ONTD

9:14 pm - 11/16/2011

Penn State/Sandusky Scandal News Roundup



New Judge in Case

There's a new judge for Jerry Sandusky's trial for dozens of counts of child rape and molestation. The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts has assigned Judge Robert Scott to preside after questions arose about District Judge Leslie Dutchcot's ties to Sandusky.



Dutchcot came under fire when she allowed the former Penn State assistant football coach to walk free without paying bond. It was later discovered that Dutchcot volunteered with Sandusky's charity The Second Mile and even received campaign donations from The Second Mile.

The press release announcing Judge Scott says he has no known ties with the Penn State University or The Second Mile.

source: http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/16/theres-a-new-judge-assigned-to-the-sandusky-case/







Mike McQueery claims he "stopped" the rape he witnessed



According to the grand jury report, a graduate assistant later identified as McQueary said he saw a boy, whose age he estimated at 10 years old, being subjected to anal intercourse by a naked Sandusky in a shower at the Penn State football building in March 2002. The graduate assistant left immediately, was distraught and called his father, according to the presentment. His father told him to leave the building and come to his home, the presentment says.

In the email obtained by The Morning Call, dated Nov. 8, McQueary said, "I did stop it, not physically, but made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room."
"No one can imagine my thoughts or wants to be in my shoes for those 30-45 seconds," McQueary wrote. "Trust me."


The email obtained by The Morning Call is the second to surface from McQueary in which he claims the facts of his involvement are distorted. NBC News reported Monday night that McQueary emailed friends and former teammates, telling them, "I did the right thing you guys know me the truth is not out there fully I didn't just turn and run I made sure it stopped I had to make quick tough decisions."

Asked about McQueary’s statement in the email that he had discussions with police, Penn State police told The Morning Call they were deferring to the university public relations office, which did not return a call Tuesday afternoon. Pennsylvania State Police in Harrisburg, who are heading the investigation, did not return a call.

source http://articles.mcall.com/2011-11-15/sports/mc-penn-state-scandal-mcqueary-20111115_1_grand-jury-report-joe-paterno-penn-state





10 more victims have come forward in Sandusky Case



STATE COLLEGE, Pa. Close to 10 additional suspected victims have come forward to the authorities since the arrest of the former Penn State defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky on Nov. 5 on 40 counts of sexually abusing young boys, according to people close to the investigation. The police are working to confirm the new allegations.

source http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/sports/ncaafootball/jack-raykovitz-chief-of-second-mile-resigns-amid-penn-state-scandal.html?_r=2&hpw

animalyears 17th-Nov-2011 07:09 am (UTC)
i dont understand why else he would have specified an amount of time otherwise. and i like to think most decent human beings would have the guts to stop what was happening, maybe you know, call the police and realize this isnt about you... its about the kid being harmed.
pythianlegume7 17th-Nov-2011 07:14 am (UTC)
Its not about guts, its about being in shock.

I don't think there is any place that he is being self-centered. People are condemning Mike McQueary before we have all of the information-- of course he's going to defend himself.

And let's not forget he's one of the prosecution's best witnesses. Vital to the success of putting Sandusky behind bars at this point.
animalyears 17th-Nov-2011 07:15 am (UTC)
Was he still in shock years after it happened, when he still wasnt doing anything about it or telling people about it? When he was still working with Sandusky?
fierceputain 17th-Nov-2011 07:18 am (UTC)
mte
ehs_wildcats 17th-Nov-2011 02:45 pm (UTC)
he wasn't still working with sandusky idt, he wasn't even really before the event from what i understand (though ofc i don't have every detail). sandusky retired from penn st in 1999. after the event mcqueary was told they took away his keys to the facilities. i've read sandusky still used a satellite campus for a football camp but we don't know if mcqueary knew that, ever saw him again, or ever heard of any other allegations.

yes he was wrong to not have talked to the cops and maybe mcqueary was taking the easy or naive way out by believing what the administration did fixed the problem. but i think more of us would act that way than we'd like to believe.

we all think we'd do that right thing and do as much as we should, but that isn't as easy as it sounds when you are shocked and see something totally contradictory to everything you expect of life and decency in people, especially from someone you respected. and then when someone you have trusted and loved for years tells you things have been handled and are okay? you believe them. all you have to do is look at psychological experiments in authority and obedience to see how far off we go from moral right or our better judgment when someone we trust tells us things are okay. wiki the milgram experiment.

