ONTD

6:48 pm - 05/08/2012

Met Gala Snub: Don’t Expect Kim Kardashian On The Cover Of Vogue Anytime Soon!!!



The most glamorous stars in Hollywood sizzled at the Met Gala in New York City Monday night but there was one starlet who was noticeably absent – Kim Kardashian!

Kim’s new boyfriend, superstar Kanye West, was at Anna Wintour’s fabled Metropolitan Museum of Art Costume Institute Gala, but Kim was not by his side, and that’s down to an edict straight from the famed Vogue editor for years.

“Anna hates Kim,” a source says.

“Why would she be invited to the event? It is all the biggest stars in the world and Kim doesn’t fit that bill at all.”

This year, big screen bombshell Gwyneth Paltrow, Beyoncé, and supermodel Gisele Bunchen and hubby Tom Brady attended the Elsa Shiaparelli and Miuccia Prada exhibit dressed in the hottest couture from the world’s most important fashion designers, but Kim wasn’t among them.

“The Met Gala is $25,000 a ticket, but Kim can’t even buy her way in, Anna Wintour does NOT want her there!” the source says.

Kim and her very pregnant sister Kourtney Kardashian were snapped on Monday running errands in Los Angeles, and the source says she’ll likely try and justify her absence.

“Kim and her camp will deny that she wasn’t invited by saying that she had business in L.A., but that is a lie,” . "She would of done anything to be there with all the A-listers."

And, don't expect to see Kardashian on the cover of the esteemed fashion mag anytime soon either!

"Anna Wintour would allow Kim Kardashian on the cover of Vogue over her dead body," the source says. "As long as Anna in charge you will NOT see Kim on Vogue."

Radar
dubiously 8th-May-2012 11:57 pm (UTC)
Ugh, would HAVE.
sprywonderdog 9th-May-2012 12:03 am (UTC)
It annoys me more than there, their, and they're.
mazohyst 9th-May-2012 12:08 am (UTC)
OH GOD I KNOW
hungryandhot 9th-May-2012 12:22 am (UTC)
Thank you. That's my biggest grammar-related pet peeve.
yah_bish_yah 9th-May-2012 12:26 am (UTC)
YES. Came here to point that out, ugh.
insensibilities 9th-May-2012 12:26 am (UTC)
Came in here to say this. Ugh. WHY DOES EVERYONE DO THIS??
_lackof_passion 9th-May-2012 12:41 am (UTC)
unfortunately they don't know better.
run_atreyu 9th-May-2012 12:50 am (UTC)
Because the contractions, eg. "would've" sound like "would of" :(((

It's so annoying and makes me majorly question adults who I know have had a good education and yet get this type of simple grammatical stuff wrong.
colorzplosion 9th-May-2012 12:37 am (UTC)
omg mte. would "of" makes no logical sense.
sitbashenjoi 9th-May-2012 12:46 am (UTC)
fucking kills me
joseishijin 9th-May-2012 02:58 am (UTC)
Someone got paid to write this - that's what makes me rage. :(
caitinlv 10th-May-2012 04:27 pm (UTC)
This. Dammit.
cecilia_weasley 14th-May-2012 08:08 pm (UTC)
I came here just to comment this, actually. Very frustrating that someone with a journalism degree and their editor couldn't spot this.
This page was loaded May 26th 2013, 12:27 am GMT.