ONTD

11:17 am - 08/16/2011

An Open Statement to the Fans of The Help



On behalf of the Association of Black Women Historians (ABWH), this statement provides historical context to address widespread stereotyping presented in both the film and novel version of
The Help. The book has sold over three million copies, and heavy promotion of the movie will ensure its success at the box office. Despite efforts to market the book and the film as a progressive story of triumph over racial injustice, The Help distorts, ignores, and trivializes the experiences of black domestic workers. We are specifically concerned about the representations of black life and the lack of attention given to sexual harassment and civil rights activism.

During the 1960s, the era covered in The Help, legal segregation and economic inequalities limited black women's employment opportunities. Up to 90 per cent of working black women in the South labored as domestic servants in white homes. The Help’s representation of these women is a disappointing resurrection of Mammy—a mythical stereotype of black women who were compelled, either by slavery or segregation, to serve white families. Portrayed as asexual, loyal, and contented caretakers of whites, the caricature of Mammy allowed mainstream America to ignore the systemic racism that bound black women to back-breaking, low paying jobs where employers routinely exploited them. The popularity of this most recent iteration is troubling because it reveals a contemporary nostalgia for the days when a black woman could only hope to clean the White House rather than reside in it.

Both versions of The Help also misrepresent African American speech and culture. Set in the South, the appropriate regional accent gives way to a child-like, over-exaggerated “black” dialect. In the film, for example, the primary character, Aibileen, reassures a young white child that, “You is smat, you is kind, you is important.” In the book, black women refer to the Lord as the “Law,” an irreverent depiction of black vernacular. For centuries, black women and men have drawn strength from their community institutions. The black family, in particular provided support and the validation of personhood necessary to stand against adversity. We do not recognize the black community described in The Help where most of the black male characters are depicted as drunkards, abusive, or absent. Such distorted images are misleading and do not represent the historical realities of black masculinity and manhood.

Furthermore, African American domestic workers often suffered sexual harassment as well as physical and verbal abuse in the homes of white employers. For example, a recently discovered letter written by Civil Rights activist Rosa Parks indicates that she, like many black domestic workers, lived under the threat and sometimes reality of sexual assault. The film, on the other hand, makes light of black women’s fears and vulnerabilities turning them into moments of comic relief.

Similarly, the film is woefully silent on the rich and vibrant history of black Civil Rights activists in Mississippi. Granted, the assassination of Medgar Evers, the first Mississippi based field secretary of the NAACP, gets some attention.
However, Evers’ assassination sends Jackson’s black community frantically scurrying into the streets in utter chaos and disorganized confusion—a far cry from the courage demonstrated by the black men and women who continued his fight. Portraying the most dangerous racists in 1960s Mississippi as a group of attractive, well dressed, society women, while ignoring the reign of terror perpetuated by the Ku Klux Klan and the White Citizens Council, limits racial injustice to individual acts of meanness.

We respect the stellar performances of the African American actresses in this film. Indeed, this statement is in no way a criticism of their talent. It is, however, an attempt to provide context for this popular rendition of black life in the Jim Crow South. In the end, The Help is not a story about the millions of hardworking and dignified black women who labored in white homes to support their families and communities. Rather, it is the coming-of-age story of a white protagonist, who uses myths about the lives of black women to make sense of her own. The Association of Black Women Historians finds it unacceptable for either this book or this film to strip black women’s lives of historical accuracy for the sake of entertainment.

Ida E. Jones is National Director of ABWH and Assistant Curator at Howard University. Daina Ramey Berry, Tiffany M. Gill, and Kali Nicole Gross are Lifetime Members of ABWH and Associate Professors at the University of Texas at Austin. Janice Sumler-Edmond is a Lifetime Member of ABWH and is a Professor at Huston-Tillotson University.



