ONTD

6:29 pm - 01/11/2012

Patti Smith Turns Back on The Chelsea?


Patti Smith selling out? While we'd like to believe it isn't true, some are concerned that Smith may indeed be betraying her Chelsea Hotel roots by playing a private show for the hotel's new developer.
According to the Hotel Chelsea Blog, Smith will be performing this Thursday for Joseph Chetrit, who purchased the legendary hotel last summer for more than $80 million. Guests living in the building were abruptly ordered to leave and soon after, Chetrit made sweeping renovations to the building, ultimately stripping it of its iconic appearance.

Hotel Chelsea is assuming Smith is not fully aware of the controversial host behind the invitation, so the blog has written to Smith, asking her to decline Chetrit's request to perform:

We love Patti and her music, and we would love to see her concert, just not under these circumstances. And so we call on Patti, now that she knows the truth, to cancel this event.

The Chelsea Hotel, once home to Smith, was also home to the likes of Bob Dylan and Charles Bukowski and has been known for its infamous nights that include the mysterious stabbing of Nancy Spungen and the incident where Edie Sedgwick set her room on fire.

My current involvement with the Hotel Chelsea began some months ago when I heard rumors that the hotel would be leveled. I was devastated and entered in a dialogue with the architect, through a mutual friend. He assured me this was not the case and every effort would be made to save and restore the building, which was greatly deteriorating. Having witnessed the demolition and redevelopment of much of our city I was at least hopeful that the hotel would stand.

Since then my few efforts on behalf of the Hotel have been unofficial and uncompensated. My dialogue has continued with the architect. My personal objectives have always been: To offer uncompensated advice as to the aesthetics of the renovation project. To council all concerned to develop positive communication with the rightful tenants. To be available in the future, without fee, in participating in the development and preservation of the artistic cachet of the hotel. To participate in the development of a possible artists-in-residence program.
My small performance for the tenants was my own idea. My hope is that we might have a nice evening and the opportunity to communicate directly. I am an independent person, not owned or directed by anyone. My allegiance is to the Hotel itself, and I have done nothing to tarnish it. It is very difficult for me to embrace change, but my great hope is to witness the Hotel Chelsea find a strong and positive place in the twenty-first century
.
SOURCE
Living With Legends Hotel Chelsea Blog

OK, I've never been to the Chelsea. But I was named after it because my mom was a hardcore Sid Vicious fan, and I've been fascinated by it's history since i was little. I also work for a construction trade mag and I have to say what's being done to this hotel is so sad. Two residents were even attacked by the demolition workers because they were trying to show union reps the work being done. Also, I had no idea what to put for tags on this.

From the Hotel Chelsea blog: 

"The demolished rooms, now just empty shells, include, on our floor alone: the room where Madonna filmed her Sex book in 1980; the last residence of Thomas Wolfe, where he wrote You Can’t Go Home Again in 1938; Dee Dee Ramone’s last room at the Chelsea; and the tiny room where Beat writer Herbert Huncke was living when he died in 1996. The room where Arthur Miller lived for ten years in the 1960s, writing his great play "After the Fall, has also been wiped out with no regard for its historical importance."
[info]freeze_i_say 11th-Jan-2012 11:47 pm (UTC)
conservanionist police force needs to happen
[info]ilikeandrewbird 11th-Jan-2012 11:49 pm (UTC)
"It is very difficult for me to embrace change, but my great hope is to witness the Hotel Chelsea find a strong and positive place in the twenty-first century"

I saw a really great documentary on the Chelsea Hotel and it really was legendary. It's still silly to blame Patti for playing a show there. The hotel had been dying for over a decade. In NYC, you'll be kicked out regardless of how famous a business is. If the Chelsea didn't make a change, then it would have just vanished.
[info]teddyism 11th-Jan-2012 11:51 pm (UTC)
I think I saw the same film (there probably aren't that many right?). The Chelsea definitely needed work, but it should have been more in the vein of preservation-oriented restoration rather than to gut it and destroy the former ethos of the place, especially harassing the tenants and shit. Seriously mis-handled, but I can understand why Patti is trying to preserve her relationship with the place.
[info]ilikeandrewbird 11th-Jan-2012 11:53 pm (UTC)
I cannot diss an establishment that holds a Doughnut Plant.
[info]teddyism 11th-Jan-2012 11:50 pm (UTC)
Someone with authority needed to step in to make sure the integrity of the building and its rooms were preserved. There are neighborhoods/buildings in places like NYC and Boston where you can barely change a light fixture without getting approval.
[info]killmyunicorn 12th-Jan-2012 04:18 am (UTC)
yeah how does the chelsea not count as a historical landmark and have the same regulations as one?

[info]numbedtoe 12th-Jan-2012 12:06 am (UTC)
it sucks that the history preservation field is rife with things that make no damn sense.

At the same time, The Chelsea was such a mess idk if it could have been pieced back together from a financial standpoint. It was let go for too long I think. I hate that all that history is gone and I hope when it opens back up they have done something to commemorate the rich and varied history it had related to the arts. Beyond a plaque here and there.
[info]so_chic_doll 12th-Jan-2012 12:11 am (UTC)
I noticed last time I went by there, things seemed a bit off... like it didn't seem opened for business.
[info]burning_disco 12th-Jan-2012 12:14 am (UTC)
they closed the hotel to guests in I think august, and cancelled any reservations.

they've also evicted tons of life-long residents and are trying to evict another thirty.

