ONTD

12:40 pm - 09/14/2012

Prince William is About to Fuck People Up



As their goodwill tour of Asia continues, The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are "saddened," angry and considering legal options as French magazine Closer published topless photos of Kate on Thursday.

"We certainly feel a red line's been crossed," a palace source tells PEOPLE of the photos, which were taken during William and Kate's private holiday in France. The source also said that the mood at the palace back home is "one of anger and disbelief."


News of the photos broke as William and Kate – dressed in headscarf – stepped out to visit Malaysia's largest mosque, in central Kuala Lumpur.

A statement from a St. James's Palace spokesman says, "Their Royal Highnesses have been hugely saddened to learn that a French publication and a photographer have invaded their privacy in such a grotesque and totally unjustifiable manner."

"The incident is reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, and all the more upsetting to The Duke and Duchess for being so," the statement continues. "Their Royal Highnesses had every expectation of privacy in the remote house. It is unthinkable that anyone should take such photographs, let alone publish them."


Adding that officials acting on their behalf are considering legal options, the statement says: "The Duke and Duchess remain focused currently on their Tour of Singapore, Malaysia, Solomon Islands and Tuvalu on behalf of HM The Queen."

The couple's next stop is a visit to the rainforests of Borneo.

Source

Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
mydogfred 14th-Sep-2012 04:45 pm (UTC)
shiiiiiit
warsawed 14th-Sep-2012 04:46 pm (UTC)
It isn't against the law if they are on their own private property?
velvetunicorn 14th-Sep-2012 04:54 pm (UTC)
I should think so. I just heard on BBC Radio that France has stricter privacy laws than the UK so I imagine they have a pretty good case.
lcacbc 14th-Sep-2012 05:15 pm (UTC)
Edited: Just realised what you said, never mind lol

Edited at 2012-09-14 05:16 pm (UTC)
thedpmiss 14th-Sep-2012 05:03 pm (UTC)
It should be since the paps had to take this pictures from 1 mile away.

Plus the public outrage over this...
superdogbiter the fight shall begin14th-Sep-2012 04:46 pm (UTC)
Photobucket
nanewt011 14th-Sep-2012 04:47 pm (UTC)
I thought the French had stricter laws for the paps, surprised at this
thedpmiss 14th-Sep-2012 04:51 pm (UTC)
I read somewhere that the punishment is usually a fine. It used to be very high at 100k but it got lowered so paps now pay the fine if the picture is worth the scoop.
nanewt011 14th-Sep-2012 04:53 pm (UTC)
sucks, guess all that shit after Diana's death meant nothing then
saffronshire 14th-Sep-2012 04:56 pm (UTC)
It does. You can't publish pics of the children and it's usually way harder to take pics in the streets, that's why some paparazzi decide to move to the UK or US. But it doesn't mean it doesn't happen at all and even if they have a fine and usually are forced to publish in front page they've been condemned, it's still a good deal for them to publish the pics and then pay the fine.
marvelhill 14th-Sep-2012 07:30 pm (UTC)
ya also i thought i remembered some law about all photos belong to the people in the photos? but maybe that's just french citizens :-/
brucelynn 14th-Sep-2012 04:47 pm (UTC)
Somebody is about to get beheaded
principino 14th-Sep-2012 04:48 pm (UTC)
I hate these parasites but that is a really offensive breach of privacy. And at the end of the day, what I want--the abolition of this archaic, offensive monarchy--won't be furthered by these photos being taken and published.

Edited at 2012-09-14 04:48 pm (UTC)
_phyxsius 14th-Sep-2012 04:50 pm (UTC)
ikr! IA! I hope they better not be published. I mean, the people at the palace are already angered and what more if the photos are published and it reaches the masses, right? Really offensive and these news spy photographer whatever have truly no respect for these royals.
freeze_i_say 14th-Sep-2012 05:29 pm (UTC)
Perfect comment
crystalfairie 14th-Sep-2012 05:45 pm (UTC)
Just out of curiosity, why do you hate them? Why is the monarchy offensive? Just legit asking.
jazzypom Not principino, but15th-Sep-2012 07:57 pm (UTC)
A lot of the Republicans I know do say that having a Monarchy is a drain on tax, and pretty outdated in a modern society. It's one thing having the notion of a King when England was just a collection of parishes, and you needed a King for the subjects to rally around. I can see how the Monarchy would be good for the identity of a nation, until the nation and its people and government forms its own identity and characteristic (see: America getting rid of the King from its shores for an easy example. Or a lot of former colonies in the 1960s declaring their independence).