Suggested Reading:

Fiction:

Like one of the Family: Conversations from A Domestic’s Life, Alice Childress

The Book of the Night Women by Marlon James

Blanche on the Lam by Barbara Neeley

The Street by Ann Petry

A Million Nightingales by Susan Straight

Non-Fiction:

Out of the House of Bondage: The Transformation of the Plantation Household by Thavolia Glymph

To Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors by Tera Hunter

Labor of Love Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family, from Slavery to the Present by Jacqueline Jones

Living In, Living Out: African American Domestics and the Great Migration
by Elizabeth Clark-Lewis

Coming of Age in Mississippi by Anne Moody

Any questions, comments, or interview requests can be sent to: ABWHTheHelp@gmail.com

Source
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
ectypes 16th-Aug-2011 03:20 pm (UTC)
Thank you! I didn't know what to think of this movie. Now that an actual black woman has told me, I can make an educated decision. (Not being sarcastic, was really confused)
bluebandit77 16th-Aug-2011 03:23 pm (UTC)
ectypes 16th-Aug-2011 03:28 pm (UTC)
lol hi brit
dedradawn 16th-Aug-2011 03:31 pm (UTC)
I get your point. I don't presume to understand the black experience, and it helps if we become informed by someone of color on their point of view.
joshlymanftw 16th-Aug-2011 03:33 pm (UTC)
mte... saw it this weekend and I was like, not sure if want
fight4thislove 16th-Aug-2011 03:23 pm (UTC)
The race wank is seriously getting annoying and out of hand.

We all know the movie isn't a 100% accurate description of what really happened during the civil rights movement and makes the film come off like a "nice white lady" film.

I saw it, I loved the story. Emma, Viola & Octavia all did an amazing job and should proud of their performances. It may have not been historically accurate and come off like a nice white lady film, but that doesn't distract from the fact that at least the film is making people talk about it now.
brandon198403 16th-Aug-2011 03:24 pm (UTC)
ia
katiexxpie 16th-Aug-2011 03:25 pm (UTC)
ia
my_bitch_face 16th-Aug-2011 03:28 pm (UTC)
ia
winonaforever 16th-Aug-2011 03:29 pm (UTC)
Aren't you contradicting yourself? You call the "race wank" annoying but at the same time you also say "at least the film is making people talk about it now".

fight4thislove 16th-Aug-2011 03:30 pm (UTC)
not really. the race wank i am talking about is people in past posts about the film calling other people blatant racists for even seeing the film or reading the book.

instead, the talk I refer is people actually having regular conversations about the civil rights movement and not just resorting to "OMG YUR A RACIST!!!!! U SAW THE MOVIE U R A RACIST!!!!"
xlovexlessxtyx 16th-Aug-2011 03:32 pm (UTC)
this.
celtic_thistle 16th-Aug-2011 03:45 pm (UTC)
Heaven forbid people's legitimate concerns over a racially problematic film get too SHRILL or anything amirite
putyohandsonme 16th-Aug-2011 03:53 pm (UTC)
Fuck man I am seeing the movie, I don't even care if it makes me a "bad" Black person. I am so tired of my race taking everything so freaking serious, it is a freaking movie, if people want to delve into it further they can research it.
sweet_honesty 16th-Aug-2011 04:01 pm (UTC)
Seriously. I'm sure there are hundreds of articles like this one but we don't need them all posted.
para1 16th-Aug-2011 04:09 pm (UTC)
Did you even read the post?
bluecupxxx 16th-Aug-2011 04:11 pm (UTC)
ia. I can't get over the fact that people still consistently expect a film which is aiming to be a high grossing popular blockbuster event to be an "accurate historical portrayal" of life. Any life. I can't remember the last film I have seen which is accurate to any experience, black, white or any other. I don't expect them to be though so I don't get worked up about it.(I also don't go to movies in the theaters though so maybe I am not really the best person to judge.)

The issue of stereotyping and negative portrayal is real, but to get so angry about it is ultimately only detrimental to the person getting worked up as well as the point they are trying to make. This letter is good because it doesn't get worked up. It points out the flaws without screaming "racism" for no reason.