I think there's about 70 left.
[info]lettucedisaster 12th-Jan-2012 01:05 am (UTC)
i got to live in the chelsea for a few weeks about 4 years ago. one of my favorite memories. even then, there was rumors that the long-time residents would soon be kicked out. sad. i'm scared to look at the renovations.
[info]stevinmichael 12th-Jan-2012 01:29 am (UTC)
"the room where Madonna filmed her Sex book in 1980"

Madonna's Sex book came out around 1990...just sayin...
[info]sinful_caesar 12th-Jan-2012 02:54 am (UTC)
it came out in 1992. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_(book)
[info]xtinkerbellax 12th-Jan-2012 01:32 am (UTC)
Remember like 5 years ago they had that club under the Chelsea Hotel that they tried to make happen?
[info]paupiedequincey 12th-Jan-2012 07:22 am (UTC)
Yeah, Serena. I had my after-party there for my first art show in like 2004 there.

I also worked the door one random night in like 2008 but by then it was all bridge and tunnel kids with fake IDs trying to get in haha!
[info]where_i_begin 12th-Jan-2012 01:33 am (UTC)
Having stayed at the Chelsea because of the history, I'm of mixed minds about it. The exterior is protected and that won't change. A lot of the rooms themselves (including one of the ones I stayed in, which as mentioned was Dee Dee Ramone's) were really run down and overpriced. The heating/ventilation are awful. And it's not like anything in that room was connected to Dee Dee in any way by that point, and I bet that's true of a lot of these rooms. Certainly they were already altered quite a bit since the 1950s/60s/70s etc. The furniture/decor wouldn't be the same so in that sense I'm not really sure what they're fighting to "preserve."

However I met a few residents, have kept in touch and had a couple of awesome nights there so my heart goes out to them and I pray they won't be evicted. It's such an interesting atmosphere/plae to live.
[info]xtinkerbellax 12th-Jan-2012 01:48 am (UTC)
Have you seen the documentary about the Gramercy Park Hotel? Your mention of the residents reminded me of it, they were doing a huge overhaul but the people living there got to stay.
[info]where_i_begin 12th-Jan-2012 01:55 am (UTC)
No, I haven't! I wasn't aware there was a similar situation there. I stayed at the Jane Hotel one time and learned that there were residents remaining there from before its overhaul as well.
[info]paupiedequincey 12th-Jan-2012 07:32 am (UTC)
18 Comments? Seriously.. this was the most interesting post on ONTD to me today! :(

I'm not surprised this is happening tbh. I went to Cooper Union across from St. Marks from 1999-03 and watched them turn Coney Island High, Electric Ladyland, and basically the whole street into a Gap and Quiznos. Luckily that shit got pushed out and at least now it is all Japanese joints which is much better but I still get a tear in my when I think about all the history that was destroyed wantonly. I also worked at CBGBs in 2001 and it was dying fast back then. THAT is a real shame (John Varvatos FML)
[info]burning_disco 12th-Jan-2012 10:41 pm (UTC)
18 Comments? Seriously.. this was the most interesting post on ONTD to me today! :(

Aw, thank you!!

omg ... you worked at CBGB? Because my mom was a punk & i was raised with a ramones bobble head in our kitchen .. it was my dream to go there someday and then they closed it in 06 and i never got my chance.

I was in new york in 04 w my family after i graduated hs and wanted to go but oh no my family wanted to go to china town and get rip off purses. haha I'm still bitter.
[info]paupiedequincey 13th-Jan-2012 10:02 am (UTC)
Its a shame CBGBs is gone but it was on its way out for years before it closed. The owner was like 90 years old and just didn't have it in him to think outside the box.. (he never was involved with the punk scene..he just got lucky hiring good bookers back in the 70s etc..) His greedy burnout bitch daughter ran the club and booked the shows and she was a pretty nasty person with no real interest in what she was doing besides trying to skim an easy buck off the door charges to buy more coke..

They only opened the gallery side during the day to sell TSHIRTS and would never let anyone in to even see the club unless there was a show and they paid full cover. It really sucked having to break that to dozens of disappointed tourists every day who trudged out there to see the club and then couldn't even peek inside. I literally saw a couple teenage kids CRY when they realized they wouldn't get to go inside and their parents were more than annoyed.. "All I got was this $40 Tshirt from the joint next door to the real thing.."

If they had a proper manager and had made even the smallest of effort to treat the place like the landmark it was it probably could have survived.. I mean they could have made so much money if they had the club bar open afternoons or at least allowed people in to see the place for $5 admission or something..

Basically I'm saying you shouldn't feel too bad as you didn't miss much in 04 unfortunately!

It is sad but what can you do? (Oh, visit the VEGAS version of CBs and buy another shitty overpriced Tshirt?!) Lol..
This page was loaded May 30th 2012, 6:58 am GMT.