ONTD

9:57 am - 10/22/2012

'No place in cycling': Lance Armstrong stripped of Tour de France titles



Lance Armstrong is losing the seven cycling titles that made him a legend.
The International Cycling Union announced Monday that Armstrong is being stripped of his Tour de France titles.



Lance Armstrong was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles and banned for life by cycling’s governing body Monday following a report from the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency that accused him of leading a massive doping program on his teams.



UCI President Pat McQuaid announced that the federation accepted the USADA’s report on Armstrong and would not appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

“Lance Armstrong has no place in cycling and he deserves to be forgotten in cycling,” McQuaid said at a news conference. “This is a landmark day for cycling.”

“I was sickened by what I read in the USADA report,” McQuaid added. “It is very difficult to accept and understand that that went on.

“Lance Armstrong deserves to be forgotten in cycling.”

The decision clears the way for Tour de France organizers to officially remove Armstrong’s name from the record books, erasing his consecutive victories from 1999-2005.

Tour director Christian Prudhomme has said the race would go along with whatever cycling’s governing body decides and will have no official winners for those years.

Armstrong’s representatives had no immediate comment.

USADA said Armstrong should be banned and stripped of his Tour titles for “the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program that sport has ever seen” within his U.S. Postal Service and Discovery Channel teams. He also loses all race results achieved since August 1998.

The USADA report said Armstrong and his teams used steroids, the blood booster EPO and blood transfusions. The report included statements from 11 former teammates who testified against Armstrong, including that he pressured them to take banned drugs.

“I was sickened by what I read in the USADA report,” McQuaid said, singling out the testimony of former teammate David Zabriskie. “The story he told of how he was coerced and to some extent forced into doping is just mind boggling.”

Armstrong denies doping, saying he passed hundreds of drug tests. But he chose not to fight USADA in one of the agency’s arbitration hearings, arguing the process was biased against him. USADA’s report, released earlier this month, was aimed at showing why the agency ordered the sanctions against him.

“At the moment Lance Armstrong hasn’t admitted to anything, yet all the evidence is there in this report that he doped,” McQuaid said.

Former Armstrong team director Johan Bruyneel is also facing doping charges, but he is challenging the USADA case in arbitration.

On Sunday, Armstrong greeted about 4,300 cyclists at his Livestrong charity’s fundraiser bike ride in Texas, telling the crowd he’s faced a “very difficult” few weeks.

“I’ve been better, but I’ve also been worse,” Armstrong, a cancer survivor, told the crowd.

While drug use allegations have followed the 41-year-old Armstrong throughout much of his career, the USADA report has badly damaged his reputation. Longtime sponsors Nike, Trek Bicycles and Anheuser-Busch have dropped him, as have other companies, and Armstrong also stepped down last week as chairman of Livestrong, the cancer awareness charity he founded 15 years ago after surviving testicular cancer which spread to his lungs and brain.

Armstrong’s astonishing return from life-threatening illness to the summit of cycling offered an inspirational story that transcended the sport. However, his downfall has ended “one of the most sordid chapters in sports history,” USADA said in its 200-page report published two weeks ago.

Armstrong has consistently argued that the USADA system was rigged against him, calling the agency’s effort a “witch hunt” which pressured witnesses into co-operating.

“It is for Mr. Armstrong to defend himself against such witness statements that he deems to be incorrect. It is not for the UCI to do so,” the governing body said in a statement.

If Armstrong’s Tour victories are not reassigned there would be a hole in the record books, marking a shift from how organizers treated similar cases in the past.

When Alberto Contador was stripped of his 2010 Tour victory for a doping violation, organizers awarded the title to Andy Schleck. In 2006, Oscar Pereiro was awarded the victory after the doping disqualification of American rider Floyd Landis.

USADA also thinks the Tour titles should not be given to other riders who finished on the podium, such was the level of doping during Armstrong’s era.

The agency said 20 of the 21 riders on the podium in the Tour from 1999 through 2005 have been “directly tied to likely doping through admissions, sanctions, public investigations” or other means. It added that of the 45 riders on the podium between 1996 and 2010, 36 were by cyclists “similarly tainted by doping.”

