ONTD

3:50 pm - 05/06/2012

Linda Evangelista Trial: Salma Hayek Told Baby Would Have Down Syndrome



# Linda Evangelista is demanding $46,000 in childcare support from ex-boyfriend for son Augie
# Francois-Henri Pinault revealed he spends $260,000 on gifts on himself a year but cannot remember what he bought his son for his birthday
# Pinault admitted on Thursday he broke up with Evangelista when he found out she was pregnant
# Began dating Salma Hayek months later and they now have daughter, four

Hollywood actress Salma Hayek feared she was carrying a baby with Down's syndrome, her French billionaire husband has revealed as he tackles his former flame, Linda Evangelista, in court.

On the witness stand in Manhattan for the second day, Francois-Henri Pinault explained that his wife, then 41, was having a 'very difficult pregnancy' and almost lost their daughter Valentina, now four.

'We were told the baby had Down syndrome until late May 2007,' Pinault said. 'I asked Linda to delay the legal recognition process [of son Augustin] until after the birth of Valentina.'


Evangelista, who has taken Pinault to court for $46,000 a month in child support for their five-year-old son Augie, agreed and he said he was grateful, the New York Daily News reported.

The revelation comes a day after the French billionaire revealed he broke up with Evangelista after discovering she was pregnant four months into their relationship.

The supermodel's lawyer also claimed on Thursday Pinault had demanded she have an abortion.


On Friday, as Pinault took the witness stand for the second time, details of his lavish spending came to light - and how he did not buy his son a birthday present until Evangelista complained.

He revealed he spent $260,000 in 2010 on luxury watches for himself, but could not remember what he bought Augie for his fourth birthday, or how much he had spent on the boy.


'I have a watch collection,' he said, the New York Post reported. 'It's for when I buy a watch for me.'

He went on: 'I bought him a present for his birthday and for Christmas,' yet admitted he could not remember what he bought Augie for his birthday.

And for Christmas: 'I bought it online. It was a piano thing.'

Evangelista also spent 30 minutes on the stand on Friday and revealed her humble beginnings.

'I asked my dad for a bike and he said, "No bike, go to work",' she said, adding that she began picking cherries until she worked as a model - a career which is now stalling, she said.

'There's not a lot of demand for me,' said Evangelista, whose $1.8 million annual salary took a hit last year when her contract with L'Oreal came to an end.

The four-day trial will spell out Pinault's childcare obligations. Evangelista spends $46,000 a month for their son's around-the-clock nanny and armed drivers, and wants Pinault to cover the costs.

Evangelista's lawyer William Beslow has argued that Augie deserves a lifestyle similar to that of his four-year-old daughter with Hayek.

Pinault, 49, is heir to a family estate estimated at $11.5 billion. As chief executive of PPR, the conglomerate that owns Yves Saint Laurent, Gucci and Bottega Veneta, he earns $5 million a year.

He spends $50,000 a month just on the taxes, upkeep and loan payments for the $12 million Los Angeles home he's put in trust for the girl, Valentina, the Post reported.


Despite his wealth, Pinault has criticised Evangelista for her outlandish demands, suggesting the $46,000 a month is in fact for 'mom support'.

She has maintained she is modelling or working on her image at all hours of the day.

'Most of the expenses do not relate to Augie but they relate to Ms. Evangelista,' Pinault's lawyer, David Aronson, said in opening statements on Thursday.

'It is the classic case of someone trying to bootstrap herself to something that is alimony.'

Also at the trial on Thursday, Evangelista's lawyer recounted a conversation the former couple shared in January 2006.

'After some initial happiness, he told her he wished she would terminate the pregnancy,' Beslow told a support magistrate.

Evangelista, who was then in her early 40s, told Pinault she would keep the baby. Pinault revealed the couple had spent just seven days together in four months when she made the announcement.

'She would support the child herself, since he had made it perfectly clear to her that he had no interest in doing so. And she did.'

Pinault said he found out she was pregnant in early 2006 and admitted he broke up with her on hearing the news.

'She was so happy to be pregnant,' he said. 'But it was not planned. I decided to stop the relationship at that point.' He added: 'We were dating four months and I didn't even know her very much.'

Asked why he didn’t pay Evangelista anything in child support for the first years of Augie's life, Pinault answered: 'She didn’t ask and I didn’t offer.'

In opening statements on Thursday, Beslow insisted Evangelista is not hoping to improve her station in life but that she has paid all of his expenses without a single cent from Pinault.

'Ms. Evangelista is not looking to piggyback on the lifestyle of Mr. Pinault,' Beslow said. 'She is looking for a continuation of the reasonable lifestyle of Augie.'

'I need to protect him,' Evangelista told Love magazine in February. If she is granted the $46,000 of her demands, it will shatter records for childcare payouts.

