ONTD

7:18 pm - 08/03/2012

Nina Garcia Very Drastically Overestimates What ‘A Few Weeks’ Salary’ Means For Most People

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Stop the presses! Someone has out-GOOP-ed Gwyneth! And it was Nina Garcia!

By “GOOPing” (a verb I just made up), I of course mean “advising one’s followers to buy something that only someone with your exorbitant salary (i.e. not many of them) can afford, and presenting it as common sense, girl-to-girl lifestyle advice.” (Depending on how naive you are willing to believe she is, it might also be interpreted as a tasteless #humblebrag.)



Image and video hosting by TinyPic

The Birkin bag in question costs $26,000. As in, more than some people make in a year.

Garcia’s followers were quick to point out her miscalculation:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

She has yet to respond to this criticism in any way.

Doing a little bit of math, someone would need to make about $450,000/year to earn $26,000 in three weeks. The average household income in America (all breadwinners combined) is somewhere around $50,000. I don’t know the average annual income of someone who follows Nina Garcia on twitter, but I’m guessing it’s not $450,000.

Believe it or not, I’m not criticizing Nina Garcia for being rich or buying expensive things. I’m criticizing her for being so out of touch with her readership that she’d sincerely recommend they buy a handbag that costs more than a year of tuition at Columbia. I know Nina Garcia was born wealthy, but she did work as a regular fashion journalist for a while before ascending to her current role as Marie Claire editor-at-large/Project Runway judge/”Style Voice and fashion collection curator” to J.C. Penney, so she should have at least some idea what her core demographic makes.

Or even if she’s always made six figures (must be nice!), Garcia is educated enough to have at least read the newspaper sometime in the past few years, no? Is this woman just incredibly naive, or what? Does she really believe that only rich ladies read fashion blogs? Or maybe she’s trolling for outrage, in which case, congrats, I guess? What do you think?


SOURCE

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

icameinyoursoup 4th-Aug-2012 04:12 am (UTC)
I was replying to "if you have 3 or more kids $100k is not going to go that far." This whole thread seems like well-off people acting like $100k a year isn't a huge amount of money and the middle class don't struggle to feed their families. Upper middle class is much closer to upper class than to middle class, even if their houses aren't made of gold.
kimberwyn 4th-Aug-2012 04:40 am (UTC)
I know you were referring to that but it's still important to know the context.

The point most people are trying to make is that you can't make a blanket statement based on a figure --$100k to a single person living in the South or a small town is completely different than a family of 5 living in New York.
vatulele 4th-Aug-2012 05:50 am (UTC)
Have you seen how many people that were part of the 'Upper Middle Class' that were two parent homes or even one parent homes that were making $100k or close to it after the housing bust? I don't know where you live but here in Arizona it was awful. I had friends that had to move out of their homes to two bedroom apartments because their parents went bankrupt because they were upside down on their mortgages. That cushion really isn't as big as you think.

My first year of college my Mom had to ask my Grandparents for help with my college tuition because I didn't receive any FAFSA money or work study grants and my Mom as a single parent makes around $60,000 a year which put her and thereby me over the hump of qualifying for assistance. But unfortunately my 3.0 GPA wasn't enough to receive a big scholarship and the one I got only equaled about $1,000 a semester and that barely covered my books. (Not that I wasn't grateful for it)
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 7:24 pm GMT.