7:17 pm - 09/17/2012
Actress Elizabeth Hurley calls her line of swimwear for girls "fun" on her website. But parents along with a child protection charity in the U.K. have had a different reaction -- they're accusing Hurley and her brand of sexualizing young girls.
"It is very disturbing to see some inappropriate items in this swimwear range," Claude Knight, the director of the charity Kidscape told the Daily Mail.
Knight points out pieces like the "Mini Cha Cha Bikini," an animal-print two-piece for girls under 8 and the "Collete Bikini," a suit that is held together by a gold ring and is meant specifically "for girls [ages 8-13] who want to look grown up." According to the company's website, "This bikini looks fab with our cheetah ruffled skirt."

Siobhan Freegard, founder of the community Netmums told the Daily Mail that she knows "a number of mothers who are concerned about the sexualization of their children and would be horrified by their daughters dressing like mini-strippers."
And, their concerns are validated by science. A recent study found that girls as young as 6 think of themselves as sex objects and want to be considered sexy. In an earlier study, Psychologists named clothing as a factor that encourages these youngsters to objectify themselves. This research was particularly disturbing given that "almost a third of girls' clothing for sale at 15 major retailers [had] sexualizing characteristics."
Knight told Sky News that Hurley shouldn't take all of the blame now. Rather, the fashion industry should stop making clothes for kids that are so adult-like.
Jen M.L., a mother of two who blogs at "People I Want To Punch In The Throat" agrees on that front. In a HuffPost blog, Jen says she is "horrified" by clothing selections when she takes her 4-year-old daughter shopping. She recounts a specific Easter shopping trip when "there were several dresses that looked like they should come with a complimentary pole and hooker heels!" But, Jen doesn't blame the industry entirely. She also writes that consumers -- parents specifically -- should stop buying and supporting the production of such items. "If we'd just stop buying this misogynistic whore-wear maybe companies would stop trying to sell it to us."
With regard to Hurley's line, a spokesperson told the Daily Mail that the collection has sold "extremely well." He added, "Most of our customers are repeat customers who report that their kids adore the designs."
Source - Huff Post & Daily Mail
Fun Fact: Charlie Sheen once had a fashion line for kids called Sheen Kids.

Elizabeth Hurley's Bikini Line For Young Girls Called 'Disturbing' And 'Inappropriate'
Actress Elizabeth Hurley calls her line of swimwear for girls "fun" on her website. But parents along with a child protection charity in the U.K. have had a different reaction -- they're accusing Hurley and her brand of sexualizing young girls.
"It is very disturbing to see some inappropriate items in this swimwear range," Claude Knight, the director of the charity Kidscape told the Daily Mail.
Knight points out pieces like the "Mini Cha Cha Bikini," an animal-print two-piece for girls under 8 and the "Collete Bikini," a suit that is held together by a gold ring and is meant specifically "for girls [ages 8-13] who want to look grown up." According to the company's website, "This bikini looks fab with our cheetah ruffled skirt."

Siobhan Freegard, founder of the community Netmums told the Daily Mail that she knows "a number of mothers who are concerned about the sexualization of their children and would be horrified by their daughters dressing like mini-strippers."
And, their concerns are validated by science. A recent study found that girls as young as 6 think of themselves as sex objects and want to be considered sexy. In an earlier study, Psychologists named clothing as a factor that encourages these youngsters to objectify themselves. This research was particularly disturbing given that "almost a third of girls' clothing for sale at 15 major retailers [had] sexualizing characteristics."
Knight told Sky News that Hurley shouldn't take all of the blame now. Rather, the fashion industry should stop making clothes for kids that are so adult-like.
Jen M.L., a mother of two who blogs at "People I Want To Punch In The Throat" agrees on that front. In a HuffPost blog, Jen says she is "horrified" by clothing selections when she takes her 4-year-old daughter shopping. She recounts a specific Easter shopping trip when "there were several dresses that looked like they should come with a complimentary pole and hooker heels!" But, Jen doesn't blame the industry entirely. She also writes that consumers -- parents specifically -- should stop buying and supporting the production of such items. "If we'd just stop buying this misogynistic whore-wear maybe companies would stop trying to sell it to us."
With regard to Hurley's line, a spokesperson told the Daily Mail that the collection has sold "extremely well." He added, "Most of our customers are repeat customers who report that their kids adore the designs."
Source - Huff Post & Daily Mail
Fun Fact: Charlie Sheen once had a fashion line for kids called Sheen Kids.


