ONTD

12:08 pm - 10/28/2011

Royals Post


300 year old Succession Law changed

Sons and daughters of any future UK monarch will have equal right to the throne, after Commonwealth leaders agreed to changed succession laws.

The leaders of the 16 Commonwealth countries where the Queen is head of state unanimously approved the changes at a summit in Perth, Australia.

It means a first-born daughter of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge will take precedence over younger brothers.

The ban on the monarch being married to a Roman Catholic was also lifted.

Under the old succession laws, dating back more than 300 years, the heir to the throne is the first-born son of the monarch. Only when there are no sons, as in the case of the Queen's father George VI, does the crown pass to the eldest daughter.


Announcing the changes had been passed, Prime Minister David Cameron said they would apply to descendants of the Prince of Wales. They will not be applied retrospectively.


"Put simply, if the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were to have a little girl, that girl would one day be our queen," he said.

"The idea that a younger son should become monarch instead of an elder daughter simply because he is a man, or that a future monarch can marry someone of any faith except a Catholic - this way of thinking is at odds with the modern countries that we have become."

more


Catherine Cambridge DOES NOT wear extensions, attends first solo Royal Engagement


Duchess of Cambridge at the "In Kind Direct" function at Clarence House

Kate Middleton dazzled at her first royal solo engagement, but it is not her stunning dress or glittering personality that has hit the headlines.

The Duchess opted for a ‘half up, half down’ hairdo, which revealed a three inch scar, close to her hairline.

To put a quick end to rumours regarding what the scar could be, a spokesman at St James’s Palace confirmed: “The scar related to a childhood operation.”

Keen to keep the matter private, senior royal sources told the Daily Mail it had been “a very serious operation”, but refused to comment any further.

Scandinavian Royals in America

Representatives from the Scandinavian Royal Houses with the Presidents
of Finland and Iceland attend The American-Scandinavian Foundation celebration of its 100th anniversary at Centennial Ball in NYC


Queen Siliva, King Carl Gustaf and Princess Madeleine


at the 9/11 Memorial


Crown Princess Mary (wearing curtains how dare she etc etc) King Harald of Norway, Queen Sonia, Sweden's King 
Karl Gustaf, Finland's Tarja Holonen and Sweden's Queen Silvia at the opening of an exhibition at Scandinavia House


Prince Frederik and Princess Mary at the Carl Hansen & Son Showroom opening in NYC


Crown Prince Haakon of Norway tours Space Systems Loral in California




Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
grammaire 28th-Oct-2011 01:32 pm (UTC)
The ban on the monarch being married to a Roman Catholic was also lifted.

HURRAH, HERE I AM HARRY
x_butterfly19_x 28th-Oct-2011 01:44 pm (UTC)
WERQ
poison20 28th-Oct-2011 01:45 pm (UTC)
mte
fabouluz 28th-Oct-2011 02:03 pm (UTC)
MTE.
xclassicstarx 28th-Oct-2011 04:19 pm (UTC)
SERIOUSLY, my thoughts exactly!
muzicnem 28th-Oct-2011 07:25 pm (UTC)
lmao mte
jeterluva 28th-Oct-2011 08:01 pm (UTC)
MTE lol
shanny_w 28th-Oct-2011 08:29 pm (UTC)
yall look divine together
superstar5622 28th-Oct-2011 08:42 pm (UTC)
Haha. If I wasn't already married...
nicolesnitchie 29th-Oct-2011 05:09 am (UTC)
i'm sure if one of them were to be married to one, the catholic person would convert to church of eng anyway.
mandramoddle 28th-Oct-2011 01:34 pm (UTC)
Those people's expressions on the right are making me lol
poison20 28th-Oct-2011 01:38 pm (UTC)
The ban on the monarch being married to a Roman Catholic was also lifted.

FUCK YEAH!! HARRY I AM COMING FOR YOU BOY!!!


that said should i go see the Queen tomorrow at the bbq they are having here for her in Perth??

ash_of_evenstar 28th-Oct-2011 01:52 pm (UTC)
I thought that was today?
poison20 28th-Oct-2011 01:55 pm (UTC)
nah tomorrow.

