11:17 am - 08/16/2011

On behalf of the Association of Black Women Historians (ABWH), this statement provides historical context to address widespread stereotyping presented in both the film and novel version of The Help. The book has sold over three million copies, and heavy promotion of the movie will ensure its success at the box office. Despite efforts to market the book and the film as a progressive story of triumph over racial injustice, The Help distorts, ignores, and trivializes the experiences of black domestic workers. We are specifically concerned about the representations of black life and the lack of attention given to sexual harassment and civil rights activism.
During the 1960s, the era covered in The Help, legal segregation and economic inequalities limited black women's employment opportunities. Up to 90 per cent of working black women in the South labored as domestic servants in white homes. The Help’s representation of these women is a disappointing resurrection of Mammy—a mythical stereotype of black women who were compelled, either by slavery or segregation, to serve white families. Portrayed as asexual, loyal, and contented caretakers of whites, the caricature of Mammy allowed mainstream America to ignore the systemic racism that bound black women to back-breaking, low paying jobs where employers routinely exploited them. The popularity of this most recent iteration is troubling because it reveals a contemporary nostalgia for the days when a black woman could only hope to clean the White House rather than reside in it.
Both versions of The Help also misrepresent African American speech and culture. Set in the South, the appropriate regional accent gives way to a child-like, over-exaggerated “black” dialect. In the film, for example, the primary character, Aibileen, reassures a young white child that, “You is smat, you is kind, you is important.” In the book, black women refer to the Lord as the “Law,” an irreverent depiction of black vernacular. For centuries, black women and men have drawn strength from their community institutions. The black family, in particular provided support and the validation of personhood necessary to stand against adversity. We do not recognize the black community described in The Help where most of the black male characters are depicted as drunkards, abusive, or absent. Such distorted images are misleading and do not represent the historical realities of black masculinity and manhood.
Furthermore, African American domestic workers often suffered sexual harassment as well as physical and verbal abuse in the homes of white employers. For example, a recently discovered letter written by Civil Rights activist Rosa Parks indicates that she, like many black domestic workers, lived under the threat and sometimes reality of sexual assault. The film, on the other hand, makes light of black women’s fears and vulnerabilities turning them into moments of comic relief.
Similarly, the film is woefully silent on the rich and vibrant history of black Civil Rights activists in Mississippi. Granted, the assassination of Medgar Evers, the first Mississippi based field secretary of the NAACP, gets some attention. However, Evers’ assassination sends Jackson’s black community frantically scurrying into the streets in utter chaos and disorganized confusion—a far cry from the courage demonstrated by the black men and women who continued his fight. Portraying the most dangerous racists in 1960s Mississippi as a group of attractive, well dressed, society women, while ignoring the reign of terror perpetuated by the Ku Klux Klan and the White Citizens Council, limits racial injustice to individual acts of meanness.
We respect the stellar performances of the African American actresses in this film. Indeed, this statement is in no way a criticism of their talent. It is, however, an attempt to provide context for this popular rendition of black life in the Jim Crow South. In the end, The Help is not a story about the millions of hardworking and dignified black women who labored in white homes to support their families and communities. Rather, it is the coming-of-age story of a white protagonist, who uses myths about the lives of black women to make sense of her own. The Association of Black Women Historians finds it unacceptable for either this book or this film to strip black women’s lives of historical accuracy for the sake of entertainment.
Ida E. Jones is National Director of ABWH and Assistant Curator at Howard University. Daina Ramey Berry, Tiffany M. Gill, and Kali Nicole Gross are Lifetime Members of ABWH and Associate Professors at the University of Texas at Austin. Janice Sumler-Edmond is a Lifetime Member of ABWH and is a Professor at Huston-Tillotson University.
Suggested Reading:
Fiction:
Like one of the Family: Conversations from A Domestic’s Life, Alice Childress
The Book of the Night Women by Marlon James
Blanche on the Lam by Barbara Neeley
The Street by Ann Petry
A Million Nightingales by Susan Straight
Non-Fiction:
Out of the House of Bondage: The Transformation of the Plantation Household by Thavolia Glymph
To Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors by Tera Hunter
Labor of Love Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family, from Slavery to the Present by Jacqueline Jones
Living In, Living Out: African American Domestics and the Great Migration by Elizabeth Clark-Lewis
Coming of Age in Mississippi by Anne Moody
Any questions, comments, or interview requests can be sent to: ABWHTheHelp@gmail.com
Source
An Open Statement to the Fans of The Help

On behalf of the Association of Black Women Historians (ABWH), this statement provides historical context to address widespread stereotyping presented in both the film and novel version of The Help. The book has sold over three million copies, and heavy promotion of the movie will ensure its success at the box office. Despite efforts to market the book and the film as a progressive story of triumph over racial injustice, The Help distorts, ignores, and trivializes the experiences of black domestic workers. We are specifically concerned about the representations of black life and the lack of attention given to sexual harassment and civil rights activism.
