ONTD

4:52 pm - 12/05/2012

Gwyneth Paltrow photoshop fail

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

When we caught a glimpse of InStyle UK's January 2013 cover feature Gwyneth Paltrow, our first thoughts were: where's Gwyn?

Seriously, the shot of the actress makes her look... different. There seems to be a glazed-over feeling to the cover -- like an intense retouching session gone wrong. It took a second for us to register that that was even Gwyneth's face. And anyone else noticing the strange juxtaposition of her foot and thigh? For a hot second we thought she was three-legged. So yah: different.

Strange photo editing and awkward leg positioning aside, the styling is pretty spot on. The GOOP blogger rocks a pink coat and a nude dress, both from the Fall 2012 collection (and both good choices for the blonde, if we say so ourselves). Inside the mag, Gwyneth dishes to designer friend Diane von Furstenburg about husband Chris Martin, her kids and her diet -- aka her juice cleanse of the week.

Source

Reminds me of this:
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Page 3 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
julietislimited 5th-Dec-2012 11:10 pm (UTC)
whenever I read a magazine like this I always read whats around the person first then look at the photo.
lacylaplante 6th-Dec-2012 12:42 am (UTC)
that's so weird I never even glance at the text
jadehunter 5th-Dec-2012 11:11 pm (UTC)
The foot I can buy as being tucked under her thigh, but the face...they definitely did something there. I think they flattened her nose and widened her cheeks or something, because it's really different from her actual face.
cherie_001 5th-Dec-2012 11:59 pm (UTC)
and reduced the size of her forehead. i mean, c'mon!
megswan 5th-Dec-2012 11:12 pm (UTC)
Omg the amount of times someone can write an article about how a magazine cover shot doesn't look like the person...



And this one looks FINE.
detectors 5th-Dec-2012 11:12 pm (UTC)
who is this
saikaro_x 5th-Dec-2012 11:13 pm (UTC)
LOL give me a break...I've seen computer generated people look more realistic than this.
loverelapse 5th-Dec-2012 11:13 pm (UTC)
vampireweekend 5th-Dec-2012 11:14 pm (UTC)
whatever we just don't know what real beauty looks like
sassandthecity 5th-Dec-2012 11:16 pm (UTC)
It looks like those faces you'd see on a young adult novel.
ragechill 5th-Dec-2012 11:17 pm (UTC)
I don't see much of a difference tbh... Oops at me.

Edited at 2012-12-05 11:17 pm (UTC)
superpchan 5th-Dec-2012 11:24 pm (UTC)
For me, it's not her face as much as the angle and the way her head is positioned that's confusing me.
milkchokolate 5th-Dec-2012 11:30 pm (UTC)
There's something off about her face, mainly the eyes.
pauldrons 6th-Dec-2012 01:45 am (UTC)
I think it looks like her, but they definitely hit some kinda level of uncanny valley there...
nt4michelangelo 5th-Dec-2012 11:17 pm (UTC)
idk I don't think it's that bad
lolcatielol 5th-Dec-2012 11:18 pm (UTC)
I can still tell it's her?
squalorholla 5th-Dec-2012 11:19 pm (UTC)
pastede on yay
chiihiro 6th-Dec-2012 01:50 am (UTC)
lmfao
bralesss 5th-Dec-2012 11:22 pm (UTC)
there's been worse...
yurasama_love 5th-Dec-2012 11:23 pm (UTC)
I've seen some bad shops, but the fact that this was published is ridiculous.
brucelynn 5th-Dec-2012 11:24 pm (UTC)
Photobucket
cherie_001 6th-Dec-2012 12:00 am (UTC)
lol this is killing me
chaylay23 6th-Dec-2012 06:07 am (UTC)
Omg, this is the best
Page 3 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 5:25 pm GMT.