ONTD

3:19 pm - 06/10/2012

How 'Prometheus' killed Guillermo del Toro's dream project



Guillermo del Toro spent 20 years trying to bring horror author H.P. Lovecraft’s novella At the Mountains of Madness to the big screen. Why did Ridley Scott’s Prometheus finally force him to abandon the project earlier this year? And might Mountains—like the book’s ancient monsters—yet come back from the dead?

(Warning: This article contains Prometheus spoilers.)


Guillermo del Toro was around 11 years old when he first read H.P. Lovecraft’s At the Mountains of Madness. Originally penned by the legendary horror writer in 1931, the story tells of an Antarctic expedition which unearths the presumed long dead bodies of strange, starfish-headed creatures—only for the specimens to wake up, slaughter their discoverers, and dissect one of them like a laboratory rat. By the tale’s conclusion, a pair of surviving expedition members has found out that these scientifically-inclined “Old Ones” are members of an ancient alien race who were responsible for creating our simian ancestors as well as even more dangerous beings called “Shoggoths” which, the narrator fears, may yet emerge from their subterranean lair with apocalyptic results.

Packed with horror, terror, and Lovecraft’s trademark sense of cosmic wonder, At the Mountains of Madness is wild stuff even if you’re an adult. Its effect was titanic on the young del Toro. “I became absolutely obsessed with [Lovecraft],” the Mexican-born director would recall in 2010, “and the notion of being created as a joke, as a cosmic joke, and humanity being given free will and ambition as you would give catnip to a cat, to amuse yourselves.”

Del Toro’s obsession would prove an enduring one. Over the past two decades the director of the two Hellboy films and the Oscar-winning Pan’s Labyrinth has repeatedly attempted to bring Mountains to the big screen, only for studios to balk at the project’s costly elements—Antarctica! Monsters! Period-setting!—and del Toro’s insistence the film needs both a downbeat ending and an R-rating to truly serve Lovecraft’s vision.

Two years ago, the movie looked set to go at Universal with del Toro’s longtime friend James Cameron signed on as producer and Tom Cruise the likely star. In the end, that effort turned to ashes. Finally, in April, del Toro effectively announced he was throwing in the towel. The final straw came not from cautious studio executives but from the dramatic and thematic similarities del Toro suspected might exist between Mountains and director Ridley Scott’s then-forthcoming Prometheus. On April 30, del Toro posted a message on his official website stating that he believed Prometheus was going to echo the “creation aspects” of At the Mountains of Madness. The director wrote that, if he was proven correct, Scott’s film would “probably mark a long pause—if not the demise—of ATMOM.”

As audiences discovered this weekend when Prometheus opened to big box office numbers, the film, like Lovecraft’s story, does indeed track the adventures of a scientific expedition who discover that an ancient alien race were responsible for creating our ancestors—as well as a race of monsters which seem more than capable of wiping out humanity. Certainly the new, aquatic aliens introduced in the film will ring bells with fans of Lovecraft whose most infamous creation, the monstrous “Cthulhu,” is described in another of the author’s yarns as resembling “an octopus, a dragon, and a human caricature.”

While no one is suggesting Scott and his screenwriters Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof plagiarized either Lovecraft or del Toro’s take on the material, there’s little doubt the movie fulfills the Hellboy director’s worst fears in terms of the two projects’ similarities.
The cosmos seem to have played a particularly cruel and ironic joke on both Cameron and del Toro. The former, of course, turned the Alien franchise into a franchise with 1986’s Aliens while the latter is a huge fan of Ridley Scott’s original movie. Indeed, del Toro is well aware the Alien movies have always featured a large amount of HPL in its DNA. “I think there is a huge Lovecraftian influence, and a huge At the Mountains of Madness influence on the first Ridley Scott Alien,” the director declared in Lovecraft: Fear of the Unknown, a 2008 documentary about the author. “The idea that they find a derelict, city-sized ship, dead denizens in it, and something that is very much alive and waiting and then takes over the humans. That’s essentially, you could say very much, in the Mountains of Madness.”

