ONTD

1:38 pm - 06/28/2011

Newsweek cover imagines Princess Diana at 50, walking with Kate Middleton



Had she lived, Princess Diana would have celebrated her 50th birthday this coming Friday. Ever ponder how things might have turned out for the people's princess had that fatal 1997 car crash never happened? Newsweek's Tina Brown has ever-so-kindly tried her hand at taking some of the guesswork out of that equation.

The rather jarring cover features an imaginary present-day Diana strolling with the daughter-in-law she never knew: An age-projected photo illustration of Di is digitally superimposed at the side of the former Kate Middleton, the commoner who married Prince William, emerging from Westminster Abbey in April as Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge.

While many fans were imagining the high glamour and higher emotion Diana's presence would've brought to the royal wedding, the cover and accompanying story takes it bigger, imagining one version of where she would be today.

"Gliding sleekly into her 40s, her romantic taste would have moved to men of power over boys of play," she writes, saying Diana's entire life would be about philanthropy and dizzying power circles, in addition to sons William and Prince Harry.

Daily Beast founder and Diana expert Brown has a rather dramatic vision of a modern Di, tweeting at the Dalai Lama and owning a deliriously designed Facebook page (featuring another age projection of Diana clutching an iPhone).


Imaginary Diana has a lofty apartment in New York, a strange but comforting friendship with ex-husband Charles, Prince of Wales, and naturally a front-row next to Victoria Beckham at Fashion Week.

Possible, yes — but it is plausible? And is the cover all sorts of right, or all sorts of wrong? Let us know.

USA Today:

Does this cover bother you?

In the new Newsweek, Tina Brown ponders what Princess Diana would be like today - as she would have turned 50 on Friday.

A computer-generated, age-projected image of a Diana shows her appearing to walk next to Kate Middleton, Prince William's bride.


"What would she have been like?" Brown writes of Diana. "Still great-looking: that's a given."

She goes on to say: "Fashionwise, Diana would have gone the J.Crew and Galliano route à la Michelle Obama, always knowing how to mix the casual with the glam. There is no doubt she would have kept her chin taut with strategic Botox shots and her bare arms buff from the gym. Remarriage? At least two, I suspect, on both sides of the Atlantic."

Brown details all sorts of escapades that might have happened, with men, with her ex-husband, in politics and more. And would Diana have found peace? "Yes, I believe she would," writes Brown.

But the Los Angeles Times ponders a different question - about the "jarring" cover, asking: "Shocking, brilliant or just plain cheap?" Most readers, it appears, find it "horribly" offensive. How about you?

1, 2

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

This seems REALLY tacky.

I hope her sons don't see this on the newstands. :(

ETA: Newsweek has also created a fake Facebook page for Diana (thanks vag_breath):

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Page 1 of 13
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] >>
juunanagou18 28th-Jun-2011 06:11 pm (UTC)
...Creepy.
luvthatdrtywata 28th-Jun-2011 06:26 pm (UTC)
not as creepy as when passions decided that one of their characters was princess diana's best friend and have her talk to her ghost and go to her funeral and whatnot...oh and this show started years after she died so...



at least there is a reason for the connection on the mag.
luvthatdrtywata 28th-Jun-2011 06:27 pm (UTC)
*not ghost, just like pray to her and shit.
fiouri 28th-Jun-2011 06:28 pm (UTC)
OMG Passions!
LMAO..