thing is though am i that keen to get up at like 5 am to get on the train to get a good spot otherwise it would be pointless in a sea of 100,000+ people :/

ash_of_evenstar 28th-Oct-2011 01:55 pm (UTC)
Oh my mistake, it is tomorrow. I think she's visiting UWA tomorrow as well?
finding_jay 28th-Oct-2011 01:53 pm (UTC)
I hear Bunnings is hosting it.
jeffreyuno_1 28th-Oct-2011 01:39 pm (UTC)
People will disagree, but I think it's too much pressure to put on a young girl to be Queen--to find a man who will be comfortable walking a step behind. As we've seen with the current Queen, her "beloved" husband cheated on her left and right, and not matter how mad she was, she could never get out of the marriage even if she wanted to.
lucciolaa 28th-Oct-2011 01:42 pm (UTC)
I think you have a point. Until we can completely overcome gender role stereotypes, it is going to be hard on young women who ascend to the throne.
miss_padfoot 28th-Oct-2011 01:43 pm (UTC)
LOL, right, because non-Queen women in the royal family are never cheated on and have such an easy time getting divorced.
bent_ley 28th-Oct-2011 01:55 pm (UTC)
idk charles cheated all the time and he was the one with power. and he got a divorce and he will be king. soooooooo
wauwy 28th-Oct-2011 02:04 pm (UTC)
wut
fakevoices 28th-Oct-2011 02:06 pm (UTC)
umm you sorta have a point but i don't think that something like that is only exempt for only one gender.
mots_inutiles 28th-Oct-2011 02:14 pm (UTC)
If you're looking specifically at royal politics, I think this is actually a tremendous step for women's rights. And it's a tremendous pressure no matter who gets the job, it's kind of offensive to assume that a woman couldn't deal with it or that any man she marries would cheat on her. Those are the kinds of stereotypes that hold America back from electing a female president, and it's truly sad to see them restated here. So, yes, those are my two cents.
reginageorge 28th-Oct-2011 02:32 pm (UTC)
preach
stebo 28th-Oct-2011 02:42 pm (UTC)
A+
hatsumomo 28th-Oct-2011 02:56 pm (UTC)
I agree
jeffreyuno_1 28th-Oct-2011 03:02 pm (UTC)
The media is so different than when the current Queen ascended to the throne. Consider if Beatrice was the one to inherit the throne, that girl has been called name in the book just because she isn't the ideal of what people think a princess should look like. It happened to Hillary Clinton and it will happen to any woman who ends up in this position. Can you imagine if Williams' daughter pulled half the stunts he did...falling out of clubs drunk? That girl will be under lock and key. It would be sad, I think. I'm not saying clubs are the only way to have fun, but the media glare will be too much and too nasty. William and Harry have been given ten million passes for "boyish antics", but look at Beatrice and Eugenie. They are thrown under the bus daily.
freeze_i_say 28th-Oct-2011 08:00 pm (UTC)
well said
nekonekox 28th-Oct-2011 03:07 pm (UTC)
Elizabeth I
simplychristina 28th-Oct-2011 06:16 pm (UTC)
So you think that the best way to change the status quo is to do nothing?

The best way to change things is to change things. Besides, this wouldn't in all likelihood, have an effect for decades, since you have Charles and then William to get through.

But remember that 40 years ago, most men were probably uncomfortable with their wives even having jobs. Today, very few guys are looking for a housewife and many, if not most, prefer goal-oriented and ambitious women.
dior 28th-Oct-2011 07:10 pm (UTC)
If I was queen, I'd have him beheaded FUCK THAT
crazyfruitlady 28th-Oct-2011 08:18 pm (UTC)
I don't see how that's any different for a King. Kings and Queens have to find someone who will stand one step behind at all times, and whether they cheat or not, we're not in the days of Henry anymore. When is the last time a British monarch got divorced?

Edited at 2011-10-28 08:18 pm (UTC)
asha_greyjoy 28th-Oct-2011 01:40 pm (UTC)
how tall is kate? she looks like a giant in that picture
lucciolaa 28th-Oct-2011 01:40 pm (UTC)
5'10" iirc
faerieglen 28th-Oct-2011 02:14 pm (UTC)
Just found out that Diana was 5'10'' as well, just an inch smaller than Charles. Apparently they had him stand on a box in their engagement photo to disguise this fact...
miss_padfoot 28th-Oct-2011 01:45 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I hadn't realized how tall and thin she was!
lucciolaa 28th-Oct-2011 01:40 pm (UTC)
OMG THIS IS SO EXCITING! This is just so great.
poison20 28th-Oct-2011 01:44 pm (UTC)
I love the theme for CHOGM this year is a focus of Women! perfect tbh.
x_butterfly19_x 28th-Oct-2011 01:50 pm (UTC)
That is very fitting. :)
x_butterfly19_x 28th-Oct-2011 01:46 pm (UTC)
Government experts admit they are still examining just which laws need to alter.

