ONTD

5:26 pm - 11/15/2011

Donatella Versace doesn't want fat people modeling Versace’s H&M Collection


Donatella Versace may be making clothes for the masses, but she doesn’t want the masses modeling them.

After the Daily News arranged for real NYC women to be photographed wearing looks from the Italian designer’s Versace for H&M line, a rep for the Swedish clothing company canceled the shoot on Friday.

Apparently, “real” doesn’t work for the 56-year-old bottle-blond designer with the bee-stung lips.

The H&M publicist initially explained by email that the “Model New Yorkers” photo feature could probably not go forward because Versace had to approve “anyone who wears the collection for press” — and, she added, “Donatella will likely not approve shooting the collection on real women.”

She was right. When the Daily News writer organizing the shoot sent the publicist photos of two of the three women he wanted to use — all recent college graduates who work in the city — the answer came back that only one was acceptable.

When the News writer asked for an explanation, he was told the woman who was rejected “doesn’t fit [Versace’s] branding.”

That might make sense if the clothes involved were from Versace’s full-priced designer collections, where a metallic brushed-leather biker jacket goes for $5,825 and a wool crepe cut-out dress fetches $2,425.

But one reason designers work with H&M is to make their designs accessible — and affordable — to a less-exclusive crowd. Previous fashion designers who’ve worked with H&M in this way include Chanel’s Karl Lagerfeld and Stella McCartney.

“The H&M customer is anyone interested in fashion,” the company’s U.S. public relations manager, Jennifer Ward, told the retail-shopping website Westfield.com this fall. “There is something for every age and personality.”

Versace’s designs for H&M reflect this perspective. Although there are some pricier items — such as a $249 metallic party dress — the line includes a $29.99 pair of leggings that feature a jungle print similar to the famous plunging dress that Jennifer Lopez wore to the 2000 Grammys.

Versace previewed her limited-edition H&M line at a party and fashion show at Pier 57 on Nov. 8. Although she used the kind of stick-thin models who don’t resemble typical NYC consumers, the designer told CBSNews.com that she understood the H&M consumer.

“I know this customer,” she said. “I know what they want.”

Now if only she didn’t mind them actually wearing her clothing.
Page 1 of 8
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] >>
gata_power 15th-Nov-2011 10:38 pm (UTC)
Is her daughter the one with the eating disorder?
lulufairybubble 15th-Nov-2011 10:39 pm (UTC)
yes
kelixo 15th-Nov-2011 10:39 pm (UTC)
Yeah.
jeugd1 yes15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
jeugd1 Re: yes15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
oops pic to big
quidscipio Re: yes15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
D:
gata_power Re: yes15th-Nov-2011 10:41 pm (UTC)
JFC, there are no words.
quickcanal Re: yes15th-Nov-2011 10:41 pm (UTC)
sad
cooconuts Re: yes15th-Nov-2011 10:41 pm (UTC)
She kinda looks like nicky hilton
quickcanal 15th-Nov-2011 10:38 pm (UTC)
“Donatella will likely not approve shooting the collection on real women.”

lol
sweet_honesty 15th-Nov-2011 10:49 pm (UTC)
This is such a ridiculous article. What constitutes as a "real woman" to them?
veal 15th-Nov-2011 11:14 pm (UTC)
I think they might just mean "not models", not necessarily their size.
greyfilm 15th-Nov-2011 11:15 pm (UTC)
Did you read it?

It's (real) people who are recent college graduates who live in the city.

So I'm reading it as your regular, average person - not a model.
pandora049 15th-Nov-2011 11:20 pm (UTC)
Non-models, it seems, and I wish they would say that, instead. The women were all 0-6 US, so it's isn't really a size thing, except maybe the size 6.
kimberwyn 16th-Nov-2011 02:07 am (UTC)
oh brudda, here we go again...
carazon 15th-Nov-2011 11:23 pm (UTC)
Ugh.
kelixo 15th-Nov-2011 10:39 pm (UTC)
mte
hazel_belle 15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
perfect description
edgeofelegance 15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
lmao

perfect comment
squeakysneaks 15th-Nov-2011 11:00 pm (UTC)
Donatella made herself look this way because she's obsessed with outward appearances, the irony of that is funny. If she would have just been naturally ugly, I doubt people would mock her for it as much.
sweet_honesty 15th-Nov-2011 10:54 pm (UTC)
I like how everyone is ready to attack when this article doesn't give one single bit of evidence, it doesn't say what size she found unacceptable, and it's terribly written.
gabriella 15th-Nov-2011 11:11 pm (UTC)
so fucking true!!!
music_lover56 15th-Nov-2011 11:29 pm (UTC)
mte
zparklemotion 16th-Nov-2011 12:34 am (UTC)
I've eaten so much of that stuff the last couple of days, and now I'm feeling ready to explode from gas.
apathetic_ninja 16th-Nov-2011 09:44 am (UTC)
Bwahaha, perfect comment!
sih_mah 15th-Nov-2011 10:39 pm (UTC)
The way they keep saying 'real women' bothers me
gata_power 15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
yeah, same here. They should have said non-models or women ranging in sizes 4+ or something.
fruitariyum 15th-Nov-2011 10:45 pm (UTC)
well tbh it doesn't even say what size the "real women models" even were. for all we know they could have been like 2s or 4s.

