ONTD

10:14 pm - 10/04/2012

Sarah Silverman on women and politics, reproductive rights, and Elizabeth Warren.

Yetta Kurland sat down with Sarah Silverman at the Openhouse Gallery in SoHo on September 27, 2012, during a fundraiser for Elizabeth Warren, Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts. Yetta and Sarah discussed women and politics, reproductive rights, and Elizabeth Warren.



Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/yetta/sarah-silverman-on-yetta-_b_1941226.html

-----------------------
The audio sucks a bit, but I thought it was interesting nonetheless.
isntdaveone 5th-Oct-2012 02:25 am (UTC)
lovefast 5th-Oct-2012 02:58 am (UTC)
meeeeeeee too.
roguewave3 5th-Oct-2012 03:31 am (UTC)
Oh my god, they did not....
thewhowhatwhats 5th-Oct-2012 03:36 am (UTC)
smh @ Pocahontas

Don't fight racism with racism.
flvy 5th-Oct-2012 04:12 pm (UTC)
Right? I don't care even if she did lie about it. I'm over it we all know and remember. We don't need to be reminded.
courtkneee1 5th-Oct-2012 02:38 am (UTC)
She's so awesome
sexi_panda 5th-Oct-2012 02:48 am (UTC)
This post deserves way more comments than this.
hopelessoptmist 5th-Oct-2012 02:53 am (UTC)
So what's with this hoopla about Warren falsely claiming to be Native American? I'm pretty disappointed in her if that's true.
lokiyan 5th-Oct-2012 03:15 am (UTC)
Basically, Scott Brown's accusation was that Elizabeth Warren can't be Native American because "look at her".
chimbleysweep 5th-Oct-2012 03:17 am (UTC)
I hate him.
saintssin 5th-Oct-2012 04:23 am (UTC)
People really suck.

I'm biracial and people seem so puzzled when I mention being part black/white. It's almost as though I have to repeat myself until they get the message. And then they're even more puzzled.
hopelessoptmist 5th-Oct-2012 04:34 am (UTC)
Scott Brown wasn't the first person to point it out though, it was several Native American groups, IIRC.
mcwicca 5th-Oct-2012 04:39 am (UTC)
yeah I believe the nearest Cherokee tribe was kind of pissed at her
lokiyan 5th-Oct-2012 04:44 am (UTC)
Pretty much what the other commenters described: they wanted her to provide official document proving her ancestry, but for a lot of people in the U.S., that doesn't exist. But she did hear all her life that she was part Native American and seems to genuinely believe it.

It depends on how you qualify race, I guess, and who gets to decide what someone is/isn't.

All that aside, it's ridiculous that this is the offensive Brown has decided to go on. It's not like there aren't real problems to talk about.
hopelessoptmist 5th-Oct-2012 04:51 am (UTC)
Even in her family anecdotes though, it was her great-great-great grandmother who was part NA. That literally makes her 1/64th Native American, at best. People on ONTD have shitted on celebrities for randomly bragging about being NA in interviews, it seems weird to give her a pass on it just because a Republican candidate is doing the criticizing.


Edited at 2012-10-05 04:52 am (UTC)
lokiyan 5th-Oct-2012 05:00 am (UTC)
Well, I can't (obviously) speak for ONTD nor can I speak for the Native American community, but I personally think that race, as a social construct, is more complicated than blood percentages. As a person of color, I think self-identification is important so if someone tells me they identify with a certain race, I give them the benefit of the doubt, no questions asked.
hopelessoptmist 5th-Oct-2012 05:17 am (UTC)
Hmm, well I do think there are grounds to question her intention in this case. This wasn't just self-identification in a general way. She marked herself as Native-American on an official document, AND as a result upset the very minority group that she's claiming to be a part of. She's defended her heritage by saying she has "high cheekbones"...I dunno what that smacks of, (exoticism, perhaps) but it seems distasteful to me.
lokiyan 5th-Oct-2012 05:23 am (UTC)
I think that depends on context though. I have distant relatives who are a fraction Chinese and I will defend their right to self-identify as whatever the hell they like whenever they like until my face turns blue. Unfortunately, I have had to in the past from people who are Chinese themselves, especially people of Chinese nationality. I don't think, however, that that should discounts my relatives' experiences and their choices to identify as Asian/Caucasian. And yea, sometimes they'll point out their eye shape as a really specific Asian feature that they've inherited. In that context, it's not so much exoticism, but a very physical way in which they've connected to a part of their culture all their lives.
kamikashi 5th-Oct-2012 03:21 am (UTC)
basically her family had told her stories about having native american ancestors so then scott brown has accused her of faking her native american heritage to get an advantage for getting better schooling/jobs (using affirmative action, checking that minority box when applying to stuff). theres no records to show that she actually did so to any of her schools/jobs, but she did list herself as minority in some sort of law directory? (i sorta forget on that one so you can look it up). but warren also doesnt have the exact documentation showing native american lineage, just her families stories.
tbh i think some people do have native american ancestry and just dont know it. a lot of people dont trace their ancestry and find out later in life they are part xxxxx.

edit: oh yeah and what the other commenter said. she cant be native american because she doesnt look native american enough.