The world’s most famous cyclist could still face further sports sanctions and legal challenges. Armstrong could lose his 2000 Olympic time-trial bronze medal and may be targeted with civil lawsuits from ex-sponsors or even the U.S. government.

McQuaid said the UCI’s board will meet Friday to discuss the OIympic issue and whether to update other race results taking account of Armstrong’s disqualifications.

A so-called “Truth and Reconciliation” commission, which could offer a limited amnesty to riders and officials who confessed to doping practices, will also be discussed, UCI legal adviser Philippe Verbiest said.

In total, 26 people — including 15 riders — testified to USADA that Armstrong and his teams used and trafficked banned substances and routinely used blood transfusions. Among the witnesses were Canadian teammate Michael Barry, loyal sidekick George Hincapie and admitted dopers Tyler Hamilton and Landis.

USADA’s case also implicated Italian sports doctor Michele Ferrari, depicted as the architect of doping programs, and longtime coach and team manager Bruyneel.

Ferrari — who has been targeted in an Italian prosecutor’s probe — and another medical official, Dr. Luis Garcia del Moral, received lifetime bans.

Bruyneel, team doctor Pedro Celaya and trainer Jose “Pepe” Marti opted to take their cases to arbitration with USADA. The agency could call Armstrong as a witness at those hearings.

Bruyneel, a Belgian former Tour de France rider, lost his job last week as manager of the RadioShack-Nissan Trek team which Armstrong helped found to ride for in the 2010 season.



Source
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
soapboxrhetoric 22nd-Oct-2012 02:17 pm (UTC)


Edited at 2012-10-22 02:17 pm (UTC)
junemeaugust 22nd-Oct-2012 08:27 pm (UTC)
IA Ian
pacificway 23rd-Oct-2012 01:04 am (UTC)
omg lol
fatpeopleeatme 22nd-Oct-2012 02:17 pm (UTC)
lmaooooo
skonka 22nd-Oct-2012 02:18 pm (UTC)
The man is a complete disgrace but what's worse is the feble response of the US media and public. This man is a cheat and a catastrophic fraud.
Where's the rebuke? Where's Bob Costas, now is the time for his self-righteousness.
skonka 22nd-Oct-2012 02:23 pm (UTC)
I get you. But the contumely directed at Bonds and Jones and Ben Johnson drapes this muted reaction in a sinister light.
Is it because he was a nice guy to the US media? Because the British media had long branded him as self-obsessed (Not uncommon among athletes, mind.) but also a bully who intimidated the media.
tragickingdomxo 22nd-Oct-2012 02:29 pm (UTC)
Bob Costas is still working out how to ask Michael Phelps to homecoming this year, nothing is going to come from him anytime soon.
mynamehere07 22nd-Oct-2012 02:34 pm (UTC)
FYI, the media is not giving him a free pass in all of this. He's lost most of his endorsement deals, he was forced to step down as the head of Livestrong, and they've been highlighting his arrogance and denial in the face of all the allegations.
smnp this bitch22nd-Oct-2012 03:14 pm (UTC)
as long as there are people who believe(and unfortunalely there are tons of them) in him, he s gonna keep denying it..
shame
anese 22nd-Oct-2012 03:30 pm (UTC)
It may just be me, but I just get the impression that a lot of Americans don't care. We have election stuff going on etc... and when has cycling ever been an important American interest?

(I could be projecting here--but while I was disappointed to find out about this with Armstrong, I didn't really care per say--so yea I probably am projecting)
ayajedi 22nd-Oct-2012 04:54 pm (UTC)
word
fred2265 22nd-Oct-2012 05:12 pm (UTC)
Shameful....
wristtattoos 22nd-Oct-2012 02:19 pm (UTC)
MLB should do this too. any player who uses doping/HGH should be banned for life.


