ONTD

4:32 pm - 01/21/2013

Condoleezza Rice to work for CBS news



Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has a new job. It has been announced that Rice will be joining CBS News as a contributor. According to Yahoo , CBS News chairman Jeff Fager and president David Rhodes stated, Rice "will use her insight and vast experience to explore issues facing America at home and abroad".

After working on the National Security Council under President George H.W. Bush, Rice became the national security adviser to President George W. Bush during his first term. When she became secretary of state in George W. Bush's second term, Rice made history as the first African American woman to ever hold the post. It's a little surprising to see Condoleezza Rice on CBS, considering the fact that the network's news department is so frequently painted as unabashedly liberal. Some would speculate that maybe CBS is trying to change its image.

The New York Post reports that Rice made her network debut Sunday on the program "Face the Nation". She will contribute to coverage of the inauguration on Monday. Rice's involvment in Mitt Romney's 2012 presidential campaign was among her most prominent activities since the end of the Bush administration. She offered the Republican presidential nominee advice on general strategy and foreign policy, and was highly praised for her speech at the Republican National Convention.

Rice is an accomplished woman in so many areas. It will be interesting to see what she does at CBS, as well as future endeavors, and whether or not she ever gets a shot at her dream job, commisioner of the NFL.

source
sibilation 21st-Jan-2013 05:16 pm (UTC)
Stretching a term (and that's being generous), then saying "at it's finest" is what had me confused. Thanks for the clarification.
ninjacandy 21st-Jan-2013 05:24 pm (UTC)
It's okay! Honestly, I was truly stretching that term (a metaphor/simile to illustrate how far I reached escapes me). Just it was the closest established term I felt I could employ, even if it certainly doesn't at all accurately reflect my meaning. Therefore, in retrospect, I was a moron.

Maybe it would have been better for me to say "Apologist politics at its finest."?
sibilation 21st-Jan-2013 06:08 pm (UTC)
Apologist politics is perfect, and you're absolutely correct - it's completely rampant here.

I'm a white male wannabe-feminist, and I was firmly anti-Condoleezza until I started watching documentaries and really reading about her. I was struck by her intelligence because, honestly, I assumed she was going to be an idiot warmonger like George Bush. That change in impression led me here - to respect. Looking at myself more closely after your comment, I think I was probably over-reacting positively because she was so different to my long-held assumptions about her. I'll try and read more about her in an attempt temper my rose colored glasses and form a more well-rounded point of view. Thanks.
ninjacandy 21st-Jan-2013 06:30 pm (UTC)
Actually, thank-you. You really nicely pointed out how I foolishly employed a term, have helped me coin a new one and now we're having a great discussion! :)

I should add that certainly Condoleezza Rice is a woman of many incredible accomplishments, I don't doubt that she is one of the smartest (if not smartest) persons to have been in American office. However, it doesn't, and shouldn't, detract from her record as an American politician. As an American politician she has been - and I do not believe that I am employing hyperbole when I make this claim - treasonous and is a war criminal. When you ignore her personal background and accomplishments, and look at her political career and actions, what elevates her from Rumsfeld or Bush Jnr? From my perspective, it's a deeply American behaviour to judge a politician on the content of their personal history and character as opposed to their record as a politician. It's a behaviour that is beginning to deeply permeate British politics - its start began in 1979. Celebrity politics.

What I find fascinating about responses to Rice from the left and feminists is how it greatly varies along race lines. The African American left and womanists have generally remained incredibly (and rightly) critical of her throughout her tenure with the Bush administration - as they have of Rumsfeld and Bush Jnr. Yet, the white left and feminists have typically always felt the need to whitewash her political activities and pay respect to her personal character, whilst Rumsfeld and Bush Jnr are the target of scathing attacks. Certainly, Rumsfeld and Bush Jnr deserve it but Condoleezza Rice's record should not be ignored. It is clear the reason that the white American left do it is because of a bizarre and totally unhelpful white apologist guilt.

I hope I make sense and all of this rambling just happens to be my opinion~
sprywonderdog 21st-Jan-2013 07:07 pm (UTC)
Spot on, very well said. The way I feel about her leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I can't help but have a certain amount of respect for her previous to working for the Bush administration. It's not just her personal character, but her professional life. Although nothing can change the impact those few years are going to have on her historically, I feel that she still has a lot of time to change what she is known for politically.
This page was loaded May 18th 2013, 9:55 pm GMT.