ONTD

10:06 pm - 08/18/2012

James Gunn In Talks to Direct Marvel's 'Guardians of the Galaxy'



James Gunn has emerged as Marvel Studios' choice to direct its upcoming space superhero saga Guardians of the Galaxy.

After a lengthy search, sources say that Marvel executives now are talking exclusively with Gunn, whose previous credits include the genre films Slither and Super. The studio is said not to have ruled out others in the running — Peyton Reed (Bring It On, Yes Man) and Half Nelson helming team Ryan Fleck and Anna Boden were in the mix, according to sources — in case talks with Gunn's reps do not lead to a deal.

Marvel is said to like Gunn's sensibility and his ability to mix comedy elements with action and horror, a quality he shares with The Avengers director Joss Whedon, who, with his exclusive contract with Marvel, is now a major architect of the company's expanding universe.

Marvel declined to comment.


Galaxy is the first original title in Marvel’s “Phase 2" of movies, which also includes Iron Man 3, sequels to Captain America and Thor, and Avengers 2.

Marvel officially announced the movie at Comic-Con. Earlier this month, THR reported that it hired Chris McCoy to rewrite the space adventure movie, which had a previous draft of a script by Nicole Perlman.

While there have been several incarnations of the Guardians team in the comics over the years, the movie’s lineup will include Drax the Destroyer, a human resurrected as a green warrior with the sole purpose of killing Thanos (the villain in the Avengers final-scene tease); Groot, a giant tree-man; Star-Lord, a gun-toting half-human/half-alien intergalactic vigilante; Rocket Raccoon, a genetically engineered animal with a knack for guns and explosives; and Gamora, the last survivor of her species who was saved by Thanos to be his assassin but now battles him.

Earlier this week a logline made the rounds describing the plot as concerning “a U.S. pilot who ends up in space in the middle of a universal conflict and goes on the run with futuristic ex-cons who have something everyone wants."

If a deal comes together, it would mark yet another unconventional director choice for a big Marvel movie. The studio raised eyebrows by handing over Iron Man to a then-untested Jon Favreau, Thor to Kenneth Branagh, who was known for arthouse pics, and The Avengers to TV showrunner Whedon. All the movies became international hits.

Guardians would be a major break for Gunn, who is best known for directing the low-budget Super and Slither. Super, released in 2010, is an indie action comedy starring Rainn Wilson and Liv Tyler about a schlub who decides to be a superhero despite lacking any skills. Slither is a horror comedy made by Gold Circle Films that starred Nathan Fillion and Elizabeth Banks. Slither only made $7.7 million domestically, though a galactic sum compared to Super’s $322,000 domestic take.

But Gunn, who wrote Warner Bros’s live-action Scooby-Doo movie and its sequel, has a cult following and rose through the moviemaking machine of low-budget farm Troma Entertainment, run by genre king Lloyd Kaufman.



Source
vehiclesshockme 19th-Aug-2012 02:14 am (UTC)
I like James Gunn.
deadtree 19th-Aug-2012 02:17 am (UTC)
I can't help it, I am stuck on the fucking raccoon. I don't think I will EVER be able to take this property seriously and if it ends up overlapping with their Avengers franchise idek how I will deal. Please let the thing be heroically sacrificed in the first 5 minutes of the movie.
it_has_been 19th-Aug-2012 02:25 am (UTC)
haaaaaaahahahhahaha
obsidianwolf 19th-Aug-2012 02:45 am (UTC)
A perverse part of me wants them to show the sector of space he comes from along with his anthropomorphic Walrus side kick. I mean if they are going to include him then I want the full package not just hey random talking Raccoon.
deadtree 19th-Aug-2012 02:51 am (UTC)
actually I agree with you on that-- I think it would be a lot more palatable if there were some context provided for the talking raccoon. Or it could be even weirder, idk. I am honestly baffled they are going with this.
obsidianwolf 19th-Aug-2012 02:55 am (UTC)
IIRC his sector of space is isolated and at some point animals taken from around the galaxy were altered and elevated to sapience as guards and companions for the patients at a planet size asylum. In fact he used to the warden of the place.

I just know we won't get shown that it will just be random Talking Racoon with maybe a bit of back story on him being genetically engineered.
deadtree 19th-Aug-2012 03:03 am (UTC)
idk... I mean that's still kind of weird. There are a lot of things that work in comic book and/or animated form but not on film, at least not when you're trying to be even a little bit serious.

Who knows, though. There were a lot of people who said Thor would never work, that Captain America would never work, that Avengers would never work... this could be the most amazing movie ever.

But I think a lot of people will never see it because it has a TALKING RACCOON.
obsidianwolf 19th-Aug-2012 03:06 am (UTC)
And that's why I still say they should have gone with the original Gaurdians team and simply sat their Marvel space opera in the far future.

I'd have rather had a Captain Marvel or Quasar movie if they wanted to introduce Thanos's threat for the Avengers.
deadtree 19th-Aug-2012 03:13 am (UTC)
yeah, weird choices all around honestly.
buzz_whistle 19th-Aug-2012 02:53 am (UTC)
IA. This movie is the next John Carter tbh
deadtree 19th-Aug-2012 03:01 am (UTC)
ugh YES. Why can't they see that?! It's like they hit a home run with Avengers and feel like they're invincible now and they can do whatever they want.
cyberghostface 19th-Aug-2012 03:04 am (UTC)
I don't see this being another John Carter for a number of reasons. At the very least, Marvel's probably aware that this is a niche property and won't risk millions and millions of dollars.
deadtree 19th-Aug-2012 03:11 am (UTC)
yeah but without millions and millions of dollars this is going to be even harder to pull off. Like that raccoon is going to have to be really fucking convincing, and that kind of animation ain't cheap.
cyberghostface 19th-Aug-2012 03:40 am (UTC)
District 9 probably has a lower budget than what this will be and the CGI was great. Plus the raccoon will probably be more stylized and less realistic.