The Alien movies are far from the only fear flicks to be influenced by Lovecraft. The impact of his so-called “Cthulu mythos”—an alternative universe of incomprehensibly powerful god-monsters, which Lovecraft developed over many stories—can be felt in such non-Lovecraft adaptations as John Carpenter’s movies The Thing and In the Mouth of Madness, Sam Raimi’s Evil Dead trilogy, and even the Pirates of the Caribbean films, whose half-human, half-octopus villain Davy Jones owes a clear debt to Lovecraft’s obsession with tentacled terror. You can even throw in the Batman franchise as the name of Gotham City’s supervillain-incarcerating Arkham Asylum derives from a fictional Massachusetts town featured or namechecked in several Lovecraft tales, including Mountains.

Lovecraft’s enduring influence—one that extends to books, comics, TV shows, rock music, video games, and even Cthulu plush toys—would have come as a huge surprise to the author himself, who garnered precious little acclaim or financial reward during his lifetime. Lovecraft, who was born in 1890, had a dim view of his writing talents and declined to even submit his longest literary effort, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, to the pulp magazines, such as Weird Tales, which were the principal publishers of his work during the author’s lifetime. Lovecraft’s low opinion of his stories was reinforced by Weird Tales editor Farnsworth Wright who rejected a couple of the author’s stories, including, for reasons of length, At the Mountains of Madness. The tale was finally serialized by another magazine, Astounding Stories, in the spring of 1936. But at the time of Lovecraft’s death from cancer the following year the writer remained almost completely unknown to the public.

In 1939, two of Lovecraft’s writer acquaintances—August Derleth and Donald Wandrei—established the Arkham House publishing company specifically to gift their late friend’s work a wider audience and that year put on sale the a collection of the author’s stories, The Outsider and Others. An omnibus featuring around a hundred tales and called Beyond the Wall of Sleep followed in 1941. Neither were huge sellers—in fact, only 1,217 copies of Beyond the Wall of Sleep were printed due to wartime restrictions—but over time Lovecraft’s reputation began to grow, particularly amongst other writers.

Psycho author Robert Bloch was an early disciple of Lovecraft, with whom he had corresponded as a teenager, and was one of the first scribes of many scribes to utilize, and expand, the Cthulu mythos. Other authors to have dared enter Lovecraft’s alternative universe include Neil Gaiman and Stephen King. In his 1981 non-fiction horror tome Danse Macabre, the Shining author encouraged readers to recall that it is Lovecraft’s “shadow, so long and gaunt, and his eyes, so dark and puritanical, which overlie almost all of the important horror fiction that has come since.”

Filmmaker Roger Corman, ever atune to hip, teen-friendly trends, directed 1963’s The Haunted Palace, an adaptation of the posthumously published The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, and, in 1970, also produced the big screen version of another Lovecraft tale, The Dunwich Horror. But it was a pair of Cthulu-adoring UCLA film students named Dan O’Bannon and John Carpenter who would properly introduce cinemagoers to the author’s horror tropes, starting with their 1974 sci-fi film Dark Star. Although an original creation, the film’s conclusion, in which a doomed astronaut gleefully embraces the idea that his corpse will forever circle the universe as part of an asteroid cluster, is clearly inspired by Lovecraft’s notion of cosmic awe.

O’Bannon and Carpenter fell out after Dark Star and never collaborated again, but both would return to the H.P. well for inspiration — Carpenter with the very Lovecraftian The Thing and the obviously homage-paying In the Mouth of Madness, O’Bannon with his script for 1979’s Alien. While O’Bannon’s screenplay would be altered by many other hands on the way to the screen, the finished movie drips, at times literally, with Lovecraftian horror. That atmosphere was greatly enhanced by the monster designs of yet another Lovecraft fan, H.R. Giger, whose 1977 book of artwork, The Necronomicon, was named after a fictional tome much mentioned in the author’s short stories. O’Bannon, who died in 2009, once said that Alien was “certainly my most successful venture into Lovecraft turf.”

