ONTD

5:58 pm - 01/30/2013

Diablo Cody Thinks Lena Dunham Is 'Our New Woody Allen'



On Lena Dunham and the backlash against "Girls": "I absolutely love Lena Dunham. I don’t know her personally, but I’m completely obsessed with the show.

I cannot believe what she has accomplished at 26. I think she is like our new Woody Allen. That’s how highly I think of her. I have to say I was not the least bit surprised by the backlash that she has encountered. Because any time you’re a woman who dares to be unconventional, outspoken, sexual -- I mean, she’s taking her shirt off every week, God bless her -- of course people are gonna bitch about it.

People cannot process the fact that a woman could be sexual and funny and brilliant and sensitive and flawed and beautiful and all of those things. Women are used to being put in boxes and compartmentalized.

People are more comfortable when we stay in our box. And Lena Dunham is jumping from box to box all the time. I hope that she’s enjoying herself. I find myself feeling very protective when I read about her because I went through an experience like that in my 20s. I went through exactly what she’s going through, except I wasn’t a huge TV star -- that’s gotta add to it.

But I think to myself, 'God, I hope she’s enjoying this time and appreciating it and not just sitting at home grinding her teeth about the criticism.'"

Source (with the rest of the interview)
lanavis 31st-Jan-2013 04:12 am (UTC)
And English is a collection of words made to oppress others
happythree 31st-Jan-2013 04:15 am (UTC)
Would you care to contribute anything, or just stare at your screen wallowing in cognitive dissonance and cursing the wrong people? Should I start brushing up on Mandarin before I respond again?
lanavis 31st-Jan-2013 04:18 am (UTC)
I ask the same of you.
Common sense sometimes does contain some prejudices, but "sometimes" is not always and one should be careful no to treat it as such.
happythree 31st-Jan-2013 04:30 am (UTC)
Your common sense is false, as I have shown you. It is not as easy to pinpoint the injustices of your own time as it is those of the past. History has already pointed out the past injustices for you. You know that women should be 'equal', vague as your knowledge is. Bravo. Too bad knowing such a thing barely requires any mental effort at all.

And common sense should never, ever be your source for an issue of such import and contention. Have some goddamn intellectual self-respect.
lanavis Re: 31st-Jan-2013 04:38 am (UTC)
I could say the same of you. Your bias for the "victimhood" of women seems only perpetuated by falsity.
happythree Re: 31st-Jan-2013 04:58 am (UTC)
Nothing I've cited is false. Your claims require the assumption that with the (still developing) legal victories of feminism, the country has become a post-feminist utopia in a matter of a few decades. You further claim that the fact of men holding disproportionate power in the most powerful segments of society - business, political, entertainment, legal - is essentially meaningless, which just might be the height of absurdity. Influence is not actually influential, in your world. It is agnotological, know-nothing insistence at its finest.

Edited at 2013-01-31 04:59 am (UTC)
deborahkla 31st-Jan-2013 12:43 pm (UTC)
Judging from your rotten grammar, you're a fucking idiot in other subjects as well as feminist history or theory. I'm sure your attitude towards feminism has more to do with the women who've dumped you than anything you've actually read or studied.

Go masturbate somewhere else, asshole.
This page was loaded May 22nd 2013, 11:26 am GMT.