, but I get the impression most men are probably not into porn if there's not violence involved. This is just my opinion, of course.
A+
Altho there are some good parody porn that manages to avoid that.
I've been freaked out by how much erotica fiction is all about S&M, Doms/Submissives, etc. It didn't used to be like that.
"Prosecutor jokes 'there goes my case' as #pistorius arresting officer summoned"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/20
Edited at 2013-02-21 10:31 pm (UTC)
In all srsns tho, I think that this was a great article and I like that it highlighted the facts as well as not making it seem like this is just a 'South Africa problem' the way a lot of people did with India when that big, horrible rape story happened.
I hope people on here read the article.
Sometimes it seems people don't understand how serious a problem misogyny is, they think it's just a word of the day thing for feminists.
were you joking?
Granted- the improved place is still pretty bad. But I feel like I'm not old enough to tell if the problem is staying the same, or getting worse.
I don't think it is improviing. And certainly, at a legal/political level in the US, shit is not getting better.
That all being said, for all the progress we've made there has been a huge backlash.
It is now even harder to speak up because people dismiss you or have started this new trend of acting as if something is sexist/misogynist only if they think it is, it doesn't matter what the person speaking out has said.
The more power women have and the more high profile women become in industries that were dominated by men the more that people react against that.
It's the same with racism.
America has a black president so when black people complain about systemic racism they are told they are whinging or holding on to the past.
its such a strange time. It feels like domestic violence is so much better, and continues to improve. I mean, today, a man could never get away with beating the shit out of a woman in public. Lots of people would put a stop to that. Most people call the police now because no one tolerates domestic violence/arguing escalating.
But in other instances of female-related violence, it seems worse. Maybe because we are at a place of it becoming a widely-known topic?
po' lil tink tink
~ call me crazy but i think he's innocent idk why i just do~
U CRAZY.
A court declaring you not guilty does not make you any less guilty. It only means that you couldn't be convicted for your crimes.
Something about the controversy and outcry in this case, though, makes me think he will have a much worse time than OJ did post-acquittal. I can easily imagine Pistorius being killed over it.
Its interesting to hear about how people in his own country are reacting to it when it seems the rest of the world is bending over backwards to prove his innocence. I mean even taking facts he admitted into consideration, he killed someone. I would never wish death upon someone, but I will say I hope this is the end of his athletic career at the very least if he gets away with this.
I'm going to be sick.