ONTD

8:49 pm - 11/21/2012

Lindsay Lohan Challenges David Gregory On Public's Right To Know About Petraeus Affair

NBC's David Gregory on Tuesday appeared to make the case that the public really didn't need to know about former CIA Director David Petraeus's affair with biographer Paula Broadwell.

Appearing with him on NBC's Tonight Show was Lindsay Lohan who surprisingly challenged the Meet the Press host on this point (video follows with transcript and commentary):



"DAVID GREGORY: I was surprised. I mean, he’s, look, he’s an amazing military leader. That’s not going to change. This was a terrible mistake. You know, it's one of these situations where do we really want to know all of this?
LINDSAY LOHAN: Yes.
GREGORY: And I think a lot of people are, yeah, right, you said…
LOHAN: Yes,
GREGORY: ...do we really want to know these things?
LOHAN: Yes, please.
GREGORY: You do? Okay.
LOHAN: I'd like to know."

It's interesting how when a sex scandal rocks a Democratic White House, the press get squeamish about reporting it.

Remember that Newsweek initially refused to publish former President Bill Clinton's sexual escapades with Monica Lewinsky.

By contrast, Republican scandals get an astonishing amount of attention.

In 2006, the media turned an unknown Florida Congressman's electronic messages to male pages into the poster child of the so-called "Republican Culture of Corruption."

As such, it makes you wonder if Gregory would be asking if we needed to know about the Petraeus affair if the former CIA director had been serving a Republican president.

Source

"Liz & Dick", starring Lindsay Lohan as Elizabeth Taylor, premieres Sunday, November 25, at 9 PM on Lifetime.
Page 4 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
so_chic_doll 21st-Nov-2012 10:20 pm (UTC)
I loved the joke on SNL about how cheaters always get caught-- even the head of the CIA did. lol
celtic_thistle 21st-Nov-2012 10:23 pm (UTC)
lmao what the fuck is wrong with her
tlcspice 21st-Nov-2012 10:23 pm (UTC)
lmao flop post babe
saltireflower 21st-Nov-2012 10:27 pm (UTC)
By contrast, Republican scandals get an astonishing amount of attention.

Oh give me a break, these guys don't make it a habit to resign or have their careers utterly ruined. And they're from the party of family values and personal responsibility.

Arnold Schwarzenegger's affairs were kept secret, so he never had to pay for anything. David Vitter resigned only to end up in the senate. It took John Ensign nearly two years to resign. Rudi Giuliani, Newt Gingrich. etc.

Meanwhile people have barely heard a peep from Edwards, Weiner, Jim McGreevey, or Spitzer. Don't even get me started on the impeachment.
anabanana0714 23rd-Nov-2012 10:35 am (UTC)
While I definitely agree, the thing with those particular dems is that their circumstances in their scandals were AWFUL. I mean, cheating is cheating and it sucks, but John Edwards had a dying wife, Weiner's wife was pregnant, McGreevey didn't come out to his wife until just before the press conference, and Spitzer committed an actual crime. And though the impeachment sucks, Clinton didn't resign, nor did he decide to lay low following the scandal. He is still very, very active in his political life. The rest just resigned and went off to live a quiet life.
zizy 21st-Nov-2012 10:28 pm (UTC)
The difference is that the Republican party likes to tout itself as the party of "family values", liberals are more about separating a politician's personal & public lives (within reason). As long as national security isn't being compromised or taxpayer money isn't being mishandled to facilitate an affair then who the fuck cares?

I won't lie, it kind of makes me happy when a Republican gets caught up in a sex scandal because of how hypocritical conservatives are.
anabanana0714 23rd-Nov-2012 10:36 am (UTC)
Even better when it's a gay sex scandal, like Larry Craig. Delicious.
ritzyroxie 21st-Nov-2012 10:31 pm (UTC)
Lilo draggedT ChimpBoy all the way to hell and back, omw
evett 21st-Nov-2012 10:39 pm (UTC)
"I move forward and I change. Life's too short not to. If people would just leave my personal life alone – because it's really not that interesting – then I could land a great role. But all the sicko fans and the noise is so distracting." -Lindsay Lohan



So she wants the media to stay out of her life but wants to know all the details about Gen. Petraeus. hmmm
lindsayportugal 21st-Nov-2012 10:44 pm (UTC)
she's obviously just as important/influential/etc but he's the director of the CIA though... lol
kwikimart 21st-Nov-2012 10:47 pm (UTC)
....

kwikimart 21st-Nov-2012 10:46 pm (UTC)
It's like Frost Vs. Nixon all over again only more intense.
cammiec 21st-Nov-2012 11:10 pm (UTC)
"Yes." - Lohan, Lindsay
chimbleysweep 21st-Nov-2012 11:31 pm (UTC)
The publication of the Clinton affair in Newsweek made my entire fifth grade year. That was the biggest and best playground gossip on the planet. In an age where we did not all have the internet, that was our porn.
backincharge 21st-Nov-2012 11:39 pm (UTC)
"By contrast, Republican scandals get an astonishing amount of attention."

Petraeus is a republican so this point is invalid. And why would they hide it under Obama's account? It's not like he had anything to do with Petraes cheating on his wife.
ostia_pyrosis 21st-Nov-2012 11:55 pm (UTC)
Says the girl who complains about people wanting to know about her life, okay
lindsayportugal 22nd-Nov-2012 12:06 am (UTC)
but she's simply a celebrity, it's not her job to be a role model of trust
ostia_pyrosis 22nd-Nov-2012 12:09 am (UTC)
True, but she's the one striving to be Oscar-worthy and a serious actress rather than a celebrity, so its a little bit of a double standard going on
happybunny_v 22nd-Nov-2012 12:20 am (UTC)
lol at this article
prophecypro 22nd-Nov-2012 05:12 am (UTC)
Politically responsible Lohan y'all
keep_touching 22nd-Nov-2012 05:46 am (UTC)
she was at the table next to me at dinner tonight. she looked amazing (and sober)
Page 4 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 10:28 am GMT.