ONTD

10:34 pm - 10/01/2012

Artists threaten to withhold future releases if planned sell-off of Parlophone goes ahead.

Strike? There's no other way: Blur lead pop protest over sale of label

Artists threaten to withhold future releases if planned sell-off of Parlophone goes ahead. Adam Sherwin reports



Some of Britain's top-selling musicians may withhold their future albums in protest against being treated as "assets" in the forced sale of their label, The Independent can disclose.

Blur are leading a revolt against the sell-off of Parlophone, part of the EMI group, which has been the launchpad for dozens of artists from The Beatles to Coldplay. Universal Music, the French-owned firm, has been ordered to shed Parlophone as part of its £1.2bn takeover of EMI.

The move has unsettled artists on Parlophone's roster, which also includes Kylie Minogue and Tinie Tempah. The stars, many of whom are worth millions of pounds, say they object to being treated as pawns in a corporate takeover.

Blur have joined forces with their label-mates to collectively lobby potential bidders for the company, calling on them to place the interests of artists first.

Stars not happy with the new owners could withhold future releases, effectively going on "strike".

Dave Rowntree, drummer with Blur, told The Independent: "Artists are the only people currently being left out of the conversation, which is unfortunate. If the staff at the label are unhappy with the new arrangements they are free to leave, but the artists are not."

Rowntree is backing negotiations through the Featured Artists Coalition (FAC), a pop stars "trade union", supported by Lily Allen and Radiohead.

"The FAC was formed by musicians who were fed up with the industry taking decisions without considering the impact it would have on those who actually make the music," he said. "The FAC and the Music Managers Forum are looking to engage with Parlophone to see how we can help."

The drummer, 48, now a qualified solicitor, said he once advised the head of EMI how to prevent illegal file-sharing, which has decimated music sales, from destroying the company's revenues.

"Years later, while the label I grew up working with is being broken up and flogged off, Apple have made a gazillion dollars using the business model I explained. I'm left in the completely unsatisfying position of being able to say, 'I told you so'.  (Dave Rowntree, inventor of iTunes?)

The great music sell-off includes artists earning "steady revenues" such as Pink Floyd, Cliff Richard, Tina Turner, Kate Bush, David Bowie, Duran Duran and Kraftwerk. Universal gets to keep The Beatles catalogue, which is excluded from the Parlophone sale, as well as Katy Perry, Robbie Williams and The Beach Boys.

Possible bidders for EMI's assets include Warner Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment and BMG Rights Management, a joint venture between a private equity group and the German media conglomerate Bertelsmann.

Jon Webster, chief executive of the Music Managers Forum, which represents managers and artists, said: "We are holding discussions with potential bidders. We want them to understand that the future of the record business is about genuine partnership with artists and that works best when their views are involved and they are not just traded as assets. But financiers often just say 'what are you talking about?'"

He added: "Artists have withheld releases to get better terms if they are powerful enough. They can sit down with the new owners and get a solution. It's the smaller acts that suffer most because they have no bargaining power."

Sir George Martin, the legendary producer who became Parlophone manager in 1955 and gave The Beatles their big break in 1962, is also believed to have concerns over the future of the label.
 
Source


misscb 1st-Oct-2012 08:41 pm (UTC)
Alex's fringe looks extra good here
thewunderland 1st-Oct-2012 08:43 pm (UTC)
misscb 1st-Oct-2012 08:55 pm (UTC)
such a handsome man
ourferocity 1st-Oct-2012 08:43 pm (UTC)
no1curr

record labels are a thing of the past.
maryhurt 1st-Oct-2012 08:52 pm (UTC)
u should bold some of this
thewunderland 1st-Oct-2012 09:04 pm (UTC)
Thought it was short enough for most people. But I did it anyway, knowing how ONTD can be.
misscb 1st-Oct-2012 08:57 pm (UTC)
they've been recording some stuff earlier this year, so it's not unlikely
thewunderland 1st-Oct-2012 09:03 pm (UTC)
Seeing how good their B-sides were/are, they certainly must have some better stuff to release.


