ONTD

9:46 am - 11/21/2012

What happened to Christina Aguilera?

Photobucket

It was widely recognized that Christina Aguilera needed her latest album Lotus to be a hit after the lukewarm reception to 2010's Bionic.

That's not to say her previous record was a complete disaster - it charted in the top ten almost everywhere - but a glance at its sales (less than 1 million) and critics' reviews revealed a star that had suddenly fallen out of favor.

As such, the performance of Lotus seemed crucial to get the singer back on track, so entering in the UK charts last week at 28 with less than 10,000 copies sold and debuting with her lowest first-week sales ever in the US will surely be a major blow to her camp.

But how and why has this happened to Christina Aguilera? We've examined some possible reasons below.

She doesn't have the right material.
The biggest complaint about Bionic was the lack of obvious chart hits as well as its constant genre-hopping, which included everything from R&B and hip-hop to electro-rock and synthpop. She attempted to rectify this on Lotus by trailing it with 'Your Body'; a thumping, anthemic pop number helmed by Max Martin that sounded like an easy hit, but it still failed to connect to a wider audience (its highest peak was in the UK at number 16).



The album itself has a similar overall sound and includes duets with fellow Voice coaches Cee Lo Green and Blake Shelton as well as an impressive list of songwriters and producers, which on paper should have proved more popular with the music-buying masses.

She's better known as a TV star than a popstar.
This could be a fairly sizeable factor, given the huge popularity of The Voice in the US. While many artists use these sorts of shows as a promotional tool for their music, Christina's major TV interviews just weeks (even days) before the album's release often focused more around the series than the album. Her decision to leave the show after its current run could be a reminder to everyone that she in fact a popstar, or it could simply see her presence diminish even further.

She didn't promote Lotus enough.
An easy excuse often wheeled out by superfans, but in this case the argument holds weight. Christina's own push behind the album appeared to be minimal, with a few last-minute appearances in the US and zero promotion across Europe. This in part explains its dismal showing in the UK (it entered at number 28 with sales of 9,422 and has since dropped to 102 in today's midweek chart), but even Britney Spears - who didn't push Femme Fatale abroad - managed to reach number eight with over 30,000 sales in March last year.

She's unlikeable.
It's a popular X Factor-ism, but Christina isn't exactly known for being personable. Unfortunately, most people like "nice" popstars these days, which is probably half the reason why Olly Murs is number one at the moment.

So what should she do next?
We think the main problem with Christina Aguilera is that in 2002's Stripped, she created an unbeatable album. An album that was too good. Follow-up Back to Basics was a smart move as it zagged where its former zigged, while Lotus wheels out the same "be yourself" message we've heard from every other female artist in the last two years. Christina is best when she commits to a complete image overhaul, which is what we'd suggest when/if there is an album six.


source
nekonekox 21st-Nov-2012 04:48 pm (UTC)
Which is really sad, because it shows that people will eat shit that is likeable rather than something with more substance. That is not to say that Christina Aguilera is the quintessential example of fine art or good taste, but her voice is unique, and with the right material and performance she should be preferred over the rest. That's basically what Adele did, but I think that the basic difference is in that Adele doesn't try to be a pop star, which is what Aguilera desperately craves.
thisoneputa 21st-Nov-2012 04:49 pm (UTC)
mte
on_my_raider 21st-Nov-2012 05:14 pm (UTC)
not really, it can be both ways. when you have a mother who is stuffing herself into slutty outfits she shouldn't be wearing while SCREAMING EVERY SONG AT THE TOP OF HER LUNGS IN A WAY THAT DOESNT EVEN SOUND GOOD in odd performance setups that people don't connect to, you're not going to connect with anyone
lovebum4life 21st-Nov-2012 05:36 pm (UTC)
mother stuffing herself in slutty outfits? Nothin wrong with that Britney and Madonna do that lol
simplychristina 21st-Nov-2012 05:47 pm (UTC)
Because mothers can't express their sexuality? Riiight.
nekonekox 21st-Nov-2012 05:52 pm (UTC)
I discussed the vocal part, and while she doesn't sound good because she oversings, it's clear that she has an exceptional voice and is extremely talented at using it. What you refer to as "sounding bad" is her personal taste, with which I do not agree. She has shown that by singing without trying to outperform herself she sounds awesome. As for her dress code, I don't agree with it either but it's hardly something she should be ashamed of or be shamed for. The woman in your icon has done much worse.

I think the real problem is her character and attitude, but I can relate to her in that.
evalize 21st-Nov-2012 06:03 pm (UTC)
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!

Take SEVERAL seats, bb, and rethink what you just typed.
xliquidskiesx 21st-Nov-2012 11:13 pm (UTC)
ikr? lol
pixiegerms 21st-Nov-2012 10:32 pm (UTC)
because she loses the acceptability to dress in a certain way because she became a mother? sit down.
saltonmycuts 21st-Nov-2012 10:51 pm (UTC)
LOL seriously? and you have a Britney icon i mean come on. reread what you just wrote.
xliquidskiesx 21st-Nov-2012 11:13 pm (UTC)
oh the irony
winninglondon 22nd-Nov-2012 03:59 am (UTC)
when you have a mother who is stuffing herself into slutty outfits she shouldn't be wearing

Like Britney?

And her live performances are another issue, her vocals on her albums and singles are adequate and those still aren't performing so your theory makes no sense. Try again
montygail 21st-Nov-2012 06:57 pm (UTC)
See, I think her voice is a major part of her problem. She might be able to really belt, but she sounds horrible while doing it these days. She has power but it's not enjoyable to listen to at all. I feel like she doesn't know what the hell she's doing with her own vocal chords.

Also. I don't see what she's done that is so revolutionary since Stripped. And that wasn't much beyond rebelling against her image for the sake of a rebel image.

I don't know, for me, everything she does seems contrived.
vervain 21st-Nov-2012 07:07 pm (UTC)
I loved that Save Me From Myself she released off Back to basics which she didn't give those power vocals on. it was beautiful.
winninglondon 22nd-Nov-2012 04:03 am (UTC)
the basic difference is in that Adele doesn't try to be a pop star, which is what Aguilera desperately craves.

You hit the nail on the head. The public embraced her when she cleaned up her look with B2B and showed growth, but with Bionic and Lotus she took several steps back and started competing with the Lady GaGas and Katy Perrys of the world. That's never really been her market since her debut. Even with Stripped people embraced her because she was the anti Britney -- She was doing something different rather than generic pop music (which is what she's doing now)
This page was loaded May 20th 2013, 4:56 am GMT.