ONTD

10:04 pm - 09/28/2012

Dolce & Gabbana Defend Their Controversial Earrings


Original ONTD Thread

There’s no question that Dolce & Gabbana’s Spring 2013 collection has caused quite a stir–and not in a good way.

Soon after images of the collection began circulating on the internet–particularly close-up ones of the earrings at left–several news sources criticized the designers for using imagery, which Refinery29 called, “cartoonish, debasing, subaltern [and] blatantly exploitative.”

Now Dolce & Gabbana has finally responded to the criticism, in a somewhat roundabout way, by posting an article on their website Swide.com, which explains the historical and cultural context of the figures, typically called “blackamoors.” “The head is inspired by Moorish features,” it reads. “Moorish is a term used to define many peoples throughout history…In Sicily’s case it defines the conquerors of Sicily [from 827 to 902 AD.]”



It goes on to explain that “these beautiful artifacts” are typically made out of a glazed ceramic, called Maiolica, which has deep historical meaning in Italy, and that they are in fact very common in homes, hotels, and restaurants in Sicily–a city that continues to inspire the designers.

Somewhat bizarrely, the post also describes a legend that is associated with the popularity of the blackamoor design, which describes a young woman cutting off the head of her former Moor lover and using it as a vase.

There’s no doubt that blackamoor imagery certainly has a unique and interesting cultural history–particularly in Sicily–but whether or not that context makes the designs any less offensive remains to be seen–a fact which Dolce & Gabbana probably could have been more sensitive to. However, it should be noted, the designers are not the only fashion VIPs to embrace blackamoor jewelry. In her 1983 autobiography, called D.V., Diana Vreeland wrote, “Blackamoors have been commemorated, in jewelry, in Russia, Venice, very eighteenth and nineteenth century…I’m told it’s not in good taste to wear blackamoors anymore, but I think I’ll revive them.”




   Definition: blackamoor (plural blackamoors)
  1. (degrading) A person with dark skin, especially (but not necessarily) one from northern Africa
  2. a blackamoor slave, a blackamoor servant; and hence any slave, servant, inferior, or child
  3. (heraldry) a stylized Negro, Argent, three blackamoors' heads couped sable, capped or, fretty gules.


Fastionista Source
Page 1 of 8
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] >>
whitegirlmob 29th-Sep-2012 03:08 am (UTC)
I honestly laughed so hard when I first saw these, out of sheer shock.

But now I think they're cute :/
misoras 29th-Sep-2012 03:34 am (UTC)
you do the laughing out of shock thing too

i don't a
whitegirlmob 29th-Sep-2012 07:06 am (UTC)
I do, I do. It gets you into trouble a lot, doesn't it?
cricketgrl 29th-Sep-2012 01:40 pm (UTC)
I honestly thought they were cute the first time I saw them too. I love the entire theme tbh.
helders 29th-Sep-2012 03:27 am (UTC)
only people who aren't affected by the imagery.
save_my_heart 29th-Sep-2012 03:37 am (UTC)
I agree.
cossard 29th-Sep-2012 04:16 am (UTC)
no.

Edited at 2012-09-29 04:55 am (UTC)
mysticmaestoso 29th-Sep-2012 04:33 am (UTC)
If they were white people.

Edited at 2012-09-29 05:13 am (UTC)
kapuki234 29th-Sep-2012 04:37 am (UTC)
if you're a dumbass.
silly_izzy_me 29th-Sep-2012 04:38 am (UTC)
they'd be interesting for their historical meaning but it ends there
mistyraven 29th-Sep-2012 05:18 am (UTC)
Gonna hop in the line of people who don't agree. It's one thing to see some racist vintage thing and wonder about its history and how it came to be, it's another to take that racist vintage thing and wear it as an accessory because it's some ~cute oldtimey bauble~

Just because it wasn't considered offensive when it was made doesn't mean it's not offensive today
sweet_honesty 29th-Sep-2012 05:49 am (UTC)
I am one of those vintage people who find things made in the past, like inhumane fur or imagery like these earings, fascinating because they speak for a time when people were ignorant. I, however, find such things appropriate for a museum, where we can learn from past mistakes, and not on a runway, which is intended to show case present fashions. Last I checked, racism has no place in the present and that's why I feel it has no place in a fashion show.
ericasays 29th-Sep-2012 03:09 am (UTC)
my mom has one of those dolls in her basement. i was fascinated by it when i was a kid.
imnotasquirrel 29th-Sep-2012 03:09 am (UTC)
Diana Vreeland wrote, “Blackamoors have been commemorated, in jewelry, in Russia, Venice, very eighteenth and nineteenth century…I’m told it’s not in good taste to wear blackamoors anymore, but I think I’ll revive them.”