maybe she just wants to have super-strict control of her brand/imaging & didnt want amateur hour ~~models. lots of designers r like that

Edited at 2011-11-15 10:50 pm (UTC)
pooq45 15th-Nov-2011 10:52 pm (UTC)
ia whenever I hear "real women" I think women outside the modeling world. It comes across as rude and implying that thin women aren't "real women" but I never read it as that idk
pandora049 15th-Nov-2011 11:21 pm (UTC)
Apparently they were all 0-6 US.
hershelwalker 15th-Nov-2011 10:41 pm (UTC)
I love real women wank.

And IA with you.
sweet_children9 15th-Nov-2011 10:45 pm (UTC)
Same
sweet_honesty 15th-Nov-2011 10:49 pm (UTC)
Right? This article is the worst.
dirtylook 15th-Nov-2011 10:58 pm (UTC)
The term is just wrong. But I think people just wanted to express that a size zero is very rare and the average women in the US for example has a bigger size. But real just sounds like skinny women are not real... The media should be more exact with the language here.
But I always think H&M has the skinniest models anyways. I keep hearing H&M is using models with all kinds of sizes, but I only see size zeroes. Maybe that's just the case in Europe?!
ty_slilreject 15th-Nov-2011 11:10 pm (UTC)
I agree. I'm naturally small so I'm not real? Right.
Body shaming is wrong in all ways.
ametalheart 15th-Nov-2011 11:37 pm (UTC)
Real women is every woman?
xsnickerzzx 15th-Nov-2011 11:57 pm (UTC)
i hate the phrase all together.
fabouluz 15th-Nov-2011 10:39 pm (UTC)
I just want to give her a big FUCK YOU. Her clothing designs are TACKY, and her shit is getting old faster than she is. Versace is DONE.
joliefoliepolie 15th-Nov-2011 10:39 pm (UTC)
Not surprised, really.
I mean, it's Versace.
bang_fcuk_bang 15th-Nov-2011 10:39 pm (UTC)
I didn't know people actually wanted to wear her eye-straining garbage.
hazel_belle 15th-Nov-2011 10:39 pm (UTC)
Not surprised at that statement comming from her, she looks haggard tho.
crucified 15th-Nov-2011 10:39 pm (UTC)
obviously "real" doesn't work for her, look at her fucking face.
squeakysneaks 15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
HAHAHA.

That's rich.
alanadelrey 15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
Thank god for ad block.
luvthatdrtywata 15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
whatev, my fat ass is not only hotter but better dressed then you. peace out, cheez doodle.
squeakysneaks 15th-Nov-2011 10:55 pm (UTC)
I've never even seen you and I can tell that this is factual.
cassie_epstein 15th-Nov-2011 11:19 pm (UTC)
werq
chantonii 16th-Nov-2011 09:06 am (UTC)
Me too. WERQ IT!
numbedtoe 15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
Get the fuck over yourself.

Things went to shit for the Versace brand when your brother was murdered.

It blows my mind that in this global economy crisis that designers will get so bitchy over who they want to buy their over priced crap.
xlovexlessxtyx 15th-Nov-2011 10:46 pm (UTC)
all of it. i love you. perfect comment. perfect commenter.
midsummerain 15th-Nov-2011 11:33 pm (UTC)
Shows you how much money they make, yeah?
cooconuts 15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
"real women" probably can't afford versace anyway
vehiclesshockme 15th-Nov-2011 10:41 pm (UTC)
Ver-sayce.
dirtylook 15th-Nov-2011 11:03 pm (UTC)
Did you just quote Showgirls? I think I'm in love with you!
fruitariyum 15th-Nov-2011 10:42 pm (UTC)
lol ia
interrobamf 15th-Nov-2011 10:46 pm (UTC)
This is a H&M collection, so it's much cheaper than the actual brand.
greyfilm 15th-Nov-2011 11:17 pm (UTC)
I think that was the point. H&M's products are affordable and marketed to average people and therefore they wanted to use "real" people to model the clothes, not runway models who parade couture.
vehiclesshockme 15th-Nov-2011 10:40 pm (UTC)
Nothing about this is at all surprising. Also, I really hate the term "real women".

Anyway, it must suck to be rich and powerful and still look like an evil character created by Jim Henson Studios.
railway 16th-Nov-2011 09:00 am (UTC)


hdu, Janice isn't evil!
Page 1 of 8
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] >>
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 7:13 am GMT.