ONTD

7:17 pm - 09/17/2012

Elizabeth Hurley's Bikini Line For Young Girls Called 'Disturbing' And 'Inappropriate'


Actress Elizabeth Hurley calls her line of swimwear for girls "fun" on her website. But parents along with a child protection charity in the U.K. have had a different reaction -- they're accusing Hurley and her brand of sexualizing young girls.



"It is very disturbing to see some inappropriate items in this swimwear range," Claude Knight, the director of the charity Kidscape told the Daily Mail.

Knight points out pieces like the "Mini Cha Cha Bikini," an animal-print two-piece for girls under 8 and the "Collete Bikini," a suit that is held together by a gold ring and is meant specifically "for girls [ages 8-13] who want to look grown up." According to the company's website, "This bikini looks fab with our cheetah ruffled skirt."

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Siobhan Freegard, founder of the community Netmums told the Daily Mail that she knows "a number of mothers who are concerned about the sexualization of their children and would be horrified by their daughters dressing like mini-strippers."

And, their concerns are validated by science. A recent study found that girls as young as 6 think of themselves as sex objects and want to be considered sexy. In an earlier study, Psychologists named clothing as a factor that encourages these youngsters to objectify themselves. This research was particularly disturbing given that "almost a third of girls' clothing for sale at 15 major retailers [had] sexualizing characteristics."

Knight told Sky News that Hurley shouldn't take all of the blame now. Rather, the fashion industry should stop making clothes for kids that are so adult-like.

Jen M.L., a mother of two who blogs at "People I Want To Punch In The Throat" agrees on that front. In a HuffPost blog, Jen says she is "horrified" by clothing selections when she takes her 4-year-old daughter shopping. She recounts a specific Easter shopping trip when "there were several dresses that looked like they should come with a complimentary pole and hooker heels!" But, Jen doesn't blame the industry entirely. She also writes that consumers -- parents specifically -- should stop buying and supporting the production of such items. "If we'd just stop buying this misogynistic whore-wear maybe companies would stop trying to sell it to us."

With regard to Hurley's line, a spokesperson told the Daily Mail that the collection has sold "extremely well." He added, "Most of our customers are repeat customers who report that their kids adore the designs."

Source - Huff Post & Daily Mail

Fun Fact: Charlie Sheen once had a fashion line for kids called Sheen Kids.



executivehpfan 18th-Sep-2012 12:43 am (UTC)
Ew, Elizabeth Hurley.

I don't see why people feel the need to put somebody who hasn't even gone through puberty yet in a bikini.
expromqueen 18th-Sep-2012 12:47 am (UTC)
in the last post about this topic there were mothers who shared that it's just easier for ur baby to be in a two-piece instead of one (like when u have to change their diaper)...makes sense to me. but i don't have children so what do i know
executivehpfan 18th-Sep-2012 12:50 am (UTC)
lol I don't have kids either, so idk about ~swimwear logistics for kids.

The idea of two-pieces on kids isn't even really that jarring, but when they're made to look like they belong on adults...that's when I bridle.
judgmental 18th-Sep-2012 01:05 am (UTC)
you can still have a two piece that is not a bikini tho
expromqueen 18th-Sep-2012 01:09 am (UTC)
u mean like a tankini? cause i don't see the difference between a bikini and tankini, tbh...slightly more coverage w/ the second, but not enough to keep a pedo from pedding
d00ditsemily 18th-Sep-2012 01:13 am (UTC)
Not putting your kid into a bikini isn't about worry about a pedophile going after your kid. Tankinis give way more than 'slightly' more coverage. Almost bikinis aren't that great especially when it comes to skin exposure to the sun even with sunscreen.
expromqueen 18th-Sep-2012 01:15 am (UTC)
well i live in texas where most babies only get a diaper (it's fucking hot here!)...so a bikini is more coverage than most babies around here get lol i've never heard anyone rage against baby bikinis outside of ontd, tbh. but, again, i don't have babies, i don't like them, and i certainly don't (usually) seek out discussion regarding them
peachiekene 18th-Sep-2012 01:32 am (UTC)
I have a daughter and I can vouch for that. The 2 pieces that bother me are the ones where the top actually looks like a bra or a string top.
I don't even have an issue with her wearing an (appropriate) 2 piece now that she's older (6), simply because it's a pain in the ass to go to the bathroom wearing a 1 piece. I have always preferred 2 pieces for that reason.
She chose her swimsuit this year and was very specific that she wanted a one piece. -She's had 2 pieces up until then for the easier bathroom factor. She's more in control of her bodily functions now, so she got to choose.
annablume80 18th-Sep-2012 06:32 am (UTC)
It would be even easier to just have them wear bottoms at that age. It´s not like there's anything to cover up there, when they're that young. It's what most people round here do (and what my parents did), I'm from Europe though. ;)
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 7:38 pm GMT.