ONTD

7:17 pm - 09/17/2012

Elizabeth Hurley's Bikini Line For Young Girls Called 'Disturbing' And 'Inappropriate'


Actress Elizabeth Hurley calls her line of swimwear for girls "fun" on her website. But parents along with a child protection charity in the U.K. have had a different reaction -- they're accusing Hurley and her brand of sexualizing young girls.

Read more...Collapse )
Page 6 of 7
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>
delleve 18th-Sep-2012 02:13 am (UTC)
I think what makes these odd is just how small/skimpy they are. Especially the one on the right, like, why.
bostongirl2003 18th-Sep-2012 02:15 am (UTC)
I think the one on the right also has weird embellishments that just aren't necessary for a kid's swimsuit. There's nothing about that suit that is practical.
bprorsum 18th-Sep-2012 02:39 am (UTC)
Whatever, I think it's fine.

If you don't want your children wearing them, don't buy them.
trinimacphisto 18th-Sep-2012 02:58 am (UTC)
It's completely normal for kids to wear bikinis here. And if you think about it it's smarter, cause a bikini fits for longer than a one piece.

I think if kids are getting "sexualized" you need to work on your fucked up brain. Not everything is about sex.

Of course my bikinis when I was a kid has bumble bees and little flowers, no leopard prints.
lilako 18th-Sep-2012 03:13 am (UTC)
This!
icameinyoursoup 18th-Sep-2012 08:13 am (UTC)
"I think if kids are getting "sexualized" you need to work on your fucked up brain. Not everything is about sex."

That's really naive. In terms of fashion design, the cut and embellishments on the clothes are supposed to be sexy. The last one is cut in a way that creates the illusion of a womanly figure, and the company even sells it for little girls who want to feel grown up. The first one has tie strings on it, which are probably going to be a hassle for kids, and are put on adult bikinis to make it a sexually enticing "easy access" garment. Of course there are one and two-piece swimwear that are meant to be innocent, but these swimsuits are designed with the intent of making a kid look and feel like a sexually mature grown up.

It's fucked up that people have been socialized to think a company making products like these for children is normal. There are padded bras and thongs for girls at this age group too, so maybe this stuff doesn't seem as bad. Being aware that children have sexuality created for them by outside forces isn't the same thing as viewing them as desirable sexual objects. Women are sexualized from cradle to grave, and people should protect young girls from that instead getting offended that this topic is brought up to begin with.
d00ditsemily 18th-Sep-2012 11:53 am (UTC)
preach it
la_magdalena 18th-Sep-2012 07:29 pm (UTC)
Genuine curiosity: Would you say it's worse if children ran around without swimsuits?
lilako 18th-Sep-2012 03:12 am (UTC)
There is nothing wrong with this. And the girl on the left is all of four years old - it would be fine if she didn't wear a top at all to the beach. She's a young child - there's nothing for her to cover! It's like a baby wearing a diaper.

And as thebebz said on the first page, "seriously though if you look at a little girl in a cute pink bikini and think ~disturbing~ you are the one with the problem."
hardcoreninja11 18th-Sep-2012 03:22 am (UTC)
At that age what kid would even want to wear a bikini? I hated them. I was all for stylish one-pieces and having them keep me snug.
gillianinoz 18th-Sep-2012 03:38 am (UTC)
There's so much Sunsafe advertsing here in Austraila that you rarely see babies and little kids at the pool or the beach without long-sleeved sun shirts.

Slip Slop Slap! Do you have that in other countries?

(slip on a shirt, slop on sunscreen and slap on a hat)



loveumbrella 18th-Sep-2012 10:08 am (UTC)
Yeah I often see small children wearing t-shirts when swimming, which is smart because of their sensitive skin.
johnjie 18th-Sep-2012 10:51 am (UTC)
I said the exact same thing in my comment - everyone I see at e beach is in long sleeved shirts and shorts

And oh god that song is such an ear worm
prophecypro 18th-Sep-2012 03:43 am (UTC)
All this well, but Im just here to say Im impressed with how hot Liz Hurley still looks
ohbubbajoan 18th-Sep-2012 03:45 am (UTC)
they are just ugly.
atheistkathleen 18th-Sep-2012 04:31 am (UTC)
Whatever Clueless
wicky_wicky 18th-Sep-2012 05:00 am (UTC)
lol this post is ridiculous... the issue here is people see skin and they think sex, EVEN ON A CHILD. how fucked up is that?

even as an adult a bikini does not have to = sexual. they're just practical, cute, and tanlines suck. who are all these beached whales running around in one pieces until they're trying to get lucky?

no one would ever accuse a man wearing swim shorts of various lengths as trying to ~be sexy~ and attracting attention to his crotch.
d00ditsemily 18th-Sep-2012 11:54 am (UTC)
why are we worrying about small children's tanlines?
wicky_wicky 18th-Sep-2012 05:32 pm (UTC)
lol i was talking about why people wear bikinis that show more skin in response to the people who say bikinis are ~worn to be sexy and draw attention to the ass/boobs~ not little kids

Edited at 2012-09-18 05:39 pm (UTC)
runnerlevelred 18th-Sep-2012 06:00 am (UTC)
"whore-wear"

Cannot get over this!</p>

testdrivegirl 18th-Sep-2012 06:02 am (UTC)
Jesus Christ at "misogynistic whore wear"

Do they not see the hypocrisy
jeffreybeaumont 18th-Sep-2012 06:35 am (UTC)
"A recent study found that girls as young as 6 think of themselves as sex objects and want to be considered sexy."

but women have their first sexual peak around that age... just most aren't really aware of it going on or able to identify it as a sexual peak. a lot of super young girls do weird little sexual things with their girl friends and by themselves because of this. i also think they don't really know what they mean when they say those things, my friends and i used to talk about wanting to have sex before we knew what sex was.
viivi 18th-Sep-2012 04:23 pm (UTC)
At 6, children are selfish. They should be selfish. That's part of their brain developing.

Exploring and learning about your body at 6 is great. Exploring and learning about your friend's bodies at 6 is also pretty normal.

The language of the article is vague, but wanting other people to consider you to be "sexy" at 6 is not the same as learning about your body. It should be self-interested, completely self absorbed, it should have nothing to do with other people's judgment of your body, or how that judgement affects how you see your body. You're still learning what your body means to YOU.

I don't think the article is saying little girls are playing doctor at age 6, as most children do, I think they're saying that little girls are realizing there are expectations on their bodies and they want to meet those expectations to be good, pretty, desirable, etc. From what I've seen, I agree, as I've seen girls as young as 8, 9, 10 with full fledged eating disorders.
jeffreybeaumont 18th-Sep-2012 06:37 am (UTC)
also i used to hang out outside topless up through when i was like 6 if i didn't have a shirt to match my dressup outfit of the day. the issue is with those who look at a little girl and see something sexual.
mjspice 18th-Sep-2012 10:15 am (UTC)
Yikes...I don't like her but she has a point. O_O
Page 6 of 7
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>
This page was loaded May 18th 2013, 7:51 pm GMT.