Direct adaptations of Lovecraft’s work have been less successful. The list of truly revered, directly inspired Lovecraft movies pretty much begins and ends with Stuart Gordon’s 1985 cult classic Re-Animator and it is notable that, in the original tale, Lovecraft reined in his habit of creating the kind of epic fantasy realms which can give a cost-conscious studio executive heart palpitations. Indeed, there is much about Lovecraft’s purple, out-there writing style that would seem to resist full-scale adaptation. As Dan O’Bannon once noted: “It’s very, very difficult to achieve that tone in film. What you need is the cinematic equivalent of Lovecraft’s prose, that’s the problem, that’s very hard to achieve. So, it’s still there to be done, if anyone wants to stick his neck out.”

One man who resolved very early in his career that he was prepared to risk his neck in Lovecraft-land was Guillermo del Toro. The director first began sketching out design ideas for a possible adaptation of At the Mountains of Madness around the time his debut film, the vampire movie Cronos, was released in 1993 and by 1998 he had completed a script with Matthew Robbins, who cowrote the director’s 1997 giant bug film Mimic.

In March 2000, it was announced that New Line Cinema’s president of production Michael De Luca had hired Del Toro to direct Blade 2, the second in the Wesley Snipes-starring vampire series. De Luca, too, was a Lovecraft fan and, in fact, had penned Carpenter’s In the Mouth of Madness, whose Lovecraft hat-tipping extended well beyond its title. In June 2001, de Luca was appointed head of production at the Steven Spielberg-cofounded DreamWorks. The next spring, after Blade 2 earned a more-than-healthy $33M on its opening weekend, it was announced that the Mexican director was negotiating with De Luca to direct Mountains for Dreamworks.

Over the next five years del Toro’s star continued to rise as he made 2004’s Hellboy and then 2006’s Pan’s Labyrinth but Mountains remained very much on the director’s mind. In an article published by the Irish Times in September 2004, Del Toro said that Spielberg “loved” the project and that DreamWorks was “extremely supportive” of the film. “I keep saying that will be my Titanic,” del Toro added. “Which, of course, could be taken two ways.” Despite Spielberg’s alleged enthusiasm, DreamWorks never greenlit the project. De Luca left the company in June 2004, and by 2006 the director was in talks with Warner Bros. about the movie.

By now, the director’s enthusiasm for the idea of adapting Mountains was well known to his growing fanbase. At the end of 2006, del Toro answered a series of queries posed by EW readers, one of whom asked whether he had yet found a studio for Mountains. “Not really” del Toro replied “although WB is still interested if I can do it for a certain number.” When another EW correspondent suggested del Toro was the “perfect” director to oversee Mountains, he responded “Somebody, quick! Send this Q&A session to the WB production dept NOW!!! Woo-hoo!!!”

Around the same time del Toro spoke with EW he gave an interview to London Time Out in which the filmmaker made clear that one of the major obstacles to getting Mountains into production was his own determination to stay true to Lovecraft’s tale. “I’m trying to do a trailer to show the studio what the movie could be,” said the director. “I finished the script three years ago, I already have my designs and I believe we are three quarters of the way there but the studio needs another push. So I’m going to make a trailer to show Warner Bros. what the movie could be. Because I believe that movie could be absolutely amazing. The studio is very nervous about the cost and it not having a love story or a happy ending, but it’s impossible to do either in the Lovecraft universe. Mountains of Madness is a very difficult novel to adapt, but if we ever made it, it will be a great movie to see. It will be an event.”

