ONTD

1:34 pm - 09/12/2012

Is it okay for 25-year-old Allie Hagan to continue exploiting Suri Cruise?



The general press coverage of Suri Cruise is almost always over-the-top and inappropriate for a young child. Weekly tabloids are absolutely shameful when it comes to celeb kids coverage, with features like “Who Wore It Best?” for the pre-school set and analyzing their entire character based on one random paparazzi shot. Apparently, Allie Hagan is attempting to mock that horrible media culture with her blog and new book, “Suri’s Burn Book.”

The shtick has been going for over a year now with Hagan running pictures of random celeb tots and imagined commentary from a caricature of Suri Cruise. Recently, there was a picture of Harper and Victoria Beckham with the caption, “It won’t be long before Harper Beckham’s arms are thicker than her mom’s.”


The blog constantly jokes about Violet Affleck‘s wardrobe, even throwing in some cruelty along with the announcement of the new book. “Proceeds will go to the ‘Help Violet Affleck Dress Better’ Charity Fund. Haha, just kidding. There’s not enough money in the world for that.” Generally, it’s the type of mean-spirited drivel that Perez Hilton would have drawn on pictures before his anti-bullying conversion.

But again, Hagan claims that it’s all meant to highlight our horrible obsession with celebrity kids. She tells The Daily Beast‘s Melissa Leon, “There are so many more celebrities now, and the obsession with the children is a part of that. My goal is to poke fun at that and how weird it is.” She wants to assure everyone that she has standards for where to draw the line. She only uses children whose parents “put them out there.” (Nevermind that she covers Nahla Aubry whose mother Halle Berry is extremely outspoken about the overreach and exploitation of celebrity children’s media coverage.) She recently decided not to run a photo pointing out a young child’s “camel toe.” (But picking on a toddler like Harper Beckham’s weight is completely okay.)

Hagan wants to claim that she’s critiquing tabloid culture, but she’s really just representing the worst of it. Suri Cruise and Violet Affleck and Harper Beckham are all human beings. They’re kids. They might have been born to famous parents, but these are young girls who all have to grow up under constant surveillance and try to build their own identity, their own opinions. Imagining a cruel and snarky personality onto a 6-year-old doesn’t make edgy social commentary. It just makes it’s that much harder for the actual person behind the caricature to break out of a mold that has been set for her.

Hagan’s blog and weekly tabloids feed off of the same curiosity that makes regular people want to feel like they know celebrities. We want to be able to relate to them. But we aren’t supposed to know kids. They aren’t supposed to be playing characters for us to feel connected to, so we’ll see their next movie or buy their next album. These are children. Their personalities will grow and change over the course of time. Suri Cruise could grow up to be a kind and thoughtful girl, but we’ll all still be stuck with this image of a mean-spirited brat thanks to Allie Hagan.

The media culture surrounding celeb kids is horrible, but Suri’s Burn Book doesn’t create a valuable critique of that. It adds to the noise. It’s a despicable attempt to exploit a little girl who never had a choice in who her parents are. And no mother, or decent human being, should be supporting it.


