2:40 am - 06/27/2012
Sony Released So Many Damn Spider-Man Clips, Someone Made a Movie Out of Them
The first reviews for “The Amazing Spider-Man” may be glowing but fans can't help but feel a tinge of desperation in the way Sony marketed it. Below is a 25-minute video of footage from the film – as released by Sony itself.
In other words, the movie studio gave away almost half an hour of its insanely-anticipated release through various promo materials.
That still leaves 110 minutes more to see in theaters, but it also speaks volumes for how badly Sony wants people to see the film, especially with Warner Bros.' “The Dark Knight Rises” hot on its heels.
Check out the video below to see what we mean. Because the videos used in the making of this one were of varying quality, this too is pretty uneven.
However, if you're a Spidey fan and would rather not be spoiled until the film is out (as is the case with us), we'd advise against checking out the clip.
“The Amazing Spider-Man” with Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone will be out on July 3.
Thwip
In other words, the movie studio gave away almost half an hour of its insanely-anticipated release through various promo materials.
That still leaves 110 minutes more to see in theaters, but it also speaks volumes for how badly Sony wants people to see the film, especially with Warner Bros.' “The Dark Knight Rises” hot on its heels.
Check out the video below to see what we mean. Because the videos used in the making of this one were of varying quality, this too is pretty uneven.
However, if you're a Spidey fan and would rather not be spoiled until the film is out (as is the case with us), we'd advise against checking out the clip.
“The Amazing Spider-Man” with Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone will be out on July 3.
Thwip
In the comics he does join the avengers .... Trying to think of a universe where he doesn't and can't right now.
But as far as the movies, Sony owns Spidey (and X-Men, and the Fantastic Four I think) while Marvel/Disney owns the Avengers, so they won't be meeting up in the movie verses for the time being.
the characters are owned by different movie companies and they wouldn't allow the SpiderMan character join the Avengers movie.
it's also part of the reason why no one from the X-Men was in the Avengers movie. even tho a lot of them are on the Avengers team in the cartoons/comic books.
Edited at 2012-06-27 07:56 am (UTC)
As far as movies go, The Avengers and Spider-Man are owned by two different companies; Marvel Studios and the money grubbing whores over at Sony, respectively. There'd be way too much red tape involved to get them to interact in the same movie, no matter what producer Avi Arad would like you to believe.
but the tumblr fanart about Spidey being left out is hilarious
not even Peter likes Peter
I went to the Disney store the other day and got excited that they had a ton of Spidey and Avengers stuff, but said out loud I'd wished he would show up in the next movie (along with Wolverine, because I love me some fucking X Men.) I got into a debate with one of the workers because she swore the next one would be a massive crossover with everyone evar. I tried to explain that different studios owned the movie rights. My mom facepalmed out of the store.
idk why but this is killing me
Edited at 2012-06-27 07:57 am (UTC)
Edited at 2012-06-27 08:33 am (UTC)
superior2002-2007 franchise by starting out with Gwen, rather than MJ as the love interest. No word on whether she'll die or not, or if MJ will even show up.To be fair, Gwen was Peter's very first love.
It's just so much more fun seeing scenes for the first time that way.
we all know the damn story about how he becomes The Spider-Man from the cartoons, comics, movies.
we sure as hell didn't need another one.
they should've just made a continuation movie.
it's always got to be how he came to earth, grew up on a farm, learns his powers, UUUGGGGHHH.
and Lex always has to be the villain, always. like there aren't thousands of more better/well-known villains in the Superman-verse.
There's been enough shots of Bruce's parents dying to fill the entire L&O catalogue.
I liked Andrew in Never Let Me Go and The Social Network but I hate him as Peter Parker. I guess I hoped he'd play better roles (like older roles) b/c Spider Man seems like a role for an up-and-coming kid actor, not someone who already established himself in the industry.
My point: Andrw is to good to play some kid in a franchise film.
And I don't really like Emma Stone. At all. I don't get what people see in her.
Edited at 2012-06-27 08:26 am (UTC)
I wasn't all that crazy about the Tobey Maguire movies and I'm a Spider-Man stan. idk.
yikes.
mmm good call sis, going to make one for lunch
even earl goes to bed earlier than i do wtf smh ngl
Spider Man has less appeal than Aqua Man does lol
tobey sis >>>
Edited at 2012-06-27 07:43 pm (UTC)