ONTD

3:44 pm - 01/09/2013

Mila Kunis is a fashion fiasco as Hollywood's frumpiest, dumpiest celeb



Sexiest? More like schlubbiest woman alive.

Sweatpants-loving Mila Kunis is a guy’s girl - and she’s got the wardrobe to prove it.

Seemingly eager to shed her Sexiest Woman Alive title - Esquire Magazine crowned the Ukrainian-born beauty last November - Kunis is rarely spotted these days in anything except dumpy, frumpy gym wear.

Apparently at chez Kunis, it’s laundry day everyday.

From morning coffee runs with boyfriend Ashton Kutcher to canoodling in the West Village, walking the dog or lunch in L.A., Kunis and Kutcher are a match made in casual dressing hell.

At first, it was cute to watch them smooching in Central Park in matching T-shirts or see her run out in the morning without painting on a full face of makeup and cavorting Kardashian-style for the paparazzi. But now it’s time to shed the elastic waistband and invest in a hairbrush.

She’s a Golden Globe-nominated actress for "Black Swan,'' not a member of Justin Bieber’s entourage.

“I love her, and though I can certainly relate to her craving for comfort, there really is a better way to do it,” says Mary Kate Steinmiller, senior fashion market editor at Teen Vogue.

Unlike other Hollywood A-listers Gwen Stefani, Jessica Chastain and Jessica Alba with street style to match their flawless red-carpet looks, Kunis insists on dressing like an unwashed teenage boy.

¬__¬Collapse )

Source
Page 10 of 11
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] >>
chuk_is_dazzled 10th-Jan-2013 12:42 am (UTC)
lol apparently there is no happy medium
ponpiri 10th-Jan-2013 12:43 am (UTC)
So many neurotic people in this post. Do you as long as you're comfortable.
duchello 10th-Jan-2013 01:12 am (UTC)
what the fuck is this post? aren't half of you all in college? since when is wearing sweatpants in public bad? I mean shit I can both look like hell sunday morning to get coffee in sweats but still be able to dress and get done up when I go out on the weekends.
meow_tan 10th-Jan-2013 04:35 am (UTC)
ontd special snowflakes in full force trying to seem ~holier than thou~ than the rest of us for not wearing sweatpants.
resphonia 10th-Jan-2013 02:39 am (UTC)
Girl can wear whatever the hell she wants on her own goddamn time.
supertex 10th-Jan-2013 02:53 am (UTC)
ahhhhhhh. its during posts like these that ONTD's true colors come shining through
sorya86 10th-Jan-2013 02:58 am (UTC)
Who fucking cares about this shit, she can wear whatever she wants.
ciao_bella315 10th-Jan-2013 03:23 am (UTC)
I'm not bothered by her outfit I'm bothered at the elastic on the hem. Wtf.
sihaya09 10th-Jan-2013 03:27 am (UTC)
Dude, if I were primped and fussed over as much as she is on set and for press, I'd live in sweatpants whenever I could.
johnjie 10th-Jan-2013 03:43 am (UTC)
jfc just because she's not dolled up to the nines for the public's edification 24/7 doesn't give anyone the right to attack her for it

She looks comfy and (gasp!) average, and that's fine
meow_tan 10th-Jan-2013 04:34 am (UTC)
when youre a celeb like that there is no "happy medium" you're either slobbered in a few pounds of makeup for a photoshoot, interview or event or you're comfortable

im the same way, idc its comfy (i wear a lot of makeup when i go out, i wear none at all when i dont, dont even bother drawing my eyebrows on tbh)
prophecypro 10th-Jan-2013 05:08 am (UTC)
Its weird but I never found that attractive, like she's more like a sister or friend type. She got her sexy shoots no doubt but eh idk never sweated her like that. I think its because I've seen enough frumpy pap pics of her and she smokes so I was like "Latah.." lol
teamdowney 10th-Jan-2013 06:21 am (UTC)
Fuck this article. Mila, you do you.
nene718 10th-Jan-2013 08:20 am (UTC)
i mean...there are sweatpants out there that look more presentable than those ones
michelleantonia 10th-Jan-2013 11:19 am (UTC)
leitao 10th-Jan-2013 11:21 am (UTC)
Whatever, ONTD. If I could live everyday in sweatpants and a baggy hoodie . . . I totally would. So comfy. XP
Page 10 of 11
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] >>
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 8:15 am GMT.