ONTD

5:02 pm - 04/18/2012

The Five Blockbusters in Danger of Tanking



LAST year the casualties included a superhero powered by a lantern, Martians in desperate need of a mother and an ill-advised team-up between James Bond and Indiana Jones.

2011 was touted as the year of the movie sequel - 24 were released - but it will be remembered as the year audience attendance fell to record lows and the number of box office turkeys rose dramatically.

This year movie execs will be on edge as Hollywood's blockbuster season gets into gear. There has already been one career-ending disaster (Disney's John Carter) and one record-breaking hit (The Hunger Games).

And although the line-up for this year includes several films that have the potential to break the billion-dollar mark - The Avengers, Ice Age 4 and The Dark Knight Rises - there are more than a few blockbusters that could end up tanking at the box office.



1. Battleship



Plot: Rihanna, Liam Nesson and Friday Night Lights' Taylor Kitsch defend the Earth from an invading alien armada.

Why it could fail: There are many problems with Battleship, although the most obvious one, that it is based on a board game, shouldn't hurt it all that much. The ads promise a film like Transformers (are those Decepticons in the water?) and that franchise has managed to take more than $US2 billion at the box office.

Critical reaction to the film has been almost universally negative, with many calling it sub-standard Michael Bay. Again, that shouldn't necessarily be a barrier to success - all three Transformer films were panned - but coupled with audience exhaustion with that style of sci-fi action flick and Battleship's prospects don't look good.

The film, which cost $200 million to make and possibly $100 million more to market, is yet to debut in the US but it opened in Australia and 25 other countries last week, taking a respectable $58 million. That's a solid start but it was overshadowed by the $98 million taken by Titanic 3D ($67 million was taken in China alone). Like most blockbusters, the majority of Battleship's money will come from its opening weekend and from markets outside the US. Asia should be Battleship's biggest market but with interest still high in Titanic 3D and The Avengers set to make its mark in coming weeks, Battleship's prospects don't look good. It won't be the disaster that John Carter was - both films share the same star, though - but anything less than $300 million will be seen as a failure, as this was supposed to be the start of a lucrative franchise.

2. Rock of Ages



Plot: Two young dreamers find love in Los Angeles. It's the '80s, though, and the action is interrupted by mullets, power chords and ROCK.

Why it could fail: Rock of Ages is based on a hit Broadway musical and features lots of 80s hits, which should guarantee an audience. But movie audiences are a fickle lot when it comes to musicals and what works on the stage doesn't always work on screen. The last musical to do any decent business was Hairspray and that was five years ago. Last year's Glee movie died at the box office despite the popularity of the TV show.

Rock of Ages boasts some big names on its cast list - Tom Cruise, Alec Baldwin and Catherine Zeta-Jones - but they are a decade past their prime and unlikely to resonate with younger audiences. The music list is similarly aimed at the nostalgia crowd and they tend to stay home with the kids and rarely make it to the cinema. Young audiences - which drive the majority of box office revenue - are unlikely to psyched about Starship and Whitesnake.

The film's budget - a reported $70 million - is also on the high side for a musical. The last time that sort of money was spent on a musical was in 1967 with Dr Dolittle and the results almost crippled a studio and killed off the genre.

3. The Amazing Spider-man



Plot: High school nerd Peter Parker crawls up walls and fights crime after he is bitten by a radioactive spider.

Why it could fail: Wait a minute, haven't I already seen that film? If the plot of The Amazing Spider-man seems familiar, then it's because it is. Memories of Tobey Maguire spinning webs and swinging off rooftops will still be fresh for most movie-goers. The first Spider-man film is only ten years old and spawned two sequels, the last of which came out in 2007, so it's not as if the world is crying out for a reboot of the story, which The Amazing Spider-man is. Audiences will take some convincing to fork out money to see what is essentially the same movie even if it is in 3D.

The first three Spider-man movies made more than $2 billion at the box office and generated billions more in merchandise. But this could work against The Amazing Spider-man. If it fails to match-up to those movies, it will be seen as a disappointment. That could harm chances of a new Spider-man franchise, which is what the studio, Sony, wants more than anything else.