Edited at 2012-10-05 03:23 am (UTC)
hopelessoptmist 5th-Oct-2012 04:45 am (UTC)
But it was several Native American groups who first pointed it out, not Scott Brown. Tbh, I haven't been following the Massachusetts Senate race so I hadn't even realized he had been using that argument. These NA groups were upset with her for essentially appropriating their struggle to take advantage of the school system. At best, it was perhaps her great-great-great grandmother who was part cherokee, making less than 1/32nd NA. So yeah, those claims aren't exactly off base.

I just find it funny that ONTD shits on Johnny Depp when he does the same thing, but when it's Warren it's all good.
kamikashi 5th-Oct-2012 05:31 am (UTC)
the thing is i dont think she is appropriating their struggle to take advantage of the school system? like, i dont think any of her school records show that. i havent read everything on this but i believe thats why some people dont care about it. cuz she actually hasnt really used it to work the system.
mcwicca 5th-Oct-2012 04:37 am (UTC)
tbqh both her and Scott Brown are wrong in one way or another

As the other commenter said, Elizabeth Warren grew up hearing stories about her Native American ancestry from her mother. I believe the claim is that her great-great-grandmother was Cherokee. Regardless of whether or not that is true (there is no evidence to confirm or deny it), she really shouldn't have ever claimed to be Native American on an official form. It's fine if that is culturally important to her, and there is no evidence that she was given any advantage because of it, but it's really not okay for people with an extremely small percentage of NA heritage to officially identify as NA. So many people have a NA ancestor somewhere in the past that when almost exclusively white people do this is reeks of trying desperately to label themselves as something "exotic" and is kind of trivializing to NA identity. I am not saying that this was her intent, nor do I pretend to be an authority on what constitutes a NA identity, but that is what I have gathered. Moreover, it's generally accepted that you need to be 1/8th NA to be really classified as NA, and for legal recognition you must have some affiliation with a tribe, which Warren does not.

THAT SAID, the way this has been dragged into the forefront of the campaign is not okay. Brown's comment about Warren not being a minority based on the way she looks was inappropriate and irresponsible, as is the entire Republican party's treatment of the issue. They are bringing up something that has no bearing on the issues or the race in hopes of discrediting Warren, presumably because they can't do that with her actual policies. Conservative pundits here also have a field day with it and call Warren all sorts of racist names to make fun of her "fake" heritage.

tl;dr:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Edited at 2012-10-05 04:41 am (UTC)
hopelessoptmist 5th-Oct-2012 05:06 am (UTC)
I first read about Warren's Native American claims several months ago, so I hadn't even realized that Brown has been using it as a point of debate until a few ONTD comments ago. Yeah, using that as political ammunition is incredibly dumb.

Apparently the claim is that her great-great-great grandmother is PART cherokee, which effectively makes her 1/64th Cherokee, at best, lol. I just find it funny that ONTD will call out Gaga, etc. or what have you for appropriation when she wears a burqa. Meanwhile, when Warren appropriates another minorities struggle, in the most literal sense of the word, it's given a pass just because a Republican candidate is doing the criticizing, albeit in a distasteful way.
mcwicca 5th-Oct-2012 05:30 am (UTC)
Yeah that's ONTD for you. I mean I'm still going to vote for her but that doesn't mean I don't have a problem with Warren's claim.
flvy 5th-Oct-2012 04:16 pm (UTC)
This comment is amazing.

The Democrate stans are annoying the shit out of me.
tlcspice 5th-Oct-2012 02:56 am (UTC)
Love love love Sarah ! <3
gnarlsbarkley 5th-Oct-2012 03:18 am (UTC)
my queen <3
ballooon 5th-Oct-2012 03:23 am (UTC)
love her, from what i've heard she's rly sweet irl too
prophecypro 5th-Oct-2012 06:33 am (UTC)
Seems much more grounded irl
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 1:30 am GMT.