Ultimately, the attempt to get the project off the ground at Warners would also come to naught. Instead, del Toro busied himself with Hellboy II: The Golden Army, which would be released in July 2008. Earlier that year, the chances of del Toro making Mountains his next movie had seemingly diminished from slight to nonexistent with the news that he had been hired to direct The Hobbit. But the film’s production was repeatedly delayed, in large part thanks to the bankruptcy of MGM, and in the spring of 2010 del Toro announced that he had decided to leave the world of Gandalf, Bilbo Baggins et al.

In June 2010, while attending the Saturn awards, Del Toro made clear in an interview for the website Collider that, while he still had ambitions to make Mountains, he felt it unlikely a studio would put up the money to realize his vision. “I would love to be doing At the Mountains of Madness,” he said. “But still it’s very difficult for the studios to take the step and do an R-rated tentpole movie with a tough ending, no love story, set in period.”

Del Toro’s luck was about to change. Or so it seemed. Around the same time as the Saturn Awards, the director met with James Cameron, who had first encountered the filmmaker just prior to the release of Cronos and stayed in friendly touch over the years. Del Toro told Cameron that he wanted his next movie to be one that would feed his soul as a filmmaker. “What’s your favorite project?” Cameron asked. Del Toro replied the movie he most wanted to make was At the Mountains of Madness. “Let’s do it,” Cameron replied.

On July 28, the horror fan community achieved collective nerdgasm when it was reported, accurately, that Cameron and del Toro were in negotiations with Universal to make the movie. “It’s going to be an epically scaled horror film and we haven’t seen anything like that in a really long time,” Cameron told Wired in August. “I guess since Aliens.” With Universal providing seed money for the project, the director employed a team to design the movie’s monsters, of which there would be many. In addition to the Old Ones and the Shoggoths, Guillermo also intended to depict the dreaded Cthulhu. Meanwhile, the rumor mill had Tom Cruise, James McAvoy, and Chris Pine all in the running to star in the film, which del Toro and Cameron intended to shoot in 3-D.

In a video interview posted in February 2011, Cameron confirmed to MTV that he and Guillermo had approached Cruise about the project. “Tom does want to do the picture,” he said. “I don’t think we have a deal with him yet, but we’re hoping to get that closed soon. Guillermo is madly working on a new draft of the script. Hopefully we’ll be shooting by June or July.”

That hope was shattered when Universal ultimately declined to greenlight the movie, whose budget would have been in the region of $150m. On March 7 del Toro emailed the CritierionCast website declaring the project to be “dead.” In another missive, to a writer at The New Yorker, the director elaborated: “Madness has gone dark. The ‘R’ did us in.” On March 9, the director announced that his next film would be the monster movie Pacific Rim.

Despite this setback, del Toro remained determined that one day he would return to his dream project. Last July, in the course of Entertainment Weekly’s Visionaries panel at Comic-Con, the director said he hoped to still make the movie: “I’ve been trying to do it for so many years. We were so close, and the incarnation we were going to do is so great, I don’t want to give up. I hope I make it. It’s one of those movies that’s a Holy Grail for me.” Finally, this April, even del Toro seemed to lose faith when he realized that the plot of Prometheus might make any version of Mountains seem like old news to the public.

So is del Toro’s dream of adapting At the Mountains of Madness really dead? Maybe. Maybe not. Yes, the box office success of Prometheus means some cinemagoers might find a Mountains adaptation thematically familiar. But the film’s box office figures also demonstrate that there is an appetite for exactly the kind of Lovecraft-inspired, philosophically-inclined monster mayhem which del Toro has now spent two decades trying to bring to the big screen. And, as the sequels-filled movie release schedule proves week after week, a lot of studio executives seem to believe that familiarity breeds contentment among moviegoers.
Of course, when you’re talking about H.P Lovecraft, it’s always unwise to assume that anything is ever really dead. Just ask the doomed explorers in At the Mountains of Madness. Except, of course you can’t. So, instead, let’s let the last words go to Lovecraft who, in The Call of Cthulhu, wrote…

That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.