During the 1960s, the era covered in The Help, legal segregation and economic inequalities limited black women's employment opportunities. Up to 90 per cent of working black women in the South labored as domestic servants in white homes. The Help’s representation of these women is a disappointing resurrection of Mammy—a mythical stereotype of black women who were compelled, either by slavery or segregation, to serve white families. Portrayed as asexual, loyal, and contented caretakers of whites, the caricature of Mammy allowed mainstream America to ignore the systemic racism that bound black women to back-breaking, low paying jobs where employers routinely exploited them. The popularity of this most recent iteration is troubling because it reveals a contemporary nostalgia for the days when a black woman could only hope to clean the White House rather than reside in it.
Both versions of The Help also misrepresent African American speech and culture. Set in the South, the appropriate regional accent gives way to a child-like, over-exaggerated “black” dialect. In the film, for example, the primary character, Aibileen, reassures a young white child that, “You is smat, you is kind, you is important.” In the book, black women refer to the Lord as the “Law,” an irreverent depiction of black vernacular. For centuries, black women and men have drawn strength from their community institutions. The black family, in particular provided support and the validation of personhood necessary to stand against adversity. We do not recognize the black community described in The Help where most of the black male characters are depicted as drunkards, abusive, or absent. Such distorted images are misleading and do not represent the historical realities of black masculinity and manhood.
Furthermore, African American domestic workers often suffered sexual harassment as well as physical and verbal abuse in the homes of white employers. For example, a recently discovered letter written by Civil Rights activist Rosa Parks indicates that she, like many black domestic workers, lived under the threat and sometimes reality of sexual assault. The film, on the other hand, makes light of black women’s fears and vulnerabilities turning them into moments of comic relief.
Similarly, the film is woefully silent on the rich and vibrant history of black Civil Rights activists in Mississippi. Granted, the assassination of Medgar Evers, the first Mississippi based field secretary of the NAACP, gets some attention. However, Evers’ assassination sends Jackson’s black community frantically scurrying into the streets in utter chaos and disorganized confusion—a far cry from the courage demonstrated by the black men and women who continued his fight. Portraying the most dangerous racists in 1960s Mississippi as a group of attractive, well dressed, society women, while ignoring the reign of terror perpetuated by the Ku Klux Klan and the White Citizens Council, limits racial injustice to individual acts of meanness.
We respect the stellar performances of the African American actresses in this film. Indeed, this statement is in no way a criticism of their talent. It is, however, an attempt to provide context for this popular rendition of black life in the Jim Crow South. In the end, The Help is not a story about the millions of hardworking and dignified black women who labored in white homes to support their families and communities. Rather, it is the coming-of-age story of a white protagonist, who uses myths about the lives of black women to make sense of her own. The Association of Black Women Historians finds it unacceptable for either this book or this film to strip black women’s lives of historical accuracy for the sake of entertainment.
Ida E. Jones is National Director of ABWH and Assistant Curator at Howard University. Daina Ramey Berry, Tiffany M. Gill, and Kali Nicole Gross are Lifetime Members of ABWH and Associate Professors at the University of Texas at Austin. Janice Sumler-Edmond is a Lifetime Member of ABWH and is a Professor at Huston-Tillotson University.
Suggested Reading:
Fiction:
Like one of the Family: Conversations from A Domestic’s Life, Alice Childress
The Book of the Night Women by Marlon James
Blanche on the Lam by Barbara Neeley
The Street by Ann Petry
A Million Nightingales by Susan Straight
Non-Fiction:
Out of the House of Bondage: The Transformation of the Plantation Household by Thavolia Glymph
To Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors by Tera Hunter
Labor of Love Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family, from Slavery to the Present by Jacqueline Jones
Living In, Living Out: African American Domestics and the Great Migration by Elizabeth Clark-Lewis
Coming of Age in Mississippi by Anne Moody
Any questions, comments, or interview requests can be sent to: ABWHTheHelp@gmail.com
Source
We all know the movie isn't a 100% accurate description of what really happened during the civil rights movement and makes the film come off like a "nice white lady" film.
