ONTD

1:14 pm - 12/07/2012

Kate Middleton Carrying Twins?



When Prince William and Kate's official announcement that she is pregnant came Monday, the palace said she was "expecting a baby."

But in light of the fact that the Duchess of Cambridge is also suffering from hyperemesis gravidarum, a form of acute morning sickness, there has been growing speculation that she may, in fact, be expecting twins.

According to the National Institutes of Health, the Duchess's rare condition tends to appear more often in women carrying twins.

So what would it mean for the royal family if Kate, 30 – who was discharged from the hospital Thursday – were to deliver two little royals? A pair of heirs?

Nope, royal experts tell PEOPLE. In fact, it's all a bit complicated.

The firstborn twin would have a completely different path than his or her sibling, says royal historian Robert Lacey, author of The Queen: A Life in Brief: "The first child to appear will have precedence. Whichever one comes out first will be the heir – and it will be the call of the obstetrician if there is a caesarean section."

And the obstetrician will make that delivery based on the location of the babies during labor, Mark Johnson, Professor of Obstetrics at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, tells PEOPLE.

cutCollapse )

People
Page 4 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
littlehayzay 7th-Dec-2012 07:57 pm (UTC)
if it is twins, they're both going to wish they were the other one... but ngl if i were the heir, i'd be watching my back my whole life waiting for #2 to do me in to take the throne
ch33rylips 7th-Dec-2012 07:58 pm (UTC)
What happens if they're conjoined tho
tiki876 7th-Dec-2012 08:51 pm (UTC)
right?
anus 7th-Dec-2012 07:58 pm (UTC)
I hope it's triplets just to surprise us all
nene718 7th-Dec-2012 07:59 pm (UTC)
it will be the call of the obstetrician if there is a caesarean section

too much responsibility. what if the person you deemed 2nd would want to get revenge on you when they grew up.
baglady25 7th-Dec-2012 08:00 pm (UTC)
It's like an awful action film
littlehayzay 7th-Dec-2012 08:02 pm (UTC)
lol someone in another post said 'what if #1 is like romney and #2 is like obama and you made that decision? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?"
tiki876 7th-Dec-2012 08:04 pm (UTC)
mfte
onyxobsidian 7th-Dec-2012 08:09 pm (UTC)
What if the one you chose becomes the next Hitler, but has a nasty hatred towards English obstetricians?
tiki876 7th-Dec-2012 08:52 pm (UTC)
lol
itspokerface 8th-Dec-2012 03:58 am (UTC)
lmao
joaniemaloney 8th-Dec-2012 12:37 am (UTC)
damn, this entire post has SO many great movie ideas.
fabouluz 7th-Dec-2012 07:59 pm (UTC)
How exciting would that be?
baglady25 7th-Dec-2012 07:59 pm (UTC)
This is going to be the news for the next 8 months or so, isn't it?
tiki876 7th-Dec-2012 08:52 pm (UTC)
yep
pixiesilver 7th-Dec-2012 08:01 pm (UTC)
I think i would be more mad if i was Baby A cause Baby B gets all the perks and none of the responsibilities. If they have a girl i hope they don't name it Diana cause that child will forever be compared to her grandmother and will never be a person of her own .now if they give her the middle name Frances that will be fine
littlehayzay 7th-Dec-2012 08:02 pm (UTC)
they will never name the baby diana, ever

there's a list of 'approved' names (not that they can't name it sometrhing else, but the heir is expected to be called something super english)
pixiesilver 7th-Dec-2012 08:05 pm (UTC)
i know, but i see a lot of people saying how cute it will be and going crazy hoping that they will name her Diana.
thetxbelle 7th-Dec-2012 08:02 pm (UTC)
My sister had that condition when she was pregnant with her twins so I think it's a good possibility.
littlehayzay 7th-Dec-2012 08:03 pm (UTC)
it's also more common for those having girls

and 'more common' in medical terms could mean like 1% more common
thetxbelle 7th-Dec-2012 08:06 pm (UTC)
That's interesting, my sisters twins were both girls.
coraelle 7th-Dec-2012 08:02 pm (UTC)
I had hyperemesis gravidarum with my son. It sucked. I did not have twins though so I can't say how accurate that is. I just know I feel her pain. :(
ruby_chalice 7th-Dec-2012 08:41 pm (UTC)
Me too. Wasn't twins either.
iamsimplysara 7th-Dec-2012 08:03 pm (UTC)
Isn't a 12 week nuchal scan standard in the UK? So they would know already if she had twins?