Have you seen Prometheus? Do you think del Toro should abandon his dream project? Or do you agree with the correspondent to the director’s website who yesterday argued that “if there’s room enough for two Snow White movies released within the same year there’s room for Prometheus and AtMoM to be released years apart. Given how important it is to Guillermo I hope we get to see it at some point."? (lol, that was me)


Source
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
fabouluz I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?10th-Jun-2012 10:38 pm (UTC)
I know it's a prequel but it's not selling it to me.
cyberghostface Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?10th-Jun-2012 10:42 pm (UTC)
Hard to say. I'd say it's in the same vein as Alien was but it's also pretty different. I'm a fan of the first three Alien films and I got a lot out of Prometheus so take that as you will.
shadyoutkast Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?10th-Jun-2012 10:58 pm (UTC)
Its in the "Alien" story universe but i don't really consider it to be a prequel.
vanishingbee Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?11th-Jun-2012 04:53 am (UTC)
why not? It's on the same planet as alien&aliens, and its ending is the direct setup to alien.
hardbeats Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?10th-Jun-2012 11:09 pm (UTC)
it's related to the alien universe, but no it is not a direct prequel to alien. if you go into it with that mindset, you will be disappointed.
makahakat Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?10th-Jun-2012 11:29 pm (UTC)
i saw zero promotion for the film and didnt follow marketing for it at all; when i saw it, at the end my reaction was "HOLY SHIT THIS WAS A PREQUEL TO ALIEN????????"

so idk people are saying its not but that was definitely the impression that the movie gave me unbiasedly
cricketgrl Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?10th-Jun-2012 11:45 pm (UTC)
It's an Alien movie so if you're an AVP fan I don't think you'll understand or care about Prometheus.

That being said I love Prometheus but I hated Alien:Resurrection and especially the AVP films.
nicholasdee Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?11th-Jun-2012 03:06 am (UTC)
Ridley Scott had nothing to do with any of the Alien sequels or Predator.

This exists in the Alien universe and Alien only.

boss_sister Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?11th-Jun-2012 03:07 am (UTC)
Prometheus was fucking FANTASTIC. I'm also an Aliens and Predator fan.
vanishingbee Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?11th-Jun-2012 04:52 am (UTC)
yes it's the story of how the xenomorph became adapted to humans

more like aliens than anything else
canuckgirl33 Re: I'm and Aliens and Predator fanatic, is Prometheus in the same vein?11th-Jun-2012 11:46 pm (UTC)
Ridley Scott, from the start, had stated that it was not a prequel but did occur prior to Alien
bottom_line 10th-Jun-2012 10:38 pm (UTC)
Seeing Prometheus tomorrow and I can't wait!
poop_of_death 11th-Jun-2012 12:11 am (UTC)
everyone is telling me it was bad
bottom_line 11th-Jun-2012 01:59 am (UTC)
Oh no :(
ruby_chalice 11th-Jun-2012 06:54 am (UTC)
My son saw it recently and confirmed my worst fears after seeing the trailer ... the script is dreadful.
sandvich 11th-Jun-2012 12:14 am (UTC)
Yay! I really liked it - I hope you do too!
vanishingbee 11th-Jun-2012 05:01 am (UTC)
I loved it.
chantonii 11th-Jun-2012 07:32 am (UTC)
I just got back from seeing it. Everyone was telling me it was bad so I put off seeing it, expecting to be disappointed. I liked it though!

Have fun, bb :)
crump 11th-Jun-2012 11:36 am (UTC)
Enjoy. I loved it but saw it in IMAX which definitely helped a lot.
manaconda 10th-Jun-2012 10:38 pm (UTC)
GODDAMMIT PROMETHEUS.

wait.

GODDAMMIT UNIVERSAL.