i understand the repulsion that he didn't go to the cops and that meant more kids got abused, i feel it too and if mcqueary is a decent person he is probably repulsed by his own actions himself. other details might come out that change my perspective and i'm not trying to write off his bad choices or say he shouldn't have to answer for them, but i just want to try to understand him and the situation and remember he's a human being too.
lachica2000 17th-Nov-2011 03:13 pm (UTC)
He would have definitely seen Sandusky after that because Sandusky was still bringing victims to pre-season Penn State practices and the camp for the charity was on the same campus.
terribilita 18th-Nov-2011 03:00 am (UTC)
No, he still saw Sandusky all the time. I heard a radio interview with a former football player who said Sandusky was on campus all the time, so much so that it was almost like he still worked there. Today MSNBC reported that McQueary participated in an even for Second Mile with Sandusky a few days after he saw the rape. And as someone else pointed out, he was spotted on campus after he was bailed out.
elementalamber 17th-Nov-2011 03:38 pm (UTC)
Yep. This post by John Scalzi pretty much sums it all up for me:
http://whatever.scalzi.com/2011/11/10/omelas-state-university/
morganofthefay 17th-Nov-2011 08:16 am (UTC)
he wasn't being self-centred? of course he wasn't, that's why he called his fucking father to asking him what to do.

ffs, this asshole needs to go, too.
ilikeandrewbird 17th-Nov-2011 02:37 pm (UTC)
I agree so much. I roll my eyes at anyone who says "this is exactly how I would react". You can't possible put yourself in his shoes unless it has happened to you. There were so many huge things that I think would come to my mind: am I hallucinating? is this really happening? will anyone believe me? will this all backfire on me? am I not really seeing this, and then my entire future is over? Everyone from that Penn State team was beloved, and EVERYONE would have turned on him. I don't doubt that he went to the cops. I don't down that he completely flipped out and was beyond traumatized and told JoePa that something must be done. I wouldn't be surprised if they lied to him to shut him up.

The only thing I don't understand is how he was able to still work at Penn State, and constantly look Sandusky in the eyes. It would have been too much to just act like nothing happened.
ehs_wildcats 17th-Nov-2011 03:00 pm (UTC)
ia with you 100%. we all want to believe that we'd do the right thing but aside from mcqueary's loyalties to the school or concern for his possible job loss, there are experiments showing we defer to trusted authority even against our deepest held moral beliefs and desire to harm no one. not trying to relieve mcqueary of his responsibility for bad decisions, but if joe paterno or other administration told him things were handled, he probably believed them. and i don't even think, with the details we have now, it had much to do with his job just his trust in his mentor.

i've been trying to figure out how much mcqueary might have seen sandusky after that cause if he didn't see him, it probably made it easier to believe the administration had actually dealt with it.

i feel like i read sandusky showed up there but i've read so much it starts running together in my head. i think though that might have just been after his initial retirement in 1999 not after 2002 when they took away his keys. from what i can find, sandusky still used satellite facilities for football camps but i can't tell if he ever really used the main campus again and there are no other grand jury incidents after that taking place at penn state so without more info, idk if the two ever saw each other again.
kerrence 17th-Nov-2011 05:06 pm (UTC)
he was using the gym on campus a little as 2 or 3 weeks ago. it makes me so nauseous.
pink_dog 17th-Nov-2011 03:06 pm (UTC)
YES, well said. I can understand being in shock, reacting slowly. What I CAN'T understand is not whistle-blowing this to the police when it became apparent that the University wasn't going to take real action. And I CAN NOT AT ALL understand HOW he could work side-by-side with this child-rapist afterward.
aleronihead 17th-Nov-2011 04:13 pm (UTC)
I completely agree.
pythianlegume7 18th-Nov-2011 01:53 am (UTC)
I think some people may also be missing the fact that Sandusky didn't even work at Penn State at this point. He retired in like 1999, right? And this happened in 2002. He was still around, but its not like McQueary was working with him all the time.

I'm with you on that first part though...I know how I'd want to act, but I have no idea how I'd really react under shock. It's really scary. And I think the case is going to start looking worse and worse for Penn State as the full details of the cover-up come out.
This page was loaded May 25th 2013, 8:15 pm GMT.