ONTD

7:50 pm - 06/29/2012

Kristen Stewart's Balenciaga Fragrance ad

Page 1 of 10
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] >>
anus 30th-Jun-2012 01:09 am (UTC)
Someone looks excited to be there!
camillesaens 30th-Jun-2012 01:19 am (UTC)
ololololol
leasheinyoface 30th-Jun-2012 01:24 am (UTC)
lol
cerseilannister 30th-Jun-2012 01:32 am (UTC)
lol
oceanhue 30th-Jun-2012 01:36 am (UTC)
lol
pantspolice 30th-Jun-2012 01:50 am (UTC)
as always.
principlvaliant 30th-Jun-2012 02:40 am (UTC)
lol
vivika_cullen13 30th-Jun-2012 03:16 am (UTC)
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! So true! She looks so.... happy.... #NOT
sowhat_whocares 30th-Jun-2012 04:55 am (UTC)
this comment is so dumb. it's a high fashion fragrance ad. since when the fuck do models/endorsers smile in those?
miakun 30th-Jun-2012 05:16 am (UTC)
I know, I seriously cannot recall a perfume ad that wasn't a celebrity brand (and usually not even then) where the model didn't look either angry or miserable.
heart_iswild 30th-Jun-2012 05:32 am (UTC)
lmao irl
brightstarmara 30th-Jun-2012 10:27 am (UTC)
That's her signature look. It is going to make her famous.
cheryb 30th-Jun-2012 01:10 am (UTC)
she looks awful. wtf.
for_serious13 30th-Jun-2012 01:10 am (UTC)
jesus christ, look more miserable, could ya?

sookehhh 30th-Jun-2012 01:10 am (UTC)
Looks about right.
affliction 30th-Jun-2012 01:10 am (UTC)
photoshop her thighs further apart why don't you
lohandjob 30th-Jun-2012 01:13 am (UTC)
Someone needs to shop all of Central Station between her legs.
kstew 30th-Jun-2012 03:57 am (UTC)
ikr :/
_natsumi_ 30th-Jun-2012 01:10 am (UTC)
why are they using that old ass dress
_natsumi_ 30th-Jun-2012 01:11 am (UTC)
also she looks like a corpse
cheryb 30th-Jun-2012 01:12 am (UTC)
lol yes, she does.
xtinkerbellax 30th-Jun-2012 01:15 am (UTC)
Yea, that surprised me.
leviicorpus 30th-Jun-2012 01:16 am (UTC)
my first thought
enid_keaner 30th-Jun-2012 01:23 am (UTC)
My first thought, thb
cerseilannister 30th-Jun-2012 01:32 am (UTC)
ikr
semalina 30th-Jun-2012 01:33 am (UTC)
i don't follow fashion and even i know that dress is not current
wasster 30th-Jun-2012 01:43 am (UTC)
I was just thinking how much better Jennifer Connolly looked in it tbh.
coquettes 30th-Jun-2012 02:04 am (UTC)
Nicolas felt that the 2008 collection captured the essence of the new fragrance the most.
bellwetherr 30th-Jun-2012 02:07 am (UTC)
because balenciaga is a fucking disaster. idek why they went in this direction.
trikc 30th-Jun-2012 05:03 am (UTC)
omg came in just to say that. Wtf? I mean it's their own shit. Just give her something out of the resort line that just came out!
crimes 30th-Jun-2012 01:10 am (UTC)
What the actual fuck.
icangoforthat 30th-Jun-2012 01:10 am (UTC)
jank and why such an old dress?
_natsumi_ 30th-Jun-2012 01:13 am (UTC)
ikr,that dress has to be at least four years old .
grande_latte 30th-Jun-2012 01:10 am (UTC)
WHAT the FAK is that?
saladshooter 30th-Jun-2012 01:11 am (UTC)
Uhhh, well, I like her in the third picture.
tipping4_2 30th-Jun-2012 01:16 am (UTC)
lol
georgie_georgie 30th-Jun-2012 01:18 am (UTC)
lol
miss_nyxie 30th-Jun-2012 02:39 am (UTC)
I like your icon.
angel_dust_fury 30th-Jun-2012 01:11 am (UTC)
Nope.
revertigo 30th-Jun-2012 01:11 am (UTC)
this is... not good
alienclit 30th-Jun-2012 01:11 am (UTC)
They should have saved themselves the embarrassment and used an actual model.
anus 30th-Jun-2012 01:13 am (UTC)
I don't get why they make celebs the face of shit anyway. Do psycho twilight fans look at this and think BELLA IS NEXT TO THAT BOTTLE I MUST HAVE IT!
judgmental 30th-Jun-2012 01:16 am (UTC)
Yes
georgie_georgie 30th-Jun-2012 01:19 am (UTC)
I think twihards are more into walmart brand perfume sprays.
drunkagron 30th-Jun-2012 01:22 am (UTC)
They're too busy stocking up on the Vampire perfume at CVS.
enid_keaner 30th-Jun-2012 01:25 am (UTC)
Copy and pasted from another comment I made today:


Let's say you're going through Sephora or something, looking for a fragrance. You're not necessarily picking up J'adore because Charlize is the spokeswoman, but because you recall the perfume and the brand more than the others because you remember the commercials. Because the brand's fronted by a celeb you remember (maybe like), the you remember the name of the perfume and maybe it has more meaning to you than something else.

Also, you have to remember that celebs themselves are a brand and their personalities are part of that brand. That's one reason they front things like perfumes - everything we know about them comes part and parcel with what they're selling. You see J'adore and you know Charlize fronts the brand. You recall that she's pretty effortlessly cool and sexy and that's the image she projects. So you associate the perfume that she fronts with effortless cool and sexiness.

You're not buying it JUST because the celeb fronts it but also because of other factors surrounding the celeb.
grande_latte 30th-Jun-2012 01:11 am (UTC)
it gives me a vibe that the fragrance is of weed and body odor
oatmealmonster 30th-Jun-2012 01:11 am (UTC)
kristen is pretty so i understand that people think that taking pictures of her is a good idea but she just never does anything. she always looks bored and blank so it is weird. give the job to someone who would actually try.
camillesaens 30th-Jun-2012 01:20 am (UTC)
she is gorgeous, but it depends who takes it to bring that out imo
oatmealmonster 30th-Jun-2012 01:23 am (UTC)
true because she does take some good pictures. but really it is her job to do a good job in the end.
steffibunny 30th-Jun-2012 01:52 am (UTC)
To be fair, if they had a specific idea of the kind of image they wanted, i.e. non-smiling, edgy, 'high fashion' look and pose, I don't know how anyone else could save it. Obviously the director was not looking for a bubbly or expressive photoshoot and is into airbrushing. They could have gone so many other directions with the concept but they chose this.
miakun 30th-Jun-2012 05:19 am (UTC)
I vastly prefer the photoshoots that embrace her awkwardness rather than forcing her into a pose that makes her look uncomfortable.

Such as
Page 1 of 10
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] >>
This page was loaded May 22nd 2013, 8:22 pm GMT.