8:26 pm - 06/23/2012

Businesses shelling out big endorsement bucks to the likes of Kim Kardashian, Justin Bieber and other celebrities may not be getting the return on their investment that they’d hoped for, according to new research.
A University of Colorado Boulder study found that celebrity endorsements, which are widely used to increase brand visibility and connect brands with celebrities’ personality traits, do not always work in the positive manner that marketers envision.
Research leader Margaret C. Campbell of CU-Boulder’s Leeds School of Business said negative celebrity associations consistently
transferred to an endorsed brand in three separate studies.
“The overall message to marketers is be careful, because all of us, celebrities or not, have positives and negatives to our personalities, and those negatives can easily transfer to a brand,” Campbell said.
As part of the research, the study’s participants were asked to read several celebrity news stories, including one piece about pop singer and reality TV personality Jessica Simpson and a brand she was endorsing.
After an earlier test revealed that consumers had both positive and negative associations with the star, the participants were asked to evaluate a variety of products, including the brand Simpson endorsed.
The researchers found participants were likely to think of the brand as ditzy and weak but also sexy and fun.
“However, when the endorsed product wasn’t a good match with the celebrity, in this case Jessica Simpson endorsing a pocketknife, the celebrity’s positive associations of sexy and fun did not transfer to the brand, while her negative associations did,” said co-author Caleb Warren of the Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi in Milan.
The reality that an endorsed brand is likely to take on the same negative traits as the celebrity means marketers need to consider all facets — good or bad — of any potential endorser, according to Campbell.
“Marketers often focus on the traits that they want without also considering whether the celebrity has traits that they do not want to be associated with their brands,” Campbell said.
Additionally, marketers should reconsider their celebrity ties should their star pitchman become embroiled in a scandal, according to the study.
“The global company Accenture, for example, chose to sever endorsement ties with Tiger Woods shortly after his extramarital affairs came to light,” Campbell said. “This new research indicates this helped lower the risk of gaining associations with disloyalty and lack of commitment rather than high performance.”
The study appears in the current issue of the journal Social Influence.

source
Celeb Endorsements Not Worth the Cost

Businesses shelling out big endorsement bucks to the likes of Kim Kardashian, Justin Bieber and other celebrities may not be getting the return on their investment that they’d hoped for, according to new research.
A University of Colorado Boulder study found that celebrity endorsements, which are widely used to increase brand visibility and connect brands with celebrities’ personality traits, do not always work in the positive manner that marketers envision.
Research leader Margaret C. Campbell of CU-Boulder’s Leeds School of Business said negative celebrity associations consistently
transferred to an endorsed brand in three separate studies.
“The overall message to marketers is be careful, because all of us, celebrities or not, have positives and negatives to our personalities, and those negatives can easily transfer to a brand,” Campbell said.
As part of the research, the study’s participants were asked to read several celebrity news stories, including one piece about pop singer and reality TV personality Jessica Simpson and a brand she was endorsing.
After an earlier test revealed that consumers had both positive and negative associations with the star, the participants were asked to evaluate a variety of products, including the brand Simpson endorsed.
The researchers found participants were likely to think of the brand as ditzy and weak but also sexy and fun.
“However, when the endorsed product wasn’t a good match with the celebrity, in this case Jessica Simpson endorsing a pocketknife, the celebrity’s positive associations of sexy and fun did not transfer to the brand, while her negative associations did,” said co-author Caleb Warren of the Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi in Milan.
The reality that an endorsed brand is likely to take on the same negative traits as the celebrity means marketers need to consider all facets — good or bad — of any potential endorser, according to Campbell.
“Marketers often focus on the traits that they want without also considering whether the celebrity has traits that they do not want to be associated with their brands,” Campbell said.
Additionally, marketers should reconsider their celebrity ties should their star pitchman become embroiled in a scandal, according to the study.
“The global company Accenture, for example, chose to sever endorsement ties with Tiger Woods shortly after his extramarital affairs came to light,” Campbell said. “This new research indicates this helped lower the risk of gaining associations with disloyalty and lack of commitment rather than high performance.”
The study appears in the current issue of the journal Social Influence.

source
But yeah I have no idea other than 5th graders who would buy celeb. endorsed shit.
i have boughten all of beyonce's perfumes even tho i didnt like the last one so much lol
I'm far less likely to wander into Sears now that the Kardashians keep pushing that damn line of clothing. However, I never really shopped at Sears before, so...
I see your icon there. How many girls are eating carrots now because of him? (I get that that's not exactly the same as a commercial endorsement, but it's the same principle.)
I personally feel if the items are good enough - they dont need some celebrity endorsing it or some advert appearing in every nook and cranny.
I learned my lesson the hard way - Creme de la mer. Expensive crap. Made me break out like crazy D:
I stan for Kim but .. I just dont understand that :( I hope its fake !
/IBD
They're surprisingly good quality for the price
but they're way too high for me
i still struggle with my 3.5 inche pumps
lol
Edited at 2012-06-24 07:50 am (UTC)
Oh and I did try KitKat senses and Sunsilk shampoo because Girls Aloud endorsed it :| Was happy with the first, but not happy with the latter. I also bought Nicola Robert's Dainty Doll make-up, but I don't think that counts as endorsement when she's the one who created the brand. I'm really happy with her concealers and lip glosses though :)
Like, when I was a kid yeah I bought whatever Spice Girls was on but now...I don't know how to explain it. I think that if a celebrity it on it then it must not really work for sure. All those diet pills and better eating ads [yogurt or weight watchers]. "SUNN IN THE SKYYY" whatever that one that jennifer hudson did. It just makes me automatically believe that it's a scam.
HOWEVER
When it comes to Asian stars endorsing something yeah I usually go for it. American stars endorse like, diet plans or weight loss pills. Things that can fuck your internal shit up-and if it's not that then it's their own shitty fashion brand. Asian stars on the other hand usually endorse candy or something silly like the Spice Girls did. And then when you get it you get like a little special thing for fans. I'll admit that I for sure buy sweets if I see a celebrity I like advertising it lol very guilty of that.
There's a HUGE one randomly in Santa Monica right near the beach and the promenade and everyone always uses it as the most convenient bathroom.
I have peed there as well