Monarchy is especially problematic in a society where the idea of meritocracy is pushed and lauded, it can be argued that a Royal family and the attendant nobles makes a mockery of the entire self belief. In addition, it doesn't help that the national anthem of "God Save The Queen" has a line that says, "long she may reign over us" - which is belittling, especially when you compare it to an Anthem or a Pledge of a Republic (I'm using America here, because I am familiar with the anthem) that sings to the spirit of the land and the people that make the land.

I don't sing the National Anthem for this same reason (I'd rather Jerusalem or that Elgin ditty that escapes me - the asking to serve the country with humble pride), because it's really unsettling.

In addition to all of that, you get the feeling that people who are born into the Monarchy... I'd say that Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip (and he's awkward) might be the last generation to understand the concept of service and duty to the position they've been lucky to be born into. Charles and his brothers and his sons seem like spoilt brats. If it's not them wanting to be a tampon in someone's vagina, it's someone pressing his balls against someone's crack. Yeah, they do service in the military, but you get the feeling that it's half hearted (especially for William - he and Kate tend to take off on holiday whenever) which is unfair, in principle, because they are denying someone who could have made a go at it.

Over here in the UK, there's normally the push and pull of the Monarchy in public opinion. The yet to be decided consensus to see if it's outlived its usefulness. When the opinion starts to get gloomy, either a Royal death or a Royal Wedding happens, and you see the pomp and traditions that the family holds and they fall in love again.

So far, the Royal family have been lucky, in terms of Princess Diana's wattage power and her death leaving her sons a bullet proof of goodwill. I think the Duchess of Cambridge benefits from that too, especially considering her worryingly workshy nature (if she's not on holiday, she's going for a blow dry or itching to take another one. Not impressed at all). So now, with these pictures of her baps out, emotion will blur the fact that the Monarchy needs to be looked at. It's just breeding a little crop of entitled brats and royal hanger ons.

To Prince Charles' credit, he's been looking to shrink the core of the important royals, but that's another piece of gossip for another time.

HTH!

Edited at 2012-09-15 08:03 pm (UTC)
bittermunchkin 14th-Sep-2012 05:53 pm (UTC)
Eh, I don't care for the ultra-wealthy in general, but I'm fairly sure that the parasite angle has been debunked.
derezzed 14th-Sep-2012 07:40 pm (UTC)
omg perfect comment, A+
_underwhelmed 15th-Sep-2012 08:23 am (UTC)
i love this + your comma splice comment below lol
_phyxsius 14th-Sep-2012 04:48 pm (UTC)
It just makes me feel sick that whoever that news spy was, cant even leave this royal couple alone.
principino 14th-Sep-2012 04:48 pm (UTC)
comma splice
ani_di_franco 14th-Sep-2012 04:48 pm (UTC)
bodyline 14th-Sep-2012 04:48 pm (UTC)
I like that this was posted before the post with pics.
shangri__la 14th-Sep-2012 04:50 pm (UTC)
LOL I wish the pics had been posted first (if they had to be), then THIS, for sake of continuity.
bodyline 14th-Sep-2012 04:52 pm (UTC)
inorite it bugs the hell out of me when things aren't in sequential order omg
lunarsole 14th-Sep-2012 04:49 pm (UTC)
I just really hate the paparazzi. Damn parasites.
coulson 14th-Sep-2012 04:49 pm (UTC)
take em down will
cleanburritos 14th-Sep-2012 04:50 pm (UTC)
Their Royal Highnesses had every expectation of privacy in the remote house.

Photobucket
nasstasja_sk 14th-Sep-2012 06:38 pm (UTC)
Perfect gif is perfect gif.
candycanegrl 14th-Sep-2012 06:53 pm (UTC)
lol I love this gif
whutness 14th-Sep-2012 07:20 pm (UTC)
perfect gir usage
door 14th-Sep-2012 04:52 pm (UTC)
On the plus side, at least there was no toe-sucking involved.

FERGIE 1.0
bittermunchkin 14th-Sep-2012 05:55 pm (UTC)
That actually makes me sort of jealous. Like I want to see if I could get someone to do that for me (without paying obvs)
door 14th-Sep-2012 08:22 pm (UTC)
The toe-sucking? Hmm. Let me know if you are successful, bb!
fraises 14th-Sep-2012 04:55 pm (UTC)
GOOD. That's so gross and such a huge invasion of privacy holy crap.
handsdowntoo 14th-Sep-2012 04:56 pm (UTC)
Good. I think it's ridiculous that on a remote estate on private property you can be photographed without your consent.

Boobs are boobs but she shouldn't have to alter a private moment with her husband for fear some creeper is 5000 yards away in the bushes.
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 3:11 pm GMT.