ONTD

10:44 am - 06/14/2012

Kelly Osbourne shares unflattering photo online


She's the host of Fashion Police, so you'd think Kelly Osbourne would ensure she looked her best at all times.

Especially when she purposefully posts photos of herself online, like other celebrities who spend hours preening before sharing their private pictures.

But she clearly didn't mind what she looked like when she took to Twitter to show off a late night photo of herself make-up free last night.

The reality TV star used Instagram to show off her favourite pair of pyjamas.

But she maybe should have thought twice before posting up the image without checking in a mirror first.

Osbourne looked in good spirits as she took the photo, while she showed off her slimmer waist.

But she was clearly about to go to sleep as she had her messy bed hair up in a ponytail and had already removed all of her make-up.

Kelly wrote: 'Just found my favorite pj's! Got to be up at 5am for @e_fashionpolice thank god for my jet lag & comfy bed.'

And although she didn't look her best she was obviously body confident enough to share the picture with her followers.

source
Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
fabouluz 14th-Jun-2012 02:54 pm (UTC)
Her faces looks better sans make-up
wearescientists 14th-Jun-2012 02:54 pm (UTC)
Bleach where r u
foureyedgirl 14th-Jun-2012 02:55 pm (UTC)
I think she looks way better without makeup.
zness 14th-Jun-2012 02:55 pm (UTC)
She looks good here. Idgi.
davejohn 14th-Jun-2012 03:08 pm (UTC)
ikr...there are far more unflattering pics of her...or others out there
zness 14th-Jun-2012 03:14 pm (UTC)
Yup--this trumps a whole bunch of her red carpet appearances.
xtinkerbellax 14th-Jun-2012 04:24 pm (UTC)
It's not that flattering of a picture facially but I can tell she looks good without makeup based off of it.
egalitarianmuse 14th-Jun-2012 02:55 pm (UTC)
The only thing I took from this is that she has the potential to be pretty, but she's not living up to it at all.
michelleantonia 15th-Jun-2012 08:36 am (UTC)
MTE
xliquidskiesx 14th-Jun-2012 02:56 pm (UTC)
the outfit and hair could be better but she looks better without all that make up caked on.
poehleroid 14th-Jun-2012 02:57 pm (UTC)
damn

how dolled up do you get before you go to bed?
xliquidskiesx 14th-Jun-2012 03:03 pm (UTC)
I didn't read the post tbh and just read that that's her pyjama after you left the comment :X

Edited at 2012-06-14 03:05 pm (UTC)
derbysinner 14th-Jun-2012 02:56 pm (UTC)
She actually looks really pretty with no makeup! (also, I'm in the process of moving and one thing I found in a long lost box was an autographed 8"x10" of her. I have no idea why I have this. Cool story, bro)
principino 14th-Jun-2012 02:56 pm (UTC)
What a stupid article. That's one of the best photos I've ever seen of her.
editnoir 14th-Jun-2012 02:57 pm (UTC)
She looks youthful and cute.
juniorquincy 14th-Jun-2012 02:58 pm (UTC)
idg why that's unflattering but okay
suburb_fabulous 14th-Jun-2012 02:58 pm (UTC)
She's clearly looking for validation.
ficre24 14th-Jun-2012 02:59 pm (UTC)
Is this article for reals?
There are so many better things to spend one's time writing about.
l_a_r_m 14th-Jun-2012 03:22 pm (UTC)
This! And why is it so overwhelming negative? Like how dare you Kelly Osbourne! I really don't get it.
transientv 14th-Jun-2012 03:00 pm (UTC)
So what if celebrities post photos of them going to bed like this, and not in full make-up & airbrushed like Kim K. Who gives a shit, let a girl be comfy.
lillylilacs 14th-Jun-2012 03:00 pm (UTC)
This is actually a better than look than some of the outfits she actually puts together.
la_petite_singe 14th-Jun-2012 03:01 pm (UTC)
I still don't get Instagram. Is it seriously just for making photos all sepia-toned?
cickiz 14th-Jun-2012 03:35 pm (UTC)
yep
hey_jealousy 14th-Jun-2012 03:53 pm (UTC)
yes
vicvinegar 14th-Jun-2012 04:05 pm (UTC)
its an app to take or upload pictures and edit them. its not all """"sepia toned"""" and its a way of sharing pictures too
tigirah 14th-Jun-2012 07:00 pm (UTC)
lol @ defending instagram
Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 5:55 pm GMT.