/cue the pressed a-roid stans
brucelynn 22nd-Oct-2012 02:23 pm (UTC)
Iirc Lance tested positive for one test ( correct if I am wrong )

I'm not saying he didn't dope but if you can't prove it how is it fair to strip someone of their titles?
wristtattoos 22nd-Oct-2012 02:24 pm (UTC)
if i remember correctly, there were several people who witnessed him doping?
spiderkelly 22nd-Oct-2012 03:12 pm (UTC)
no gurl. according to the report he tested positive multiple times (he paid off the testers to make them disappear) and was unavailable for two tests which also count as positives.
toilandblood 22nd-Oct-2012 04:02 pm (UTC)
he did but he has/had a lot of power in the cycling world that it's really almost like a mafia and he has the money and the sources to manipulate the tests.
chikntetrazzini 22nd-Oct-2012 05:03 pm (UTC)
His entire team testified against him...
kiki3291 22nd-Oct-2012 02:32 pm (UTC)
That's the one thing that I hate about the MLB. They don't really do anything about it. The 50+ game suspensions are a joke, and it's already public knowledge that a list with more than 100 names exists of players that use(d) HGH.

I shall forever assume that all players do it until the names are released.
brucelynn 22nd-Oct-2012 02:20 pm (UTC)
The whole situation is stupid to me

If people believe he doped that's fine , I don't know if he did

But there was never any proof that he did right? Stripping people of medals and titles without solid proof is problematic tbh
gee 22nd-Oct-2012 02:21 pm (UTC)
I didn't follow the story closely, was there really no proof? I thought they had like witnesses or something.
mi_nion 22nd-Oct-2012 02:30 pm (UTC)
From what I gather he tested positive once, was retested and passed. When he announced he would no longer fight, everyone came out saying they saw it.

I don't care, but the LiveStrong foundation actually has done good things for cancer survivors. I hope it continues.
hearthecity 22nd-Oct-2012 02:22 pm (UTC)
That's what everyone around me is saying, but people online seem convinced he did dope.
anolinde 22nd-Oct-2012 02:23 pm (UTC)
Apparently there was a 1000-page report? But idk if they've ever released the details of that report. I know that post also came on the heels of another post where they didn't have any proof, and a lot of people were pointing out that he's passed every test (including the ones done after the fact). Tbh I could be getting this wrong, since I haven't really been following the case, but it seems weird that ONTD went from defending him to hating him so quickly.
principino 22nd-Oct-2012 02:25 pm (UTC)
Uh. There was so much proof.
mynamehere07 22nd-Oct-2012 02:26 pm (UTC)
I think a lot of people are seeing his refusal to legally fight this as a sign of guilt.

I mean he had been tested all through his career and came up clean for what they were testing for. Unless they saved past samples and tested them now for a list of updated drugs; it would be difficult to prove or disprove at this point.
liebestorys 22nd-Oct-2012 02:31 pm (UTC)
But they have proof.
spiderkelly 22nd-Oct-2012 03:15 pm (UTC)
they have solid proof tho. he's tested positive multiple times, he's dodged tests, he's paid off the testers, etc.

it's all in the report, but if you don't want read the proof, that's another thing entirely.
smnp just read this and read the report22nd-Oct-2012 03:21 pm (UTC)
you really need to read it , it will be cristal clearly
first 1-his doctor named ferrari , worked for one of the scientist who was making test machines and medical procedures,
the riders said while he was making the new tests system he was also teaching them how to avoid testing positive.
lance armostrong had 2 failed tests,one of them he was boosting he and his team had a meeting with the International Cycling Union (UCI) paid them and the test went away.
there are proof UCI did receive the money but they say it was just a contribution to cycling.
also people inside UCI tipped off lance and his team.
today they have new test system and some armstrong s blood samples show that he must have been doing blood transfusions
cos the components of the blood were below human standards
USADA asked to re test specifics armstrong s " old tests" but UCI denied it saying lance has to consent(he didnt )
some of the whistleblowers riders who now openly admitt using drugs never had a positive test /failed test.