Audiences are showing signs of superhero fatigue, with recent comic-to-screen outings such as Green Lantern and Jonah Hex performing miserably. Plus, this blockbuster season is packed with superheroes: Iron Man, Thor, Captain America and the Hulk will be battling for screen time in The Avengers and Batman will be returning in The Dark Knight Rises. The anticipation for those two movies far outstrips that for The Amazing Spider-man, which suggests Spidey could get lost in all the spandex.

4. The Bourne Legacy



Plot: It's a spy film so the plot is being kept under wraps. What is known is that the story deals with the fallout from the events in The Bourne Ultimatum.

Why it could fail: Can you make a Jason Bourne film without Jason Bourne? That's what audiences will be asking themselves when The Bourne Legacy hits cinemas. Although set in the Bourne universe, Legacy doesn't feature Jason Bourne. The reason for this is Matt Damon decided to walk after the film's producers decided to part ways with Paul Greengrass, the director of The Bourne Supremacy and The Bourne Ultimatum. Greengrass's shaky camera style and Damon's intense stare brought a sense of realism to the Bourne films and were their main selling point.

Universal has drafted in Bourne's screenwriter Tony Gilroy to direct and Hurt Locker star and Damon-lookalike Jeremy Renner to be their Bourne substitute, Aaron Cross, but it will take more than that to convince movie-goers. The ploy smacks of those posters that trade on loose associations with successful films - from the studio that brought you Shrek etc.

Again, the name of the game is franchise. The last Bourne movie made $440 million worldwide, so Universal will be looking for a total of $200 million to at least save face. But without a big name star and the film's main character, this could be a mission impossible.

5. Total Recall



Plot: A factory worker begins to suspect that he's a spy, though he is unaware which side of the fight he's on.

Why it could fail: Total Recall was a successful sci-fi action flick from the '90s starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. It was big on guns, splatter and Schwarzenegger zingers, the best being "Consider that a divorce" after Arnie shoots his fake wife. The remake has swapped bulging muscles for soulful eyes, with Colin Farrell playing the hero who has his memory altered (or does he?).

The film's two-minute trailer manages to reference just about every successful sci-fi film of the last decade - Rise of the Planet of the Apes, Inception, Transformers, I Robot, Attack of the Clones, Minority Report and The Matrix - but in a way that suggests the film is a rip-off. The quick fades to black and the taglines "What is real" and "What is recall" aren't quite as bad as the "Titans will clash" that accompanied Clash of the Titans but it doesn't give the viewer much to hang onto.

Sony Pictures is hoping Total Recall will emulate the success of Rise of the Planet of the Apes. That film debuted in August last year and made almost $US500m at the box office. But movie-goers went because the ad campaign highlighted the believability of the film's central character, the CGI ape Caesar.

Although he has movie star looks, Farrell has not proved himself as a leading man; S.W.A.T., Miami Vice and Fright Night were all disappointments at the box office, while Alexander was a complete disaster.



