2:30 am - 01/02/2013
Paparazzi have had nasty run-ins with pop star Justin Bieber, including a high-speed chase in July that prompted a city councilman to predict that such an encounter could end tragically. On Tuesday, a photographer, who thought he spied Justin Bieber sitting in his parked white Ferrari, was struck by oncoming traffic as he walked across a Los Angeles freeway to get back to his car after snapping photos.
An opportune picture of the 18-year-old celebrity can rake in hard currency -- but Bieber was not in the car at the time of the New Year's Day incident. California Highway Patrol officers had pulled over Bieber's vehicle Tuesday evening at an off-ramp of Interstate 405. The photographer spotted the sports car, parked his own vehicle across the street, crossed to get closer to Bieber's car and took photos of its occupants, said Los Angeles Police spokesman James Stoughton.
Officers told the man twice to return to his car, CNN affiliate KTLA reported. A car struck the paparazzo as he crossed back across the street to leave, Stoughton said. Authorities have not released his name.
"While I was not present nor directly involved with this tragic accident, my thoughts and prayers are with the family of the victim," Bieber said in a statement.
"Hopefully this tragedy will finally inspire meaningful legislation and whatever other necessary steps to protect the lives and safety of celebrities, police officers, innocent public bystanders, and the photographers themselves.
CNN
2, 3
Update to this post. All snark aside, just wow @ everything.
*Update* on Paparazzo Killed Trying to Photograph Justin Bieber's Ferrari. Statement From Bieber.
Paparazzi have had nasty run-ins with pop star Justin Bieber, including a high-speed chase in July that prompted a city councilman to predict that such an encounter could end tragically. On Tuesday, a photographer, who thought he spied Justin Bieber sitting in his parked white Ferrari, was struck by oncoming traffic as he walked across a Los Angeles freeway to get back to his car after snapping photos.
An opportune picture of the 18-year-old celebrity can rake in hard currency -- but Bieber was not in the car at the time of the New Year's Day incident. California Highway Patrol officers had pulled over Bieber's vehicle Tuesday evening at an off-ramp of Interstate 405. The photographer spotted the sports car, parked his own vehicle across the street, crossed to get closer to Bieber's car and took photos of its occupants, said Los Angeles Police spokesman James Stoughton.
Officers told the man twice to return to his car, CNN affiliate KTLA reported. A car struck the paparazzo as he crossed back across the street to leave, Stoughton said. Authorities have not released his name.
"While I was not present nor directly involved with this tragic accident, my thoughts and prayers are with the family of the victim," Bieber said in a statement.
"Hopefully this tragedy will finally inspire meaningful legislation and whatever other necessary steps to protect the lives and safety of celebrities, police officers, innocent public bystanders, and the photographers themselves.
CNN
2, 3
Update to this post. All snark aside, just wow @ everything.
but then again, when normal people are stalked by creeps, nothing's done for them so why should it be done for celebs
ugh but then again this story is a prime example of how ruthless these people are. i don't know. i don't know what the right solution would be at all lol.
I don't think photos of other people taken and distributed without their consent should be considered free speech. This applies to things like upskirt photos too.
And that IS ONE of the arguments, I'm not the end-all, I'm just stating SOME of the things that I have read.
Also, your last sentence is where it gets complicated. What if that were law, how are journalists supposed to do their job by being the publics watchdog if they cannot use photos of illegal activity or of even a person if the photo was taken without consent? Imagine all the things that would be covered up still today if that were law. It doesn't protect the public and it violates first amendment rights.