ONTD

5:46 pm - 02/04/2013

Jennifer Lawrence - Oscar Nominees Luncheon 2013

Page 9 of 11
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] >>
lillylilacs 5th-Feb-2013 01:11 am (UTC)
The dress is terrible, the nude lipstick is nagl, and her hair is a mess. God, I hope someone tells her to fire Rachel Zoe once award season is over.
myxwill 5th-Feb-2013 01:17 am (UTC)
Her tan looks nice, but the dress looks like one of those towel tank top dresses lol..
ace_kay 5th-Feb-2013 01:25 am (UTC)
Why does she look like Nicole Ritchie?
dirrtypony 5th-Feb-2013 01:31 am (UTC)
i dont really mind the dress but u can tell shes not really feeling it by the way shes standing and shit. not liking the lipstick color. with the tanned skin it just blends too much.
dirrtypony 5th-Feb-2013 01:32 am (UTC)
her arms look really nice
the_wolski 5th-Feb-2013 01:33 am (UTC)
she looks gorgeous until she smiles lol
faithgirl16 5th-Feb-2013 01:35 am (UTC)
She looks like she still might be ill. Poor girl could use a break from the awards season.
overprotected 5th-Feb-2013 01:39 am (UTC)
drownamydrown 5th-Feb-2013 10:25 pm (UTC)
Lolllll! Wth
overprotected 5th-Feb-2013 10:50 pm (UTC)
best part of the entire movie lmao
lucciolaa 5th-Feb-2013 01:49 am (UTC)
Who the fuck let this happen???

That hair, that makeup, that HAIR. The dress and shoes would be fine on someone else and if they were worn separately.
golden_train 5th-Feb-2013 02:13 am (UTC)
that dress...lmao.
beachshore 5th-Feb-2013 02:24 am (UTC)
Nice towel you have on. Nice shade of cum lipstick.
dontreadmylj 5th-Feb-2013 02:37 am (UTC)
lmao
gaga 5th-Feb-2013 02:25 am (UTC)
looks gorgeous but really awk
dontreadmylj 5th-Feb-2013 02:26 am (UTC)
the dress, hair, and lipstick are nagl
outpour 5th-Feb-2013 02:27 am (UTC)
god I love her to death but this whole look is not good. at all.
billsolomon 5th-Feb-2013 02:35 am (UTC)
good god

she is not pretty. at all. she's not even average.

jesus how did she get here?
robinsparkle 5th-Feb-2013 01:22 pm (UTC)
Really? Lol she's hardly ugly.
Page 9 of 11
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] >>
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 10:52 pm GMT.