They have drawn up a list of nine dating back 1689 - but they admit it may not be exhaustive.

One problem is that male primogeniture - which gives younger brothers the right to become monarchs ahead of their elder sisters - is based on many centuries of common law rules of property, not any one piece of legislation.

Legislation being looked at includes: the Bill of Rights 1689, the Act of Settlement 1701, the Coronation Oath Act 1689, the Act of Union with Scotland 1706, Princess Sophia's Precedence Act 1711, the Royal Marriages Act 1772, the Union with Ireland Act 1800, the Accession Declaration Act 1910 and the Regency Act 1937.


oh Lord.
finding_jay 28th-Oct-2011 01:51 pm (UTC)
I heard a police car go screaming by last night and I immediately thought somebody had tried to kill the queen.
poison20 28th-Oct-2011 01:58 pm (UTC)
im surprised how well the protest went down today.

finally Perth is showing their maturity for a change
ash_of_evenstar 28th-Oct-2011 01:53 pm (UTC)
I really like these royal posts
x_butterfly19_x 28th-Oct-2011 02:14 pm (UTC)
;)
The reason she is standing so far back is because they obviously ALL HATE HER



trololololo :D
hearthecity 28th-Oct-2011 01:58 pm (UTC)
Is that picture real? that's one of the cutest things ever.
x_butterfly19_x 28th-Oct-2011 02:02 pm (UTC)
I think so!
captchasucks 28th-Oct-2011 03:25 pm (UTC)
it is. it's a photo of the queen's doggies coming out of the plane at heathrow aiport.

larger photo:

tw_31988 28th-Oct-2011 03:38 pm (UTC)
OMG CORGIZZZ!!!
scarletsherlock 28th-Oct-2011 03:39 pm (UTC)
That is so cute. I want to steal them all!
bitchsdangerous 28th-Oct-2011 04:57 pm (UTC)
So fuckin CUUUUUUUUTE!

My friend has a Corgy named "Shorty" and now everytime I see Corgy's I call them by that name.
michelleantonia 29th-Oct-2011 03:56 am (UTC)
ONLY REASON I CAME IN HERE!!!! <333333333
hopeful_wish 28th-Oct-2011 02:00 pm (UTC)
I'm suprised at how many Perth ONTD'ers there are tbh. Anyone caught sight of the queen?
ash_of_evenstar 28th-Oct-2011 02:06 pm (UTC)
i've only seen a few photos on fb. i want to go see her, but i don't really want to deal with the crowds.
poison20 28th-Oct-2011 02:09 pm (UTC)
thats my issue as well.
poison20 28th-Oct-2011 02:09 pm (UTC)
Me here!

and only glimps was on tv. the closet connection would be seeing one of my uni tutors taking her around clontaff lol
fakevoices 28th-Oct-2011 02:02 pm (UTC)
i thought the succession rule was changed a long time ago
but that's good.
fakevoices 28th-Oct-2011 02:03 pm (UTC)
also flawless post. i've been meaning to make a royal post for a while but i'm so fucking busy.

good job op <3
x_butterfly19_x 28th-Oct-2011 02:06 pm (UTC)
ty! Love the new Ruth icon btw :)

The UK was slow to change, many of the continental Royal Houses have done this already.
childish 28th-Oct-2011 04:23 pm (UTC)
I think they never really had to change it because they kept having boys
But I'm sure they would have changed it had Diana/Charles had girls
jeveuxmacaron 28th-Oct-2011 02:02 pm (UTC)
the history geek in me is really freaking out over the roman catholic ban being lifted.
jeveuxmacaron 28th-Oct-2011 02:04 pm (UTC)
lol, i wasn't freaking out in a negative sense. idk what i mean.
poison20 28th-Oct-2011 02:09 pm (UTC)
lmao same
x_butterfly19_x 28th-Oct-2011 02:11 pm (UTC)
ditto, and I'm lapsed.

raychel86 28th-Oct-2011 10:18 pm (UTC)
me too!
x_butterfly19_x 28th-Oct-2011 02:05 pm (UTC)
That part is awesome. The Guardian lists what might have been had these changes been in place earlier.
fabouluz 28th-Oct-2011 02:05 pm (UTC)
why? i'm glad it's been lifted since most people in the UK are Catholic, and the rule was old and full of bloody history surrounding it.
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 3:43 pm GMT.