well, bully for you, diana vreeland.
ericasays 29th-Sep-2012 03:11 am (UTC)
"you know, someone suggested to me that this might be construed as racist... but i'm not offended by it so i think i'll just go ahead as planned"
chimbleysweep 29th-Sep-2012 03:11 am (UTC)
Why stop there!! Minstrel shows are due for a comeback. I nominate Amanda Palmer to lead us there.
imnotasquirrel 29th-Sep-2012 03:12 am (UTC)
oh god, don't give her any ideas.
stormer1_1 29th-Sep-2012 03:32 am (UTC)
She'd do it too.
lestat 29th-Sep-2012 03:35 am (UTC)
oh god she would tho
misssugarpink 29th-Sep-2012 04:10 am (UTC)
She would. That pain the ass. LORDT I hate her.
xevochic 29th-Sep-2012 07:29 am (UTC)
Grrrrrl, you know Minstrel shows never went away.
wigsnatcher 29th-Sep-2012 03:33 am (UTC)
omg your icon

lol i thought you were tyleroakley come back from the grave etc
mementox 29th-Sep-2012 04:16 am (UTC)
This reminded me so much of Clerks 2 when he's gonna "bring back" the term porch monkey

Randal: Well,I still don't think porch monkey should be considered a racial term. I mean, I've always used it to describe lazy people, not lazy black people! I think if we really tried, we could re-claim it, and save it.
Dante:It can't be saved, Randal! The sole purpose for its creation, the only reason it exists in the first place, is to disparage an entire race! And even if it could be saved, you can't save it because you're not black!
Randal:Well listen to you! Telling me I can't do something because of the color of my skin! You're the racist! I'm taking it back, you watch!
roxania 29th-Sep-2012 09:43 am (UTC)
she's so freaking dumb!
isntdaveone 29th-Sep-2012 03:10 am (UTC)
i think they're ok.
mysticmaestoso 29th-Sep-2012 05:14 am (UTC)
Like it's up for debate.
hoodoo 29th-Sep-2012 03:10 am (UTC)
so fucking awful on so many levels.
genbu_no_miko24 29th-Sep-2012 03:10 am (UTC)
biktur 29th-Sep-2012 03:39 am (UTC)
that gif! my favorite part of the movie
genbu_no_miko24 29th-Sep-2012 03:49 am (UTC)
:DDDD

Raúl Juliá is everything in these films, and the best Gomez Addams ever!
megisthesex 29th-Sep-2012 03:54 am (UTC)
hahaha fuck yes
goldenlockets 29th-Sep-2012 02:54 pm (UTC)
lmao best movie ever
bluekrinkle 29th-Sep-2012 09:47 am (UTC)
Dammit, I can't think clearly when I see this man!
forkmeup 29th-Sep-2012 03:11 am (UTC)
Photobucket
crazyventures 29th-Sep-2012 03:11 am (UTC)
Fucking Christ
mirlos 29th-Sep-2012 03:11 am (UTC)
oh ginta, honey

but this is sooo wrong
courtkneee1 29th-Sep-2012 03:15 am (UTC)
ikr
carryyourheart 29th-Sep-2012 03:17 am (UTC)
qt icon
mirlos 29th-Sep-2012 03:21 am (UTC)
thx
monaes 29th-Sep-2012 03:12 am (UTC)
this triflin situation rn
brucelynn 29th-Sep-2012 03:42 am (UTC)
You are one of my favs <3
monaes 29th-Sep-2012 03:48 am (UTC)
omg bless
thishollywood 29th-Sep-2012 03:13 am (UTC)
has sum1 mentioned white ppl yet?
thishollywood 29th-Sep-2012 03:22 am (UTC)
omg NO
butt_or_skotch 29th-Sep-2012 03:13 am (UTC)
The head is inspired by Moorish features,” it reads. “Moorish is a term used to define many peoples throughout history…In Sicily’s case it defines the conquerors of Sicily [from 827 to 902 AD.]

That's like saying "faggot" is ok because from the years 1843-1871 it was used to describe a bundle of sticks, so now it's time for a revival.

Right.Okay.

When you have to pull out obscure history it's time to let your argument go.