I saw it, I loved the story. Emma, Viola & Octavia all did an amazing job and should proud of their performances. It may have not been historically accurate and come off like a nice white lady film, but that doesn't distract from the fact that at least the film is making people talk about it now.
instead, the talk I refer is people actually having regular conversations about the civil rights movement and not just resorting to "OMG YUR A RACIST!!!!! U SAW THE MOVIE U R A RACIST!!!!"
The issue of stereotyping and negative portrayal is real, but to get so angry about it is ultimately only detrimental to the person getting worked up as well as the point they are trying to make. This letter is good because it doesn't get worked up. It points out the flaws without screaming "racism" for no reason.
I think everyone expects way too much out of popular films. Every character in every film is a stereotype of some sort. It seems like it's the only way that film studios think the public can relate to them well enough to sell tickets.
who is we jw
or maybe i just read it somewhere else
ugh it's mind boggling that this country thought it was okay to treat black people like that.
my grandmother was on of those people treated poorly because of the color of her skin and the stories she has told..break my heart.
separate bathrooms? separate water fountains? couldn't eat in the same diner as whites? i'm sorry but whattttt
It's really a lot closer to us than people here on ONTD and others think, and I wish people would fuck off with the ~OMG SO LONG AGOOO! RACE CARD!~ shit. Or at least understand why some of us don't want to see this movie.
(not mad at you, just saying)
A book like this one--even though it's a flawed, surface-treatment of the topic--is making people remember and think and TALK about this stuff. It's a good thing. Is it a perfect thing? No, but it's good.
Okay if anything the film makes Emma's character grow up and show that she believes that african american's should've had equal rights during a time when they had none. Emma's character had her own sense of what her life was, her character the entire time never treated her maid as a slave. She made the comment that Constantine raised her and her mother didn't. She said in the film she loved Constantine more than her own mother. She was more distraught over Constantine's death than her own mothers cancer.
However, what perhaps is missing is that it is told from the POV of Emma's character, so she really doesn't have a true insight into the lives and woes of the black women surrounding her character. While it would be more accurate, would it not be just as much as pandering to deliver a side that simply does not exist to the white character, especially they themselves are blinded by their white privilege and other factors of systematic racism? IDK.
It's a white savior movie. Get on board with that reality already.
...tho ONTD would probably tell me since I'm a white woman whatever I think will be wrong. :P
I'm personally going to see it at some point, though I'm hesitant about it in some measures. I'm reading the book now before I do, though.
and is anything ever accurately depicted in blockbuster films? not often
I'm currently reading the book for myself to look at interpretations before I see the movie, but I do think that the people who write/show pieces in this or any other era of history should be mindful of the time and people, despite it being fiction.
I'm not saying that anything/everything is accurate in Hollywood films, but it can be grating to watch people who see these films and get the wrong idea from them.
Of course they are usually smart enough to not believe that the conversations went 100 percent that way or that the actors are not a more attractive charismatic update but they believe the generics, like with the Help that sexual and physical abuse didn't exist or matter.
And that's kind of fucked up and dangerous.
Also, brb adding all those books to my to-read list
Is it possible for anyone to write a film where a black woman is, i dont know, content?
yeah but if it's told from a white woman's perspective during the height of segregation I understand these historians' point
is that what the article said?
Do you mean content Black characters or being content with characters Black actors portray?
But organizations like the one that search for an ounce of misrepresentation so they can justify their B.S.
Edited at 2011-08-16 03:44 pm (UTC)
It's not just a strange coincidence that a lot of 'singular characters' (in this case, black women) are written the same way, even though black women (like any other group) are far more diverse than that. And it's worse when they're constantly written from the perspective of people who can't understand what it's like to be a black woman in the US, even if they mean well with their story; they miss a lot of really important complexities, like how a lot of these women probably code-switched, playing docile and dumb when in the presence of white people in order to avoid being seen as too much of a threat, too argumentative, unemployable, etc., but in stories like this, it almost always comes across as "they want their rights but they're not smart or strong enough to fight for them; they need our help." Because that's how a lot of anti-racist white people think, and those are the stories they keep telling, and those stories are constantly chosen over the stories of black people who explain why that's inaccurate. If that makes sense.
Edited at 2011-08-16 04:02 pm (UTC)