Pressure is also mounting on cycling's governing body, the International Cycling Union (UCI), after the sport's leading anti-doping campaigner, David Millar, left, called for the body's honorary president, Hein Verbruggen, to resign in the wake of the Armstrong revelations. Verbruggen was president of the UCI during most of the Armstrong years – quitting his post at the end of 2004 – and as recently as last year insisted that the seven-times Tour de France winner had "never, never, never" engaged in doping. The 71-year-old Dutchman is also a member of the UCI's management committee.

Verbruggen's time at the UCI includes two critical moments. The first was in 2002 when it accepted two donations totalling more than $100,000 from Armstrong, one of which was used to purchase a machine for analysing blood samples. The second was in 2005 when the Dutch lawyer Emile Vrijman was appointed to investigate allegations from the newspaper L'Equipe that EPO had been detected in five urine samples taken from Armstrong during the 1999 Tour when the samples were tested retroactively for scientific purposes.

brbsb 22nd-Oct-2012 06:39 pm (UTC)
There's tons of witnesses and the kind of doping he was doing apparently can't really be detected outside of a super narrow window (like an hour after doing it, I think?). Witnesses testified that they'd purposely find ways to delay tests until they were outside of the window where it could be detected.

Yeah, it's shady to strip the titles without actual scientific proof, but I also feel like you wouldn't have so many people coming forward as witnesses implicating themselves if it wasn't true.
orangemusictrip 23rd-Oct-2012 02:06 pm (UTC)
Well considering everyone in the races he won were doping it is nigh on impossible for him to win clean. U can't beat someone using performance enhancing drugs. Also in this years race which was very strictly controlled the race times were 10+ minutes slower than 10 years ago...

There is tons of proof, you can read the findings and see.
yummyhead2toe 22nd-Oct-2012 02:22 pm (UTC)
Hated that "Livestrong" bracelet trend in high school.
astrologee 22nd-Oct-2012 02:29 pm (UTC)
i have one hanging on my bulletin board, i remember everyone wearing one in middle school
kawaiisis86 22nd-Oct-2012 06:19 pm (UTC)
It was huge when I was in college, I can't lie I def wanted one >< never got one though.
imnotasquirrel 22nd-Oct-2012 02:23 pm (UTC)
i'm more interested in the speedskating shenanigans

will simon cho be banned for life or not.
brucelynn 22nd-Oct-2012 02:27 pm (UTC)
That made me sad but tbh I can't really blame Simon because Speedskating is so corrupt and they often abuse the athletes especially when they are the younger ones. Something similar happened in Korea shortly after the Vancouver games.

I doubt Simon will get banned for life seeing as how there were a number of athletes being abused.
If anything the Coach will go down.
imnotasquirrel 22nd-Oct-2012 02:43 pm (UTC)
but i thought the investigation showed that there wasn't conclusive proof of the coach's abuses. he was forced out, but i don't think he faces any additional punishment?

i'm just interested to see if this tampers down all the talk about the south korean skating team being dirty cheaters, since this latest scandal is coming from the american team. or if it'll just make things worse since the skater and coach involved are of korean descent.

earlier simon was talking about how he wanted to skate in sochi. oh, simon, you incredibly naive dumbass.... even if he doesn't get banned for life, ain't no way that boy's gonna be skating in sochi.
brbsb 22nd-Oct-2012 06:42 pm (UTC)
I don't think he'll get banned for life, but I do think he'll be banned through Sochi, unfortunately. And I am pretty sure his family doesn't have the strongest financial situation, so I'm guessing he'll have to end his career :(
actrisse 22nd-Oct-2012 03:15 pm (UTC)
Wait, what happened with Simon?
empirebird 22nd-Oct-2012 02:23 pm (UTC)
Peasants.
ourferocity 22nd-Oct-2012 02:23 pm (UTC)
"will have no official winners for those years"