Edited at 2012-10-01 09:18 pm (UTC)
toilandblood 1st-Oct-2012 09:08 pm (UTC)
i hope so that would be amazing
prophecypro 1st-Oct-2012 09:03 pm (UTC)
Thats a lot of surprising label love.
theartistprince 1st-Oct-2012 09:05 pm (UTC)
here for Blur tbh

dying for them to just get back together already.
cansuralama 1st-Oct-2012 09:17 pm (UTC)
babies
phookie 1st-Oct-2012 09:18 pm (UTC)
blurrrr
thewunderland 1st-Oct-2012 09:19 pm (UTC)
Anyone ever listened to the pre-blur music?
Like Circus



Sounds so different from Blur
thrillho 1st-Oct-2012 11:10 pm (UTC)
tbh, sounds like every silly blur bside to me. Damon's singing style is the only bit that's significantly different.
ayajedi 1st-Oct-2012 09:25 pm (UTC)
Good Luck with that. None of them (with the exception of The Beatles) have the worldwide musical clout to influence a deal of this nature in today's music world. If this was U2 of a few years ago then maybe but Blur does not have that legacy or musical clout
mynamehere07 1st-Oct-2012 10:13 pm (UTC)
Basically this. If the label gets bought out by a large corporation, they aren't going to give two shits about most of these artists, and give a chuckle when they go on strike.
ayajedi 2nd-Oct-2012 12:08 am (UTC)
exactly. The market especially in the UK is not what is was 15, 20 or 25 years ago, they have to realize this.
caligari1 2nd-Oct-2012 04:36 am (UTC)
A label is a large corporation, at least in this case... And, anyway, EMI was bought by another label.

But your point stands. I doubt Universal will feel terribly threatened by a Blur strike.
betentacled 1st-Oct-2012 09:54 pm (UTC)
thetxbelle 1st-Oct-2012 09:57 pm (UTC)
speaking of Blur I was cleaning out my house and found all these zines and books from my obsessive britpop years, I wonder if any are worth money...I doubt it :(
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
thewunderland 1st-Oct-2012 10:02 pm (UTC)
I think you could make some money out of it especially now. I checked ebay once for the blurbs (before the blur21 box came out) and people were asking a lot of money for the blurbs and regular magazines with blur on the cover.
thetxbelle 1st-Oct-2012 11:24 pm (UTC)
Thanks, I'll look into ebay!
infinite93 1st-Oct-2012 11:05 pm (UTC)
What Blur stuff do you have?
thetxbelle 1st-Oct-2012 11:15 pm (UTC)
A few tshirts, one of which I had a cartoon of them from NME I had put on it by Kinkos (lol) so I don't think that's worth anything, the other shirts are from Park Life and Great Escape but I'm keeping those.

I have all the records, that greatest hits DVD of their videos, autographs and photo of Alex James and Damon Albarn, those books you can see in the photo and an old episode of 120 Minutes where they debuted the Universal.

mynamehere07 1st-Oct-2012 10:02 pm (UTC)
It's a noble gesture, but it could backfire hardcore on them. They would still be under contract, regardless of who currently "owns" the label. If they decided to go ahead with the "no new music" plan, couldn't the label sue them for violating the terms of their contract?

But it is really sad that 95% of all musicians really have no control over their own creations.
thewunderland 1st-Oct-2012 10:07 pm (UTC)
I wonder about that too. How much bargaining power do the bigger artists even have in this case.

I'm glad they're making an issue out of this, though.
sonja_76 1st-Oct-2012 10:45 pm (UTC)
The sale of Parlophone is a stipulation for the sale of EMI to Universal Music to go through. If the artists 'strike', Parlophone's worth decreases to a point where it's just not interesting for potential buyers. The back catalogue alone isn't valuable enough, so no buyers, no merger.

I'm sad to see EMI go. It's been here since 1897 and now it is just going to vanish. A lot of people are going to lose their jobs, artists are losing their home and going to be 'handled' by new people who don't have any connection to their music and past.
mistyraven 1st-Oct-2012 10:30 pm (UTC)
"Artists are the only people currently being left out of the conversation, which is unfortunate. If the staff at the label are unhappy with the new arrangements they are free to leave, but the artists are not."

That's bullshit :/ I feel like it should at the very least be required to give them a chance to leave if they disagree with what's going on
caligari1 2nd-Oct-2012 04:38 am (UTC)
The artists are also free to leave, if their contracts are up. David Bowie did just that last year, when the sale was first announced.

And the staff aren't really free to leave, insofar as most of them aren't rich, and need jobs, and the economy sucks (oh, and also most of them will get laid off, most likely). Smh at Dave saying that, tbh, he is normally very sensible.
mistyraven 2nd-Oct-2012 11:17 am (UTC)
Yeah, I figured that about the staff, which is just depressing and makes it worse tbh :/ And with the artists, Idk, I feel like this should count as a change in their contract or something but I guess that depends what changes the new folks in charge make.

I'm generally all "fuck the record labels" but sadly going independent isn't the most feasible option for most artists (yet)
This page was loaded May 25th 2013, 9:57 am GMT.