source

So ONTD, will you be seeing any of these potentially flop films? I'm not joining my friends today to see Battleship, not paying for and sitting through that shitfest.
Page 1 of 11
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] >>
bananasnrum 18th-Apr-2012 07:12 am (UTC)
I think the only one of these I'd see is Spidey. Why anyone would see Battleship is beyond me.
starchain 18th-Apr-2012 07:16 am (UTC)
My friends went, they didn't know it was based on the board game. I had a lot of fun when they came back from the cinema.
lucythedragon 18th-Apr-2012 07:25 am (UTC)
IDK if Liam Nesson ends up dramatically saying "you sunk my battleship" in the movie, I might be tempted to shill out the 10 bucks.
numbedtoe 18th-Apr-2012 07:39 am (UTC)
Liam is why I am tempted to go. Taylor was too, but after John Carter, I'm kinda thinking that those two and that Oliver Stone movie are going to kill his career.
anniemann101 18th-Apr-2012 10:32 am (UTC)
THIS.
I need hardcore proof that liam says this in the movie and will in fact pay money to watch it!!!!!
mcwicca 18th-Apr-2012 01:14 pm (UTC)
It will be the "I'm tired of these motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking plane" of this decade.
promisemewings 18th-Apr-2012 01:40 pm (UTC)
Me too.
hemsworth 18th-Apr-2012 06:45 pm (UTC)
i would die if he said that. i was originally going to see it for liam and askars but i've heard that SPOILER askars isn't in the movie for very long
akasha6915 18th-Apr-2012 07:41 am (UTC)
Explosions and fluff, the film is suppose to be nothing more than an enjoyable popcorn flick.
chaquitalicia04 18th-Apr-2012 08:05 am (UTC)
Alexander Skarsgard is the only reason I would consider seeing Battleship. But then again, True Blood will be back in less than 2 months, so it's not like I'm not gonna have other options to stare at him. Plus, TB= him naked. Battleship appears to feature him in an ascot.
ozgirl_1988 18th-Apr-2012 08:55 am (UTC)
i saw this last week.

my sister and 1 just went for Alex..who looked AMAZING in uniform

cool CGI and music but i wasnt impressed with Taylor or RiRi (she annoyed me in the film)

rheya_kelvin 18th-Apr-2012 10:17 am (UTC)
I saw it for ASkars. I sat through Straw Dogs for Askars. There isn't any shitty movie I won't see for him.

Seriously though, Battleship is actually a step above Transformers. The female characters don't just sit around, scream and wait to get saved; they are competent and courageous and get shit done. There are minority and disabled secondary characters who have pretty big roles and aren't just there to be blown up or be the butt of racist jokes. The main character (Taylor Kitsch) starts off as a massive dick and gets called on it. For such a dudebro movie, it actually makes a conscious effort to not be massively offensive.
In these conditions, I'd rather give my money to Peter Berg than to Michael Bay.

I think people are recoiling at the silly concept, but it's basically an Alien invasion movie, and a rather fun one at that.

Edited at 2012-04-18 10:21 am (UTC)
stylistic4u 18th-Apr-2012 12:27 pm (UTC)
I work in a cinema so I saw it for free.....and it is complete shit.
sixseventytwo 18th-Apr-2012 10:34 pm (UTC)
I'm going to see Battleship with my bffs and a gigantic fucking daquiri. Also, for Rihanna.
inflixion 18th-Apr-2012 07:13 am (UTC)
Maybe Rock of Ages
pinkprincessnat 18th-Apr-2012 07:14 am (UTC)
I want to see Rock of Ages because it actually looks hilarious (but also kind of awful). Still undecided about Spiderman, seems unnecessary they made it in the first place.
chivalry_pony 18th-Apr-2012 07:15 am (UTC)
I might see Spider-man but probably because other people will want to go. I'm not pumped for it since it feels totally unnecessary.
yououghtaknow 18th-Apr-2012 07:16 am (UTC)
clothingaddict 18th-Apr-2012 08:01 am (UTC)
omg your icon is KILLING me. SO CUTE AHHH with its little paws aww

And I feel like Spider-Man could have at least had a chance if they pushed its release date back or even forward. Making a reboot compete with this summer's Avengers and Batman is just unfair.
fraubluecher 18th-Apr-2012 08:45 am (UTC)
I really hope many people won't go. Hollywood should not be rewarded for that epic lack of originality.
scriptedending 18th-Apr-2012 01:33 pm (UTC)
iawtc
emerald_soul 18th-Apr-2012 09:07 am (UTC)
That's how I feel. I was excited at first, but since the full trailer was released...