I think everyone expects way too much out of popular films. Every character in every film is a stereotype of some sort. It seems like it's the only way that film studios think the public can relate to them well enough to sell tickets.
la_petite_singe 16th-Aug-2011 04:18 pm (UTC)
Basically this. I actually liked that the characters weren't just stock characters who represented the entire movement; it was a tighter focus and told their personal stories. It was hardly perfect, but it was well-acted and I thought the characters were depicted well.
oh7 16th-Aug-2011 04:21 pm (UTC)
I've seen one White savior film, I've seen them all. My nanny was a maid for a family for years and was a line of work a lot of Black women took because it was harder to get higher education and high paying jobs but this author and director couldn't break onto the psyche of Black women in that time and gives plain ol basic storylines.
freeze_i_say 17th-Aug-2011 08:02 am (UTC)
"We all know"

who is we jw
bitchwhisperer 16th-Aug-2011 03:24 pm (UTC)
watch white ppl backpedal
lickety_split 16th-Aug-2011 03:29 pm (UTC)
Or express pride in their blissful ignorance (glances at comment above yours).
fight4thislove 16th-Aug-2011 03:31 pm (UTC)
oh fuck off.
celtic_thistle 16th-Aug-2011 03:48 pm (UTC)
These posts are a mess bb.
lil_creamsoda 16th-Aug-2011 04:06 pm (UTC)
LOL
smirk_dog 16th-Aug-2011 04:40 pm (UTC)
Ahahahaha.
bellwetherr 16th-Aug-2011 07:44 pm (UTC)
lol
katiexxpie 16th-Aug-2011 03:24 pm (UTC)
wasn't this posted?

or maybe i just read it somewhere else
sweet_honesty 16th-Aug-2011 04:03 pm (UTC)
Something like this has been posted before on ONTD, many times.
the_perishers 16th-Aug-2011 03:26 pm (UTC)
Oh okay. For a moment there I thought being oppressed and a servant was a really good situation. Now I know....it is not.
bluebandit77 16th-Aug-2011 03:26 pm (UTC)
why?
anachu 16th-Aug-2011 03:34 pm (UTC)
lol ia
xlovexlessxtyx 16th-Aug-2011 03:38 pm (UTC)
agreed. I like Viola, Octavia and Emma, but I just don't care.
bluebandit77 16th-Aug-2011 03:56 pm (UTC)
don't care about what?
drunkagron 16th-Aug-2011 04:02 pm (UTC)
Me neither! I'm sick of it. It's the new Eat, Pray, Love.
bollyhood 16th-Aug-2011 04:14 pm (UTC)
Me neither. I can't stand Emma stone.
sweet_honesty 16th-Aug-2011 04:19 pm (UTC)
I will probably watch it if I am bored on an airplane. I am very over the controversy surrounding it
troy_macclure 16th-Aug-2011 04:22 pm (UTC)
yep
oh7 16th-Aug-2011 04:25 pm (UTC)
Yeah me too. I was thinking about reading the book but I read she wrote Black people with very Southern accents and can't read things written that way. I couldn't read Push (that Precious book) because of the ebonics.
canuckgirl33 16th-Aug-2011 06:40 pm (UTC)
This
bellwetherr 16th-Aug-2011 07:45 pm (UTC)
lol mte. in fact, i'm embarrassed for everyone who took part in it. i still side-eye sandra bullock.
bluebandit77 16th-Aug-2011 03:26 pm (UTC)
the book is amazing...i haven't seen the movie yet...


ugh it's mind boggling that this country thought it was okay to treat black people like that.

my grandmother was on of those people treated poorly because of the color of her skin and the stories she has told..break my heart.