lol

cause errrrrbody else was doping as well
larastone 22nd-Oct-2012 02:26 pm (UTC)
mfte
bloody_hell 22nd-Oct-2012 02:31 pm (UTC)
lol yep
lovedhurtlost 22nd-Oct-2012 02:36 pm (UTC)
Exactly.
winonaforever 22nd-Oct-2012 02:37 pm (UTC)
sad tbh
warsawed 22nd-Oct-2012 02:42 pm (UTC)
#oop
m_h_p 22nd-Oct-2012 03:09 pm (UTC)
It's like that Olympic men's 100m final race from the 80s where, if you kicked out all the dopers, the guy who came 4th would have got gold, the guy who came 6th would have got silver, and nobody would have got bronze.
anastrophe 22nd-Oct-2012 04:09 pm (UTC)
'88, right? Don't people refer to that as the dirtiest race ever run? Everyone was up in arms over Ben Johnson, but he was one of how many in that race!
toilandblood 22nd-Oct-2012 04:04 pm (UTC)
really its sad how much doping goes on.. really all the elite cyclists dope.
jsrocks 22nd-Oct-2012 02:23 pm (UTC)
egads Lance
poop_of_death 22nd-Oct-2012 02:38 pm (UTC)
why at first glance did I think your icon was the Bionic cover?
maria0305 22nd-Oct-2012 02:24 pm (UTC)
i need someone to explain to me what the damning insurmountable evidence was, if he's still never failed a drug test...
ourferocity 22nd-Oct-2012 02:29 pm (UTC)
i haven't read 1,000 pages but i know there were things he did that weren't picked up in any sort of test. there was one technique where he would get blood transfusions using his own stored blood.
spiderkelly 22nd-Oct-2012 03:18 pm (UTC)
he failed drug tests. multiple times. he failed to report to testing which register as positive. we didn't know b/c he paid ppl to cover it up.
wits 22nd-Oct-2012 02:25 pm (UTC)
i was talking to an avid cyclist and they said almost EVERYONE at the top of the cycling world dopes and it would be pretty much impossible to get those times or keep up with them without doping in some way, i don't know how true that is though
principino 22nd-Oct-2012 02:27 pm (UTC)
It's absolutely true.
m_h_p 22nd-Oct-2012 03:08 pm (UTC)
Team Sky are making everyone connected to them sign anti-doping pledges and kicking out anyone with a shady past.

I just want my bb Bradley Wiggins to be clean.
lostinshalott 22nd-Oct-2012 06:55 pm (UTC)
same I hope he is.
drop_and_roll 22nd-Oct-2012 09:46 pm (UTC)
Me too!
I did lol at the news that Cavendish was leaving Team Sky came out the day after they announced that everyone had to sign a pledge saying that they never had doped and never would do. I know it's been known for a while that Cav was leaving but I just found the timing of the official announcement to be unfortunate for him (but amusing for me).
biene 22nd-Oct-2012 10:29 pm (UTC)
Wiggins better be clean or ill be crushed
mydearmonte 22nd-Oct-2012 03:41 pm (UTC)
Sorry, that is npt true. I am dating an avid cyclost who has met Lance. He is an asshole btw.
Riders at the top are Not all doping. It is frowned upon, and they will get major shit. A lot of guys work their ass off training, and it kills me to see a guy doping get the win. Also, people have been saying for YEARS that Lance has been doping, this whole shitstorm has been building up for a while in the cycling world. Only now is eveone else getting the news and seem shocked by it.
toilandblood 22nd-Oct-2012 04:05 pm (UTC)
its true. the majority of the top cyclists do dope and even if they didn't to begin with a lot of them are pressured to. it's sad.
vettus 22nd-Oct-2012 02:25 pm (UTC)
Oops. Lol
butt_or_skotch 22nd-Oct-2012 02:26 pm (UTC)
Not that I condone doping, but I wonder how many people could do what he did even if they were on steroids?

And what were his teammates doing while they were watching him inject and then subsequently win time and time again? Why didn't they say anything then? Why not get him out then and give yourself a better chance of winning the title?
gee 22nd-Oct-2012 02:38 pm (UTC)
Is Lance the only one getting in trouble or is everyone being dragged out?
butt_or_skotch 22nd-Oct-2012 02:41 pm (UTC)
Not surprising. i just don't get why they'd want to call out Lance, YEARS LATER, for doing something they were doing as well. It's like, really? Come on.
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 12:11 pm GMT.