Source

Interesting follow-up to this post. ONTD, how would you feel if someone was writing a blog posing as your child?
Page 1 of 8
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] >>
welurklate 12th-Sep-2012 06:40 pm (UTC)
that lady is only 25? she looks so much older
nutmegdealer 12th-Sep-2012 06:43 pm (UTC)
she looks 40. maybe because she's so pale?
welurklate 12th-Sep-2012 06:44 pm (UTC)
idk her entire face just looks...older. like pushing her 40's older.
tell_a_tale_4_u 12th-Sep-2012 06:52 pm (UTC)
lol i'm pale as hell, 24 and still get asked for id when i buy beer (drinking age is 16). so no. it's not the paleness. it actually makes me look younger/more innocent looking.
evett 12th-Sep-2012 06:56 pm (UTC)
being pale tends to make you look younger. that lady just looks old
zeldafitzgerald 12th-Sep-2012 06:56 pm (UTC)
It's the lack of "baby fat" in the face. It's why older women get fillers.
sweetestbliss1 12th-Sep-2012 06:47 pm (UTC)
that's the first thing I thought too. Maybe if she gained some weight she'd look more her age. She looks kind of scary skinny.
kawaiisis86 12th-Sep-2012 06:47 pm (UTC)
That's what I came in to mention, I thought she was in her 30s and that's me being nice. Damn girl...
lastingchances 12th-Sep-2012 06:48 pm (UTC)
Lol that's why I came in here
miss_almost 12th-Sep-2012 07:05 pm (UTC)
haha. this is all i got out of the article.
xtinkerbellax 12th-Sep-2012 07:13 pm (UTC)
My first thought.
bienenkiste 12th-Sep-2012 07:20 pm (UTC)
IKR DAMN
onyxobsidian 12th-Sep-2012 07:20 pm (UTC)
25?? This chick is younger than I am? Shit. Poor woma-... girl.
themaus 12th-Sep-2012 07:24 pm (UTC)
MTE
lauracoy 12th-Sep-2012 07:27 pm (UTC)
MTE. It's kinda Florence &themachine I have such a hard time believing I'm the same age!
vivisexion 12th-Sep-2012 07:28 pm (UTC)
ikr wow
fastusagi 12th-Sep-2012 07:31 pm (UTC)
lol first thing I thought when i read the title
bbbitchface 12th-Sep-2012 08:00 pm (UTC)
for real, and that outfit is not doing her any favours
xkyrie_eleisonx 12th-Sep-2012 08:39 pm (UTC)
mte
anderbobo 12th-Sep-2012 08:42 pm (UTC)
Suri's magic works quickly and harshly....
glass_houses 12th-Sep-2012 08:58 pm (UTC)
She's younger than me D: what da fuck
_quietriot_ 12th-Sep-2012 09:38 pm (UTC)
MTE
chimbleysweep 12th-Sep-2012 09:47 pm (UTC)
Literally the only reason why I came to read the comments was to see how many were about how old she looks.
msmandiemitz 12th-Sep-2012 09:48 pm (UTC)
I was thinking she looked closer to 40 before I read that she was 25. Yikes.
ncc_gqmf 12th-Sep-2012 10:27 pm (UTC)
I seriously came in here to see if anyone had said that.
sad_1985 12th-Sep-2012 10:33 pm (UTC)
ikr
cuzilubb 12th-Sep-2012 11:19 pm (UTC)
ikr? damn.
dothefrug 13th-Sep-2012 12:27 am (UTC)
came in here only to say this.
lifebehindadesk 13th-Sep-2012 01:18 am (UTC)
Came here to say this. DAMN, GURL.
saltwatergirl 13th-Sep-2012 07:29 am (UTC)
Damn she is a rough 25.
mjspice 13th-Sep-2012 08:05 am (UTC)
FO REALZ?? Damn!!!!!
gypsy_leerose 13th-Sep-2012 09:11 pm (UTC)
Holy shit
kampfbaby 14th-Sep-2012 03:48 am (UTC)
jfc i am the same age as her o_o
winniechili 12th-Sep-2012 06:41 pm (UTC)
1) She's 25? Really?
2) I don't find her stuff that funny.
sirenlyfox 12th-Sep-2012 06:49 pm (UTC)
1) 25 in dog years.
2) I don't find it funny but wish I had thought of it. The idea is great but the execution doesn't exactly blow me away
onyxobsidian 12th-Sep-2012 07:23 pm (UTC)
Yeah, when I heard about Suri's Burn Book, I was so excited for some exceptionally funny shit since I had always liked the idea that Suri was this bad ass bitch, but she took a great idea and ruined it.
tinymfdancer 15th-Sep-2012 12:21 am (UTC)
It was cute for a hot minute. Then... you can't mock children for very long without getting into some murky waters, ethically speaking.
the_pinkdress 12th-Sep-2012 06:58 pm (UTC)
me neither. i was so confused when i finally checked out the blog b/c i was like "THIS is it?"
ava_adore0 12th-Sep-2012 07:23 pm (UTC)
Suri's Burn Book used to be quite funny, but it's pretty lame now. It peaked with Beyonce's pregnancy/Blue Ivy's birth tbh.