separate bathrooms? separate water fountains? couldn't eat in the same diner as whites? i'm sorry but whattttt
boomstick 16th-Aug-2011 03:28 pm (UTC)
It's really weird to think that there are still so many people living who lived through segregation. It always struck me as the kind of horrible, primitive thing people would do hundreds of years ago, but not now.
bluebandit77 16th-Aug-2011 03:29 pm (UTC)
:( it's awful
yeahwell_britt 16th-Aug-2011 03:36 pm (UTC)
you wanna meet my parents?
vehiclesshockme 16th-Aug-2011 04:00 pm (UTC)
I know right? When my mom was little her grandparents lived in Alabama and she said even as a kid the first time she saw separate bathrooms and water fountains she was really confused by it and thought it was horrible and even though she saw it first hand she still has a hard time thinking that was something she witnessed during her lifetime.
ectypes 16th-Aug-2011 03:32 pm (UTC)
I know, it is beyond fucking weird
massielita 16th-Aug-2011 03:37 pm (UTC)
Yep. My father had me at an old age and he experienced segregration as a dark-skinned Puerto Rican man. He worked as kitchen staff in restaurants where they served white people and he also drank from different water fountain, used different bathrooms oh and here in Miami POCs had their own beach to bathe in. Also, if you were POC you'd better not think of taking the I75 here in Florida or you'd be likely to be lynched.
shania_cares 16th-Aug-2011 04:29 pm (UTC)
This was going on even in the mid to late 70s. My dad temporarily relocated from a university town in Georgia to a small town in South Carolina for work, and when he was there he noticed how segregated the town was, but no one actually outright put out signs saying "whites only" on anything. For example, he went to the doctor's office and he noticed when the black patients asked for the key to the lavatory, the secretaries denied them and told them it was out of order, but when the white patients asked for the key they'd give them the key. He said you could see it in the black people's eyes how they'd lived a life where they were constantly put down and had to act meek and submissive. So sad.
oh7 16th-Aug-2011 04:29 pm (UTC)
Black babies being fed to alligators, slaves' flesh being used to bound books,etc. Shit was rough.
troy_macclure 16th-Aug-2011 04:35 pm (UTC)
Yep. My grandmother grew up during the jim crow era. Hell, My dad couldn't even go some places in the early 60's :(

It's really a lot closer to us than people here on ONTD and others think, and I wish people would fuck off with the ~OMG SO LONG AGOOO! RACE CARD!~ shit. Or at least understand why some of us don't want to see this movie.

(not mad at you, just saying)
dimwit90 16th-Aug-2011 05:03 pm (UTC)
Until I was 10 I went to a "white" only school and lived in an extremely segregated town, when I came to the US I remember walking in on my first day seeing a black girl in my classroom and asking my teacher why she was allowed in the school. So yeah, shit still sucks
pink_dog 16th-Aug-2011 07:06 pm (UTC)
Now, you see, comments like yours make me CHEER for the book. We've come just far enough away from desegregation so that many of us (especially white people) don't think about it much anymore. And some young black people too--I have black students blithely announce that racism is over, except that maybe if too many black people get in the club, the white bouncers will stop letting blacks in for an hour or two. These kids don't even seem to realize that what they're saying is twisted up.

A book like this one--even though it's a flawed, surface-treatment of the topic--is making people remember and think and TALK about this stuff. It's a good thing. Is it a perfect thing? No, but it's good.
fight4thislove 16th-Aug-2011 03:27 pm (UTC)
Rather, it is the coming-of-age story of a white protagonist, who uses myths about the lives of black women to make sense of her own. The Association of Black Women Historians finds it unacceptable for either this book or this film to strip black women’s lives of historical accuracy for the sake of entertainment.

Okay if anything the film makes Emma's character grow up and show that she believes that african american's should've had equal rights during a time when they had none. Emma's character had her own sense of what her life was, her character the entire time never treated her maid as a slave. She made the comment that Constantine raised her and her mother didn't. She said in the film she loved Constantine more than her own mother. She was more distraught over Constantine's death than her own mothers cancer.
yeahwell_britt 16th-Aug-2011 03:32 pm (UTC)
i think you kind of just elaborated their point.
door 16th-Aug-2011 03:53 pm (UTC)
Seriously.
0sleep2dream0 16th-Aug-2011 03:36 pm (UTC)
I don't really have a desire to see this film, because it did seem like a nice white lady film (Imma use the terminology in this post).

However, what perhaps is missing is that it is told from the POV of Emma's character, so she really doesn't have a true insight into the lives and woes of the black women surrounding her character. While it would be more accurate, would it not be just as much as pandering to deliver a side that simply does not exist to the white character, especially they themselves are blinded by their white privilege and other factors of systematic racism? IDK.
patronuscharms 16th-Aug-2011 03:36 pm (UTC)
Gurl, check your privilege asap, because you clearly don't get how extensively you're basically agreeing with the statement you italicized.

