8:40 pm - 12/12/2012

Jada Pinkett-Smith Addresses The Problems Facing Today’s Women And Men In Relationships

So Jada really went there…and I’m not mad at it.

Jada Pinkett Smith has obvious concerns about the state of relationships between men and women nowadays and has posted a long blog to her Facebook page to address them.  In her latest post, Jada talks about how the true inner beauty of a woman over time has taken a backseat to superficiality of “weaves and red bottom shoes,” while men use money as a status symbol and as a way of buying love. Jada also believes that women today have no voice and have been reduced to being just pleasure toys. She states that our culture promotes women looking good without saying anything meaningful, and men have become so frustrated with insecurity that it often leads to domestic violence in the home.  Jada also says if one person in the relationship is lost, then the entire union is doomed because the couple are supposed to balance each other out..

The war on men through the degradation of woman.

How is man to recognize his full self, his full power through the eye’s of an incomplete woman? The woman who has been stripped of Goddess recognition and diminished to a big ass and full breast for physical comfort only. The woman who has been silenced so she may forget her spiritual essence because her words stir too much thought outside of the pleasure space. The woman who has been diminished to covering all that rots inside of her with weaves and red bottom shoes.

I am sure the men, who restructured our societies from cultures that honored woman, had no idea of the outcome. They had no idea that eventually, even men would render themselves empty and longing for meaning, depth and connection. There is a deep sadness when I witness a man that can’t recognize the emptiness he feels when he objectifies himself as a bank and truly believes he can buy love with things and status. It is painful to witness the betrayal when a woman takes him up on that offer. He doesn’t recognize that the create of a half woman has contributed to his repressed anger and frustration of feeling he is not enough. He then may love no woman or keep many half women as his prize. He doesn’t recognize that it’s his submersion in the imbalanced warrior culture, where violence is the means of getting respect and power, as the reason he can break the face of the woman who bore him four children.

When woman is lost, so is man. The truth is, woman is the window to a man’s heart and a man’s heart is the gateway to his soul.

Power and control will NEVER out weigh love.

May we all find our way.


chantalzola 13th-Dec-2012 04:40 am (UTC)
Having worked in publishing for most of my working career I find this all... oops, my brain just exploded.
theratwhispers 13th-Dec-2012 04:46 am (UTC)
If you read these posts, your brain would melt, they seriously HAVE NO IDEA what goes into writing and publishing books, and even less of an idea of how Hollywood works.

They honestly believe that it is ruining creativity and that shit should be like it was in Ancient Greece. I CAN NOT.
chantalzola 13th-Dec-2012 04:51 am (UTC)
Having spent most of my working career in publishing, their ideas make me go HJKSFDHKFKJDSHGJDHS. A lot of times a good editor can help a writer be more creative and can make a good book a great book. Sure there are shitty editors out there, etc., but to say it stunts creativity etc. is just... you're right. Brain. Melting.

But writer sin ancient greece got notoriety and they didn't have to pay for stuff, people took them in and were there patrons. So, they're wrong. I mean, I believe that's a form of payment.
theratwhispers 13th-Dec-2012 04:54 am (UTC)
I really think a lot of them are just jealous. They have a serious case of entitlement, and most of them are insane. And yah, a lot of them had that purity of art complex going on.
chantalzola 13th-Dec-2012 04:56 am (UTC)
So they believe all authors are sell-outs who lost their creative edge and that they, the non-sell outs who couldn't pay people to read their stuff, deserve to be just as famous, etc., that kind of thing?
theratwhispers 13th-Dec-2012 05:01 am (UTC)
No. If you create something, you are supposed to give it away to improve society. If you do not, you are holding ideas captive and away from the rest of society, and you suck.
chantalzola 13th-Dec-2012 05:03 am (UTC)
LOL!!!!! Not only do you suck, but you deserve to live in poverty and homelessness.
theratwhispers 13th-Dec-2012 05:05 am (UTC)
Yup, that sums it all up.
suzycat 13th-Dec-2012 10:39 pm (UTC)
I have the strangest suspicion that art in ancient Greece was done by people whose job it was to do art, and paid for by patronage of some kind. But I could be wrong, perhaps Socrates and that were all sitting round in their ancient Grecian garments knocking out a few vase paintings after dinner just for the sake of ahhhrtistic expression.
theratwhispers 13th-Dec-2012 10:44 pm (UTC)
I really feel like the Redditors saying that stuff, really had no idea what they were talking about. LOL!
This page was loaded Aug 22nd 2014, 5:48 pm GMT.