sad_1985 12th-Sep-2012 10:33 pm (UTC)
mte
reveeling 12th-Sep-2012 11:08 pm (UTC)
There's no way that heffa is 25
brucelynn 12th-Sep-2012 06:41 pm (UTC)
Katie Holmes needs to punch her
tadashee 13th-Sep-2012 12:53 am (UTC)
if i were here or tom- i would have called out this lady publicly. Actually if i were jennifer garner or ben affleck too. i think this is worse than what tabs do to kids. Also, if your life is based on 'mock" slamming little children- someone needs to reevaluate.
and_the_damned 13th-Sep-2012 02:12 am (UTC)
imagine how thrilled she would be if Tom or Katie acknowledged her. More press, more money. I feel bad for them.
actxappalledx 12th-Sep-2012 06:42 pm (UTC)
She needs bangs or something, nagl
sirenlyfox 12th-Sep-2012 06:52 pm (UTC)
she also needs a nose job and a chin implant. plus new teeth (maybe braces). and a stylist.
actxappalledx 12th-Sep-2012 06:55 pm (UTC)
lmao well damn, i was trying to be gentle! haha
the_pinkdress 12th-Sep-2012 07:09 pm (UTC)
no she doesn't, what is wrong with you?
the_pinkdress 12th-Sep-2012 07:10 pm (UTC)
oh wait i thought i was still in the lena dunham post lol. well i guess my sentiment still stands.
so_os 12th-Sep-2012 07:14 pm (UTC)
Daaaang Suri! I guess that's what she gets for trying to speak for you
itspokerface 12th-Sep-2012 07:24 pm (UTC)
LOOL truth
elijahxwhore 12th-Sep-2012 06:42 pm (UTC)
25? yeah OK
winegums 12th-Sep-2012 07:02 pm (UTC)
or halve it
trinity_squared 12th-Sep-2012 06:43 pm (UTC)
I think its like a mockumentary in book form. If Tom Cruise was going to sue or was worried, this book AND woman wouldnt see the light of day.
orangeberryfly 12th-Sep-2012 06:43 pm (UTC)
that blog is so not funny. ive laughed maybe once
danceprincess20 12th-Sep-2012 06:44 pm (UTC)
Actual tabloids are way worse than the stuff she writes.
unnecessaryhat 12th-Sep-2012 10:12 pm (UTC)
I agree. Tabloids claim to be true.
between_lights 12th-Sep-2012 06:45 pm (UTC)
I'm okay with her blog (as long as she isn't getting paid to run it), but cashing in on Suri's "persona" or w/e with a book is not cool imo.
69love_songs 12th-Sep-2012 06:50 pm (UTC)
This is sort of how I feel. Anon on a silly blog on the internet that doesn't make any money? Yeah that's fine. I might have a giggle. Actual fame and money to do this shit? No thanx.
kampfbaby 14th-Sep-2012 03:49 am (UTC)
mte
fauxparadiso 12th-Sep-2012 06:53 pm (UTC)
Basically.
icangoforthat 12th-Sep-2012 06:53 pm (UTC)
mte
liliana_ 12th-Sep-2012 06:55 pm (UTC)
This.
hearthecity 12th-Sep-2012 06:56 pm (UTC)
mte
leitao 12th-Sep-2012 06:57 pm (UTC)
MTE.
goldenlockets 12th-Sep-2012 06:57 pm (UTC)
same. and i also feel like it's only funny in the context of the internet? idk when things like that go into book format i just think they're completely unamusing.
hera_bearrra 12th-Sep-2012 07:13 pm (UTC)
IA. Now the blog is ruined to me.
shred 12th-Sep-2012 07:16 pm (UTC)
same here.
itspokerface 12th-Sep-2012 07:24 pm (UTC)
this
pikapika217 12th-Sep-2012 07:26 pm (UTC)
MTE
megalixer 12th-Sep-2012 07:31 pm (UTC)
IA with this.
jay_oats 12th-Sep-2012 07:55 pm (UTC)
ia also I feel like it's funny only funny on the internet
colorzplosion 12th-Sep-2012 07:56 pm (UTC)
mte
endingonfire 12th-Sep-2012 08:16 pm (UTC)
Same. Getting paid to use a child's image without permission... that's fucked.
buttercup31 12th-Sep-2012 10:32 pm (UTC)
Exactly what I've been saying. I stopped going to the blog, which I used to love, because this book skeeves me out. It's not right on any level.
grammaire 13th-Sep-2012 12:31 am (UTC)
iawtc
sapphybelle 13th-Sep-2012 07:34 am (UTC)
I agree. At least on the internet it's kind of removed from most people (people who don't read tumblr, especially) but now that it's published... it's really wrong :/ what if the kids she's making all these snarky comments about see it one day?
melissa_ivory 13th-Sep-2012 10:02 pm (UTC)
alkalinecupcake 12th-Sep-2012 06:45 pm (UTC)
for me, it's not right, suri's a child. the tumblr was funny but...oh money money....

