ONTD

3:07 am - 12/02/2012

Vegan Anne Hathaway flaunts 25-lb weight loss

Actress Anne Hathaway, who lost 25 pounds on a crash diet for the film, "Les Misérables," looks sporty and sassy in the January 2013 issue of Glamour.





The slender 5-foot-8 Anne dons a white tank top and black underwear that accentuate her lean thighs. Hathaway, 30, admitted she essentially starved herself to look the part of the emaciated Fantine in the tragedy, "Les Misérables."

"I had to be obsessive about it; the idea was to look near death," Hathaway told Vogue. "Looking back on the whole experience, it was definitely a little nuts. It was definitely a break with reality, but I think that’s who Fantine is anyway."

Anne lost 10 pounds before shooting began, and then lost another 15 pounds during a two-week break in filming by eating only two thin squares of dried oatmeal paste a day. Hathaway's competitive personality enabled her to stick to her extreme low-calorie diet.

"I like to fight for a job," she says. "You feel like you've emerged from the scrap, and you're like, 'OK, this one's mine. Did it. Done.' "

Transforming herself physically is nothing new for the dedicated Anne, who worked out five days a week to play Catwoman in "The Dark Knight Rises." In addition to gym workouts, Hathaway underwent stunt training, did strength exercises as well as 90 minutes of dance every day.

Anne, who switched to a vegan diet while training for "The Dark Knight Rises," has really embraced the plant-based eating plan.

"I don't go the soy-meat route; I have a really plant-based diet," she said. "So I wind up cooking at home a lot. Kale is amazing. Spelt [a kind of wheat] pasta is amazing. I can't do the white-flour stuff. It makes me really ill."


source
derrobitch 2nd-Dec-2012 05:14 pm (UTC)
the only reason why people "lose their dignity" by not having a person around you is because our society VIEWS that as something to be ashamed of.

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

how the fuck don't you understand why a disabled person - a human fucking being - would want autonomy and independence like any other regular person? you are fucking clueless. this is not a societal issue, this is a human need, how does someone not grasp this? keep fighting for the rights~ of animals because you clearly have no clue when it comes to your fellow man.
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 05:20 pm (UTC)
how does a human being using a guide not allow them autonomy? lol if a blind person has a guide that doesn't mean they don't have the right to autonomy wtf
ladyvoldything 2nd-Dec-2012 05:24 pm (UTC)
so did your mom mix the formula with lead paint or what
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 05:30 pm (UTC)
instead of being rude why don't you help me understand how having a human guide doesn't let a person have the right to autonomy? if a person is blind or disabled and needs an animal to help guide them, i don't see how that prevents them from autonomy? they still have every right to their own body
ladyvoldything 2nd-Dec-2012 05:34 pm (UTC)
you know what? we're trying. you refuse to step out of your own head and put yourself in somebody else's.

imagine being dependent. really imagine it. close your eyes and try to go to the bathroom and imagine having to have someone lead you around for the rest of your life. people in wheelchairs get talked down to and treated like they're retarded and blind people get patronized, and if you don't think that a human carer would patronize them and wind up having people talk to THEM instead of the blind person, you're kidding yourself. people would ask the carer questions, they'd defer to the guide, the guide would step in for them because humans are flawed and often paternalistic, and the blind person would be constantly in a state of childish dependence. it's infantilizing. it's a creepy BDSM ageplay scenario without the safeword.

dignity is so, so important. having a human lead you around- that's the ultimate in debasement. with a dog, the person makes their own decisions, with nobody to defer to. nobody else to consult. a grown-ass adult gets to keep being a grown-ass adult without needing say-so.
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 05:39 pm (UTC)
i agree with you that this is what would sadly happen to people right now if every guide dog was suddenly a guide human tomorrow. but why can't we change how people view guides and how people view disabled people in general? what if we made sure that human guides exercised in a way similar to that of a guide dog, where they only serve as a way of helping the disabled person getting around? what if we taught human guides to never ever step in for people, only when its neccesary? what if this happened, then there wouldn't be a problem with human guides. i'm listening to you and i see directly where you are coming from given the sad state of our society right now and the treatment of the disabled.
ladyvoldything 2nd-Dec-2012 05:42 pm (UTC)
but that would debase the dignity of the guide person, too.