Edited at 2012-06-10 10:40 pm (UTC)
ragdollia 10th-Jun-2012 10:40 pm (UTC)
wasnt this posted from another source like a month ago?
cyberghostface 10th-Jun-2012 10:41 pm (UTC)
Guillermo del Toro's comments were but this was written after Prometheus was released and takes that into account.
scottfreein4_d 10th-Jun-2012 10:41 pm (UTC)
whine whine whine

budget would have been in the region of $150m
that couldn't possibly have been the reason this project was shelved, now could it?
cyberghostface 10th-Jun-2012 10:43 pm (UTC)
That's not what they're talking about.
audrey 10th-Jun-2012 10:47 pm (UTC)
did you read this?
runitsjess 12th-Jun-2012 05:53 am (UTC)
I sure as shit didn't, did you see how long that was?
mechuparmucho 10th-Jun-2012 10:42 pm (UTC)
good.
i need hellboy 3
greenwitch 11th-Jun-2012 12:20 am (UTC)
this
masterofmystery 10th-Jun-2012 10:43 pm (UTC)
doesn't he have like five other movies on the shelf/pre-production? when the hell would have time for this
chrislola 10th-Jun-2012 10:52 pm (UTC)
He'll sleep when he's dead.
faithlessjuliet 10th-Jun-2012 10:43 pm (UTC)
I don't think the two projects are very similar at all. I feel like Del Toro could still continue working on At the Mountains of Madness, if he wanted.
whimsical_tale 10th-Jun-2012 11:49 pm (UTC)
They are pretty similar though or at least similar enough that the studios won't want to make it right now. Maybe in a few years but I doubt Guillermo will want to make it even then. I'm not sure if you already saw Prometheus or not but I can tell you that it's heavily influenced by ATMOM.
faithlessjuliet 11th-Jun-2012 10:52 pm (UTC)
Really? I've just seen Prometheus, but I haven't read ATMOM in ages.
alessar 11th-Jun-2012 05:34 am (UTC)
I think that if his take on AtMoM was going to be close enough in mood and effects to Prometheus to get it canned, then his take was going to be one I didn't like. I read another interview with him and it sounded like he really wanted to show all the Lovecraftian critters and then some, and I think AtMoM should be a less is more type horror flick.
pussyfoot 10th-Jun-2012 10:43 pm (UTC)
lovecraft fanboys are the worst so this can only be a good thing
prophecypro 10th-Jun-2012 10:45 pm (UTC)
Haven't seen it yet but I cannot find a single person from my friends or people at work who says they liked Prometheus. Shit's been getting slated here in the UK.
vanishingbee 11th-Jun-2012 05:03 am (UTC)
I saw it with a group of 10 people who all loved it. but we're all sci-fi nerds (though not everyone had seen an aliens movie before).
astralwish 11th-Jun-2012 11:21 am (UTC)
the plot was just plain messy but visually it's stunning
lostinshalott 11th-Jun-2012 04:05 pm (UTC)
I saw it with my family and they all hated it, one of my friends liked it but all others I know who've seen it didn't like it. I just found it really messy and underwhelming it was like two films meshed together.
pathologie 12th-Jun-2012 04:26 pm (UTC)
Honestly, it was whatever. I liked Rooni but that was about it..
whatwouldwasdo 12th-Jun-2012 05:46 pm (UTC)
me and my friends all liked it, but we're film design students so we mainly focused on the aesthetics.. lol
audrey 10th-Jun-2012 10:46 pm (UTC)
i feel so awkward, i liked prometheus mostly for all the elements apparently described in lovecraft's work. but prometheus was epic in scope and i don't think del toro would ever be comfortable working outside of a tiny little controllable world.
dottiehinkle 10th-Jun-2012 10:46 pm (UTC)
I'm surprised there havn't been any big movies made about any of lovecrafts stories.
booster_blue 11th-Jun-2012 03:48 am (UTC)
It's not surprising, really. The simple fact that his stories tend to always have ~bad endings will always be one of the biggest reasons studios will keep their distance. I Am Legend and The Descent are both prime examples of the Happy Ending Syndrome.