Edited at 2012-08-19 03:43 am (UTC)
beoweasel 19th-Aug-2012 01:05 pm (UTC)
Screw you! Rocket Raccoon is flawless. :|

xpirate_queenx 19th-Aug-2012 10:32 pm (UTC)
This, to the eleventh power.

I have no problem with the Guardians in the comics. But I simply cannot wrap my mind around Rocket Raccoon existing in the same universe as Robert Downey, Jr.'s Tony Stark and company. They worked so hard to give these movies a touch of scientifically-sound realism to them; and that seems like it's all going to be thrown out the window when they ask us to accept a 4-foot-tall, chaingun-wielding anthropomorphic raccoon from outer space.

We'll see, Marvel. We'll see.
deadtree 19th-Aug-2012 10:58 pm (UTC)
YES holy shit, that's what I was trying to get at but never managed to put into words. It's not like the MCU is "realistic" by any stretch, but it does have a kind of groundedness that is going to be completely destroyed when the talking raccoon shows up.
Which is why the Guardians movie needs to be animated. That way no one will get confused and think they're part of the same canon.

Because please, god of movies, let them not be part of the same canon.
brownxeyedxdork 19th-Aug-2012 02:21 am (UTC)
I love Slither!
ritaamber 19th-Aug-2012 02:24 am (UTC)
the ending of super made me want to die and then buy a bunny. so good but really dark.

which gives me hope this will be a dark and hard movie.
it_has_been 19th-Aug-2012 02:26 am (UTC)
oh my god this guy wrote the scooby-doo movies?
cackling
obsidianwolf 19th-Aug-2012 02:31 am (UTC)
I'm still extremely irritated that they went with the modern Guardians instead of the original team.

I mean personally last genetically engineered survivors of Earth's off world colonies fighting an evil lizard race to free Earth inspired by the Avengers in the far future sounds so much better than what this will ever be.

Plus lets face it if they could pull of Martinex's look right it would be awesome to see on screen.
itscomicrelief 19th-Aug-2012 02:45 am (UTC)
FUCK THIS FLOP

I WANT THE RUNAWAYS MOVIE
theblackwidow 19th-Aug-2012 03:15 am (UTC)
Why they're trying this and not black panther I don't know
jazzypom IA!19th-Aug-2012 09:42 am (UTC)
A talking raccoon is more relatable to middle America than a poc? Really, Marvel?

So sitting that ish out.
chthonist 19th-Aug-2012 03:23 am (UTC)
Only here for Vance Astro..... lbh
obsidianwolf 19th-Aug-2012 03:28 am (UTC)
He probably won't be in the movie since they'd want to avoid Time Travel/Alternate worlds in the cinematic universe. Plus there's the whole mutant thing since Fox has the rights to the mutants.
missing_mile_15 19th-Aug-2012 04:00 am (UTC)
Moondragon isn't in this, despite her being perfect to tie-in to the Thanos plot and my queen, so the movie is dead to me. Even though I like Mantis.
blackwidow 19th-Aug-2012 04:03 am (UTC)
But will Wal Russ be in this movie?

GO BIG OR GO HOME MARVEL!
jearsforqueers 19th-Aug-2012 04:15 am (UTC)
idk how i feel about this movie.

will the raccoon have a squeaky voice or a deep one? i can't even picture this without laughing.
pavonine 19th-Aug-2012 06:24 am (UTC)
i still can't see this being a success. it's going to be one of those films parents take their little kids to see because of the "cute talking raccoon!!" and "oh, a talking tree too, just like lotr!!!!!" and end up walking out halfway through when their fresh-plucked crotchfruit can't handle the violence and loud noises.

i wish this were a runaways movie. :-( or a black panther movie, that would work as well. just. not this. no.
grapefruitzzz 19th-Aug-2012 09:21 am (UTC)
*collapsing under endless torrent of Marvel films and I meeeean torrent*

Is this part of the same continuity as the main stuff? Spiderman's continuity? A special snowflake of its own? How many prequels would I have to watch to understand it?
cyberghostface 19th-Aug-2012 05:28 pm (UTC)
I think the first film can be watched on its own although I imagine they'll tie it in with later sequels.
grapefruitzzz 20th-Aug-2012 08:40 pm (UTC)
Heh, they always say that and I *still* had to watch Iron Man 2.
xpirate_queenx 19th-Aug-2012 10:41 pm (UTC)
It's going to be set in the same continuity as Iron Man, Thor, The Avengers, etc. Whether or not we'll ever actually see those characters interacting with the Guardians is another matter entirely.

But, the Guardians are very closely tied with Thanos (that big, grinning purple people eater at the end of Avengers), and giving them their own movie to perhaps shed a little more light and development on him before we get the real showdown in Avengers 2 might be beneficial.

Maybe. Almost.

Given the massive success of Phase 1, Marvel seems to be going full steam ahead with populating their movie-verse out with as many characters as they hold the rights to; in order to make it more like the comics. Whether or not that's a good thing (as I said in another post), we shall see.
grapefruitzzz 20th-Aug-2012 08:39 pm (UTC)
Thanks!

I get confused between all the DC and Marvel 'gangs of B-List people'.

Thanos looked very cool back there :D
xpirate_queenx 20th-Aug-2012 09:04 pm (UTC)
No problem!
prophecypro 19th-Aug-2012 09:50 am (UTC)
Interested to see how he handles it. He hasnt made anything of this impact, but we'll see how Marvel guides him on it.
This page was loaded May 22nd 2013, 8:13 am GMT.