people think it's prudish of me, but whatevs.
Hell, I am in my 20's and I still only wear one-piece swimsuits for the reason that I do not want people to look at me as a sexual object.
Edited at 2012-09-18 01:08 am (UTC)
Even though I was all "oh hai overreaction leave the kid alone" with the Jessica Simpson crochet baby bikini incident, and this is therefore hypocritical of me, I think there is a difference between dressing an obvious baby that cannot even walk in fake "adult" clothes and dressing up a little kid in clothes that put them in a narrow box of options. Bikinis to me say "little girl, you must prepare yourself for being a sexy adult" as opposed to "little girl go out and play in the sunshine and swim".
it's extremely disturbing how sexualized children's clothing has become
one-pieces until you're 16 tbh
If they haven't grown the parts, don't fucking put them on display.
Little girls walk around topless in beaches in here and no one says a damn thing.
Sorry, you are completely entitled to your own opinion, I'm just really surprised.
... I hope I won't get a lot for this.
come the fuck on liz hurley
I don't even know what to say to this.
Depressing as hale
Usually this type of thinking is indicative of sexual and physical abuse if young children desire sexiness, which really does beg the question is this then harmful if this line of thinking is normally associated with abuse.
i did an education placement in a grade 5 classroom, and they were starting the puberty unit after i was done and decided to look through some pamphlet/magazines that were in the book nook and were FREAKING OUT. they were making gagging noises and screaming
when they learn what sex really is they're grossed out and don't want to do that
I know this shouldn't surprise me given the current state of affairs, but WHAT THE FUCK?! YOU ARE A BABY!!!
I doubt these kids really understand what sexy is but that they know they are suppose to grow up to be this thing.
they don't realize that the world is full of sick fucks and their young daughters are actually getting people leering at them. They also don't realize that at such a tender age they so easily absorb ideas about sex appeal and the female form.
I'm not saying bikinis should be banned or anything, but I think there's a danger there that makes this worth talking about.
the bikinis, though.... I don't understand the bikinis.
I don't see why people feel the need to put somebody who hasn't even gone through puberty yet in a bikini.
The idea of two-pieces on kids isn't even really that jarring, but when they're made to look like they belong on adults...that's when I bridle.
I don't even have an issue with her wearing an (appropriate) 2 piece now that she's older (6), simply because it's a pain in the ass to go to the bathroom wearing a 1 piece. I have always preferred 2 pieces for that reason.
She chose her swimsuit this year and was very specific that she wanted a one piece. -She's had 2 pieces up until then for the easier bathroom factor. She's more in control of her bodily functions now, so she got to choose.
Does anyone have a link to that study? The sources are HuffPo and Daily Fail and I don't want to believe any of this.
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/07/1
http://www.livescience.com/21609-self-s
so yeah
apparently i knew what sex was. My parents didn't really monitor what I watched on tv but i turned out fine.
just that it felt good
my parents would call it "the thing" if they caught me doing it haha
hell, i didn't even know what a handjob/blowjob was until i was 12/13 and was HORRIFIED at the thought of it
lol this used to happen to me too.
When I look at my young nieces, I want them to be kids and wear kids' clothing. Not string bikinis. They have plenty of time to be adults and deal with adult issues, which come soon enough, later.
Edited at 2012-09-18 01:15 am (UTC)
that's simply how I would do it. And I agree that the dynamic b/w a kid in a bikini being disturbing vs. the the diaper thing....it's odd how one is OK and the other is not.
Usually this type of thinking is indicative of sexual and physical abuse if young children desire sexiness, which really does beg the question is this then harmful if this line of thinking is normally associated with abuse.
A top is meant to hide something because it special or sexual, that triangle top is cut in a way to be "titillating"- no one gets to see it. With regards to no top, it isn't hiding something, some parts aren't being "secretive" by being selectively covered up. I think that's why we find the no top for babies not at all sexual and the triangle top sexual, if that makes sense.
diapers aren't ~alluring
Do you seriously think the people against clothing that sexualizes children are the real perverts?