ONTD

2:57 pm - 07/17/2012

Joseph Gordon-Levitt is upset at GQ's mention of his brother's death

Photobucket


First of all, I’d like to thank both of the Jims and everyone else at GQ for putting me on the cover of their magazine this month. That kind of exposure is a huge help to all the work I love to do, and I’m deeply appreciative.

I’m writing this because I have a problem with what their article says about my brother. I’ll be honest, it really made me feel terrible. Here’s a quote:

‘…the elder Gordon-Levitt died of an alleged drug overdose in 2010. “It was an accident” is all Joe will say about that.’


Using the word “alleged” technically allows the writer to say whatever she wants. The “allegations” to which she must be referring were made by a handful of gossip websites. They are factually incorrect according to the coroner’s office and the police department. I don’t like publicly speaking about my brother’s death, but I’m making an exception to correct this irresponsible claim.

By the way, while I asked the writer not to dwell on how he died, I did say quite a bit about how he lived, and how much he means to me. Dan was a brightly positive, genuinely caring, and brilliantly inspiring person, and I liked the idea of such a wide readership learning about him. My parents and I are disappointed with what the article chose to focus on regarding this sensitive subject.

thanks

J

Source: his Tumblr
fraubluecher 17th-Jul-2012 08:41 pm (UTC)
Released to the public by whom? It was not released to the public.

A correct wording would be drug accident, but JGL wanted them to not mention anything about the way he died.

Why are you hell-bent on defending this sentence if it is factually inaccurate and against JGL's wishes? Why exactly shouldn't she have left it out?
xbellaxmiax 17th-Jul-2012 08:45 pm (UTC)
released to the public as far as, that was the reason given for his death publicly? again, i wasn't even aware of his death until now.
but how is it factually inaccurate that they said "alleged"? this is what i don't understand. i don't see how it goes against any of his wishes.
fraubluecher 17th-Jul-2012 08:56 pm (UTC)
Seriously? There was an interview and he didn't tell her how he died, as he never does, so she went and investigated very poorly, instead of printing what JGL told her.

It was not the reason given for his death publicly. Some gossip site speculated = reason given for his death publicly.

Also, he himself says it's against his wishes. Did you read the post?
hershelwalker 17th-Jul-2012 08:57 pm (UTC)
that's not what he was saying. I read it as, in HIS mind, using the word "alleged" is just an easy way for the journalist to speculate on his death (not saying I agree with this, but this is how it's reading). what he finds "factually inaccurate" are the allegations themselves.
xbellaxmiax 17th-Jul-2012 09:51 pm (UTC)
thank you
now i understand his thought process more
This page was loaded May 18th 2013, 7:26 pm GMT.