But my bestie LOVES Andrew and Spiderman so I have to go.
ayedel 18th-Apr-2012 09:15 am (UTC)
I'm going just cause it's Andrew and I want to support him. THe whole lack of originality bugs me honestly.
leopard_legs 18th-Apr-2012 05:52 pm (UTC)
I really, to this day, cannot work out why they are releasing another spiderman film when the last when only came out 5 years ago and did really fucking well, too (even though it sucked)

It's too soon to "reboot" and it's THE EXACT SAME MOVIE
gnarlsbarkley 18th-Apr-2012 07:15 am (UTC)
I think the only one that might flop is Battleship. Rock of Ages will do pretty well for a musical imo but not as well as the rest of them. Expectations are always lower for musicals, no?
liliana_ 18th-Apr-2012 11:52 am (UTC)
Yeah, Rock of Ages will probably "flop" in comparison to The Avengers, but with a $70 million budget, I can't see it not making a nice profit. Plus overseas people LOVE Tom Cruise, so it should be fine.
loony_moony 18th-Apr-2012 03:43 pm (UTC)
Yeah, Rock of Ages could do really well worldwide. Tom Cruise + musical movie normally spell big worldwide haul.
thedpmiss 18th-Apr-2012 07:15 am (UTC)
Rock of Ages for me.

I love that kind of music. Idc about anything else.
agoraphobicorgy 18th-Apr-2012 07:16 am (UTC)
dnw any of these
yououghtaknow 18th-Apr-2012 07:16 am (UTC)
All of them are gonna tank imo
mooshki 18th-Apr-2012 09:05 am (UTC)
I think you're right. Nothing on this list screams "must-see" to me.
loony_moony 18th-Apr-2012 03:45 pm (UTC)
Mostly in North America box office standards, and also because they'll be compared to Batman, The Avengers and Brave.
poisoned_summer 18th-Apr-2012 07:16 am (UTC)
i hope spiderman fails

sick of seeing andrew garfield and emma stone's annoying mugs everywhere
poisoned_summer 18th-Apr-2012 07:18 am (UTC)
like paps are always catching them ~taking a walk

WHO TAKES WALKS!!!!
scorsesedog 18th-Apr-2012 07:35 am (UTC)
hilary duff
mynamehere07 18th-Apr-2012 08:45 am (UTC)
WHO TAKES WALKS!!!!

People who want to be photographed by the paps.
kapuki234 18th-Apr-2012 09:13 am (UTC)
paps stalk them outside coffeeshops and other places where you normally walk inside/outside

idt they "take walks"
makahakat 18th-Apr-2012 12:03 pm (UTC)
miley cyrus in and out of windsor pilates 6 times a day
promisemewings 18th-Apr-2012 01:46 pm (UTC)
WHO TAKES PICTURES OF PEOPLE TAKING WALKS?! (When half of our posts here at ONTD are candids of Lindsay Lohan and Kim Kardashian going about their daily routines.)
rogue 18th-Apr-2012 07:22 am (UTC)
i honestly can't with them walking around nyc being news

like

don't even
belkisa 18th-Apr-2012 07:34 am (UTC)
I hope it fails too
kal_ella 18th-Apr-2012 07:34 am (UTC)
lol srsly, basic ass couple
belle_chouette 18th-Apr-2012 08:43 am (UTC)
ia

but mostly because i'm tired of comics being made into movies
fraubluecher 18th-Apr-2012 08:48 am (UTC)
I like(d) them both, but I'm pretty emotionally invested in that shit failing. Still can't believe they actually did that.
asweetsymphony 18th-Apr-2012 03:44 pm (UTC)
this.... It's so tryhard, Hollywood.
loony_moony 18th-Apr-2012 03:46 pm (UTC)
It's also so obvious they're contracted to do "public appearances together" at this point. Their body languages are screaming "ffs I better get ALL THE SWAG for this shit".
youbeboy 18th-Apr-2012 07:24 pm (UTC)
IA
spillvegas 18th-Apr-2012 07:17 am (UTC)
LBR with the avengers and dark knight rises coming out, who's gonna wanna see spiderman? it looks boring as fuck anyways, the 2002 was fun and exciting while this screams basic
gnarlsbarkley 18th-Apr-2012 07:18 am (UTC)
everyone seeing tdkr and the avengers? esp for that demographic, you can never have too many superhero movies. i do hope it fails but i don't see it happening, sigh
equanimity23 18th-Apr-2012 07:24 am (UTC)
I want to see Spider-Man because he's on my favorite heroes. I always thought the original films were overrated but I'll try this one. Also excited for The Avengers but have lost enthusiasm for Dark Knight Rises after seeing the trailer, tbh.
kimberwyn 18th-Apr-2012 07:55 am (UTC)
it looks so much better than the 2002 one...
belle_chouette 18th-Apr-2012 08:46 am (UTC)
ia

