1:56 pm - 06/19/2012

Last night at the MuchMusic Video Awards in Toronto, Katy Perry showed up on the red carpet with a bunch of little girls. Each child was dressed as a mini-Katy, in her signature costumes, from videos like "Last Friday Night (TGIF)," "Teenage Dream" and "The One That Got Away." But one little girl was wearing a blue wig, like Katy did in "California Gurls." The child also had her own version of Katy's cupcake bra: Two little cupcakes over her breasts, with two tiny red cherries as nipples. Yikes.
One can only assume the little girl — and her parents — okayed this ensemble. But everyone involved ought to know: It's not okay. It's one thing for a grown woman to cover sexualized areas with edible treats, announcing (however playfully) that her body is quite literally for consumption. But to transfer that message onto the body of a child is revolting.
There's a difference between this and a Little Mermaid costume with a shell bra, or a "hula" outfit with a coconut bra. Even though the little girl is covered up — unlike Katy in the video, she's actually wearing a shirt — those cupcakes are invitations: Put me in your mouth. Frosting is made for licking, cherries are for biting, and it's abundantly clear that the decorations are a declaration: I'm sweet, just taste me. There's no innuendo or subtext; it's straight-forward sexual communication: Eat me. (And lest we forget, a cupcake is also a vaginal proxy.)
Look, surely this kid is fine, not scarred for life, and can grow up to have a healthy, normal existence. Who knows, maybe she's already read Forever. And let's not stifle Katy's — or any other pop star's — creativity by whining, Won't someone please think of the children? I was only a few years older than this kid when I started listening to Prince, dressing like Madonna, and singing the lyrics to "Like A Virgin."
Of couse, I wasn't photographed on a red carpet by global media outlets. And self-sexualization/exploration is not the same as objectification; this child is being used as a prop in a photo-op. Maybe this is just as bad as the Toddlers and Tiaras kid who was dressed up as a hooker… but then again, at least a prostitute is a job, where a woman has agency ("I say who, I say when, I say WHO.").
A cupcake doesn't have voice, a brain, or feelings. A little kid persuaded into advertising her breasts as snacks? Inert, dehumanized, true, pure objectification, coupled with sexualization of a child. All of the adults involved — parents, stylists, Katy Perry — should have known better.
source
A little girl shouldn't be wearing cupcakes on her breasts, No matter how cute Katy thinks it is!
Last night at the MuchMusic Video Awards in Toronto, Katy Perry showed up on the red carpet with a bunch of little girls. Each child was dressed as a mini-Katy, in her signature costumes, from videos like "Last Friday Night (TGIF)," "Teenage Dream" and "The One That Got Away." But one little girl was wearing a blue wig, like Katy did in "California Gurls." The child also had her own version of Katy's cupcake bra: Two little cupcakes over her breasts, with two tiny red cherries as nipples. Yikes.
One can only assume the little girl — and her parents — okayed this ensemble. But everyone involved ought to know: It's not okay. It's one thing for a grown woman to cover sexualized areas with edible treats, announcing (however playfully) that her body is quite literally for consumption. But to transfer that message onto the body of a child is revolting.
There's a difference between this and a Little Mermaid costume with a shell bra, or a "hula" outfit with a coconut bra. Even though the little girl is covered up — unlike Katy in the video, she's actually wearing a shirt — those cupcakes are invitations: Put me in your mouth. Frosting is made for licking, cherries are for biting, and it's abundantly clear that the decorations are a declaration: I'm sweet, just taste me. There's no innuendo or subtext; it's straight-forward sexual communication: Eat me. (And lest we forget, a cupcake is also a vaginal proxy.)
Look, surely this kid is fine, not scarred for life, and can grow up to have a healthy, normal existence. Who knows, maybe she's already read Forever. And let's not stifle Katy's — or any other pop star's — creativity by whining, Won't someone please think of the children? I was only a few years older than this kid when I started listening to Prince, dressing like Madonna, and singing the lyrics to "Like A Virgin."
Of couse, I wasn't photographed on a red carpet by global media outlets. And self-sexualization/exploration is not the same as objectification; this child is being used as a prop in a photo-op. Maybe this is just as bad as the Toddlers and Tiaras kid who was dressed up as a hooker… but then again, at least a prostitute is a job, where a woman has agency ("I say who, I say when, I say WHO.").
A cupcake doesn't have voice, a brain, or feelings. A little kid persuaded into advertising her breasts as snacks? Inert, dehumanized, true, pure objectification, coupled with sexualization of a child. All of the adults involved — parents, stylists, Katy Perry — should have known better.
source
of course
my future kids are staying away from the tv and computer for a looong time lol
You're keeping a tally, right?
And she isn't even in a damn forest.
M
F
A
O
Case in point: If there's anything I've taught my children from day one, it's that hatred against any group of people for things they can't control (race, sexual orientation, etc) is unacceptable. They can get shitty grades if they can't help it, they can give attitude once in a while if they can't control it, they can be honest about their opinions, they can have flexible chore/bedtime rules, blah blah blah, but the one thing I will not tolerate is any kind of negative behavior in the way of racism, misogyny, or homophobia. It's pretty much drilled into their heads from birth. And I came out of the closet a few years ago, and they've seen me get disowned by family and have seen how anti-gay behavior is painful.
Cue my 13 year old and his friends deciding that calling each other "gay" and "faggot" was hilarious. Complete shock, 100% not my fault.
Little kids, though, that's all on the parent.
Edited at 2012-06-19 12:47 pm (UTC)
This part is making me feel so uncomfortable omg
i bet you no one was thinking that and now they are!!
Edited at 2012-06-19 04:24 am (UTC)
Edited at 2012-06-21 08:57 pm (UTC)