9:00 pm - 12/30/2012

Antoine Fuqua Defends Quentin Tarantino Against Spike Lee's 'Django' Criticisms


CAPRI, Italy – Spike Lee should have called Quentin Tarantino personally rather than criticize him in public with charges of racism, the director of 2001 Oscar winner Training Day said Sunday.

Lee, the director behin Do the Right Thing 1989) Malcolm X 1992) and the thriller Inside Man (2006), made headlines before Christmas when he said he would boycott Tarantino’s Django Unchained because it was "disrespectful" to black people.

"American slavery was not a Sergio Leone Spaghetti Western," Lee wrote on Twitter. "It was a holocaust."

Later, in an interview, Lee declined to elaborate, except to say he had no intention of seeing the film: "I can’t speak on it ‘cause I’m not going to see it," he said.

It is not the first time Lee criticized Tarantino for racial insensitivity: after the release of Tarantino’s 1997 blacksploitation tribute Jackie Brown, Lee blasted Tarantino for what he said was an overuse of "the n-word," saying, "I think there is something wrong with him."

But Antoine Fuqua, the director behind Training Day who says he knows both Tarantino and Lee but is not close friends with either one, said Lee aired his concerns in wrong way.

"That’s just not the way you do things," said Fuqua, speaking on the sidelines of the 17th Capri, Hollywood Film Festival. "If you disagree with the way a colleague did something, call him up, invite him out for a coffee, talk about it. But don’t do it publically."

Fuqua -- at the Capri festival as part of a big Hollywood contingent that also includes Leaving Las Vegas director Mike Figgis, 300 sta Gerard Butler Iceman director Ariel Vromen nd Franco Nero, the star of the original Django film that inspired Tarantino's latest -- also defended Tarantino.

"I don’t think Quentin Tarantino has a racist bone in his body," he said. "Besides, I’m good friends with [Django Unchained star] Jamie Foxx and he wouldn’t have anything to do with a film that had anything racist to it."

Fuqua continued: "I haven’t seen the film, so I can’t speak about it specifically, but we’re supposed to find some truth in films and if you set a film in the 1850s, you’re going to hear the word 'nigger,' because that’s the way they spoke then, and you’re going to discuss slavery because that was part of the reality," he said.

"I want my kids to hear those kinds of words in the right context, so that they’ll know that language is not OK," Fuqua said.


piratesswoop 30th-Dec-2012 10:58 pm (UTC)
lmao right? parent your godamn kids instead of relying on films to do it for you. tell them the history of the word, don't subject them to r-rated films when they're too young to understand what the fuck is going on.
nothingcleva89 31st-Dec-2012 06:22 am (UTC)
I think that's what is bothering me about the whole discussion right now. Why are we relying on widely inaccurate historical fiction movies to tell our children about the past? Way to screw up. I don't have a problem with the violence, just the fact people take these films as fact.

I mean, showing a child a historical fiction movie is great, to get them a context for certain events and whatever, but we need to separate fiction from reality. So far, I have had 2 FB friends message me about slave narratives featuring these slave cock fights like in the movie (I minored in Black Studies, so I'm like the resident professor of my FB group on race relations). NOT A REAL THING. Just...ugh. Read a book, damn.
This page was loaded Dec 22nd 2014, 12:57 pm GMT.
# # # #