ONTD

3:07 am - 12/02/2012

Vegan Anne Hathaway flaunts 25-lb weight loss

Actress Anne Hathaway, who lost 25 pounds on a crash diet for the film, "Les Misérables," looks sporty and sassy in the January 2013 issue of Glamour.





The slender 5-foot-8 Anne dons a white tank top and black underwear that accentuate her lean thighs. Hathaway, 30, admitted she essentially starved herself to look the part of the emaciated Fantine in the tragedy, "Les Misérables."

"I had to be obsessive about it; the idea was to look near death," Hathaway told Vogue. "Looking back on the whole experience, it was definitely a little nuts. It was definitely a break with reality, but I think that’s who Fantine is anyway."

Anne lost 10 pounds before shooting began, and then lost another 15 pounds during a two-week break in filming by eating only two thin squares of dried oatmeal paste a day. Hathaway's competitive personality enabled her to stick to her extreme low-calorie diet.

"I like to fight for a job," she says. "You feel like you've emerged from the scrap, and you're like, 'OK, this one's mine. Did it. Done.' "

Transforming herself physically is nothing new for the dedicated Anne, who worked out five days a week to play Catwoman in "The Dark Knight Rises." In addition to gym workouts, Hathaway underwent stunt training, did strength exercises as well as 90 minutes of dance every day.

Anne, who switched to a vegan diet while training for "The Dark Knight Rises," has really embraced the plant-based eating plan.

"I don't go the soy-meat route; I have a really plant-based diet," she said. "So I wind up cooking at home a lot. Kale is amazing. Spelt [a kind of wheat] pasta is amazing. I can't do the white-flour stuff. It makes me really ill."


source
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 05:39 pm (UTC)
i agree with you that this is what would sadly happen to people right now if every guide dog was suddenly a guide human tomorrow. but why can't we change how people view guides and how people view disabled people in general? what if we made sure that human guides exercised in a way similar to that of a guide dog, where they only serve as a way of helping the disabled person getting around? what if we taught human guides to never ever step in for people, only when its neccesary? what if this happened, then there wouldn't be a problem with human guides. i'm listening to you and i see directly where you are coming from given the sad state of our society right now and the treatment of the disabled.
ladyvoldything 2nd-Dec-2012 05:42 pm (UTC)
but that would debase the dignity of the guide person, too.

stop looking at it as how things SHOULD be, or talking about how people SHOULD see things. just see them for what they are. you'd feel horrible if you needed a babysitter for the rest of your life. you would, wouldn't you? when my sister had partial paralysis last year, the trauma of her husband having to clean her was worse than the pain. that's how humans are. that's how we always will be. we value our dignity, that's an essential part of the human spirit.

empowering the disabled is all about that- power. giving them their own power, not interfering elves to lead them around on leashes. guide animals do that: they not only let the person make their own choices, but it gives them a companion with all the soul-feeding benefits of owning a pet. it lets them own a pet in a way the might not be able to do normally, and god, i wouldn't begrudge that to anyone. hell, a dog would need special training to be compatible with a blind owner.
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 05:49 pm (UTC)
but why can't a person make their own decisions if their guide is a human? when i guide my friend around i don't do anything he doesn't ask me not to do, i just answer him when he asks if there is anything in his way and what his surrounding are when he asks. i don't see how having a human guide doesn't let people not make their own decisions. they still have the power of making their own decisions. when i say human guide i mean someone who doesn't do anything different from what a guide dog does as far as guiding people goes.

i do acknowledge though that companion animals who are trained as guides benefits both the companion animal as well as the disabled person. it's great for both involved.
ladyvoldything 2nd-Dec-2012 05:54 pm (UTC)
because humans have biases that animals don't, and not all human guides would be nice and perfect about it. and there's just a massive difference in empowerment between having to ask someone your size or bigger than you, vs having a dog just kind of steer you. idk. it's a different experience, and everyone with a guide dog reports improvement in their satisfaction with daily life. it's independence, it's not having to rely on the guide's schedule - because to be humane, the guide would need overtime and sleeping time and weekends and vacation pay and a life of their own. a dog is with you at all times. a human isn't.
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 06:00 pm (UTC)
it's independence, it's not having to rely on the guide's schedule - because to be humane, the guide would need overtime and sleeping time and weekends and vacation pay and a life of their own. a dog is with you at all times. a human isn't.

this is really true and i didn't take it into consideration before you pointed it out. i think what you just said is the crux for why we have to have guide companion animals. you really have opened my eyes to many more reasons for the need of and reliance upon companion animals. i'm eternally grateful for this conversation tbh now i feel a lot more comfortable about guide animals since a guide robot isn't a reality for some people. i think this is why socialism needs to happen more so people don't have to worry about how much the robot would cost, and people need to stop not listening to the voice of the disabled with their concerns over dignity, respect, and autonomy and help create choices for ALL disabled people, including disabled people who are vegan. until then, there has to be some exceptions as you've pointed out :)
This page was loaded May 18th 2013, 5:29 pm GMT.