Edited at 2012-09-29 03:15 am (UTC)
tobiveil12 29th-Sep-2012 04:10 am (UTC)
that's actually not quite true, so people who say that are wrong. Faggot was always for gay people. when they would burn people and the fire was dying out, due to not enough Sticks they would through in gay people as if they were so less than like a bundle of sticks
underdog_ontop 29th-Sep-2012 04:48 am (UTC)
so gay people=flammable?
blueburndown 29th-Sep-2012 05:17 am (UTC)
No.
Also that makes no sense anyway, people are terrible kindling. That's why they used 'sticks' to burn people in the first place instead of just lighting them on fire.
yeats 29th-Sep-2012 04:29 am (UTC)
"moors" by itself isn't an offensive term. it just describes a group of people. i guess by mentioning the conquest of sicily, d&g are trying to argue that moors are part of italian history, which is true, but it's bullshit to say that because there were moors in italy and maybe they were represented in traditional italian artwork, those depictions weren't racist as fuck.

"blackamoors," btw, which is a term they also use, is a super fucked up european way of describing black people by assuming they were muslims.
flightbyzephyr 29th-Sep-2012 10:42 am (UTC)
Actually the word faggot is still used to mean a meat dish here in the UK. It's made out of offal and other meat cuttings.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faggot_(food)

The more you know I guess.
ohhhlife 29th-Sep-2012 01:26 pm (UTC)
O_o Moorish isn't an offensive term. It's even an architectural style.
gingey123 29th-Sep-2012 02:34 pm (UTC)
I'm not in favour of the fashion show, but I'm from sicily and it's really not obscure history - you can find "moorish" souvenirs in pretty much every tourist shop (which is a bit fucked up in itself tbh)

Edited at 2012-09-29 02:37 pm (UTC)
powerbottom 29th-Sep-2012 03:14 am (UTC)
Abraham did not die for this shit.
genbu_no_miko24 29th-Sep-2012 03:16 am (UTC)
lol irl at your comment and icon xD
thishollywood 29th-Sep-2012 03:17 am (UTC)
p sure lincoln was a racist
powerbottom 29th-Sep-2012 03:22 am (UTC)
His weave was on point though, we can't deny that.
tobiveil12 29th-Sep-2012 04:12 am (UTC)
really, it's pretty well known that he never owned slaves. While he started the war to punish the Southern states, and bring them back to Union he saw how the slaves were treated. And said all people were made free and equal. So I don't know
myhipusername 29th-Sep-2012 04:19 am (UTC)
how was he a racist omg dont ruin him for me hes my favorite president
soul_amazinn 29th-Sep-2012 04:33 am (UTC)
Not saying it was right but I'm pretty sure all white people who lived in his time were racist or at least had racist thoughts. It just seems normal for him to have had prejudice views towards blacks.
kapuki234 29th-Sep-2012 04:38 am (UTC)
he was. the civil war wasn't started due to slavery btw.
cerseilannister 29th-Sep-2012 03:19 am (UTC)
lol
abcdlovelife 29th-Sep-2012 03:20 am (UTC)
omg lmao
__nocturna 29th-Sep-2012 03:21 am (UTC)
abe looks cute with pink tips
vampireweekend 29th-Sep-2012 03:22 am (UTC)
omg
emo_isoverused 29th-Sep-2012 03:24 am (UTC)
omg lol
_xxtom 29th-Sep-2012 03:25 am (UTC)
dying rn
treradical 29th-Sep-2012 03:33 am (UTC)
lmao fuck
helders 29th-Sep-2012 03:33 am (UTC)
lmao
judgmental 29th-Sep-2012 03:37 am (UTC)
lmaoooo


flawless username imo
piratesswoop 29th-Sep-2012 04:00 am (UTC)
nicki minaj wishes she could look as good as the great empancipater

bow tbh
arielcharming 29th-Sep-2012 04:28 am (UTC)
loved everything about this thread
trex_in_boots 29th-Sep-2012 05:53 am (UTC)
i'm more mesmerized by your icon than anything else.
bienenkiste 29th-Sep-2012 09:28 am (UTC)
LMAO
toilandblood 29th-Sep-2012 02:49 pm (UTC)
omg that icon hahaha
mellarks 29th-Sep-2012 03:14 am (UTC)
Oh ffs.
foreignhorsie 29th-Sep-2012 02:49 pm (UTC)
true comment.
Page 1 of 8
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] >>
This page was loaded May 25th 2013, 12:28 pm GMT.