I like Tobey but he always seemed to old for that role
psychoticstory 18th-Apr-2012 09:34 am (UTC)
my thoughts completely.

The 2002 one was good for one watching, after that I couldn't stand to watch it ever again. And because of that, I didn't even see the second or third one.
anniemann101 18th-Apr-2012 10:34 am (UTC)
mte. and i LOVED the tobey maguire series. haters goanna hate tbh.
lovedhurtlost 18th-Apr-2012 12:27 pm (UTC)
Lol exactly.
joaniemaloney 18th-Apr-2012 05:36 pm (UTC)
I can't even hate, I'm going to be watching it.
tipping4_2 18th-Apr-2012 10:04 am (UTC)
I just rewatched the 2002 one recently and loved it tbh
it was so fun and camp <3
promisemewings 18th-Apr-2012 01:54 pm (UTC)
The 2002 one was fresh off the heels of 9/11 and patriotism was at a fever pitch here in America.
factorywannabe 18th-Apr-2012 02:05 pm (UTC)
ugh i know. just from the trailer alone, you can tell that the special effects from 2002 are superior to the 2012 one.
gnarlsbarkley 18th-Apr-2012 07:17 am (UTC)
I want Spiderman to flop tho :( It won't especially for the reasons listed, we live in such an ADD culture, half the people who even saw the other Spidermans will think it's just another one and the other half were kids who did not see the other ones. It might have trouble sustaining a run but it def will make bank opening weeks.
magnifying 18th-Apr-2012 07:17 am (UTC)
i will be watching the fuck out of total recall tbh
punkinelf 18th-Apr-2012 12:32 pm (UTC)
YAY YOU!!!!! At least Colin Farrell can act! & the cgi looks fabulous!
hemsworth 18th-Apr-2012 06:58 pm (UTC)
me too. give me colin and kate beckinsale
bluebear_74 18th-Apr-2012 07:18 am (UTC)
LOL I saw Battleship. Will not see the rest though, well maybe Total Recall.
callme_morbid 18th-Apr-2012 07:18 am (UTC)
Greengrass's shaky camera style and Damon's intense stare brought a sense of realism to the Bourne films and were their main selling point.

ugh that shit got so tiring though. and i'll make sure to stay away from all of these movies.
sexyvegeta 18th-Apr-2012 07:19 am (UTC)
do we really need another spiderman movie?

the guy playing peter looks annoying.
forevergold217 18th-Apr-2012 07:50 am (UTC)
hes adorable imo
spiderkelly 18th-Apr-2012 08:24 am (UTC)
nope.

and ita.
muddyroad 18th-Apr-2012 08:44 am (UTC)
He looks like the poor man's David Tennant, imo.
winegums 18th-Apr-2012 01:43 pm (UTC)
He actually had a guest spot on the show while Ten was on it, lol!
menorahmajora 18th-Apr-2012 01:54 pm (UTC)
david tennant is a poor mans david tennant imo. he even overacted the ever-loving- shit out of his miniscule scene in GoF
courtkneee1 18th-Apr-2012 09:26 am (UTC)
yeah mte
who_love 18th-Apr-2012 01:16 pm (UTC)
no
asweetsymphony 18th-Apr-2012 03:46 pm (UTC)
Ita. Emma Stone kinda irked me in the trailer too. It just looks horrible tbh.
youbeboy 18th-Apr-2012 07:25 pm (UTC)
He looks basic.
Page 1 of 11
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] >>
This page was loaded May 20th 2013, 2:06 am GMT.