Not to mention the potential budget. Lovecraft isn't a sure bet like HP or Twilight, so throwing a lot of money into it seems a big risk to them.
ebertrules 10th-Jun-2012 10:46 pm (UTC)
idgaf about lovercraft so yay. i hope del toro moves on to something awesome.
esoteriq 10th-Jun-2012 10:50 pm (UTC)
I heard Prometheus was great, but the ending blew it. Anyone wanna spoil for me?
robertsbox_xo 10th-Jun-2012 10:53 pm (UTC)
nah, the whole movie sucked not just the ending
ebertrules 10th-Jun-2012 10:55 pm (UTC)
lol no. it wasn't the ending. it was everything.
cyberghostface 10th-Jun-2012 10:59 pm (UTC)
I'm a bit surprised at all the hate it's getting. It wasn't Blade Runner but it wasn't Phantom Menace either.
dothecrunge 10th-Jun-2012 11:27 pm (UTC)
Same. It wasn't perfect but it was entertaining and intriguing. I wouldn't consider it a piece of shit as some people are saying..
hannahstarr 11th-Jun-2012 12:11 am (UTC)
same, I really enjoyed it although I fully acknowledge the script could have been way better
drownanddive 11th-Jun-2012 12:28 am (UTC)
IA.
shadowpiranha 11th-Jun-2012 01:47 am (UTC)
Seriously. It had actually been a while since I felt 'things' at a theater, some parts actually built up my anxiety, and hey if I'm paying I want to feel something and be entertained. It did its job, as far as I'm concerned. I don't think it was that bad.
fierysadness 11th-Jun-2012 02:04 am (UTC)
mte. I was so disappointed 'cause everyone on ONTD has been saying how horrible it was that I didn't even wanna see it, but my friends dragged me to it and I actually liked it.
hardbeats 10th-Jun-2012 11:15 pm (UTC)
the ending was a bit of a let down, but it totally opened it up for a sequel.
makahakat 10th-Jun-2012 11:31 pm (UTC)
i thought the whole thing was great, the only thing that i was rme at was how much shit the girl was going through but still running around (like having surgery and running and jumping right after, ntm getting punched and slammed into by things right where she'd been cut into a few hours before, etc etc)
sirenlyfox 11th-Jun-2012 12:00 am (UTC)
It's really bad. I went to see it with some friends and they hated it too, which surprised me, cause usually they love everything.
ladysherlock 11th-Jun-2012 12:09 am (UTC)
Sure

Turns out the space jockey from alien is actually the race that created humans. However they are pissed at us cause we fucked it all up so they're headed to kill us before something went awry (I wasn't clear on what this was). Their weapon is a biological agent that causes people to die or become rage zombies. One character ingests this, and has sex with Noomi Rapace's character. He dies, and she gets pregnant. She self-aborts the creature she's carrying, but it survives. In the end, the last space jockey survivor and the creature (which has grown into a giant vagina dentata) duke it out until the creature finally clamps on to the jockey a la the face huggers in Alien. A few scenes later - ta da - baby mama alien pops out of the jockey's stomach



TL;DR version - our ancestors accidentally create the Alien species


Edited at 2012-06-11 12:09 am (UTC)
diamond_dust06 11th-Jun-2012 01:57 am (UTC)
The movie barely tries to answer any of the question it raises. I felt unfulfilled.
shaibitch 11th-Jun-2012 06:36 am (UTC)
Nope it was all asstastic and I'm a scifi nerd!
genbu_no_miko24 10th-Jun-2012 10:50 pm (UTC)
Different directors....different visions.

I don't think he give it up completely...
dionisia2005 11th-Jun-2012 04:45 pm (UTC)
your icon..the best
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 12:35 am GMT.