Yah, that was creepy.
xanaxplz 28th-Jun-2011 06:55 pm (UTC)
god I miss this show.
Never ending LULz
deceitful 28th-Jun-2011 07:11 pm (UTC)
I remember this so well. This show was such a mess but I still watched.
expromqueen 28th-Jun-2011 07:15 pm (UTC)
lmao i miss passions
dmclaire 28th-Jun-2011 06:11 pm (UTC)
that's creepy
brenden 28th-Jun-2011 06:12 pm (UTC)
whoever cleared this needs to be fired. this is so sick and exploitative and gross.
youth_depraved 28th-Jun-2011 06:18 pm (UTC)
This. I'm horrified someone actually allowed this to go to press.
treatyoself 28th-Jun-2011 06:21 pm (UTC)
+1. that many people working for Newsweek and NO ONE thought this was a bad idea? what the actual fuck?
bienenkiste 28th-Jun-2011 06:18 pm (UTC)
MFTE.
vag_breath 28th-Jun-2011 06:20 pm (UTC)
iawtc
sistershotgun 28th-Jun-2011 06:22 pm (UTC)
This times a million. What in the everloving fuck?
forbidden_john 28th-Jun-2011 06:35 pm (UTC)
Is imagining the life someone would have lived really that bad? It was cut short. I'm sure a lot of people have wondered what could have been. This just puts it down on paper.
boomstick 28th-Jun-2011 06:37 pm (UTC)
I agree. The National Enquirer did the same with Jon Benet, also creepy and gross.
alicia666 28th-Jun-2011 06:44 pm (UTC)
mmhmm
winonaforever 28th-Jun-2011 06:46 pm (UTC)
mte
madonna 28th-Jun-2011 07:04 pm (UTC)
I agree 100%
prophecy_grl 28th-Jun-2011 07:17 pm (UTC)
They should fire the graphic designer too. She looks like a zombie, not a 50 year old...
palmthejoker 28th-Jun-2011 11:34 pm (UTC)
Tina Brown's the editor in chief of Newsweek so apparently she can get away with shit like this :/
comalies 28th-Jun-2011 06:12 pm (UTC)
Who the fuck thought that was a good idea.
with_club_sauce 29th-Jun-2011 08:51 am (UTC)
lolll wat is ur icon
comalies 29th-Jun-2011 03:15 pm (UTC)
Lol, oh. That's Daniel O'Brien, he writes for cracked.com.
chiaki95 28th-Jun-2011 06:12 pm (UTC)
Why would you even do that shit ?
oldfrenchminuet 28th-Jun-2011 06:12 pm (UTC)
This won't end well.
fabouluz 28th-Jun-2011 06:12 pm (UTC)
No
shake_it_out 28th-Jun-2011 06:12 pm (UTC)
Not necessary
halfblood_ninja 28th-Jun-2011 06:13 pm (UTC)
Yeah...that's not creepy.

I literally said eugh out loud.
flitterin 28th-Jun-2011 06:13 pm (UTC)
The royal family is NOT going to be pleased with this one.
chiihiro 28th-Jun-2011 06:57 pm (UTC)
They are not amused.
cupkate 30th-Jun-2011 03:12 am (UTC)
They We are not amused.

soul_amazinn 28th-Jun-2011 06:13 pm (UTC)
Why would they do that? That's just wrong.
0sleep2dream0 28th-Jun-2011 06:17 pm (UTC)
SAM!
acustica 28th-Jun-2011 06:13 pm (UTC)
didn't bother to read the article....

THE FUCK IS THIS!? WHYYYYYYYYYY?
frenchoral 28th-Jun-2011 06:13 pm (UTC)
Not SEEMS, it IS tacky
muzik_love 28th-Jun-2011 08:05 pm (UTC)
tacky as fuck
slow_rush 28th-Jun-2011 06:14 pm (UTC)
that ain't right
overprotected 28th-Jun-2011 06:14 pm (UTC)
There's a line and I feel this definitely crossed it.
hausofashley 28th-Jun-2011 06:28 pm (UTC)
They didn't just cross it. They can-caned their way cross it.
lubowskee 28th-Jun-2011 07:46 pm (UTC)
lol!
treegrowth 28th-Jun-2011 10:17 pm (UTC)
LOL IRL
joaniemaloney 29th-Jun-2011 05:49 pm (UTC)
lmfao.
Page 1 of 13
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] >>
This page was loaded May 20th 2013, 11:54 am GMT.