It's a white savior movie. Get on board with that reality already.
celtic_thistle 16th-Aug-2011 03:47 pm (UTC)
Embarrassed for you rn
bluebandit77 16th-Aug-2011 04:07 pm (UTC)
you don't get it..
slayer4915 16th-Aug-2011 06:02 pm (UTC)
I actually agree with you tbh. I didn't see this story as being "coming-of-age" for Emma's character at all. She was pretty much fully developed from the beginning. Girl just wanted to be a writer, and she found a unique story to get her foot in the door. I didn't even consider her the main protagonist of the film.
getwellchanel 16th-Aug-2011 06:06 pm (UTC)
Spoiler alert. -________________________________-
shh_im_a_ninja 16th-Aug-2011 03:27 pm (UTC)
I feel like I need to see this for myself before I listen to everyone's ideas about it.

...tho ONTD would probably tell me since I'm a white woman whatever I think will be wrong. :P
ladyserenity84 16th-Aug-2011 03:41 pm (UTC)
You should see it and judge for yourself, bb. Better to have an opinion of it yourself and bring it to the table rather than listening to what other people tell you about it.

I'm personally going to see it at some point, though I'm hesitant about it in some measures. I'm reading the book now before I do, though.
shh_im_a_ninja 16th-Aug-2011 04:00 pm (UTC)
I probably should read the book first.
oh7 16th-Aug-2011 04:34 pm (UTC)
If you say you're looking at the film through an European worldview, you're looking at from an European worldview.
madamearnoux 17th-Aug-2011 02:49 am (UTC)
Yep, better check your privilege.
invisible_cunt 16th-Aug-2011 03:29 pm (UTC)
is the film claiming to be non-fiction?
and is anything ever accurately depicted in blockbuster films? not often
fight4thislove 16th-Aug-2011 03:31 pm (UTC)
in no adds is the film saying "based on a true story".
bellwetherr 16th-Aug-2011 07:48 pm (UTC)
but the film is based on novel based on a true story. so.
dedradawn 16th-Aug-2011 03:32 pm (UTC)
The Transformers movies accurately depict the dangers of robot invasion.
yeahwell_britt 16th-Aug-2011 03:34 pm (UTC)
when your covering a subject as serious and important as the civil rights era, i'd think you'd kinda want to make sure your facts are straight.
bitchwhisperer 16th-Aug-2011 03:46 pm (UTC)
lol ur missing the point
ladyserenity84 16th-Aug-2011 03:56 pm (UTC)
To be honest, if you're writing a book/portraying a movie that is historical fiction in any measure, you do want the history to be reflected and as accurate as possible, because it reflects the attitudes and climate of the setting as well as the people living during that time. That way the context is there.

I'm currently reading the book for myself to look at interpretations before I see the movie, but I do think that the people who write/show pieces in this or any other era of history should be mindful of the time and people, despite it being fiction.

I'm not saying that anything/everything is accurate in Hollywood films, but it can be grating to watch people who see these films and get the wrong idea from them.
para1 16th-Aug-2011 04:19 pm (UTC)
Visual depictions of something that really happened to some extent are often mistaken for reality by most of its viewers. Even if they are told that a lot of it is fiction and exaggeration, they still believe what they saw. People usually do that's why movies are worse than any other fictionalized account of history.

Of course they are usually smart enough to not believe that the conversations went 100 percent that way or that the actors are not a more attractive charismatic update but they believe the generics, like with the Help that sexual and physical abuse didn't exist or matter.