but then again, honestly, if i was in a similar situation, i don't know if i have enough will power to say no to the money, or ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY.

winniechili 12th-Sep-2012 06:45 pm (UTC)
I should not have googled to confirm her age.

dandyxwarhol 12th-Sep-2012 06:47 pm (UTC)
nightmares
janacjb 12th-Sep-2012 06:47 pm (UTC)
Oh Allie Hagan. What would Suri say about you?
summerswings 14th-Sep-2012 04:11 pm (UTC)
Except her Suri doesn't make fun of children's looks, only what they wear. The Harper Beckham thing was hilarious because obviously she's a BABY. That's the joke.
actxappalledx 12th-Sep-2012 06:48 pm (UTC)
yikes
amalgamade 12th-Sep-2012 06:49 pm (UTC)
yeesh
lcacbc 12th-Sep-2012 06:52 pm (UTC)
O_O
hello_samm 12th-Sep-2012 06:53 pm (UTC)
She looks like Miss Caroline Krafft from the Marymount Mathletes in Mean Girls. Is that 99 cent lipgloss on her snaggletooth that I see?
withoutyoursmil 12th-Sep-2012 06:54 pm (UTC)
OMG THOSE TEETH
maitressefleche 12th-Sep-2012 06:56 pm (UTC)
oh my god
leviicorpus 12th-Sep-2012 07:00 pm (UTC)
nagl
dubiously 12th-Sep-2012 07:08 pm (UTC)
And this is the woman who likes making fun of children's appearances? Nagl.
itspokerface 12th-Sep-2012 07:25 pm (UTC)
omg
hpxstac 12th-Sep-2012 07:30 pm (UTC)
Oh honey...
odeeryme 12th-Sep-2012 07:34 pm (UTC)
LOL 4EVER
silky_pico 12th-Sep-2012 07:35 pm (UTC)
she looks like the average ontder
mutterby 12th-Sep-2012 07:49 pm (UTC)
her teeth are like ugly yet perfectly shaped at the same time.
shining_starsxx 12th-Sep-2012 08:32 pm (UTC)
I'm seeing a little bit of Kathy Beth Terry.
aftergypsies 12th-Sep-2012 10:29 pm (UTC)
lol
xourxourw 12th-Sep-2012 11:06 pm (UTC)
Is this real life...?
time_ambassador 13th-Sep-2012 08:49 pm (UTC)
she has no lips. how is that possible.

and all those lines around her eyes...damn, there's no way she's two years younger than me.
gypsy_leerose 13th-Sep-2012 10:05 pm (UTC)
My eyes
__papillon 12th-Sep-2012 06:46 pm (UTC)
i actually thought she'd stop now, seeing as suri's been dressing like a real, little kid lately.
megaleena 12th-Sep-2012 06:46 pm (UTC)
I don't think Violet Affleck is 'put out there'.
t3pps 12th-Sep-2012 06:49 pm (UTC)
Exactly!
tell_a_tale_4_u 12th-Sep-2012 06:53 pm (UTC)
Or Mathilda Ledger. Ugh please.
marywebgirl 12th-Sep-2012 07:05 pm (UTC)
Yeah, being transfered to and from school is not "out there."
aerinsol 12th-Sep-2012 07:05 pm (UTC)
Or Ava Jackman.
manicpixiegirl 12th-Sep-2012 07:22 pm (UTC)
none of the afflecks are. they could easily 'present' them on the cover of people if they wanted to but they never did (which i totally respect)
bellwetherr 12th-Sep-2012 07:31 pm (UTC)
I don't think any of these children are "put out there" tbh. A pap shot on the street while they're going to school is not "out there" for any of these children.
haverchuck_bill 12th-Sep-2012 07:31 pm (UTC)
I guess she means outside by "out there."
bittermunchkin 12th-Sep-2012 07:52 pm (UTC)
Unless the children are performers in their own right like the Smith girl (and boy? idk) I don't see how they could be considered out there.
viivi 14th-Sep-2012 03:54 pm (UTC)
lol
whiteswallows 12th-Sep-2012 08:06 pm (UTC)
Yes, exactly.
fabuleuxx 13th-Sep-2012 04:19 pm (UTC)
Right! And how is it the child's fault if their parent happens to flaunt them?
jonesingjay 12th-Sep-2012 06:46 pm (UTC)
now, that i've seen her i wish i could forget.
Page 1 of 8
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] >>
This page was loaded May 23rd 2013, 10:58 pm GMT.