ONTD

12:16 pm - 12/19/2012

Elementary: Female Watson 'Started as a Joke'


Rob Doherty's choice to pair Jonny Lee Miller's Sherlock Holmes with a woman resulted in fall's No. 1 new series, and inclusion in THR's 2012 Rule Breakers portfolio.

"It started out as something of a joke," creator Rob Doherty confesses of his decision to make the Watson in his Sherlock Holmes tale a woman. When he began to research the story's original characters, he came across a handful of experts who had written up psychological assessments of Sherlock; one of them had noted an aversion to women.

"I thought to myself, 'What would make Holmes crazier than taking the figurative rock he has in Watson and making him a woman?' I scribbled it down and then went back to my research," the 38-year-old Elementary showrunner continues. "The more I thought about it, the more I wanted to try it."

The result: casting Asian-American film star Lucy Liu as the first female Watson opposite Jonny Lee Miller's Sherlock and an impressive 13.9 million viewers tuning in weekly, making Elementary the No. 1 new series with total viewers this fall. (Among the key 18-to-49 set, the series ranks No. 2 behind only NBC's breakout Revolution.) And come February, the CBS drama -- one of the season's few hits with critics and audiences alike -- will get the coveted post-Super Bowl slot.
The show's stars, Liu, 44, and Miller, 40, still are making sense of the series' success, particularly rewarding because the show colors outside the lines in a way that excites both of them.

"To me, one of the best things you can do in this profession is to take a risk," says Miller, whose co-star plays sober coach to his recovering-addict Sherlock. Liu says the tweak in formula can liberate the story in other ways as well: "There's an endless supply of unpredictability that we can delve into and we can change and add. It will still be a pound cake, but it could be marble, it could be lemon, it could be poppy seed."


_______________
DELICIOUS VIDEO @ SRC
meadowphoenix 20th-Dec-2012 12:18 am (UTC)
lol, mte. He was utterly contemptuous to people the narrative told you were jerks, so...

Most people consider that justifiable rudeness.
sherlockholmes 20th-Dec-2012 12:22 am (UTC)
Exactly. Holmes was rude to criminals. And while he did, say, tease Lestrade a little -- he also used to invite Lestrade over for dinner and it was a compliment from the Inspector that actually visibly moved Holmes on one of the rare occasions he showed off his emotional side.

Holmes was much more balanced and much less mean in the original stories than he is on the BBC -- and that's fine. I'm not knocking the interpretation at all, I dig Cumberpatches. But that doesn't mean it's canon.
meadowphoenix 20th-Dec-2012 01:11 am (UTC)
I get especially pissed about Scandal when it comes to people who want to believe BBC Sherlock is so close to canon (Hounds is a pretty obvious and complete departure). I think you and I have talked about ACD's Irene, but I think we can both agree that it's nothing like BBC Irene.

But yes, BBC Sherlock is a really well put together show. Everything but the writing is absolutely fantastic. The writing has a lot of faults but there are a lot high points there too. From what I can remember, they do write Mycroft pretty close to ACD's description (smarter than Sherlock, government, partial to food), though I hate that their relationship is strained in BBC. I'm really quite partial to their Mycroft.

I don't agree that BBC's cases are harder than Elementary either. A Study in Pink was pretty obvious from the beginning. Moriarty rather than the cases drives the drama in the others.
sherlockholmes 20th-Dec-2012 01:19 am (UTC)
I like 2.25 episodes from BBC. Study in Pink, Reichenbach Fall & parts of Great Game. That is less than 50% of the show. They're not getting a passing grade. It's stylish, Benedict and Martin can act -- I do like Mycroft -- I want to do bad things to Lestrade :3 -- and I think Jim Moriarty was so amazing and that show hung so much on him -- that they'll regret the fact he's gone.

But the BBC is very far removed from canon -- which is why it makes me want to hit my head on a wall when people talk about how not canon Elementary is. I mean, BBC Irene is an insult to the strength of character and intelligence of the original Irene. Sherlock has lost his gentlemanly flare and is now a bit like a stuck-up, sulking spoiled smarty-pants teen -- and Jim. Jim. My precious Jim. He's the first Moriarty that hasn't made me want to go to sleep. But he's about as far from canon as you can get. Sometimes the changes work, sometimes they don't.
meadowphoenix 20th-Dec-2012 02:08 am (UTC)
I'm trying to think of the ones I actually enjoyed and I've got just the Great Game and Reichenbach, lol. Sherlock thinking it was a cab passenger instead of the driver in Study screwed up his whole mystique for me because that didn't make any sense. I'm just a sucker for well-put together things; it's pure aesthetic admiration for the crew. But the writing. It keeps me every time from loving the whole thing.

Honestly, something being more or less canon obviously doesn't make it more or less valid, so the whole line of argument is kinda silly in whether something should be liked or not, but it kills me when the people who make those arguments for BBC have read nothing. Mind you I tend to like adaptations more than ACD, because I hate ACD's mystery writing style/Watson's 1st person narrative (far more of a Christie fan).

I loved how apologetically crazy, no I won't see the light, darkness is better you fools, Jim was. But yeah, that's a far cry from a professor.
sherlockholmes 20th-Dec-2012 02:11 am (UTC)
I agree with you -- 100%. I think my favourite Watson is Jude!Watson, actually (and Joan!) because they're so far removed from the hollowless, Watson-as-little-more-than-narrative-device that ACD gives us.

At the end of the day we all have to remember that ACD didn't fucking care about this characters... >.>
meadowphoenix 20th-Dec-2012 03:39 am (UTC)
Jude struck a nice balance between actual deep friendship, admiration, and exasperation. Now that you mention it, that is what I like about Lucy!Joan too. She cares and thinks he's really intelligent but that doesn't mean she's not going to say when she thinks Sherlock's gone too far or is up his own ass.

Thanks for the friending! I hope you don't mind that I don't post myself really
sherlockholmes 20th-Dec-2012 03:42 am (UTC)
I think that's important in a Watson. Because it makes the character more -- well -- real and less Nigel Bruce.

((And it's more so you can see my entries 'cause they might interest you :) ))
meadowphoenix 20th-Dec-2012 04:40 am (UTC)
I'm reading right now, lol.

Update: You hate James Joyce as much as I do (stream of consciousness my ass)!
sherlockholmes 20th-Dec-2012 04:42 am (UTC)
Aahahaha

I ACTUALLY gigglesnorted at that.

I've been rereading Portrait of an Artist. And Dude.

DUDE.
meadowphoenix 20th-Dec-2012 05:25 am (UTC)
It is the definition of navel-gazing. The definition. I have never rolled my eyes at a book so hard.
sherlockholmes 20th-Dec-2012 05:32 am (UTC)
I'm actually Role-playing Stephen Dedalus in a game right now. Because I hate myself.

I've read Ulysses. I'm one of the few and the ...proud?
meadowphoenix 20th-Dec-2012 06:35 am (UTC)
You're a survivor, bb.
sherlockholmes 20th-Dec-2012 01:03 pm (UTC)
lol. I did it to prove I could, I think!
This page was loaded May 26th 2013, 5:04 am GMT.