stop looking at it as how things SHOULD be, or talking about how people SHOULD see things. just see them for what they are. you'd feel horrible if you needed a babysitter for the rest of your life. you would, wouldn't you? when my sister had partial paralysis last year, the trauma of her husband having to clean her was worse than the pain. that's how humans are. that's how we always will be. we value our dignity, that's an essential part of the human spirit.

empowering the disabled is all about that- power. giving them their own power, not interfering elves to lead them around on leashes. guide animals do that: they not only let the person make their own choices, but it gives them a companion with all the soul-feeding benefits of owning a pet. it lets them own a pet in a way the might not be able to do normally, and god, i wouldn't begrudge that to anyone. hell, a dog would need special training to be compatible with a blind owner.
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 05:49 pm (UTC)
but why can't a person make their own decisions if their guide is a human? when i guide my friend around i don't do anything he doesn't ask me not to do, i just answer him when he asks if there is anything in his way and what his surrounding are when he asks. i don't see how having a human guide doesn't let people not make their own decisions. they still have the power of making their own decisions. when i say human guide i mean someone who doesn't do anything different from what a guide dog does as far as guiding people goes.

i do acknowledge though that companion animals who are trained as guides benefits both the companion animal as well as the disabled person. it's great for both involved.
ladyvoldything 2nd-Dec-2012 05:54 pm (UTC)
because humans have biases that animals don't, and not all human guides would be nice and perfect about it. and there's just a massive difference in empowerment between having to ask someone your size or bigger than you, vs having a dog just kind of steer you. idk. it's a different experience, and everyone with a guide dog reports improvement in their satisfaction with daily life. it's independence, it's not having to rely on the guide's schedule - because to be humane, the guide would need overtime and sleeping time and weekends and vacation pay and a life of their own. a dog is with you at all times. a human isn't.
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 06:00 pm (UTC)
it's independence, it's not having to rely on the guide's schedule - because to be humane, the guide would need overtime and sleeping time and weekends and vacation pay and a life of their own. a dog is with you at all times. a human isn't.

this is really true and i didn't take it into consideration before you pointed it out. i think what you just said is the crux for why we have to have guide companion animals. you really have opened my eyes to many more reasons for the need of and reliance upon companion animals. i'm eternally grateful for this conversation tbh now i feel a lot more comfortable about guide animals since a guide robot isn't a reality for some people. i think this is why socialism needs to happen more so people don't have to worry about how much the robot would cost, and people need to stop not listening to the voice of the disabled with their concerns over dignity, respect, and autonomy and help create choices for ALL disabled people, including disabled people who are vegan. until then, there has to be some exceptions as you've pointed out :)
nemo_011 2nd-Dec-2012 08:13 pm (UTC)
mte, they sound crazy
bittermunchkin 2nd-Dec-2012 06:00 pm (UTC)
Um, as someone who is independently employed to aid a blind person, and has been for years, I can tell you that relying solely on humans would definitely affect their autonomy. Blind people are not all wealthy enough to pay people a high enough wage to offer incentive for them to dedicate their lives to helping them. The man I work for is better off than most, and lucky in that he doesn't have to work, but he still has problems with turn over from the people he hires. I'm a college student, and I was hired with the awareness that I wouldn't be available for winter and summer periods, and yet he begs me not to go on breaks (in which I visit my family) because he doesn't think he can rely on the other people he's hired. Long story short, relying on humans certainly does affect their autonomy.
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 06:02 pm (UTC)
i didn't take this into consideration until now. thank you for pointing this very important reason for an exception for guide animals.
happythree 2nd-Dec-2012 06:16 pm (UTC)
Thank you for your willingness to listen.

Also, it's hard in a country where the mere suggestion of regulation in an industry pisses about 50% of the population off to advocate for changes to how we treat animals, so I give you props for doing so. I wish the country could have a modern The Jungle moment, but we've become so systemically detached from the production of our food that it's difficult to imagine how that could happen.
alouds 2nd-Dec-2012 06:22 pm (UTC)
yup. animal rights is a rly big thing that is involved in so much more than food. i just wish suffering of them was lessened as much as possible, thats all. different things like guide animals, therapy animals for the epileptic, etc are things with very different ethical situations than just the diet of animal products or the use of fur for fashion etc. animal welfare is really important bc there HAS to be exceptions, as people have pointed out to me which i agree with now that is has been introduced to me.
This page was loaded May 18th 2013, 9:55 pm GMT.