And that's kind of fucked up and dangerous.
bellwetherr 16th-Aug-2011 07:49 pm (UTC)
when the fuck has become okay to expect nothing out of film? like, it seems like everyone is a bunch of passive assholes. "historical accuracy? simples facts portrayed correctly? blah, who cares, let's blow shit up."
tx5mym5 17th-Aug-2011 12:49 am (UTC)
Or you could read some of the book suggested at the end of this article.
cigarettelover 16th-Aug-2011 03:32 pm (UTC)
The book sucks, I have no desire to see this, despite adoring Viola.
smirk_dog 16th-Aug-2011 04:42 pm (UTC)
Co-signed.
tx5mym5 17th-Aug-2011 12:52 am (UTC)
I feel like I HAVE to read the book,, so I can properly trash it.
massielita 16th-Aug-2011 03:33 pm (UTC)
I haven't seen it and now I feel like I kinda have to just to be able to judge for myself but my feelings have mostly been in accord with this article. IDK, it comes off as very 'zomg look how far we've come/ aren't we glad we live in a post racial america' and that doesn't sit well with me by far.

Also, brb adding all those books to my to-read list
innosancta 16th-Aug-2011 03:34 pm (UTC)
Lol is the "it's fictional!" becoming the "but it's my free speech!!" excuse for movies/tv?
she_rockstar 17th-Aug-2011 12:00 am (UTC)
Seriously... I'm concerned.

xlovexlessxtyx 16th-Aug-2011 03:34 pm (UTC)
So because I'm black I'm supposed to hate this yet embrace culutural bullshit like Soul Plane, Who's Your Caddy? and For Colored Girls?

Is it possible for anyone to write a film where a black woman is, i dont know, content?
msloserrific 16th-Aug-2011 03:45 pm (UTC)
I tried to forget those movies ever happened. Curse you!
asteriatic 16th-Aug-2011 04:15 pm (UTC)
Is it possible for anyone to write a film where a black woman is, i dont know, content

yeah but if it's told from a white woman's perspective during the height of segregation I understand these historians' point
xlovexlessxtyx 16th-Aug-2011 04:23 pm (UTC)
And I get their frustration but it's not like their doing anything besides complaining about it.
yeahwell_britt 16th-Aug-2011 04:23 pm (UTC)
So because I'm black I'm supposed to hate this yet embrace culutural bullshit like Soul Plane, Who's Your Caddy? and For Colored Girls?


is that what the article said?
oh7 16th-Aug-2011 04:40 pm (UTC)
When do Black people tell you you need to like Soul Plane? If you speak and or hear from Black people who detest Tyler Perry you shouldn't get that message.

Do you mean content Black characters or being content with characters Black actors portray?
wigsnatcher 16th-Aug-2011 03:34 pm (UTC)
where do you draw the line between how a singular character acts and stereotype though?
xlovexlessxtyx 16th-Aug-2011 03:36 pm (UTC)
That's a personal decision.

But organizations like the one that search for an ounce of misrepresentation so they can justify their B.S.
celtic_thistle 16th-Aug-2011 03:40 pm (UTC)
What. Are you implying this organization of historians is overreacting? Why?

Edited at 2011-08-16 03:44 pm (UTC)
hellooo 16th-Aug-2011 03:55 pm (UTC)
I think it's that how that singular character becomes the only (or one of a few kinds of) character that people generally see in pop culture, and they become representative of some group.

It's not just a strange coincidence that a lot of 'singular characters' (in this case, black women) are written the same way, even though black women (like any other group) are far more diverse than that. And it's worse when they're constantly written from the perspective of people who can't understand what it's like to be a black woman in the US, even if they mean well with their story; they miss a lot of really important complexities, like how a lot of these women probably code-switched, playing docile and dumb when in the presence of white people in order to avoid being seen as too much of a threat, too argumentative, unemployable, etc., but in stories like this, it almost always comes across as "they want their rights but they're not smart or strong enough to fight for them; they need our help." Because that's how a lot of anti-racist white people think, and those are the stories they keep telling, and those stories are constantly chosen over the stories of black people who explain why that's inaccurate. If that makes sense.

Edited at 2011-08-16 04:02 pm (UTC)
oh7 16th-Aug-2011 04:43 pm (UTC)
I was taught that it's throughout correct historical facts and parts of the African worldview . lol Making a "good" Black film sounds hard.
starbucks_patch 17th-Aug-2011 12:50 am (UTC)
idk Tommy. idk.
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
This page was loaded May 18th 2013, 4:41 pm GMT.