Last year a judge questioned the model's need for full-time nannies, asking how often she worked.

'When I work, it can be a 16-hour day,' she said. 'On days when I do not work, I am working on my image. I have to hit the gym. I have beauty appointments. I have to work toward my next job and maintaining my image, just like an athlete.'

Evangelista, herself worth $8 million, is also demanding Pinault give her son a home similar to the $13 million California mansion he put in a trust for his and Hayek's four-year-old daughter, Valentina.

His family estate includes the Christie’s auction house, the Château-Latour vineyard in Bordeaux and the French premiere league football team Stade Rennais, the Daily News reported.

Earlier this week, Manhattan divorce lawyer Raoul Felder said the eye-watering payout - which comes to $1,500 a day - was unlikely.

He pointed out that judges consider how much it costs to care for a child, rather than the wealth of the parents.

'She’s in for a big surprise. I wouldn’t be counting the money yet,' he told the New York Daily News.

She is worth $8 million and owns a penthouse in Chelsea, New York and an apartment near her son’s school on the upper East Side.

She broke up with billionaire and Hard Rock Cafe co-founder Peter Morton last year and filed her case against Pinault shortly after the break up.

Since, Pinault has been paying child support - although the amount has not been disclosed.

The couple dated from September 2005 until January 2006, and she was pregnant with Augie when Pinault began dating Hayek in April 2006. He and Hayek married in 2009.

Evangelista had kept the name of Augie's father secret until it was written in court papers filed in August

source
Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
superdogbiter 6th-May-2012 11:12 pm (UTC)
i get hayek and cruz mixed up alot
scotchsour 7th-May-2012 01:12 am (UTC)
Well they are best friends...
cricketgrl 7th-May-2012 03:24 am (UTC)
Hayek is the prettier one. It's the only way I can distinguish.

They are very close friends so it's understandable.
nymphadoratonks 7th-May-2012 06:00 am (UTC)
get new eyes
mari_lyn00 7th-May-2012 09:07 am (UTC)
howww?? they don't even look alike.
greyfilm 7th-May-2012 03:55 pm (UTC)
They really look nothing alike.
parapraxes 7th-May-2012 11:44 pm (UTC)
they don't look alike at all, numb nuts
cherrybombx 8th-May-2012 01:35 am (UTC)
cruz's face is shaped like a circle, hayek's is more like a rectangle
the_landlady 6th-May-2012 11:12 pm (UTC)
I don't care how much money he makes, $46,000 a month on child support is ridiculous when you know she's not going to spend it all on the child.
kapuki234 6th-May-2012 11:28 pm (UTC)
who cares
he can afford it easy, and it'd help him in the long run regardless

this guy's just bitter and a grade A dickface
sweet_honesty 6th-May-2012 11:35 pm (UTC)
I don't like any of them in this case.
ppeak 7th-May-2012 05:40 pm (UTC)
Then put it in a trust for the child...don't give it to Linda.

persephone_tree 6th-May-2012 11:54 pm (UTC)
At this point, idec if she spends 80% on it on daily baths in money tbh, i just want her to get that money because he's an asshole.
kerrence 6th-May-2012 11:59 pm (UTC)
child support is income-based, though

e: oh it's not in this case. that'll teach me to get mad at nothing.

Edited at 2012-05-07 12:01 am (UTC)
kimberwyn 7th-May-2012 02:19 am (UTC)
I thought this guy was a billionaire, so that sounded like chump change. But maybe she knows she'll get less so she's asking for more?
wits 6th-May-2012 11:13 pm (UTC)
this happened with my sister
derbysinner 7th-May-2012 01:10 am (UTC)
she got knocked up after dating a billionaire for 4 months?
patiently 7th-May-2012 08:11 pm (UTC)
lol
lovely_niqua 7th-May-2012 10:39 pm (UTC)
lmao
tebtosca 6th-May-2012 11:14 pm (UTC)
Linda--GET THAT MONEY, GIRL
cricketgrl SALMA HAYEK!7th-May-2012 03:28 am (UTC)


She worked the fuck outta that billionaire ass hole and good for her in securing her daughter's future. So many daughters are screwed when sons are born.