Edited at 2012-12-07 08:09 pm (UTC)
sadisticsidhe 7th-Dec-2012 08:10 pm (UTC)
Well she's not 12 weeks yet and also they probably won't say anything until the kid's born.
iamsimplysara 7th-Dec-2012 08:19 pm (UTC)
LOL It's not even 12 weeks? WTF

She's carrying royalty though so they would have probably scanned her just because to make sure everything is okay and how many babies?

If she was, I doubt all the slimy dickweasels could keep their mouths shut.
scaredsquee 7th-Dec-2012 11:39 pm (UTC)
you can tell if it's twins by ~6 weeks. /ultrasound grad
treegrowth 7th-Dec-2012 08:05 pm (UTC)
ugh my poor mom had that too when i was in utero. she said she puked for 9 months straight and was hospitalized twice because she was so sick and in so much pain. i was 2 weeks late and was an emergency c-section birth to boot. i was apparently a drama free baby though to make up for my fuckery in the womb.
lawd i am never having kids.
thetxbelle 7th-Dec-2012 08:07 pm (UTC)
lol
xliquidskiesx 7th-Dec-2012 08:05 pm (UTC)
poor thing, this will be going on now for the next months until she gives birth.
kittenism 7th-Dec-2012 08:07 pm (UTC)
There can only be on heirlander.

...but seriously, as interesting as it would be if she really is having twins, it's completely ridiculous that they're already saying things like this. Not surprised in the least, but damn. Give it a few months.
asweetsymphony Desperate student needs your help PLEASE7th-Dec-2012 08:10 pm (UTC)
Hey guys, I'm doing a report about the different uses of technology for today's generation and the older generation who grew up in the 70s and 80s and I would really appreciate your help by just answering this. Thank you so much. Kinda desperate right now cause my interviewees bailed on me on the last second.

1) how did you do your research and write a report or essays in the 70s or 80s?

Ex: typewriter, books? Etc.

2) how did you make plans with your friends back in the day?

Ex: telephone, talked in school etc.

3) are you more comfortable to use traditional forms of technology and communication than today's modern technology like apps, and social media?

Traditional ex: face to face conversations , telephone, books rather than google.

Thanks so much!
littlehayzay Re: Desperate student needs your help PLEASE7th-Dec-2012 08:36 pm (UTC)
i was in school before we had computers

- encyclopedias
- the library

most papers were handwritten
obviously telephone/school for chatting with friends - oh and i had my own phone line which was a big deal

Edited at 2012-12-07 08:38 pm (UTC)
asweetsymphony Re: Desperate student needs your help PLEASE9th-Dec-2012 03:33 am (UTC)
Thank you!
mercystars 7th-Dec-2012 09:05 pm (UTC)
1. Encyclopedias/books/other media in the library (like microfilm, film strips, and such), with everyone doing their own research or dividing up the research if you were partnered with someone else or on a team (for group projects/reports). You could either write it all up freehand or type it, depending on the teacher's instructions, but most reports were handwritten.

2. Phones, talking in school, meeting friends after school and planning then, passing notes in class, etc..

3. Technology that makes things easier is great. Personally I don't have a preference but I do feel there are some things better discussed in person/face-to-face than over the phone or online.

I graduated hs in 1985. The year before that, stenography (shorthand) was discontinued as a course you could take, and not long after I graduated, typing was discontinued (I took typing). I was the second year of students to take the new data processing class (early computer programming where we learned DOS), and apparently that switched to computer science a couple years later.
purplecrayon_ 7th-Dec-2012 08:20 pm (UTC)
After all the guessing and a nurse committing suicide. I'm really over this pregnancy.
Page 4 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 12:05 pm GMT.