ONTD

3:10 pm - 10/28/2012

Lucky apologizes for awful Britney Spears cover after fan backlash



Despite some questionable behavior in the past, Britney Spears has managed to maintain a remarkably loyal fan base. So loyal, in fact, that an army of her devotees lept to Brit's defense after Lucky magazine's cover shoot with the singer didn't exactly resemble the pop star they know and love.

It's not uncommon for a glossy's cover to receive less-than-stellar reviews, since everyone seems to have their own opinions on what looks best on celebrities. But Lucky received an unusually-fierce backlash from fans accusing the mag of putting an unflattering wig on the "X-Factor" judge and excessive use of retouching. The retaliation method of choice? Twitter.

Brit aficionados took to the social networking site to chastise Lucky for putting the 30-year-old in a "horrendous wig" and making her look unrecognizable. "Did @britneyspears even show up for the photoshoot or did you just photoshop her face on a body[?]" a fan tweeted at the magazine. Ouch!

Unable to ignore the poor reviews on Twitter, Lucky apologized to readers, tweeting, "We're sorry to have let some of you down." Check out the cover in question and Lucky's apology tweet below. Do you think the strong response was merited? soure
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
riookierin 28th-Oct-2012 11:49 pm (UTC)
Good. That cover was fucking hideous.
mikeblitzz 28th-Oct-2012 11:50 pm (UTC)
oh hold up lemme tweet them some SHIT
idealfacade 28th-Oct-2012 11:50 pm (UTC)
i honestly don't think it looks that bad. maybe its because i've seen too many of her candid pictures...
gerrycurls 29th-Oct-2012 12:16 am (UTC)
sad but true.
getbacknow 29th-Oct-2012 12:28 am (UTC)
mte, that wig looks better than her ratchety extensions and her eyebrows look decent, what more do her stans want
losviluppo 29th-Oct-2012 01:24 am (UTC)
Her eyebrows DO look fantastic. The forehead is what killed me though lol
kindafunnysad 28th-Oct-2012 11:50 pm (UTC)
i don't think it looks that bad compared to what she really looks like nowadays. it's just the hairline almost touching her eyebrows that's fucked up
hardy91 Really? i think shes been looking pretty good rn 29th-Oct-2012 12:01 am (UTC)



revertigo Re: Really? i think shes been looking pretty good rn 29th-Oct-2012 12:04 am (UTC)
the only thing these prove to me, unfortunately, is brit's issues aren't just superficial. but we all know that.
thishollywood Re: Really? i think shes been looking pretty good rn 29th-Oct-2012 12:11 am (UTC)
Lol u can't use a picture of someone wearing large-ish sunglasses as an example if sum1 looks good (gaga stans do this ALL the time). If u can't really see their face it doesn't count!
kindafunnysad Re: Really? i think shes been looking pretty good rn 29th-Oct-2012 12:14 am (UTC)
you know what i mean
hahahey Re: Really? i think shes been looking pretty good rn 29th-Oct-2012 12:18 am (UTC)
nah, she's looking rough. she looks like she's in her 40s
msmandiemitz Re: Really? i think shes been looking pretty good rn 29th-Oct-2012 02:38 am (UTC)
I love that first picture, she looks so pretty in it :)
gaga 28th-Oct-2012 11:51 pm (UTC)
lmfao damn britney stans went in

that being said, she looks awful in this shoot
patiently 28th-Oct-2012 11:51 pm (UTC)
she looks like kim zolciak and teresa giudices's lovechild on that cover.

Edited at 2012-10-28 11:51 pm (UTC)
die2nitelive4ev 28th-Oct-2012 11:52 pm (UTC)
Exact description
heyjuude 29th-Oct-2012 12:01 am (UTC)
omg yes.
dontreadmylj 29th-Oct-2012 12:25 am (UTC)
lmao
losviluppo 29th-Oct-2012 01:25 am (UTC)
Truer words have never been typed
drunkagron 28th-Oct-2012 11:51 pm (UTC)
Lucky should apologize for being a low quality and tacky magazine
roxas39 28th-Oct-2012 11:51 pm (UTC)
They should be blaming Britney
kindafunnysad 28th-Oct-2012 11:52 pm (UTC)
or dakota
heyjuude 29th-Oct-2012 12:00 am (UTC)
not even, I'm not even really a fan and I can see from a mile away this poor girl being a puppet
britneyrocks26 28th-Oct-2012 11:52 pm (UTC)
I saw the outtakes and it didn't look like they did much photoshop at all. It's just the wig, and how they placed it.
xliquidskiesx 29th-Oct-2012 08:32 am (UTC)
Receipts aka a link to the outtakes.
She doesn't look herself in te lucky mag pics. but not only because of the wig. which id unfortunate because she wouldn't need all that photoshop.

Edited at 2012-10-29 08:37 am (UTC)
die2nitelive4ev 28th-Oct-2012 11:53 pm (UTC)
I feel like no one wants to help Britney out and give her a chance. It's like everyone is trying to fuck her up.
artpopart 29th-Oct-2012 01:32 am (UTC)
It's that people don't care.
revertigo 28th-Oct-2012 11:53 pm (UTC)
because britney's hair is so naturally gorgeous and lush? lol....
starchain 28th-Oct-2012 11:56 pm (UTC)
it's more about the face than the hair
judgmental 29th-Oct-2012 12:00 am (UTC)
so they want to see her haggard ass face and then complain they made her look ugly?
revertigo 29th-Oct-2012 12:13 am (UTC)
idk i see comments about the hair
rctshack 29th-Oct-2012 05:28 pm (UTC)
It's the hair... but her hair recently has been great. Look at all the candids in the comments above. They screwed up with the wig and it looks tragic.
pippa_middleton 28th-Oct-2012 11:57 pm (UTC)
If you're a cow looking for some dry, golden grass, then yes
forgethissmile 28th-Oct-2012 11:53 pm (UTC)
Compared to the shoddy photoshop jobs of most magazine covers, this is actually pretty tame. At least she didn't fall into the Uncanny Valley with weirdly smooth/glowing skin and stretched out limbs.
shangman 28th-Oct-2012 11:54 pm (UTC)
They tried to hide her forehead, but her face was proportional before and fucking with that made it look jacked.
egowars 28th-Oct-2012 11:54 pm (UTC)
she looks like someone else in that cover but i cant quite figure out who
likegunfire 28th-Oct-2012 11:55 pm (UTC)
denzel washington
riookierin 28th-Oct-2012 11:56 pm (UTC)
Lmaoooooooooooooo
pippa_middleton 28th-Oct-2012 11:58 pm (UTC)
lol irl
heyjuude 29th-Oct-2012 12:01 am (UTC)
omg lol'd.
superpchan 28th-Oct-2012 11:55 pm (UTC)
Connie Britton?
gee 28th-Oct-2012 11:57 pm (UTC)
She reminds me of a blonde version of the mom from AHS first season lol.
bigbranch 29th-Oct-2012 12:08 am (UTC)
teresa guidice?
violet_crumble9 29th-Oct-2012 12:16 am (UTC)
stacy dash.
yummyhead2toe 29th-Oct-2012 12:20 am (UTC)
Faith Hill.
miniglik 29th-Oct-2012 12:49 am (UTC)
Definitely Faith Hill
pippa_middleton 28th-Oct-2012 11:54 pm (UTC)
Looks better than she does irl
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 12:33 pm GMT.