This is a reversal of fortune.
heart_iswild 6th-May-2012 11:14 pm (UTC)
they both sound like gigantic twats

if linda's career is really taking a hit, she better be getting out of bed for less than 10k a day

Edited at 2012-05-06 11:15 pm (UTC)
jezemel 7th-May-2012 12:57 am (UTC)
A+ Classic.
crump 7th-May-2012 07:25 pm (UTC)
haha zing!
infinite_drag 7th-May-2012 09:17 pm (UTC)
oooh snap!
ljubavirakija 6th-May-2012 11:15 pm (UTC)
Yikes. This battle is getting messy
superdogbiter 6th-May-2012 11:16 pm (UTC)
well than call the avengers thor
Together you will be victorious
ljubavirakija 6th-May-2012 11:18 pm (UTC)
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Damn, bb. Your shade is usually better
lumosofmylife 6th-May-2012 11:15 pm (UTC)
I thought that was Mila Jovovich (sp?) at first.
vzylexy 6th-May-2012 11:17 pm (UTC)
Damn, I seriously thought it was.
on_broadway36 6th-May-2012 11:18 pm (UTC)
mte
ljubavirakija 6th-May-2012 11:19 pm (UTC)
See it now
lenra 7th-May-2012 12:14 am (UTC)
yeah me too and i had to google Evangelista and Mila to set them apart.
tundrabeast 7th-May-2012 11:37 pm (UTC)
They both have that bright-eyed pretty birdy kind of face, don't they?
judgmental 8th-May-2012 04:30 am (UTC)
I was like "what does Mila has to do with this mess idgi"
kubaba 8th-May-2012 01:26 pm (UTC)
Me too I was so confused
noon 6th-May-2012 11:15 pm (UTC)
it's so nice seeing that rich people are just as ratchet as them heauxs down the street
paarycia 6th-May-2012 11:55 pm (UTC)
loool ia
pastelstar 7th-May-2012 12:01 am (UTC)
LOL yes
gata_power 7th-May-2012 12:13 am (UTC)
lmao
muzicnem 7th-May-2012 01:16 am (UTC)
lmao perfect description
chantonii 7th-May-2012 06:51 am (UTC)
LOL damn straight. Cashed up bogans tbh.
karinette001 6th-May-2012 11:15 pm (UTC)
ooh this is turning nasty already omg
ch33rylips 6th-May-2012 11:17 pm (UTC)
Whatever his son should have a trust and he should pay child support it irks me when parents treat their kids differently.
heartstopper 6th-May-2012 11:32 pm (UTC)
me too, it's disgusting. he values his child with hayek far more, how awful.
helloneworld 6th-May-2012 11:36 pm (UTC)
i agree. it is absolutely disgusting
janey 7th-May-2012 12:00 am (UTC)
ia, that must be so shitty for his son :(
sweet_honesty 6th-May-2012 11:35 pm (UTC)
I agree that he should set up a trust fund for the child. Maybe split some of the child support into a fund, because there is no way she's going to need that much. But it could really help the child in the future.
emofordino 7th-May-2012 12:24 am (UTC)
i couldn't agree more. if you have sex with someone, you're basically agreeing to have to contribute to raising a child as the worst case scenario. there's no excuse for not at least making an attempt to help raise your child, regardless of whether it was intended or not.
muzicnem 7th-May-2012 01:18 am (UTC)
Agreed. I think the majority of the money though should go into a trust/college/ fund for his kid instead of her (she's got her own and shouldn't receive a ton money just because she slept w/ him, imo). But I do think it's really sad he's not treating his son the same way as he treats Valentina.
_underwhelmed 7th-May-2012 01:49 am (UTC)
ia!!! if one kid lives the Good Life, the other one should too! down to the last penny
cricketgrl 7th-May-2012 03:54 am (UTC)


Valentina is starting to look more like Mr. Hayek as she's aging. She was adorable and looked more like Salma when she was born.
on_broadway36 6th-May-2012 11:18 pm (UTC)
"Evangelista" sounds like name for a super femme Evangelical who prays loudly to God before eating dinner at Red Lobster. It distracted me from properly reading the article.
snapiphany 6th-May-2012 11:30 pm (UTC)
Heavenly Father, bless these Cheddar Bay Biscuits IN THE HOLY NAME OF JESUS WHO SHED BLOOD TO ALLOW US TO ENJOY THIS MEAL AND THE ENDLESS BLESSING OF BISCUIT REFILLS. SATAN, YOU HAVE NO PLACE AT THIS TABLE. TAKE YOUR FILTHY HANDS OFF THIS DIRTY FORK AND KNIFE. COME OUT! COME OUT, I SAY, IN THE NAME OF JESUS!

Amen.
queenweasley 6th-May-2012 11:33 pm (UTC)
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
on_broadway36 7th-May-2012 12:12 am (UTC)
LMAO yes
muzicnem 7th-May-2012 01:21 am (UTC)
GARGOYLES

DARK-SAHDED
ishachan 7th-May-2012 02:24 am (UTC)
OMG ROFLMAO
judgmental 8th-May-2012 04:34 am (UTC)
LMAO
judgmental 8th-May-2012 04:33 am (UTC)
RIGHT? I always think that when I read her name tbh
likegunfire 6th-May-2012 11:18 pm (UTC)
this trial is literally EVERYTHING to me rn
wikkidraven 6th-May-2012 11:18 pm (UTC)
you don't have a baby with someone you've known for four months idgaf who you are

wakeupjulia 6th-May-2012 11:24 pm (UTC)
you do if he's a billionaire and you have a stalling career.
whitegirlthin 6th-May-2012 11:34 pm (UTC)
I wish I was a female - an attractive one at that - so I could find myself a nice and rich sugar daddy
wikkidraven 7th-May-2012 12:04 am (UTC)
you're right, what an excellent reason to become a mother O_O
roguewave3 6th-May-2012 11:25 pm (UTC)
It wasn't planned. The only other option was an abortion and she didn't want to go through that.
calcified 6th-May-2012 11:29 pm (UTC)
This comment reads like people should HAVE to get an abortion if they haven't been with someone long.
odd_fish_stick 6th-May-2012 11:54 pm (UTC)
she was 40 it's not like she would have had that many chances after that
gjee 7th-May-2012 02:14 am (UTC)
i thought it was shady too until I read that she was in her 40s when it happened. plus, she dated another billionaire and didn't get pregnant with him.

sounds like she only started asking for support once her career stalled rather than doing it immediately.
angel_dust_fury 6th-May-2012 11:19 pm (UTC)
Pinault said he found out she was pregnant in early 2006 and admitted he broke up with her on hearing the news.

No surprise there.
distant_lines 6th-May-2012 11:21 pm (UTC)
I'm curious what made him stay with Hayek when she was pregnant.
tanya1976 6th-May-2012 11:25 pm (UTC)
She threatened to kick his ass.
thishollywood 6th-May-2012 11:27 pm (UTC)
Maybe he was actually in love with her :)
isthisdesire 6th-May-2012 11:37 pm (UTC)
dem chichis
sorya86 6th-May-2012 11:40 pm (UTC)
Her chichis. They are magical, no lie.
cricketgrl 7th-May-2012 03:31 am (UTC)
She's Salma 'fuckin' Hayek!

That's all the answer that should be required.
loveconfess 6th-May-2012 11:24 pm (UTC)
that is quite rude, omfg
I can't imagine finding out I was pregnant and then having my SO leave me because of it, talk about a double punch
bgwqlc 7th-May-2012 02:34 am (UTC)
That is what happened with my parents. My mom dated for a year and he dumped her when she found out she was pregnant with me. My father and I don't have a close relationship and my older sister hates him.
nafrate 6th-May-2012 11:19 pm (UTC)
They all sound like their priorities are messed up. It's your kid, your ex shouldn't have to ask for child support, you should offer especially considering you dumped her just because she got pregnant. And it doesn't cost $46k a MONTH to raise a kid, even one raised in the lap of luxury. It's all sorts of absurd from every angle.

Edited at 2012-05-06 11:20 pm (UTC)
crystalzelda 6th-May-2012 11:22 pm (UTC)
If he's a billionaire - which he is - there's no reason for him not to pay a huge sum of money. He can afford it, and there's no reason for his son not to live as well as possible. Does he need all that money? No. But he deserves it.
roguewave3 6th-May-2012 11:26 pm (UTC)
mfte
whitegirlthin 6th-May-2012 11:37 pm (UTC)
That's what you would think, but "...judges consider how much it costs to care for a child, rather than the wealth of the parents."

iTA that he can def. afford to pay such a large sum for child support, but it all depends on what the judge believes :/
lindz93 7th-May-2012 12:29 am (UTC)
Exactly
helloneworld 6th-May-2012 11:38 pm (UTC)
he probably pays more to support his daughter with salma which would motivate me to want to ask for some crazy amount of money too if i were linda. he obviously favors his daughter more. his son deserves as close to fair treatment to his sister (salma's daughter)
emofordino 7th-May-2012 12:31 am (UTC)
i would agree with your last point if he didn't have another child that he provides for emotionally and financially. shit, his daughter is like, still a baby and she already has a huge house in a trust waiting for her when she comes of age. it's not like he can't give a little money towards the care of his child with linda evangelista.
run_atreyu 7th-May-2012 01:08 am (UTC)
You can raise a kid on staple foods, water and some form of shelter. That doesn't mean that people actually do that. They raise them to the standard of living in their family.
littlelauren86 7th-May-2012 02:04 am (UTC)
The guy's a billionaire who rakes in millions a year. The kid's entitled to the same lifestyle the other child has. It's wrong for one kid to be in the (hypothetical) poor house while the other lives a life of luxury.
lachica2000 7th-May-2012 02:30 am (UTC)
It does seem like a ridiculous sum of money but if he's paying out $50k a month just for a house in trust for his daughter he can pay the $46k for his son's needs.
Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 5:31 pm GMT.